| Question Everything!Everything!! |
Welcome to Truth, FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience. , is an alternative media and news site that is dedicated to the truth, true journalism and the truth movement. The articles, ideas, quotes, books and movies are here to let everyone know the truth about our universe. The truth will set us free, it will enlighten, inspire, awaken and unite us. Armed with the truth united we stand, for peace, freedom, health and happiness for all
Question Everything!
This blog does not promote
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.
MEN OF PEACE
"I don't know how to save the world. I don't have the answers or The Answer. I hold no secret knowledge as to how to fix the mistakes of generations past and present. I only know that without compassion and respect for all Earth's inhabitants, none of us will survive - nor will we deserve to." Leonard Peltier
Tuesday, May 30, 2017
Russia Calls House Bill an “Act of War.”
Russia Calls House Bill an “Act ofWar.”
Top Russian officials are concerned that a bill passed by the US Congress will do more than increase sanctions on North Korea. Moscow claims H.R. 1644 violates its sovereignty and constitutes an “act of war.”
On May 4, 2017, House Resolution 1644, the innocently named “Korean Interdiction and Modernization of Sanctions Act,” was quickly passed by the US House of Representatives by a vote of 419-1 – and it was just as quickly labeled an “act of war” by a top Russian official.
Why was Konstantin Kosachev, chair of the Russian Senate’s Foreign Affairs Committee, so alarmed about a US law ostensibly aimed at North Korea? After all, there had been no blistering partisan debate preceding the vote. Instead, the bill was handled under a “suspension of the rules” procedure usually applied to noncontroversial legislation. And it passed with only one dissenting vote (cast by Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky).
So what did H.R. 1644 call for? If enacted, the bill would amend the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016 to increase the president’s powers to impose sanctions on anyone in violation of certain United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding North Korea. Specifically, it would allow for expanding sanctions to punish North Korea for its nuclear weapons programs by: targeting overseas individuals who employ North Korean “slave labor”; requiring the administration to determine whether North Korea was a state sponsor of terrorism and, most critically; authorizing a crackdown on North Korea’s use of international transit ports.
H.R. 1644 Targets Foreign Ports and Air Terminals
What caught the eye of Russian critics was Section 104, the part of the bill that presumed to grant the US “inspection authorities” over shipping ports (and major airports) far beyond the Korean Peninsula – specifically, ports in China, Russia, Syria, and Iran. The bill identifies more than 20 foreign targets, including: two ports in China (Dandong and Dalian and “any other port in the People’s Republic of China that the President deems appropriate”); ten ports in Iran (Abadan, Bandar-e-Abbas, Chabahar, Bandar-e-Khomeini, Bushehr Port, Asaluyeh Port, Kish, Kharg Island, Bandar-e-Lenge, Khorramshahr, and the Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airport); four facilities in Syria (the ports at Latakia, Banias, Tartous and the Damascus International Airport) and; three ports in Russia (Nakhodka, Vanino, and Vladivostok). Under the proposed law, the US Secretary of Homeland Security could use the National Targeting Center’s Automated Targeting System to search any ship, plane, or conveyance that has “entered the territory, waters, or airspace of North Korea, or landed in any of the sea ports or airports of North Korea.” Any vessel, aircraft, or vehicle found in violation of this US law would be subject to “seizure and forfeiture.” House Bill Raises a Red Flag for Russia
“I hope [this bill] will never be implemented,” Kosachev told Sputnik News, “because its implementation envisions a scenario of power with forced inspections of all vessels by US warships. Such a power scenario is beyond comprehension, because it means a declaration of war.”
Russian officials were understandably outraged by Congress’ imperious move to extend the US military’s authority to include surveillance of sovereign ports in the Russian Far East. Russia’s Upper House heatedly noted that such actions constitute a violation of international law that was tantamount to a declaration of war.
“No country in the world, and no international organization, has authorized the US to monitor implementation of any resolutions of the UN Security Council,” Kosachev observed. He accused Washington of attempting to “affirm the supremacy of its own legislation over international law,” an example of US “exceptionalism” that he claimed constitutes “the main problem of present-day international relations.”
Kosachev’s Upper House colleague, Alexey Pushkov, underscored this concern. “It is absolutely unclear how the bill will be implemented,” Pushkov stated. “To control Russian ports, the US will have to introduce a blockade and inspect all ships, which amounts to an act of war.” Pushkov argued that the lopsided 419-1 vote “indicates the nature of the legal and political culture of the US Congress.”
Russia Challenges US Exceptionalism
Russia now fears that the US Senate maybe similarly inclined. According to Sputnik News, the surveillance-and-interdiction amendment is “due to be approved by the Senate and then signed by US president Donald Trump.”
Andrey Krasov, the First Deputy Head of the Defense Committee in Russia’s Lower House, greeted news of the US move with a mixture of disbelief and indignation:
“Why on Earth did America assume the responsibilities? Who gave it such powers to control the seaports of our country? Neither Russia nor international organizations asked Washington to do so. One can only answer that any unfriendly step by the US administration against Russia and our allies will receive a symmetrical adequate response. In any case, no American ship will enter our waters. Our armed forces and our fleet have every means to severely punish those who will dare to enter our territorial waters.”
Krasov suggested that Washington’s “saber-rattling” was another sign that the US has no interest in accommodating other members of the world community – especially rivals like China and Russia. “These are heavyweights which, in principle, do not fit into the US’s overall concept on governing and ruling the whole world.”
Vladimir Baranov, a Russian ferry line operator whose vessels ply the waters between Vladivostok and the North Korean port city of Rajin, told Sputnik News that “the US physically cannot control Russian ports – you have to visit the Port Authority, demand documents, that sort of thing . . . . This is essentially a bluff by the US, an attempt to show that it controls the world.”
Alexander Latkin, a professor from the Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, was similarly skeptical: “How could the US control our ports operations? It might have been possible if the US possessed a percentage of the port’s equity but, as far as I know, all of the shareholders are Russian. It is essentially a political move by the US. The Americans don’t have any legal or economic basis for controlling our ports.”
Maxim Grigoryev, who heads Russia’s Foundation for the Study of Democracy, told Sputnik Radio that he found the proposed legislation “rather funny,” given that it fails to provide any details on what a US inspection intervention might entail nor does it provide any guidelines for conducting Pentagon inspections of internationally flagged foreign vessels and foreign port facilities.
“What happened is that the US judicial authority has empowered its executive counterpart to present a report on this matter, which includes telling whether the sanctions against North Korea are being violated via Russian, Korean, and Syrian ports,” Grigoryev stated. “The US doesn’t mind that it basically dictates that other countries must adhere to US legislation. Clearly, this is a preparation for some sort of statement to be made against Russia, Syria or China. The measure is unlikely to be related to real politics – because the US doesn’t have any jurisdiction over other countries – but this is an obvious foundation for some propaganda campaign.”
Adding to the growing uncertainty over rising US/Russia tensions, top Russian military officials have expressed alarm over signs that the Pentagon is making preparations for a preemptive nuclear strike on Russia.
Rising Concerns of a Nuclear Attack
On March 28, 2017, Lt. Gen. Victor Poznihir, Deputy Chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the Russian Armed Forces, warned that the placement of US anti-ballistic missiles near Russia’s borders “creates a powerful clandestine potential for delivering a surprise nuclear missile strike against Russia.” He repeated this concern again on April 26, when he alerted the Moscow International Security Conference that the Russian General Staff’s Operations Command is convinced Washington is preparing to exercise the “nuclear option.”
This terrifying news went virtually unnoted by the US media. On May 11, columnist Paul Craig Roberts (a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under Ronald Reagan and former associate editor of The Wall Street Journal) cited Poznihir’s comments in a clearly agitated blog post.
According to Roberts, a Google search revealed that this “most alarming of all announcements” had only been reported in a single US publication – the Times-Gazetteof Ashland, Ohio. There were, Roberts reported, “no reports on US TV, and none on Canadian, Australian, European, or any other media except RT [a Russian news agency] and Internet sites.”
Roberts also was alarmed to discover that no “US senator or representative or any European, Canadian, or Australian politician has raised a voice of concern that the West was now preparing for a first strike on Russia” nor, it appeared, had anyone reached out to “ask Putin how this serious situation could be defused.”
(Roberts has previously written that Beijing’s leaders also fear the US has detailed plans for a nuclear for strike on China. In response, China has pointedly reminded the US that its submarine fleet stands ready to destroy America’s West Coast while it’s ICBMs go to work obliterating the rest of the country.)
“Never in my life have I experienced the situation where two nuclear powers were convinced that the third was going to surprise them with a nuclear attack,” Roberts wrote. Despite this existential threat, Roberts notes, there has been “zero awareness and no discussion” of the growing risks.
“Putin has been issuing warnings for years,” Roberts writes. “Putin has said over and over, ‘I issue warnings and no one hears. How do I get through to you?'”
The US Senate now has a critical role to play. The bill is currently before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. The committee has an opportunity to acknowledge the grave existential risks created by H.R. 1644 and make sure that no companion bill ever makes it to the Senate floor. If this precipitously ill-conceived legislation is allowed to survive, our own survival – and the survival of hundreds of millions of others around the world – cannot be guaranteed.
Gar Smith is a veteran of the Free Speech Movement, an anti-war organizer, a Project Censored Award-winning reporter, Editor Emeritus of Earth Island Journal, co-founder ofEnvironmentalists Against War, a member of the board of World Beyond War, author ofNuclear Roulette and editor of the forthcoming book, The War and Environment Reader.
Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
JFK at 100
JFK at 100
Memorial Day, Monday, May 29, 2017, is the 100th birthday of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States.
JFK was assassinated on November 22, 1963, as he approached the end of his third year in office. Researchers who spent years studying the evidence have concluded that President Kennedy was assassinated by a conspiracy between the CIA, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Secret Service. (See, for example, JFK and the Unspeakable by James W. Douglass)
Kennedy entered office as a cold warrior, but he learned from his interaction with the CIA and Joint Chiefs that the military/security complex had an agenda that was self-interested and a danger to humanity. He began working to defuse tensions with the Soviet Union. His rejections of plans to invade Cuba, of the Northwoods project, of a preemptive nuclear attack on the Soviet Union, and his intention to withdraw from Vietnam after his reelection, together with some of his speeches signaling a new approach to foreign policy in the nuclear age ( see for example,
https://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/BWC7I4C9QUmLG9J6I8oy8w.aspx ), convinced the military/security complex that he was a threat to their interests. Cold War conservatives regarded him as naive about the Soviet Threat and a liability to US national security. These were the reasons for his assassination. These views were set in stone when Kennedy announced on June 10, 1963, negotiations with the Soviets toward a nuclear test ban treaty and a halt to US atmospheric nuclear tests.
The Oswald coverup story never made any sense and was contradicted by all evidence including tourist films of the assassination. President Johnson had ro cover up the assassination, not because he was part of it or because he willfully wanted to deceive the American people, but because to give Americans the true story would have shaken their confidence in their government at a critical time in US-Soviet relations. To make the coverup succeed, Johnson needed the credibility of the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, Earl Warren, to chair the commission that covered up the assassination. Warren understood the devastating impact the true story would have on the public and their confidence in the military and national security leadership and on America’s allies.
As I previously reported, Lance deHaven-Smith in his book, Conspiracy Theory in America, shows that the CIA introduced “conspiracy theory” into the political lexicon as a technique to discredit skepticism of the Warren Commission’s coverup report. He provides the CIA document that describes how the agency used its media friends to control the explanation.
The term “conspiracy theory” has been used ever since to validate false explanations by discrediting true explanations.
