FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today

To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

THE SNOWDEN EFFECT

THE SNOWDEN EFFECT


I’ve never met Edward Snowden, so please understand that I’m not trying to besmirch his character. And the truth is that I was thrilled when his disclosures hit. I was managing aprofessional-level VPN and traveling widely, warning people (who were often skeptical) about state-level surveillance. Edward Snowden vindicated me.
But it’s now becoming clear that there is a serious down-side to the Snowden disclosures. I’ve been noticing it in my work at Cryptohippie and it has recently started to appear in scholarly literature.
For example, a new study from Oxford University (read about it here) shows that mass surveillance makes people less likely to read about surveillance topics online, and significantly so. Even page-viewing on Wikipedia has been affected.
A second study, from MIT, showed a “substantial empirical… chilling effect.” The study goes on to say that this chilling effect seems related to an “increased awareness of government surveillance.”
In other words, Snowden’s proof of surveillance made people turn away from the entire discussion. And there’s a reason for this.

Sooner Or Later, the Sword Must Be Seen

Again, I am not implying that this was Ed Snowden’s intent, but the fact remains that mass surveillance is never more than half-effective until people know about it. Consider this, please:
Every ruling regime (republic, monarchy, whatever) is fully dependent upon their subjects obeying them: Without obedience, no government could survive.
The ruled, at some places and times more than others, will obey because they feel it’s their duty. But the rest of the time, fear is required. How many Americans, for example, would pay more than minimal levels of income tax if they didn’t fear the IRS?
So, given the current consensus that politicians are liars at best, instilling fear would seem necessary for any state to function.
The Snowden revelations made Joe and Jane Average face the threat of surveillance, often against their will. In other words, they were force-fed a new reason to be afraid. As a result, they pulled back from thinking on the subject, turning away from another class of things that might get them into trouble.
Civic propaganda aside, we all know that the true operating principle of government ismandatory compliance. We also know that ‘mandatory’ has sharp teeth; that’s why we lower our voices when complaining about the IRS or the FBI.
So, now that NSA surveillance is undeniable – now that the sword is seen – Mr. and Ms. Average have closed themselves down that much further. That’s what I’m referring to as the Snowden Effect.

Given What the Averages Know…

By no means do I mean to imply that Joe and Jane Average are stupid. They are not. My description of them as “average” is merely descriptive: in reality, these are the people who make the world work. But they are also intimidated, distracted, and poorly informed. They don’t know that avoiding surveillance is even possible.
The problem, however, is even worse than ignorance: Snowden, or at least the people who spread his disclosures, have consistently delivered a backward message: that the solution lies not in technology, but in politics… and that’s about the worst message they could have delivered.
Technological solutions can actually work. Pursuing a political solution, on the other hand, is like running through quicksand: no matter how much you thrash about, you never actually reach the other side. As a result, we’re left with people who could escape the surveillance threat, but don’t, because they treat politics as an effective tool.
But again, Joe and Jane are not stupid; they know that politics never really solves their problems, they just don’t believe they have an alternative. And so, they try to live within ever-tighter limits.
Given that Averages are right to avoid government retribution, and given that they have no idea how to protect themselves, this choice is not irrational. Everything in their environment assures them that closing down a little more the safest option.

What Now?

So, we have a hundred fifty million people – basically decent people – who are now aware of a new reason to fear. There is an escape from it, but since it’s never authorized by politicians, broadcasters or Facebook, they’re afraid to look at it. “Unauthorized” means “I could get in trouble,” and they already have too many threats to deal with.
What, then, is to be done?
To begin with, people need to understand that they can protect themselves… that it’s not particularly hard or expensive. (I’ve recently addressed the technical details, so I won’t repeat them here.)
But even more essential than technology is to convince people they’re better than the game they’ve been playing: That the system they’re chained to isn’t worthy of them.
These people have to see that they’re being played: that they’re being frightened on purpose; that the system is designed to bleed them dry; that the system couldn’t survive if they were happy, confident and thoughtful.
Once Joe and Jane Average start trusting themselves and thinking for themselves, they’ll take purposeful actions rather than being herded into conformity. And when that happens, this problem and many others will start fading away.
Please do whatever you can.