President Kennedy was also determined to require the Israel Lobby to register as a foreign agent and to block Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons. His assassination removed the constraints on Israel’s illegal activities. http://www.voltairenet.org/article178401.html
Memorial Day is when Americans honor those in the armed services who died serving the country. JFK fell while serving the causes of peace and nuclear disarmament. In a 1961 address to the United Nations, President Kennedy said:
“Today, every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day when this planet may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman and child lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident or miscalculation or by madness. The weapons of war must be abolished before they abolish us. It is therefore our intention to challenge the Soviet Union, not to an arms race, but to a peace race – to advance together step by step, stage by stage, until general and complete disarmament has been achieved.”
Kennedy’s address was well received at home and abroad and received a favorable and supportive response from Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, but it caused consternation among the warhawks in the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The US led in terms of the number of nuclear warheads and delivery systems, and this lead was the basis for US military plans for a surprise nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. http://prospect.org/article/did-us-military-plan-nuclear-first-strike-1963 Also, Many believed that nuclear disarmament would remove the obstacle to the Soviet Army overrunning Western Europe. Warhawks considered this a greater threat than nuclear armageddon. Many in high military circles regarded President Kennedy as weakening the US viv-a-vis the Soviet Union.
The assassination of President Kennedy was an enormous cost to the world. Kennedy and Khrushchev would have followed up their collaboration in defusing the Cuban Missile Crisis by ending the Cold War long before the military/security complex achieved its iron grip on the US government. Israel would have been denied nuclear weapons, and the designation of the Israel Lobby as a foreign agent would have prevented Israel’s strong grip on the US government. In his second term, JFK would have broken the CIA into a thousand pieces, an intention he expressed to his brother, Robert, and the Deep State would have been terminated before it became more powerful than the President.
But the military/security complex struck first, and pulled off a coup that voided all these promises and terminated American democracy.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
See also
Paul Craig Roberts; The Collapse Of France: News analysis - The brainwashed and insouciant French electorate has voted to abolish the French nation. In five years France will exist only as a geographical location, a province in “Europe,” itself a province in global capitalism.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/FreedomOrAnarchycampaignOfConscience
https://www.facebook.com/FREEDOMORANARCHYCampaignofConscience
https://twitter.com/toptradesmen
https://josephfreedomoranarchy.blogspot.com/
https://the-family-assistants-campaign.blogspot.com/
https://tradesmen.blogspot.com/
https://www.facebook.com/JosephBarberMastercarpenterBuilder/
https://www.facebook.com/lawfulrebelion/
https://plus.google.com/+JOSEPHBARBERforfreedom
Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Let Us Bomb Violence With Mercy
Let Us Bomb Violence With Mercy
Video
Lets Bomb Hatred With Love.
“Confront your enemy with peace, nor war… Let’s bomb extremism for a better life,”
Posted May 29, 2017
Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Memorial DAZE!
Memorial DAZE!
My neighbor is a Vietnam vet suffering from the effects of Agent Orange. He is in his early 70s and looks at least 10 years older. In and out of hospitals with lapses in memory, the guy still maintains a ' gung ho ' Amerikan exceptionalist mindset. Will he ever learn the truth about how his life and that of millions of others, military and civilian, was damaged or destroyed by our country? On Monday he will both display and salute our flag, the one that the Military Industrial Empire had hijacked long ago. With the exception of WW2,Memorial Day will be an endless bunch of hogwash celebrations and remembrances to honor men and women who dutifully followed orders while never questioning the evil ones who controlled them. Ignorance is most certainly bliss!
We already see that over 50% of our taxes goes down this rabbit hole of bloated, obscene and unnecessary military spending. Having nearly 1000 bases replete with advanced weapons systems, and of course those poor kids in uniform, in over 100 countries we should NOT be in, does not make us safer. Matter of fact, it has and will make us LESS safe! Too many afflicted people in the Middle East despise us for what we have done to them in recent years. All the honor guards and pomp and circumstance that this empire throws at us does not save the day. The con job of being in a ' War with Terror ' tells only half the story. The other half is listing what we have done to terrorize the people in the Middle East! Dropping the ' Mother of All Bombs' or drone missile strikes only exacerbates things, doesn't it?
I salute our young service people, not the ones who randomly or without just cause have murdered women, children, the elderly or innocent Arab men in places they should never have been sent to. During the Vietnam War era, we peace activists never pointed fingers at the overwhelming majority of our returning G.I.s. We only took issue with those who professed such animus for the Communist gooks they were so proud to have killed, tortured or burned alive. Many guys from our neighborhood signed up, hoping to ' fight the good fight', only to return home in a box. These 18, 19 and 20 year old kids did not know what the hell this war was all about. They, including this writer, believed, in the early stages of it all, that we were doing a noble thing to help the South Vietnamese fend off the invading North Vietnamese communists. The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis gave us the hype and spin that we were protecting our great nation from a possible Communist attack. The Russians, like the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong, never played fair... only we did! That was the Kool- Aid that most of us drank at the time.
In this baby boomer's lifetime I have never seen such a militaristic mindset amongst so many citizens. Too many car license plates have those military logos on them. Too many parents have those signs on the back of their cars " Proud Parent ( Grandparent ) of a Marine ( Soldier ) ". Every sporting event has to now have the honor guard with the flag before the National Anthem is sung. Football fields will have one giant flag cover the whole field! The fans stand there with their hands over their hearts, and faces down in reverence. It seems the Amerikan way of war is now the norm. This Military Industrial Empire has won over the hearts and minds of too many good people! If it doesn't stop our nation will not only become bankrupt fiscally, but morally as well!
Philip A Farruggio is son and grandson of Brooklyn, NYC longshoremen. A graduate of Brooklyn College, he is a free lance columnist. Philip works as an environmental products sales rep and has been a street corner protest activist leader and Green Party member since 2000. In 2010 he became a local spokesperson for the 25% Solution Movement to Save Our Cities by cutting military spending 25%. Philip can be reached at PAF1222@bellsouth.net
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Ending Violence in a Nonviolent Way
Ending Violence in a Nonviolent Way
Take Torture Off Agenda
Consider ending violence in a nonviolent way
According to President Donald Trump, people who are tortured deserve it. Trump's initial draft executive order in January revealed his passion for reopening U.S. black site prisons, loading Guantanamo with prisoners, and rewriting the Army Field Manual to redefine allowable interrogation techniques.
Sure, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis opposes torture. But multiple CIA agents, military brass, legislators, and citizens have opposed torture for decades. Those with a will for torture find a way.
The Bush administration tortured foreign prisoners using waterboarding, forced feeding, rectal feeding, slamming into concrete walls by the neck, freezing water, stripping, beating, dragging, mock executions, isolation, drug injections, agonizing enclosure in tiny boxes, forced runs while hooded, and harrowing threats to families. Such despicable behavior, hypocritically to preserve American values and safety, makes some Americans want to shred their flags.
Guilt of foreign captives is often unknown. There are no trials. There's not even a clear definition of guilt. Even if guilt were proven, torture is immoral and illegal. The post-9/11 torture program violated the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice, and international law.
U.S. torture policy rested partly upon psychologists James Mitchell's and Bruce Jessen's absurd logic that since dogs cease resisting electric shocks when learning resistance is futile, prisoners will release truthful information when tortured. Notice, the poor dogs didn't divulge any information. And given affectionate training, dogs will joyfully cooperate.
In 2002, Mitchell and Jessen implemented torture at a U.S. black site in Thailand run by Gina Haspel, who had the site's videotapes destroyed in 2005 and is now Trump's CIA deputy director. That year, the CIA outsourced almost its entire interrogation program to Mitchell, Jessen, and Associates who developed 20 "enhanced interrogation techniques" for $81.1 million. A sadistic murderer could've done that for free.
What was the excuse for tax-funded depravity? CIA attorney John Rizzo explained, "The government wanted a solution. It wanted a path to get these guys to talk." Rizzo believed that if another attack occurred and he'd failed to force captives to talk, he'd be responsible for thousands of deaths.
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales defended the torture program's "ability to quickly obtain information from captured terrorists ... to avoid further atrocities against American civilians."
So cruelty is defended in the name of protecting us, as if we're chickens running around, believing the sky will fall if we don't get tough now. But if timely action is critical, doesn't it waste time to quickly go in the wrong direction?
After all, seasoned interrogators know torture is useless. It damages mental clarity, coherence, and recall. In its 2014 report, the Senate Intelligence Committee recognized torture's unquestionable failure as an information-gathering tool: It acquires neither actionable intelligence nor prisoner cooperation. Victims, crying, begging, and whimpering, are rendered "unable to effectively communicate."
Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Consider ending violence in a nonviolent way
According to President Donald Trump, people who are tortured deserve it. Trump's initial draft executive order in January revealed his passion for reopening U.S. black site prisons, loading Guantanamo with prisoners, and rewriting the Army Field Manual to redefine allowable interrogation techniques.
Sure, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis opposes torture. But multiple CIA agents, military brass, legislators, and citizens have opposed torture for decades. Those with a will for torture find a way.
The Bush administration tortured foreign prisoners using waterboarding, forced feeding, rectal feeding, slamming into concrete walls by the neck, freezing water, stripping, beating, dragging, mock executions, isolation, drug injections, agonizing enclosure in tiny boxes, forced runs while hooded, and harrowing threats to families. Such despicable behavior, hypocritically to preserve American values and safety, makes some Americans want to shred their flags.
Guilt of foreign captives is often unknown. There are no trials. There's not even a clear definition of guilt. Even if guilt were proven, torture is immoral and illegal. The post-9/11 torture program violated the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice, and international law.
U.S. torture policy rested partly upon psychologists James Mitchell's and Bruce Jessen's absurd logic that since dogs cease resisting electric shocks when learning resistance is futile, prisoners will release truthful information when tortured. Notice, the poor dogs didn't divulge any information. And given affectionate training, dogs will joyfully cooperate.
In 2002, Mitchell and Jessen implemented torture at a U.S. black site in Thailand run by Gina Haspel, who had the site's videotapes destroyed in 2005 and is now Trump's CIA deputy director. That year, the CIA outsourced almost its entire interrogation program to Mitchell, Jessen, and Associates who developed 20 "enhanced interrogation techniques" for $81.1 million. A sadistic murderer could've done that for free.
What was the excuse for tax-funded depravity? CIA attorney John Rizzo explained, "The government wanted a solution. It wanted a path to get these guys to talk." Rizzo believed that if another attack occurred and he'd failed to force captives to talk, he'd be responsible for thousands of deaths.
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales defended the torture program's "ability to quickly obtain information from captured terrorists ... to avoid further atrocities against American civilians."
So cruelty is defended in the name of protecting us, as if we're chickens running around, believing the sky will fall if we don't get tough now. But if timely action is critical, doesn't it waste time to quickly go in the wrong direction?
After all, seasoned interrogators know torture is useless. It damages mental clarity, coherence, and recall. In its 2014 report, the Senate Intelligence Committee recognized torture's unquestionable failure as an information-gathering tool: It acquires neither actionable intelligence nor prisoner cooperation. Victims, crying, begging, and whimpering, are rendered "unable to effectively communicate."
Particularly disgusting is the U.S. double standard of justice. Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Trump have protected torture program members from prosecution, often by invoking the "state secrets executive privilege." Apparently, torture folks don't belong on trial. They're above the law. We're supposed to understand that they were doing their best, serving our nation, following orders, pressured, fearful: good people with noble motives.
Yet when we turn to suspected Mid-Eastern militants, we're not supposed to consider their circumstances, motivations, pressures, or fears. Apparently, they also don't belong on trial. They're below the law. Nail them with drones, the extrajudicial killing more politically palatable than extrajudicial torture.
Mitchell, Jessen, and Associates face a lawsuit in court June 26, and Trump is trying to block federal court access to CIA testimony on grounds of "national security."
But as long as the U.S. perceives enemies the way exterminators perceive cockroaches, national security will be elusive and any peace will be no more stable than a house of cards.
Notice that intelligence efforts always revolve around obtaining Destructive Intelligence: information for defeating enemies. No Constructive Intelligence is sought, nothing to illuminate causes of violence and cooperative solutions.
Why? Because the CIA, NSA, and Department of Defense are boxed in by organizational missions to conquer enemies, missions that constrict the mind's ability to perceive the enemy as having any heart or mind worth caring about.
If we created a U.S. Department of Peace whose mission was to non-violently address roots of violence, such a mission would gear American ingenuity and enthusiasm toward the bigger picture of conflict resolution and friendship rather than toward desperate conclusions that security requires cruelty toward enemies.
We've got to considerately ask Mid-Eastern friends and enemies their perspectives on ISIS, the Taliban, and the U.S., ask their ideas for creating trust, caring, justice and peace, for leading meaningful lives, sharing wealth and power, and resolving disagreements. Such questions would rapidly elicit the empowering Constructive Intelligence needed to activate cooperative solutions.
But without a caring approach to peace, the American imagination fails us, imagining only the bad that may result from refusing to torture and kill, rather than the good that will come from non-violently resolving conflict.
Kristin Christman is author of Taxonomy of Peace. https://sites.google.com/site/paradigmforpeace
Yet when we turn to suspected Mid-Eastern militants, we're not supposed to consider their circumstances, motivations, pressures, or fears. Apparently, they also don't belong on trial. They're below the law. Nail them with drones, the extrajudicial killing more politically palatable than extrajudicial torture.
Mitchell, Jessen, and Associates face a lawsuit in court June 26, and Trump is trying to block federal court access to CIA testimony on grounds of "national security."
But as long as the U.S. perceives enemies the way exterminators perceive cockroaches, national security will be elusive and any peace will be no more stable than a house of cards.
Notice that intelligence efforts always revolve around obtaining Destructive Intelligence: information for defeating enemies. No Constructive Intelligence is sought, nothing to illuminate causes of violence and cooperative solutions.
Why? Because the CIA, NSA, and Department of Defense are boxed in by organizational missions to conquer enemies, missions that constrict the mind's ability to perceive the enemy as having any heart or mind worth caring about.
If we created a U.S. Department of Peace whose mission was to non-violently address roots of violence, such a mission would gear American ingenuity and enthusiasm toward the bigger picture of conflict resolution and friendship rather than toward desperate conclusions that security requires cruelty toward enemies.
We've got to considerately ask Mid-Eastern friends and enemies their perspectives on ISIS, the Taliban, and the U.S., ask their ideas for creating trust, caring, justice and peace, for leading meaningful lives, sharing wealth and power, and resolving disagreements. Such questions would rapidly elicit the empowering Constructive Intelligence needed to activate cooperative solutions.
But without a caring approach to peace, the American imagination fails us, imagining only the bad that may result from refusing to torture and kill, rather than the good that will come from non-violently resolving conflict.
Kristin Christman is author of Taxonomy of Peace. https://sites.google.com/site/paradigmforpeace
A previous version of this article was first published in the Albany Times Union.
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Gaslighting: State Mind Control and Abusive Narcissism
Gaslighting: State Mind Control and Abusive Narcissism
Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Exceptionalism: the condition of being different from the norm; also: a theory expounding the exceptionalism especially of a nation or region.
There are many theories surrounding the origin of American exceptionalism. The most popular in US folklore, being that it describes America’s unique character as a “free” nation founded on democratic ideals and civil liberties. The Declaration of Independence from British colonial rule is the foundation of this theory and has persevered throughout the often violent history of the US since its birth as a free nation.
Over time, exceptionalism has come to represent superiority in the minds and hearts of Americans. Belief in their economic, military and ideological supremacy is what has motivated successive US governments to invest in shaping the world in their superior image with little or no regard for the destruction left in the wake of their exceptional hegemony.
In considering itself, exceptional, the US has extricated itself from any legal obligation to adhere to either International law or even the common moral laws that should govern Humanity. The US has become exceptionally lawless and authoritarian particularly in its intolerant neo-colonialist foreign policy. The colonized have become the colonialists, concealing their brutal savagery behind a veneer of missionary zeal that they are converting the world to their form of exceptionalist Utopia.
Such is the media & marketing apparatus that supports this superiority complex, the majority of US congress exist within its echo chamber and are willing victims of its indoctrination. The power of the propaganda vortex pulls them in and then radiates outwards, infecting all in its path. Self-extraction from this oligarchical perspective is perceived as a revolutionary act that challenges the core of US security so exceptionalism becomes the modus vivendi.
Just as Israel considers itself ‘the chosen people’ from a religious perspective, the US considers itself the chosen nation to impose its version of Democratic reform and capitalist hegemony the world over. One can see why Israel and the US make such symbiotic bedfellows.
“The fatal war for humanity is the war with Russia and China toward which Washington is driving the US and Washington’s NATO and Asian puppet states. The bigotry of the US power elite is rooted in its self-righteous doctrine that stipulates America as the “indispensable country” ~ Paul Craig Roberts: Washington Drives the World Towards War.
So why do the American people accept US criminal hegemony, domestic and foreign brutal tyranny & neo-colonialist blood-letting with scant protest? Why do the European vassal states not rise up against this authoritarian regime that flaunts international law and drags its NATO allies down the path to complete lawlessness and diplomatic ignominy?
What is Gaslighting?
The psychological term “Gaslighting” comes from a 1944 Hollywood classic movie called Gaslight. Gaslighting describes the abuse employed by a narcissist to instil in their victim’s mind, an extreme anxiety and confusion to the extent where they no longer have faith in their own powers of logic, reason and judgement. These gaslighting techniques were adopted by central intelligence agencies in the US and Europe as part of their psychological warfare methods, used primarily during torture or interrogation.
Gaslighting as an abuser’s modus operandi, involves, specifically, the withholding of factual information and its replacement with false or fictional information designed to confuse and disorientate. This subtle and Machiavellian process eventually undermines the mental stability of its victims reducing them to such a depth of insecurity and identity crisis that they become entirely dependent upon their abuser for their sense of reality and even identity.
Gaslighting involves a step by step psychological process to manipulate and destabilize its victim. It is built up over time and consists of repetitive information feeds that enter the victim’s subconscious over a period of time, until it is fully registered on the subconscious “hard disk” and cannot be overridden by the conscious floppy disk. Put more simply, it is brainwashing.
“Overall, the main reason for gaslighting is to create a dynamic where the abuser has complete control over their victim so that they are so weak that they are very easy to manipulate.” ~ Alex Myles
Three Stages of Gaslighting: Stage One
The first stage depends upon trust in the integrity and unimpeachable intentions of the abuser, a state of reliance that has been engendered by the abuser’s artful self-promotion and ingratiating propaganda. Once this trust is gained, the abuser will begin to subtly undermine it, creating situations and environments where the victim will begin to doubt their own judgement. Eventually the victim will rely entirely upon the abuser to alleviate their uncertainty and to restore their sense of reality which is in fact that of the abuser.
Stage Two
The second stage, defence, is a process by which the abuser isolates the victim, not only from their own sense of identity but from the validation of their peers. They are made to feel that their opinion is worthless, discredited, down-right weird. In political circles they would be labelled a conspiracy theorist, a dissident, a terror apologist. As a consequence, the victim will withdraw from society and cease to express themselves for fear of ridicule, judgement or punishment.
This stage can also be compared to Stockholm Syndrome where a hostage or captive is reduced,by psychological mind games, back to infantile dependency upon their captor. Narcissistic abuse bonds the victim to the aggressor via trauma. Stockholm Syndrome bonds the victim to the aggressor via regression to an infantile state where the abuser/aggressor becomes the “parent” who will rescue the victim from imminent annihilation. Both methods tap into the victim’s survival mechanisms to gain and maintain control.
Stage Three
The final stage is depression. A life under the tyrannical rule of a narcissist drives the victim into a state of extreme confusion. They are stripped of dignity & self-reliance. They, ultimately exist in an information vacuum which is only filled by that which the abuser deems suitable or relevant. This can eventually invoke symptoms of PTSD [Post Traumatic Stress Disorder]. Flashbacks, constant apprehension, hyper vigilance, mind paralysis, rage and even violence. The process is complete and the victim has been reduced to a willing accomplice in the abusers creation of a very distorted reality.
Exceptionalism or Narcissism?
We are currently seeing the transformation of US exceptionalism into an abusive Narcissism.
The gargantuan apparatus of mind bending and controlling is being put into hyper drive by the ruling elite. We are inundated with propaganda that challenges our sense of reality but only after being “tenderized” by the fear factor. Fear of “terror”, fear of war, fear of financial insecurity, fear of gun violence, fear of our own shadow. Once we are suitably quaking in our boots, in comes the rendition of reality that relieves our anxiety. If we challenge this version of events we are labelled a conspiracy theorist, a threat to security. We are hounded, discredited, slandered and ridiculed. We are isolated and threatened.
Wars are started in the same way. Despite the hindsight that should enable us to see it coming, the process swings into motion with resounding success. The ubiquitous dictator, the oligarch who threatens to destroy all that the US and her allies represent which of course is, freedom, equality & civil liberty all wrapped up in the Democracy shiny paper and tied with the exceptionalist ribbon.
Next the false flag to engender fear, terror and to foment sectarian strife. The support of a “legitimate” organic, indigenous “revolution” conveniently emerging in tandem with US ambitions for imposing their model of governance upon a target nation. The arming of “freedom fighters”, the securing of mercenary additions to these manufactured proxy forces. All this is sold in the name of freedom and democracy to a public that is already in a state of anxiety and insecurity, lacking in judgement or insight into any other reality but that of their “abuser”.
The NGO Complex Deployment
Finally, the Humanitarians are deployed. The forces for “good”, the vanguard of integrity and ethical intervention. The power that offers all lost souls a stake-holding in the salvation of sovereign nations that have lost their way and need rescuing. A balm for a damaged soul, to know they can leave their doubts and fears in such trustworthy hands as HRW, Amnesty International, they can assuage their deep sense of guilt at the suffering being endured by the people of far flung nations because they can depend upon the NGOs to provide absolution with minimal effort on their part. They don’t realise that NGOs are an integral part of their abuser’s apparatus, operating on the leash of neo-colonialist financing and influence. NGOs provide the optic through which the abuser will allow the victim to perceive their world and once absorbed into this flawed prism the victim’s own cognitive dissonance will ensure they do not attempt a jail break.
In this state of oppressed consciousness the victim accepts what they are told. They accept that the US can sell cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia that obliterate human beings and lay waste to essential civilian infrastructure in Yemen. They accept that the US financially, ideologically & militarily supports the illegal state of Israel and provides the arsenal of experimental weapons that maim and mutilate children and civilians on a scale that is unimaginable. They accept that a crippling blockade of the already impoverished and starving nation of Yemen is “necessary” to resolve the issues of sectarian divisions that only exist in the minds of their Congressional abusers.
The majority of Americans accept mass murder under the pretext of the right to protect, because their ability to form rational and reasoned opinions has been engineered out of them. This is now the definition of US exceptionalism. It is their ability to manipulate the world into accepting their lawlessness and global hegemony agenda. In seeking to impose its own image upon our world the US has drifted so far from its founding principles, one wonders how they will ever return to them. They have employed a recognised form of torture to ensure capitulation to their mission of world domination which entails the mental, physical and spiritual torture of target civilian populations.
In conclusion, the US has indeed achieved exceptionalism. The US has become an exceptional global executioner and persecutor of Humanity. Imperialism is a euphemism for the depths of abuse the US is inflicting upon the people of this world.
Our only hope is to break the cycle of abuse with empathy for the victim and with appreciation for the years of brainwashing that precedes their agonizing passive-aggressive apathy towards crimes being committed in “their name”.
This was an email I received recently from one courageous young American girl whose epiphany is testament to the resilience and survival instinct of the human spirit.