THE SNOWDEN EFFECT


I’ve never met Edward Snowden, so please understand that I’m not trying to besmirch his character. And the truth is that I was thrilled when his disclosures hit. I was managing aprofessional-level VPN and traveling widely, warning people (who were often skeptical) about state-level surveillance. Edward Snowden vindicated me.
But it’s now becoming clear that there is a serious down-side to the Snowden disclosures. I’ve been noticing it in my work at Cryptohippie and it has recently started to appear in scholarly literature.
For example, a new study from Oxford University (read about it here) shows that mass surveillance makes people less likely to read about surveillance topics online, and significantly so. Even page-viewing on Wikipedia has been affected.
A second study, from MIT, showed a “substantial empirical… chilling effect.” The study goes on to say that this chilling effect seems related to an “increased awareness of government surveillance.”
In other words, Snowden’s proof of surveillance made people turn away from the entire discussion. And there’s a reason for this.

Sooner Or Later, the Sword Must Be Seen

Again, I am not implying that this was Ed Snowden’s intent, but the fact remains that mass surveillance is never more than half-effective until people know about it. Consider this, please:
Every ruling regime (republic, monarchy, whatever) is fully dependent upon their subjects obeying them: Without obedience, no government could survive.
The ruled, at some places and times more than others, will obey because they feel it’s their duty. But the rest of the time, fear is required. How many Americans, for example, would pay more than minimal levels of income tax if they didn’t fear the IRS?
So, given the current consensus that politicians are liars at best, instilling fear would seem necessary for any state to function.
The Snowden revelations made Joe and Jane Average face the threat of surveillance, often against their will. In other words, they were force-fed a new reason to be afraid. As a result, they pulled back from thinking on the subject, turning away from another class of things that might get them into trouble.
Civic propaganda aside, we all know that the true operating principle of government ismandatory compliance. We also know that ‘mandatory’ has sharp teeth; that’s why we lower our voices when complaining about the IRS or the FBI.
So, now that NSA surveillance is undeniable – now that the sword is seen – Mr. and Ms. Average have closed themselves down that much further. That’s what I’m referring to as the Snowden Effect.

Given What the Averages Know…

By no means do I mean to imply that Joe and Jane Average are stupid. They are not. My description of them as “average” is merely descriptive: in reality, these are the people who make the world work. But they are also intimidated, distracted, and poorly informed. They don’t know that avoiding surveillance is even possible.
The problem, however, is even worse than ignorance: Snowden, or at least the people who spread his disclosures, have consistently delivered a backward message: that the solution lies not in technology, but in politics… and that’s about the worst message they could have delivered.
Technological solutions can actually work. Pursuing a political solution, on the other hand, is like running through quicksand: no matter how much you thrash about, you never actually reach the other side. As a result, we’re left with people who could escape the surveillance threat, but don’t, because they treat politics as an effective tool.
But again, Joe and Jane are not stupid; they know that politics never really solves their problems, they just don’t believe they have an alternative. And so, they try to live within ever-tighter limits.
Given that Averages are right to avoid government retribution, and given that they have no idea how to protect themselves, this choice is not irrational. Everything in their environment assures them that closing down a little more the safest option.

What Now?

So, we have a hundred fifty million people – basically decent people – who are now aware of a new reason to fear. There is an escape from it, but since it’s never authorized by politicians, broadcasters or Facebook, they’re afraid to look at it. “Unauthorized” means “I could get in trouble,” and they already have too many threats to deal with.
What, then, is to be done?
To begin with, people need to understand that they can protect themselves… that it’s not particularly hard or expensive. (I’ve recently addressed the technical details, so I won’t repeat them here.)
But even more essential than technology is to convince people they’re better than the game they’ve been playing: That the system they’re chained to isn’t worthy of them.
These people have to see that they’re being played: that they’re being frightened on purpose; that the system is designed to bleed them dry; that the system couldn’t survive if they were happy, confident and thoughtful.
Once Joe and Jane Average start trusting themselves and thinking for themselves, they’ll take purposeful actions rather than being herded into conformity. And when that happens, this problem and many others will start fading away.
Please do whatever you can.


No comments :