“My name is Caroline and I am a 22 year old US citizen. I only fairly recently discovered the truth about Empire/NATO’s activities in Syria and Libya and so many other countries (thanks to writers like Andre Vltchek, Cory Morningstar, Forrest Palmer). I am sickened when I remember that I signed some of those Avaaz petitions and I feel horrified at knowing that I have Syrian and Libyan blood on my hands. I want to believe that I’m not “really” guilty because I really thought (as I had been told) that I was not doing something bad at the time, but still, what I did contributed to the suffering of those people and I want to do something to atone in at least some small way, even though I probably can’t “make up” for what I did or erase my crime.
If it’s not too much trouble, could you please tell me what you think I should do, if there is anything?”
She deserves an answer…
***
Author Vanessa Beeley is a contributor to 21WIRE, and since 2011, she has spent most of her time in the Middle East reporting on events there – as a independent researcher, writer, photographer and peace activist. She is also a member of the Steering Committee of the Syria Solidarity Movement, and a volunteer with the Global Campaign to Return to Palestine. See more of her work at her blog The Wall Will Fall.
Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F BarberThe views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience
Thursday, May 18, 2017
Good vs. Evil in the Supreme Court
Good vs. Evil in the Supreme Court
A few months after lefty activists crowded Washington D.C. for the Women’s March, activists from many of those same organizations went to bat for a serial rapist and murderer.
Ledell Lee’s victims were all women. While he was on trial for the rape and murder of Debra Reese, the testimony of three of his rape victims was presented. Lee had made a habit of knocking on doors and asking to borrow some tools to see whether a woman’s husband might be home.
Debra Reese called her mother and told her that a strange man had tried to borrow some tools. A few minutes later, Ledell Lee had beaten her to death with a tire thumper. Marks on her neck showed that the former baby boutique worker had also been strangled.
Then Lee headed out to spend the $300 he had stolen from her.
Three years earlier, Ledell Lee had attacked a 17-year-old girl while she was rocking her 3-month old niece to sleep. Lee hit her, dragged her out of the house, held her head under water until she lost consciousness and raped her.
A year after that atrocity, Ledell Lee attacked a 50-year-old woman walking home from the grocery store. He strangled her repeatedly, dragged her to the back of a building and raped her.
When Lee was caught after murdering Debra Reese, the evidence tied him to these assaults and two murders. He was convicted of two rapes and sentenced to death for his crimes against Debra Reese. Justice would be done. But first justice had to elbow past the ACLU and the pro-crime lobby.
In a Supreme Court dissent written on April 20, 2017, Justice Breyer whined, “Why now?” "The state is rushing to put him to death," complained Nina Morrison of the badly misnamed Innocence Project.
But it’s her client who rushed to put his victims to death. Ledell Lee had committed his crimes in the first years of the nineties. His youngest victim is now in her forties. Arkansas had let him live for decades.
Three other Supreme Court justices, feminist heroines Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor, also clamored for a serial rapist.
Midazolam, a medication approved for sedating infants, has a “risk of severe pain”, Sotomayor wailed. The “wise Latina” failed to clarify whether it’s more painful than being beaten to death with a tire thumper, being strangled behind a school building or being held underwater until you pass out.
Any and all of these alternative methods of execution should have been offered to Ledell Lee.
Despite the panicked warnings by agonized human rights activists about the suffering that Ledell Lee might experience if Midazolam were used, it took the left’s latest monster two minutes to lose consciousness. There was nothing to show that the murderer and rapist had suffered as he died.
The objections to Midazolam were a sham. The pro-crime lobby has worked to cut off the supply of drugs that might be used to execute murderers. Demanding more tests and filing new appeals was a slimy scheme by the pro-crime lobby to run out the clock until the Midazolam expired.
And then Arkansas wouldn’t have been able to execute Lee no matter the results.
The pro-crime lobby has pursued a cynical game of cutting off the supply of reliable drugs thereby forcing states to use medications not intended for that purpose. And then filing suit to complain that the medications being used are not intended for that purpose. But the Supreme Court didn’t bite.
Justice Neil Gorsuch cast the deciding vote. And a monster died.
The left loved Ledell Lee as it loves all its monsters. The ACLU and Innocence Project filing tenderly dwells on Lee’s victimhood. We are told that he repeated eight grade and his mother smoked when she was pregnant. But despite Lee’s supposed retardation, he was cunning enough to scout houses, contrive a pretext for finding out if women were home alone and then raping and murdering them. Despite his time in special education, he managed to conduct a rape and murder spree for three years.
The pro-crime lobby would have us believe that Ledell Lee is smart enough to rape and kill, but too stupid to die.
The stupidity defense has become the new insanity defense. Every killer on death row is suddenly diagnosed with lead poisoning, fetal alcohol syndrome and mental retardation. Once you hear an ACLU lawyer argue that his murderer is too stupid to die, you know that he’s guilty as hell.
The case of Ledell Lee showed us again what was at stake in the Gorsuch battle. Legal debates sometimes seem abstract. And yet they are as real as a teenage girl being dragged out of her sister’s home into the woods, a woman being strangled behind a school and a housewife being beaten to death with the tool that her husband gave her to protect her.
The left is a pro-crime lobby. Behind the empty theater of its sham feminism and pink rallies, it is on the side of the rapists and the murderers. It is on the side of Ledell Lee and all the other monsters like him.
"If the six of you had been in that conversation, you would have come away not saying, oh these are some thugs or superpredators that I can’t relate to,” Obama smugly boasted. The left prides itself on relating to “superpredators”. It empathizes with Ledell Lee and not his victims.
That’s what Obama’s justices did. That’s what anyone else he appointed would have done.
Gorsuch’s successful appointment to the Supreme Court won justice for the women whom Ledell Lee raped and murdered. Over the objections of the pro-crime Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg and Breyer.
In a small moment, Justice Gorsuch stood up for justice and against the pro-crime lobby. He brought closure to the victims and their families. He made sure that Arkansas was allowed to do the right thing.
"With his first vote, the Supreme Court’s newest member sent a man to die," the New York Times sneered.
But the Times, as usual, is wrong. With his first vote, Justice Gorsuch helped put down a monster.
During his trial, Ledell Lee’s lawyer asked who were we to decide when someone dies.
“I will tell you who we are," the prosecutor replied. "We are the hunted."
We are the hunted. The monsters that the left shields, protects and promotes are hunting us on the streets and in our homes. When they are caught, the left frees them. When they are sentenced, the left fights for them. It builds sanctuary cities to protect them and ties the hands of the police who fight them.
Everyone who has been a victim of crime knows what Lee’s prosecutor meant. The left stands with the hunters, the robbers, the rapists, the killers and looters. Justice Gorsuch stood with the hunted.
The left stands with them. He stood with us.
Daniel Greenfield
Overthrowing America in Twelve Steps
Overthrowing America in Twelve Steps (Video)
The “deep state” is called the “deep state” for a reason; its globalist roots run much deeper, and stretch much further than most people can even fathom. The Federal Reserve, the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, the NSA, the CIA; these are just some of the instruments that Deep State has used to systematically bring about the collapse of individual freedom in America and to enact their nefarious agenda.
The deep state consists largely of people who are at the top of the political and economic heap, from the Bush family to billionaire George Soros, and the name of the game has always been the manipulation and subjugation of the common citizen.
In the following video, Right Wing News looks at the entire history of the efforts to overthrow America, stretching all the way back from the creation of the Federal Reserve to the enactment of the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act. We also look at how the mainstream media is being manipulated as part of the larger agenda to accept a one world government, which is why Trump, with his anti-globalism America-first message has to be stopped at all costs.
The video also takes a closer look at the Council on Foreign Relations; the true power behind big news, the mysterious $2.3 trillion that went missing from the Department of Defense the day before 9/11, and a summary of the interview we conducted with a former NSA operative of the Deep State.
State of the Nation writes:
By the Anonymous Patriot
The Millennium Report Exclusive
The Millennium Report Exclusive
For the last one hundred years, transnational interests have attempted to overthrow America for economic gain and political control. Starting in 1913 and continuing until today, there have been a series of steps taken to continually undermine American freedoms and fleece the wealth of our nation. The largest corporations in history have been fighting this battle for American wealth and resources through banking wars, political wars, and outright war. Many banking families and warlord corporations have vied for the prize of America, and it seemed that the Bush/Clinton/Obama criminal family had sold out American freedoms and consolidated power in the White House and its CIA operatives both inside and outside of the government. Electing Hillary Clinton (and husband Bill) would have created a modern “economic monarchy” in America that would quickly sell every asset and resource in a fire sale that would have burnt down America and consumed the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Bill of Rights in flames.
YOU GOTTA KNOW HISTORY TO KNOW TODAY….
Ever since Pope Alexander VI declared that all lands west and south of any of the islands of the Azores should belong to Spain, a fierce battle began. America has been in a commerce war waged between Portuguese sailors working for German banking families, the Fuggers, Welsers and Warburgs, and their rivals in the British and Dutch East India Companies.These imperialistic corporations were created by the richest banking families in Hamburg, Amsterdam, and London to strip the East of its spices through any means necessary.
Eventually, these corporations became more powerful than any nation at the time and had navies and armies that waged war in the name of mercantilism. The explorations of America were focused on finding spices, gold, silk, and an easier passage to the Indies. These bankers, shareholders and imperialistic corporations came to participate in what was called, commerce with a sword.
The American Revolution was fought over the issue of which trading company would own the largest share of American commerce. British taxes levied over British East India Company tea was a breaking point for the Boston colonists who threw the tea in the Boston harbor. Britain, Spain, Germany, and France were vying for the spoils of the new continent and became deeply embroiled in the commerce of taxes, cotton, textiles, tobacco, sugar, and slaves. The British East India Company handled the trading of goods with the northern colonies while the Dutch East India Company provided goods and slaves to southern colonies. European nations fought for economic control of America also and were used as political tools by corporate interests.
Transnational banking families and corporations, who we can call “warlord bankers and corporate imperialists,” were in a war against American nationalism and self-rule. Britain and the warlord bankers offered to found banks in the colonies that would issue paper money, fiat currency, instead of using gold and silver coins. The many attempts to “loan” the American Continental Congress money for the impending war were spurned because of the entanglements that come with repaying interest on the original “war-loan.” In the end, the American Revolution was won, in part, because the colonists accepted a huge war-loan from Spain.
Benjamin Franklin and many others were against accepting any loans and instead offered to create a land bank that would issue paper currency and handled the war-debt. Franklin’s ideas were rejected and the beginning of American “national” banks took on the Spanish war-debt. Thus, the stage was set for the first step in the overthrow of America.
Step One – Creating the U.S. Federal Reserve
Eventually, after creating numerous U.S. national banks, the need for monetary stabilization led America to create the Federal Reserve System in 1913 with its twelve central banks that theoretically control U.S. economic policy. Unfortunately, the same warlord bankers and corporate imperialists were the initial investors in the Federal Reserve assuring that the U.S. Treasury debt would be held by the same people who hold the debt of most other nations through a central banking system. The same German and British bankers were deeply involved in the planning and funding of the Federal Reserve: the Rothschild banking family (originally a German family named Bauer), the Warburg banking family, Rothschild’s prior employee J. P. Morgan, the Rockefeller family (close associates of the Rothschild family). and a few other European banking families.
From the beginning, these families knew that the Federal Reserve System, a private corporation, would own the debt from the initial infusion of investment capital and that the interest on those funds would continually grow and never be able to be fully repaid, thus compounding the debt and increasing its amount continually and creating economic slavery of the entire nation. This type of central bank capital investment is behind all 189 countries that use a central banking system in the world. This explains why America has a $20 trillion war-debt to a private corporation of warlord bankers who have no intention of letting American’s be economically free.
Translation: Foreign control of the American economic system keeps Americans enslaved to the policies of warlord bankers and corporate imperialists.
Step Two – Creation of the Council on Foreign Relations
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), founded in 1921, is a United Statesnonprofit organization, publisher, and think tank specializing in U.S. foreign policy and international affairs. It is headquartered in New York City, and hosted by the Roman Catholic Church. Its membership has included senior politicians, more than a dozen secretaries of state, CIA directors, bankers, lawyers, professors, and senior media figures.
In the following video, just before the 10:00 minute mark, the video recalls that in 1912, “JP Morgan Interests” hired 12 high ranking managers from different news organizations. They were tasked with determining which papers in the United States were the most influential ones. Once that was determined, next the group was tasked with how many of those papers would be required to generally control the policy of the entire daily press of the United States.
After it was determined that to establish control of the national media narrative would only require taking control of the 25 best newspapers papers in the nation, an “agreement” was made. That group eventually went on to be named The Council on Foreign Relations, and the groups primary role has been to act as the invisible hand that guides and controls thenarratives fed to the masses via the mainstream media.
The CFR promotes globalization, free trade, reducing financial regulations on transnational corporations, and economic consolidation into regional blocs such as NAFTA or the European Union, and develops policy recommendations that reflect these goals. The CFR meetings convene government officials, global business leaders and prominent members of the intelligence and foreign-policy community to discuss international issues. The CFR publishes the bi-monthly journal Foreign Affairs, and runs the David Rockefeller Studies Program, which influences foreign policy by making recommendations to the presidential administration and diplomatic community, testifying before Congress, interacting with the media, and publishing on foreign policy issues.
The CFR was modeled after the Royal Institute of International Affairs, commonly known as Chatham House. It is a non-profit, non-governmental organization based in London whose mission is to analyze and promote the understanding of major international issues and current affairs. It is a pseudo-secret organization but is still ranked the second most influential think tank in the world.
Translation: British imperialists and international interests control US Foreign policy which always drives towards the clash of civilizations, war economies, and the destabilization of America.
Step Three – Creating the Exchange Stabilization Fund
The U.S. Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) was established at the Treasury Department by a provision in the Gold Reserve Act as a response to Britain’s Exchange Equalization Account. The fund began operations in 1934, financed by the $2 billion in paper profit the government realized from raising the price of gold to $35 an ounce from $20. The act authorized the ESF to use its capital to deal in gold and foreign exchange to stabilize the exchange value of the dollar. The ESF, as originally designed, was part of the executive branch not subject to legislative oversight.
Over time, the ESF became the sole director of U.S. economic policy from offices in the U.S. Treasury. The ESF eventually came to control the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy. The ESF started printing paper money for the Treasury and giving it to the Fed to “do with as it pleased” and this created our $20 trillion debt. The Federal Reserve and its twelve central banks have never been audited. The shareholders of the Fed still make huge profits each year while the U.S. debt rises and U.S. taxpayers line the pockets of foreign warlord bankers.
Translation: The U.S. currency, stock markets, commodity markets, gold and silver prices, and interest rates are all completely rigged by the Exchange Stabilization Fund.
Step Four – Joining the United Nations
The United Nations is an intergovernmental organization to promote international co-operation. A replacement for the League of Nations, the organization was established on October 24, 1945 after World War II in order to prevent another global conflict. At its founding, the UN had 51 member states; there are now 193. The headquarters of the United Nations is in Manhattan, New York City, and has extraterritoriality. Other main offices are situated in Geneva, Nairobi, and Vienna. The organization is financed by assessed and voluntary contributions from its member states. Its objectives include maintaining international peace and security, promoting human rights, fostering social and economic development, protecting the environment, and providing humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disaster, and armed conflict.
The International Monetary Fund is a United Nation international organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The IMF was formed in 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference primarily by the ideas of Harry Dexter White who was later found to be a Russian spy. It came into formal existence in 1945 with 29 member countries and the goal of reconstructing the international payment system. Countries contribute funds to a pool through a quota system from which countries experiencing balance of payments problems can borrow money. As of 2016, the IMF had about $668 billion in the fund.
The Bretton Woods Conference, formally known as the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, was the gathering of 730 delegates from all 44 Allied nations in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire to regulate the international monetary and financial order after the conclusion of World War II.
The IMF is an international gambling casino for nations. It is a tool of the UN to channel world economics through one source that makes sure that the largest donor nations remain in control. The IMF became a new mechanism for making “war loans” that could keep armed conflicts and economic war-games raging around the planet. The IMF is the tool of “economic development” that actually represents international corporation’s interests in developing countries. Loans are made to countries so that money is available to hire U.S. corporations to move in and fleece resources and assets leaving the country with more debt than they had to begin with.
The IMF does not look out for the interests of Americas, just American corporations and their international associates. It is highly likely that IMF Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) will become an international currency and that the IMF itself will become the basis for a global economic system in contradistinction to US currency. The IMF serves multi-national corporations and banks instead of America, even though America pays more money into the IMF than any other country. Americans get absolutely nothing from the IMF except continued erosion of the U.S. dollar and the U.S. economy.
Translation: Americans surrendered political and economic national sovereignty when we joined the United Nations.
Step Five – The Birth of the Bush Criminal Family
In 1926, Prescott Bush became vice president of W.A. Harriman and Company, an investment firm, later known as Brown Brothers, Harriman. While Prescott Bush was a director of Union Banking Corp., a New York investment bank owned by a bank controlled by the Thyssen family, it was seized by the federal government because it helped bankroll Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. Fritz Thyssen was an early financial supporter of Hitler, whose National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) Mr. Thyssen believed was preferable to communism. Union Banking was owned by a Dutch bank, Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaardt N.V., which was “closely affiliated” with the German conglomerate, United Steel Works. The Dutch bank and the steel firm were part of the business and financial empire of Thyssen.
Union Banking was seized by the government in October 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. Bush’s position with Union Banking didn’t stop him from later being elected to the Senate from Connecticut in 1952.
George H. W. Bush Leads CIA
John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas. Many believe that George H. W. Bush was in charge of the CIA that day and that the CIA was responsible for President Kennedy’s death. Below we see a picture of George H. W. Bush standing on the steps of the Book Depository Building on the day of the assassination.
The October Surprise
The October Surprise refers to a plot to influence the outcome of the 1980 United States presidential election, contested between incumbent president Jimmy Carterand Ronald Reagan. One of the leading national issues during that year was the release of 52 Americans being held hostage in Iran. Reagan won the election. On the day of his inauguration—in fact, 20 minutes after he concluded his inaugural address—Iran announced the release of the hostages. The timing gave rise to an allegation that representatives of Reagan’s presidential campaign had conspired with Iran to delay the release until after the election to thwart President Carter from pulling off an “October surprise.” The Reagan Administration rewarded Iran for its participation in the plot by supplying Iran with weapons via Israel and by unblocking Iranian government monetary assets in U.S. banks. It is easy to smell the foul works of George Bush behind these machinations.
On March 30, 1981, a shooting occurred at the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington D.C., which targeted Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States. While leaving a speaking engagement at the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C., President Reagan and three others were shot and wounded by John Hinckley, Jr., a close personal friend of the Bush family. After Reagan was shot, an Executive Order was signed putting Vice President George H. W. Bush in charge of U.S. foreign policy, which is the domain of the CIA.
Bush was also appointed foreign affairs “crisis manager” by executive order. After that, Bush could act without worry of detection or blame for his continued CIA dominance of international affairs. This began the Bush CIA White House that continues even today. Below we see a list of the handiwork of Bush while he was Vice President.
The Iran Contra Scandal
“If the American people ever find out what we have done,
they will chase us down the streets and lynch us.”
— George H. W. Bush to White House correspondent Sarah McClendon
The Iran–Contra scandal occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. They hoped, thereby, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua while at the same time negotiating the release of several U.S. hostages. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
The scandal began as an operation to free the seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties. It was planned that Israel would ship weapons to Iran, and then the United States would resupply Israel and receive the Israeli payment. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the U.S. hostages. Large modifications to the plan were devised by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985, in which a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista, or Contras, in Nicaragua. George H. W. Bush was vice-president at the time of the affair and in charge of foreign affairs.
On March 4, 1987, Reagan said that “what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages.”
Iran Contra Scandal Indictments
Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Defense, was indicted on two counts of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice. Weinberger received a pardon from George H. W. Bush.
Robert C. McFarlane, National Security Adviser, convicted of withholding evidence, but after a plea bargain was given two years probation. Later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush.
Elliott Abrams, Assistant Secretary of State, convicted of withholding evidence, but after a plea bargain was given two years’ probation. Later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush.
Alan D. Fiers, Chief of the CIA’s Central American Task Force, convicted of withholding evidence and sentenced to one year probation. Later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush.
Clair George, Chief of Covert Ops-CIA, convicted on two charges of perjury, but pardoned by President George H. W. Bush before sentencing.
Oliver North, member of the National Security Council convicted of accepting an illegal gratuity, obstruction of a congressional inquiry, and destruction of documents, but the ruling was overturned since he had been granted immunity.
John Poindexter, National Security Advisor, was convicted of five counts of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, perjury, defrauding the government, and the alteration and destruction of evidence. Later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush.
Duane Clarridge, ex-CIA senior official, he was indicted in November 1991 on seven counts of perjury and false statements relating to a 1985 arms shipment to Iran. Pardoned before trial by President George H. W. Bush.
Richard V. Secord, former Air Force major general, was involved in arms transfers to Iran and diversion of funds to Contras and making false statements to Congress. Sentenced to two years’ probation. As part of his plea bargain, Secord agreed to provide further truthful testimony in exchange for the dismissal of remaining criminal charges against him.
Translation: The birth of the Bush Criminal Family comes from illegal war-mongering. The Bush Criminal Family has no regard for the rule of law and will use government authority to enrich their personal lust for power and money.
Step Six – Bush’s 911 False Flag
The 911 Commission Investigation was a complete farce run by Robert Mueller, the same person who ran the investigation on the BCCI scandal (CIA bank), the Iran-Contra criminal investigation, and the Noriega-CIA drug investigation. The Commissioners of the Investigation of 911 followed no leads, investigated no banks or brokers and the case was closed without looking at any evidence, with 28 pages of sealed testimony by Bush and Cheney remaining secret. In the wake of the total destruction of five buildings in the World Trade Center complex by the supposed collision of two airplanes, over 15 investigations into a variety of economic terrorism came to a halt. The culprits of 911 have not been caught and the real motives have been displaced on to patsy characters and groups, to name a few, Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Linden, radical Islamic terrorism, Iraq and Saddam Hussein.
These 15 pending investigations included: the theft of national treasuries of Russia and the Philippines; the use of heroin sales proceeds to fund covert intelligence operations in Azerbaijan, Chechnya, Georgia, Afghanistan, Kosovo, etc.; illegal bribes to various Central Asian oligarchs from major corporate financial contributors to the Bush campaigns, illegal gold and money laundering operations; and $280 billion in fraudulent Brady Bonds issued to Russian criminal oligarchs. After 911, the FBI, ONI, SEC, and all other government agencies now grouped under Homeland Security focused much of their efforts on “terrorism” and dropped all 15 investigations.
Conveniently for the culprits being investigated, the two WTC airplane strikes were direct hits on the largest traders of U.S. Securities, which were the only trades that were made on the morning of 911. The FBI center holding the records of the investigations exploded before the first plane struck. Rescue teams had already reached the FBI offices before the first plane struck. Towers 7, 4, and 6 all exploded and the records in those towers were also destroyed. The Pentagon’s missing $2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld announced the day before can be traced to some of these investigations. There was much to be lost by many bankers, brokers, and CIA politicians and operatives in those investigations.
See our extensive research on 911 at www.aim4truth.org. Treason: Who Terrorized Americans and the World on 911?
9/10/2001 (The Day Before 9/11):
Rumsfeld Tells Congress it’s Terrifying $2.3 Trillion is Missing
It appears that contrary to what the U.S. Government, under the guidance of George W. Bush, Jr., has convinced the public, terrorists attacked the World Trade Center, but not for the purpose of jihad. These unknown terrorists most likely were contract operatives working under the guidance of the Mossad and rogue U.S. intelligence operatives. Their objective was to bring to an end numerous U.S. investigations into secret Swiss bank accounts and Deutsche Bank transactions which would have exposed numerous criminal activities by the Russian mafia and the George Bush Sr.’s intelligence operations going back as far as 1991.
Like the Iran Contra scandal of the 1980’s, George Bush Sr. used a wide array of illegal activities to fund intelligence operations for a foreign policy he deemed appropriate, and decided to pursue, without Congressional confirmation, and in violation of the law. His administration’s foreign policies were nothing more than illegal activities developed to take over the Central Asian and Russian oil and gas fields of the former Soviet Union through use of privately funded armies and financial fraud – just as he had illegally funded covert activities to promote foreign policy in Iran and Nicaragua. Illegal activities also included Bush’s payoffs to Russian oligarchs with ten-year Brady Bonds to ensure the collapse of the former Soviet Union.
The Bush Criminal Family has been propelled into history by “dark ops” across the globe, funded by the initial theft of the World War II Asian treasuries recovered by Ferdinand Marcos, and subsidized by criminal profits from weapons for drugs for cash. The involvement of the Bush apparatus in facilitating this trade between crime organizations, terrorist organizations, and mainstream political parties is seen in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Albania, Columbia, Nicaragua, to mention the obvious examples. Using these funds, they have destabilized these same areas for the sake of controlling oil, while their Russian/Israeli mafia partners reap the gold and diamond mineral wealth. This type of illegal activity became standard operating procedure for Bush Sr. and subsequently Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama.
Translation: The false flag attacks of 911 were orchestrated by Bush Sr. through Dick Chaney to cover their tracks.
Step Seven – Enacting of the USA Patriot Act
The US Patriot Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in response to the attacks of 911. The full title is “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.”
The Patriot Act was established after the 911 and its main point was to protect people from terrorism. It allows FBI agents to search personal information of people, to read their emails, and listen to their private phone calls.
It breaches the First Amendment, which declares our rights to freedom expression, speech and information.
The Patriot Act allows the federal government to take away the property of a “supposed” terrorist without notice or the agreement of the judge. The FBI can search private records within financial institutions and look into personal records such as medical, phone, internet, student or library records. Federal agents do not need to have or show any reasons that a person is engaged in “supposed” criminal or political activity to search the person. The FBI does not need to prove any criminal charges against her/him to deny U.S. Civil Liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution. Many of the provisions of the Bill of Rights were supplanted by the Patriot Act.
President Carter has denounced the Patriot Act for authorizing federal agents “to search people’s homes and businesses secretly, to confiscate property without any deadline or without giving notice that the intrusion had taken place, and to collect without notice personal information on American citizens including their medical histories, books checked out of libraries, and goods they purchase.”
“What the American People are witnessing now with this new legislation (USA Freedom Act – the newly edited Patriot Act) is the further development of an American Police State into a Military Dictatorship, a process that was started by the so-called USA Patriot Act in 2001,” says Professor Francis Boyle, the constitutional law authority at the University of Illinois, Champaign. “If it is enacted into law, America will lose all pretense of having our military subjected to the control of democratically elected civilian leaders as originally envisioned and required by the Constitution.”
Translation: The Patriot Act (USA Freedom Act) abolished the rights and protections to citizens by undermining the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Step Eight – Financial Legislation for Warlord Bankers
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the bipartisan passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. Furthermore, it failed to give to the SEC or any other financial regulatory agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, commonly referred to as a bailout of the U.S. financial system, was a law enacted in response to the subprime mortgage crisis authorizing the United States Secretary of the Treasury to spend up to $700 billion to purchase distressed assets, especially mortgage-backed securities, and supply cash directly to banks. The funds for purchase of distressed assets were mostly redirected to inject capital into banks and other financial institutions while the Treasury continued to examine the usefulness of targeted asset purchases. Both foreign and domestic banks are included in the program. The Act was proposed by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson during the global financial crisis of 2008 and signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 3, 2008.
Translation: These actions and laws amounted to a total sell-out of American “free markets” to warlord bankers and corporate imperialists who then became “too big to fail.”
Step Nine – Broadening the National Defense Authorization Act
“The 2012 NDAA is a bold and dangerous attempt to establish martial law in America.” Rand Paul
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is a United States federal law specifying the budget, expenditures, and other provisions of the United States Department of Defense. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 makes it legal to broadcast propaganda within America that usually is used against our “enemies.” US citizens are now treated like enemy combatants whose “perception” must be managed to come in line with presidential “National Security” policies. The Department of Defense may now broadcast propaganda with the approval and authority of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) both internationally and domestically. (See our article on Legal Propaganda for more details.)
Any presidential policy may be accompanied by broadcasts that use subliminal programming as a form of brain-washing. These mechanisms that squelch dissent have been used since the Reagan administration to shape public opinion to support administrative policies. Wars require domestic support and these “black ops” programs started to use the “psy-ops” tools of the military. DARPA, the research and development arm of the military, has created many tools to control the enemy through media that shapes public perception. It is called “perception management” and has been used legally in advertising since the late seventies and also in electronic warfare throughout the world to brain-wash our enemies and shape their perception and opinion of America.
From Amendment 114 of the NDAA 2012: “The Secretary and the Broadcasting Board of Governors are authorized to use funds appropriated or otherwise made available for public diplomacy information programs to provide for the preparation, dissemination, and use of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States, its people, and its policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers, instructors, and other direct or indirect means of communication. It is time to liberate the authority of the US government to broadcast American produced foreign propaganda in the U.S.”
The amendment empowers the State Department and Pentagon to utilize all forms of media against the American public for the sake of coercing US citizens to believe whatever version of the truth the US government wants them to believe. All oversight is removed with Amendment 114 regardless of whether the information disseminated is truthful, partially truthful or completely false.
Four billion dollars per year is spent by the Pentagon on propaganda aimed at the American public. The Pentagon uses fake accounts on social media sites to purvey false information, harass users and enact perception management to influence Americans. Sophisticated software allows the military to engage in online conversations with coordinated answers, blog comments and instant messaging remarks that are solely meant to spread pro-American propaganda.
In 2012, Obama signed an order called National Defense Resources Preparedness giving himself explicit control over the nation and declaring a permanent state of Martial Law in the U.S. due to terrorism. It gives the U.S. Government the right to detain anyone for anything indefinitely. Obama renewed that order every year since then.
The Broadcasting Board of Governors allows a new perception management system called Information Operations (IO), which is defined as “the integrated employment of electronic warfare (EW), computer network operations (CNO), psychological operations (PSYOP), military deception (MILDEC), and operations security (OPSEC), in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own.”
Information Operations activities are undertaken to shape the essential narrative of a conflict or situation and thus affect the attitudes and behaviors of the targeted audience and equates descriptions of combat operations with standard marketing strategies. With the NDAA 2012 in its current form, the State Department and Pentagon can go beyond manipulating mainstream media outlets and directly disseminate campaigns of misinformation to the American public. Major parts of the legislation are based on the assumption that key legal protections for individuals are incompatible with the requirements of “national security.”
The 2013 NDAA overturned a 64-year ban on the domestic dissemination of propaganda which is described as public diplomacy information. It preaches freedom of the press abroad while practicing censorship at home. The resources and personnel who focus on talking about America overseas are diverted in favor of domestic perception management. There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, NDAA 2014 authorizes presidents “to order the military to pick up and imprison people, including U.S. citizens, without charging them or putting them on trial.” The ACLU charges the provisions of NDAA “were negotiated by a small group of members of Congress, in secret, and without proper congressional review and, are inconsistent with fundamental American values embodied in the Constitution. Our fundamental freedoms are on the line.”
In the National Defense Authorization Act of 2016, Obama skirts around the Constitution by having Sections 1021 and 1022, authorize “indefinite military detention, without charge or without trial, any person, including an American citizen”, and applies the “Laws of War,” to U.S. soil, making the United States legally a battlefield. Obama claimed he would develop “an appropriate legal regime” to permanently detain people prior to having committed any crime. The idea of these detentions would be to prevent any individual from committing a “possible future crime.” Obama says that he might detain someone up to ten years before they might commit a crime. The NDAA removes all of the rights guaranteed under the US Bill of Rights.
The Countering Foreign Disinformation and Propaganda Act of 2016, initially entitled the Countering Information Warfare Act, essentially created another level on top of the Broadcasting Board of Governors that has complete control of every type of broadcast in America. Some call this new governmental mechanism of scrubbing all American broadcasts, the “Ministry of Truth.” In a post-truth age, we call it Main Stream Media.
Translation: Obama has declared all Americans to be enemies until proven otherwise and thus subject to military attacks without recourse to US laws.
Step Ten – George Soros Conducts CIA Economic Terrorism
“It is sort of a disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” George Soros, The Independent, 1993
George Soros has been behind destabilizing national currencies and markets in England, China, Thailand, Burma, Hungary, France, Russia, USSR, and many other countries. No country in the world is safe from Soros who is a wanted criminal in numerous countries and yet he is allowed to give $6 billion to the Democratic National Committee and be the largest donor to the Clinton and Sanders campaigns. Soros owns the DNC and the DNC leaks demonstrate that Hillary and the Democratic Party take their orders from Soros.
Soros uses the old trick of the Jesuits to first buy his way into the hearts of his enemies while establishing “influence” organizations that preach the Socialist philosophy of Soros’s “Open Society.” Infiltrate, educate and control are the Jesuit steps, also called covert penetration, brainwashing, and propagandizing. Soros has a vast network of financial and social intelligence that is similar to the CIA’s but even more insidious because the espionage and subversion drives his “economic terrorism” that has vampirized nations and driven millions into poverty.
It seems that Soros is only content when he is attacking markets for his own personal gain, or fomenting decent in one of the 187 political activist organizations he backs in America. He has given over $4 billion world-wide since 2002 to these one-sided groups that work to destabilize nations. Soros removes politicians who stand in the way of him fleecing the assets of a country. He has removed numerous duly elected national leaders through the political actions of these organizations.
Under the guise of Democracy, Soros infiltrates and destabilizes politicians he opposes and rakes in the assets during the chaos and economic confusion. He finds a weakness in the economic system of a country, and then leverages it until the country’s economy crashes.
Even though Soros does not pay a single penny in taxes in America, he is considered one of the wealthiest people in the world. All of his operations run from off-shore accounts – even though he has an office in NYC. He was the original hedge fund manager who taught others the rules of gambling with markets for personal greed. Soros loves regime changes, as he and the CIA call it, especially if he personally takes the regime and its leader down. During the election of George Bush Jr. Soros said: “Removing President George W. Bush from office was the central focus of my life.” He gave $23.58 million to various groups dedicated to defeating Bush.
Soros has donated a great deal of money to numerous “Open Society” organizations that are taking action to impeach Trump. Soros recently criticized Trump at the economic meetings in Davos.
“He [Trump] stands for that other form of government, which is the opposite of an open society,” said Soros.
To have Soros hate you and say that you are the opposite of his “Open Society” means that you are not a globalist and might have the economic health of America at heart. Soros wants chaotic socialism and Trump wants Democracy based upon the Constitution and rule of U.S. laws. Soros believes his greed and delusions of grandeur are more important than America or any other country and its laws. Soros wants Trump deposed.
The real story is that Soros told the press many times that he had “taken care” of the election and Trump would lose. Trump’s unexpected win in November hurt Soros beyond money or ideology. Soros lost more than $1 billion in trades he made that would have benefited if the market went down. Instead, a month-long rally after the election cost Soros big-time and his attempt at crashing the U.S. markets failed.
Soros’s Seven Steps to Bring Down a Government
Let’s look at Soros’s own words from his books and articles that describe his tried and true system for taking down a country – or “regime change” as he calls it. (See our article on Soros’ Seven Steps for more information.)
Step One: Form a shadow government using humanitarian aid as cover.
Step Two: Control the airwaves. Fund existing radio and TV outlets and take control over them or start your own outlets.
Step Three: Destabilize the state, weaken the government and build an anti-government kind of feeling in the country. You exploit an economic crisis or take advantage of an existing crisis — pressure from the top and the bottom. This will allow you to weaken the government and build anti-government public sentiment.
Step Four: Sow unrest.
Step Five: Provoke an election crisis. You wait for an election and during the election, you cry voter fraud.
Step Six: Take power. You stage massive demonstrations, civil disobedience, sit-ins, general strikes and you encourage activism. You promote voter fraud and tell followers what to do through your radio and television stations. Incitement and violence are conducted at this stage.
Step Seven: Outlast your opponent.
As you can see, we are on Step Six with the recent “Women’s March” on Washington. Soros controlled the march because the organizations who took part were principally funded by Soros and his Open Society Foundation. It truly was a Soros March against Trump as the enacting of Step Six in his plan to oust Trump.
MUCH OF WHAT IS WRITTEN ABOUT IN THIS ENTIRE POST IS DISCUSSED IN THE FOLLOWING INTERVIEW CONDUCTED 3/3/2017 WITH “DEEP STATE” AND FORMER NSA OPERATIVE OTHERWISE KNOWN AS “THOMAS PAINE”
Soros Leads the Impeachment Attempts on Trump
One need not look too deeply to discover the two groups behind the movement to impeach Donald Trump are tied to billionaire George Soros. The organization that just filed a lawsuit challenging the Constitutionality of Trump’s presidency is financed by Soros’s Open Society Foundations.
The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit claiming that Trump is in violation of a Constitutional clause banning government officials from accepting benefits from foreign nations. CREW, which does not publicize its donor list, has received financing from Soros’s Open Society Foundations. CREW has also been funded by the Soros-financed Tides Foundation. In August 2014, long-time Hillary Clinton ally David Brock, founder of the Soros-financed Media Matters for America progressive group, was elected chairman of CREW’s board. Brock departed the organization last December, but Politico reported that CREW is part of a network of groups for which the activist is attempting to raise $40 million to oust Trump. The campaign to impeach Trump is being led by two liberal advocacy groups – Free Speech for People and RootsAction, both of which are Soros-funded.
Step Eleven – The US Intelligence Community Dismantles America
Since the reign of Bush Sr., military intelligence has been “sold out,” quite literally, to corporate intelligence agencies. Before the restructuring of the U.S. Intelligence Community, the National Security Council (NSC), working with the National Security Agency (NSA), was the lead intelligence group that was only trumped by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in matters of “international security.” The Bush/ Clinton/ Obama CIA White House continued to broaden international control of the U.S. Intelligence Community. Eventually, 850,000 corporate contractors would be granted Top Secret security clearance per year, even if they were also working for foreign nations that were our enemies. The U.S. Intelligence Community counted on contractors whose allegiance was to transnational corporatism, not U.S. interests.
There has been an erosion of American sovereignty by international intelligence corporations that is tantamount to an overthrow of our government by our very own U.S. Intelligence Community. Eventually, the Council on Foreign Relations came to direct both domestic and foreign policy and usurped the authority of the U.S. military’s prior control through the National Security Council (NSA).
The NSA is responsible for global monitoring, collection, and processing of information and data for foreign and domestic intelligence and counterintelligence purposes. The NSA is concurrently charged with protection of U.S. government communications and information systems against penetration and network warfare. Although many of NSA’s programs rely on “passive” electronic collection, the agency is authorized to accomplish its mission through active clandestine means, among which are physically bugging electronic systems and engaging in sabotage through subversive software and cyberwarfare. The NSA has a co-located organization called the Central Security Service (CSS), which was created to facilitate cooperation between NSA and other US military cryptanalysis components. Additionally, the NSA Director simultaneously serves as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and as Chief of the Central Security Service.
Originating as a unit to decipher coded communications in World War II, it was officially formed as the NSA by President Harry S. Truman in 1952. Since then, it has become one of the largest U.S. intelligence organizations in terms of personnel and budget, operating as part of the Department of Defense and now structured to report to the newly created Office of Director of National Intelligence, who coordinates all 17 US Intelligence agencies.
On May 26, 2009, President Barack Obama merged the White House staff supporting the Homeland Security Council (HSC) and the National Security Council into one National Security Staff (NSS). The HSC and NSC each continue to exist by statute as bodies supporting the President. The name of the staff organization was changed back to National Security Council Staff in 2014.
The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is the United States government cabinet-level official – subject to the authority, direction, and control of the President – required by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 to: serve as head of the sixteen-member United States Intelligence Community, direct and oversee the
National Intelligence Program; and serve as an advisor, upon invitation, to the President and his executive offices of the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council about intelligence matters related to national security.
Obama placed control of all U.S. Intelligence agencies under one person who was a political appointment. James Clapper, who lied before the U.S. Congress on multiple occasions about NSA surveillance of Americans, is a good example of the integrity of the people who have been appointed to run this “shadow intelligence agency” for the Obama White House called the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The Strategies of the U.S. Intelligence Community
The U.S. Intelligence Community shares its plans, which are principally created by the Council on Foreign Relations, with the world through public dissemination so that America’s future strategies are shared with the entire world including U.S. enemies. The document below is the current “predictions and strategies” of U.S. Intelligence Community for the next five years. It is a document that any citizen can retrieve right now by opening the hyperlink.
This gross disregard for secrecy or “putting America first” is demonstrated by the existence of this report on Wikipedia. There are no secrets in the U.S. Intelligence Community; it has been dismantled and replaced by international corporate intelligence agencies. The Bush/Clinton/ Obama strategies were almost complete and then Trump’s victory spoiled those plans.
Let’s look at the disturbing intelligence strategies that the Bush/Clinton/Obama CIA White House laid out as the downfall of America in the report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It only takes reading a few quotes from this document to see what would have happened if Hillary Clinton would have become president. It is obvious that Hillary took her “playbook” from this report. Exact descriptions of her political planks are spelled out in the future plans of the combined 17 US intelligence agencies.
Global Trends / Paradox of Progress
A publication of the National Intelligence Council, January, 2017, NIC 2017-001 ISBN 978-0-16-093614-2 or www.dni.gov/nic/globaltrends
Prediction of the Use of a Nuclear Weapon
Orbits (regions) explore a future of tensions created by competing major powers seeking their own spheres of influence while attempting to maintain stability at home. It examines how the trends of rising nationalism, changing conflict patterns, emerging disruptive technologies, and decreasing global cooperation might combine to increase the risk of interstate conflict. This scenario emphasizes the policy choices ahead for governments that would reinforce stability and peace or further exacerbate tensions. It features a nuclear weapon used in anger, which turns out to concentrate global minds so that it does not happen again.
Translation: Once Hillary was elected she was going to drop a nuclear bomb on some country to continue the policy of maintaining global control by inciting war to destabilize nations and boost military spending. The fulfillment of Henry Kissinger’s “Clash of Civilizations” was about to be enacted.
Use of Propaganda
Information technology remains the key enabler, and companies, advocacy groups, charities, and local governments prove nimbler than national governments in delivering services to sway populations in support of their agendas. Most national governments resist, but others cede some power to emerging networks.
Translation: The U.S. should continue hiring private intelligence agencies to propagandize US citizens.
Migrants Bread Terrorism
The spread of ungoverned space, particularly during the past five years, created an environment conducive to extremism and encouraged the enlistment of thousands of volunteers eager to fight. Until some semblance of security is established, militancy will continue to breed. Second, today’s foreign fighters unless identified, de-radicalized, and reintegrated back into society are likely to become the recruiting pool for tomorrow’s violent non-state actors. Similarly, disaffected migrants, without better integration, education, and economic opportunity, could become an ideal recruiting pool for violent extremist groups.
Translation: “Ungoverned space” = No-fly zones. No-fly zones imposed by Obama/Hillary created civil war and radicalized the migrants who were displaced
by the bombing.
by the bombing.
Prediction of One World Government
To be clear, we expect the term “World Government” to remain seldom spoken aloud, even though two of what might be considered four “branches’ of such governance have been augmented in recent years—international courts and the rising bureaucracy of agencies like the World Trade Organization. Notably, these are the two entities that vest legal standing in nations and, to some degree, in corporations and NGOs, rather than in private persons. As yet, no major or substantial movement has gathered to press for the two missing branches—executive and a legislature—in part because those would require standing elections on the part of global citizens.
Translation: America was one step away from becoming a subject of the United Nations in the New World Order – as predicted by George H. W. Bush.
Intelligence Agencies Peddle Post-truth and Post-factual
Competing silos of information and perspectives of truth and fact among proliferating influential actors are poised to complicate governments’ ability to generate compromise. A combination of factors, including growing distrust of formal institutions and the proliferation and polarization of media outlets, are driving some academics and political observers to describe the current era as one of ‘post-truth” or “post-factual” politics.This results in part from the growing number of individuals and agencies providing information to consumers. Whether this atmosphere continues, or people and political groups adjust to growing flows of communication and trend back toward more-balanced perspectives, will be crucial in coming years.
As a result of this “post-factual” trend, individuals appear more likely to base their political views more on feelings than on fact and to seek out information that supports their opinions. Conflicting information actually reinforces views that the new information is from a biased or hostile source and further polarizes groups. To interpret the deluge of details, people turn to leaders who think like they do and trust them to interpret the ‘truth.’
Translation: Fake News and intelligence leaks are planned by the US Intelligence Community.
MSM is in a War with Social Media
Social media has radically lowered the transaction costs of mobilizing populations, but some social scientists worry that virtual activism will replace more concrete political participation—including voting—diluting the quality of the political process. Worse, some worry that new technologies fracture and polarize populations; social media, in particular, typically passes information and ideas through narrow, existing networks to members who self-select, rather than traditional forms of media, which project ideas to a broader audience. This selective dissemination and receipt of information contribute to reinforcement and confirmation bias, segregation, and polarization.
Translation: The Alternative Media has upset the plans of the Intelligence Community to control information. There truly is a war of information going on.
Prediction of Trump
Liberalism is likely to remain the benchmark model for economies and politics over the coming decades, but it will face stronger competition and demands from publics to address its shortfalls. Many developing countries will strive for modernization more or less along Western lines, but the allure of liberalism has taken some strong hits over the years as political polarization, financial volatility, and economic inequality in western countries have stoked populism and caused doubts about the price of political and economic openness.
Governments having trouble meeting the needs of their citizens will be strongly tempted to turn to nationalism while publics fearful of loss of jobs to immigrants or economic hardship, are likely to be increasingly receptive to more exclusive ideologies and identities.
Translation: It seems that Trump’s team is completely aware of this document and used its indicators as tools to win the election.
Prediction of Sanders
It is not clear that economic ideologies, such as socialism and neoliberalism, which had dominated much of the 20th Century until challenged by the collapse of communism and the 2008 financial crisis, will remain relevant in a world in which both low-growth and high levels of inequality dominate political agendas. Other forms of political thought remain viable alternatives —in particular, nationalism, political liberalism, and religiously-based political thought.
Translation: The far left needed to go even more far left into socialism and neoliberalism and merge with the Democratic Party.
Trump Toppled Globalism Expansion
Islands investigates a restructuring of the global economy that leads to long periods of slow or no growth, challenging both traditional models of economic prosperity and the presumption that globalization will continue to expand. The scenario emphasizes the challenges to governments in meeting societies’ demands for both economic and physical security as popular pushback to globalization increases, emerging technologies transform work and trade, and political instability grows. It underscores the choices governments will face in conditions that might tempt some to turn inward, reduce support for multilateral cooperation, and adopt protectionist policies, while others find ways to leverage new sources of economic growth and productivity.
Translation: The globalists are worried they are losing their grip on people and economies.
Description of the Work of George Soros
Communities show how growing public expectations but diminishing capacity of national governments open space for local governments and private actors, challenging traditional assumptions about what governing means. Most national governments resist, but others cede some power to emerging networks. These trends will further blur the lines between different forms of violence; governments will continue to debate which actions constitute “terrorism” versus “war,” “insurgency” or “criminal acts.” These developments suggest that how we fight terrorism will probably continue to evolve.
Translation: The economic terrorism of George Soros is a new form of “insurgency” and “war.”
Desperate Cry for Globalism Instead of Nationalism
A new, more broadly defined, more widely conceived definition of national interest, based on the concept of mutuality, might induce states to find far greater unity in deliberations at the international level. With the growing number of existential challenges facing humanity, “collective interest” could become “national interest.” Leadership among international institutions will need to promote a long-term perspective and a global mentality – and be decisive in the short-term – to overcome the temptation toward insularity and muddling through. Rule-making, enforcement, and dispute resolution by private actors, however, is becoming more common. Multi-stakeholder multilateralism will complement state efforts. Government officials will dominate—but not monopolize—multilateral cooperation in the future.
Translation: A prophetic worry that a nationalist like Trump might come to power.
It is clear by this report from the combined 17 US Intelligence Agencies that the future is uncertain and that American national interests have been completely sold out to globalism. The opening for a populist running on a nationalistic platform calling for borders, jobs, and America first is clearly predicted. The advice that the liberals need to become even more liberal, if not socialistic, is also quite clear. The “Paradox of Progress” is a report that is truly hoping that the Bush/Clinton/Obama loyalists can maintain power long enough to complete the overthrow of America.
Step Twelve – The Election of Hillary Clinton
America was one step away from its complete overthrow by the transnational forces being directed through the recent efforts of the Bush/Clinton/Obama CIA White House. Each step of the gradual overthrow of America subsumed yet another aspect of American life: economic, political, cultural, military and constitutional rights. The U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been abnegated and eroded by the globalization of America.
Hillary would be the American president who would willingly surrender U.S. citizens to the slavery of United Nation’s policies and the economic terrorism of George Soros. Hillary was Soros’ puppet who was headed to the White House to continue the warlord policies of international bankers and brokers and her personal greed. Hillary had already demonstrated herself to be the penultimate criminal politician, along with Wild Bill her husband, and was headed for even higher realms of deceit, criminal activity, and treason.
Trump’s victory was the worst blow the imperialistic globalists have had since 1913 when they installed foreign bankers in the U.S. Federal Reserve. Every evil cabal, from the Trilateralists to the Knights of Malta, had emergency meetings to create a “plan B” for the shock of a Trump victory over the assumed Queen and King of America, Hillary and Wild Bill. The new global Bonnie and Clyde were only an inch away from completing the total overthrow of America.
Trump was the wild card, the ace up the sleeve, the black swan that shook the entire world and announced that “America ain’t dead yet.” Trump is the intelligence community’s worst nightmare, the fly in the soup, the mill-stone around their necks. George Soros is ready to have a heart-attack and Valarie Jarrett, Barrack and Michele/Michael, and Oprah Winfrey have been called to the front lines to help enact George Soros’ strategy of regime change that has worked so effectively before in other countries.
Their fear of criminal prosecution has them so worried that they will do anything to stop Trump from being the “wrecking ball” that knocks down their carefully constructed house of cards.
We can see why the “vested interests” behind the Clintons, and even Bernie Sanders (another Soros puppet), are going crazy with wild rhetoric, imaginary Russian scandals, MSM fake news, baseless accusations, and Hollywood created dissent and resistance. (Patriots must boycott Hollywood. See our article.)
We can see that all 187 funded Soros political activist groups are doing exactly what they are being told to do to help alleviate the “globalist’s stress” that Trump creates every time he opens his mouth. The Democratic Party is in shambles and the “bought and paid for” Republicans are having anxiety attacks because their steady stream of money may be cut off and the rule of law upheld for the first time in decades. Trump has called them all out and they are showing their true colors and jumping from what they think is a sinking ship. The question is, “Whose ship is sinking?”
Trump Dismantles the 12 Steps
The Anonymous Patriots have written before about what President Donald J. Trump can do to grab this bull by the horns and tame it. Essentially, Trump is doing the right things by going slowly, enforcing the rule of law, and carefully auditing and dismantling the mechanisms of globalism in the American political, economic, and cultural spheres. He has put everyone in Washington D. C. “on notice” and is threatening a sort of “mass firing” and the rehiring of honest politicians who have term limits, financial transparency, and honesty in their selfless service to the spirit of American freedom.
The steps are clear and simple and only require a thorough review of existing laws and a diligent application of them in all matters. Investigations, audits, and criminal proceeding should take place within the defined limits of the law, but the law must be enforced without impunity.
Action Item One – Creating the US Federal Reserve
Audit, investigate wrongdoing, and then seize the assets of the Fed and surrender them to the US Treasury.
Action Item Two – Creation of the Council on Foreign Relations
Disband the Council of Foreign Relations and create a national advisory board for foreign relations with only U.S. citizens (no dual citizens) as members.
Action Item Three – Creating the Exchange Stabilization Fund
Take back control of the ESF from the CIA and put this office under the control of the U.S. Treasury without a Federal Reserve System or central bank system.
Action Item Four – Joining the United Nations
Audit, investigate and prosecute criminal activities, and seize US funds being held by the UN. End American membership in all aspects, branches, and agencies of the United Nations.
Action Item Five – The Birth of the Bush Criminal Family
Thoroughly investigate all allegations of crimes and wrongdoings of George H. W. Bush.
Action Item Six – Bush’s 911 False Flag
Conduct an honest investigation of the attacks on 911. Prosecute the criminals found involved.
Action Item Seven – Enacting of the USA Patriot Act
Rescind the USA Freedom Act (USA Patriot Act) and all of its components.
Action Item Eight – Enacting the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
Create legislation that makes illegal banking practices and criminal stocks and market
manipulation equal to terrorism.
Action Item Nine – Broadening the National Defense Authorization Act
Reinstate the language of the NDAA that existed before the Bush/Clinton/Obama White House broadened its scope and application.
Action Item Ten – George Soros Conducts CIA Economic Terrorism
Arrest George Soros as a criminal economic terrorist and seize his assets. Investigate all Soros funded organizations and prosecute criminals for conspiracy to create sedition, treason, and murder.
Action Item Eleven – The U.S. Intelligence Community Dismantles America
Fire all corporate intelligence agencies working for the US government and replace them with military personnel. Create laws against sharing US intelligence and enforce those laws.
Action Item Twelve – The Election of Hillary Clinton
Seize all assets of the Clinton Foundation and prosecute Bill & Hillary for tax evasion and the misuse of a governmental department (presidential library commission). Prosecute Hillary for using the State Department as part of her foundation solicitations. Prosecute Hillary for her mishandling of secret State Department documents on her personal server.
As we always ask our readers and viewers, please do what you can to help your fellow patriots in the Second American Revolution. The American Intelligence Media is a grassroots citizen to citizen intelligence network and our home page can be found at www.aim4truth.org. Please get to know our members and subscribe to their channels and emails so that you can receive intelligence reports directly into your inbox. Share these videos and articles with your friends, family, and colleagues.
___
FOR MORE ON OBAMA'S SHADOW GOVERNMENT:
FOR MORE ON THE “DEEP STATE” CRISIS:
Once Upon a Time in America… Are you ready to turn back the clocks to the 1800’s for up to three years? Our grandfathers and great-grandfathers were the last generation to practice the basic things that we call survival skills now… Watch this video and you will find many interesting things!
HERE ARE SOME ITEMS YOU MIGHT FIND USEFUL AS WELL. SOME ARE PRICEY, BUT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT PROTECTING YOUR FAMILY!
Backyard Liberty: Aquaponic system to grow your organic and living food bank
The Lost Ways: 4 Important Forgotten Skills used by our Ancestors that can help you in any crises
Bulletproof Home: Guide to safeguarding your home
Conquering the Collapse: Financial advice and preparedness
Liberty Generator: Have an alternative power source
Sold Out After Crisis: Americans proven to be over-confident and under prepared lack these crucial items – Get them while you can
Conquering the Collapse is an extensive guide, covering everything from why we should prepare, how a collapse may happen, what civilization may look like in its aftermath, and what steps you can take to not only prepare ahead of time, but how you’ll survive and thrive during the reconstruction and rebuilding that follows.
OTHER NOTABLE BOOKS:
Conquering the Collapse is an extensive guide, covering everything from why we should prepare, how a collapse may happen, what civilization may look like in its aftermath, and what steps you can take to not only prepare ahead of time, but how you’ll survive and thrive during the reconstruction and rebuilding that follows.
Just so we're clear, Martial Law is the suspension of the Constitution. Typically, its imposition accompanies CONFISCATION OF FIREARMS AND SUPPLIES, curfews, the suspension of civil law, suspension of all civil rights, suspension of habeas corpus, and the application or extension of military law or military justice to civilians. Civilians defying martial law may be subjected to military tribunal (court-martial).
Just so there is no confusion about where the information I am presenting comes from, virtually all of the close to 2,000 pages linked below are not being held on MY server. They link to the originals on the official website of The White House, U.S. Congress, U.S. Army, United Nations, The Official United States Federal Code, and and handful were obtained via lawsuit by Judicial Watch using the Freedom of Information Act
Some of you can tell "Conspiracy Theorist" as loud as you want to. That doesn't make these laws any less real. It just makes you more ignorant.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE PDF WITH ALL THE FILES BELOW HERE FROM AMAZON:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/governmentdocs/Government+Doc+Collection+1000+Pgs+Plus.pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/governmentdocs/Government+Doc+Collection+1000+Pgs+Plus.pdf
THE NUMBER ON THE LEFT IS THE PAGE NUMBER THE DOCUMENT STARTS ON!
1. H.R. 390 (2013-2014) Establishing National Emergency Centers on Military Installations:
11. U.S. Army Manual FM 3-19.40 Internment Camp/Resettlement Operations:
337. U.S. Army Civilian Inmate Labor Program:
371. Domestic Terrorism — Congress (FPC):
450. EXECUTIVE ORDER 13603 – National Defense Resource Preparedness:
477. Obama Administration Department of Defense Training Manual via FOIA:
609. AGENDA 2030
641. Military Police Leader’s Handbook
1282. Rightwing Extremism (FAS):
1283. Agenda 21
11. U.S. Army Manual FM 3-19.40 Internment Camp/Resettlement Operations:
337. U.S. Army Civilian Inmate Labor Program:
371. Domestic Terrorism — Congress (FPC):
450. EXECUTIVE ORDER 13603 – National Defense Resource Preparedness:
477. Obama Administration Department of Defense Training Manual via FOIA:
609. AGENDA 2030
641. Military Police Leader’s Handbook
1282. Rightwing Extremism (FAS):
1283. Agenda 21
THE FOLLOWING ARE NOT IN THE .PDF:
– Paris Climate Accord:http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris/index_en.htm
– UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol: http://bigpicture.unfccc.int/#content…
– FEMA Executive Orders: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/eo/femalist.htm#.V-ysWzKZPFy
– Obama’s Warning at FEMA Center: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/05/31/remarks-president-hurricane-preparedness-fema-national-response
– ROBERT T. STAFFORD DISASTER RELIEF AND EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ACT – 42 U.S.C. 5195:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5195c
– INTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW: 10 U.S.C. SECTION 332, 333 & 334 – https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/333
– Executive Order — 2016 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial – https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/16/executive-order-2016-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states
– Executive Order 12473–Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984 – https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12473.html
– Courts-Martial Manual – https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/MCM-2012.pdf
– LETTER — Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism – https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/15/letter-and-notice-continuation-national-emergency-respect-persons-who
– NOTICE — Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism – https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/15/notice-continuation-national-emergency-respect-persons-who-commit
– EXECUTIVE ORDER 13224 – BLOCKING PROPERTY AND PROHIBITING TRANSACTIONS WITH PERSONS WHO COMMIT, THREATEN TO COMMIT, OR SUPPORT TERRORISM – https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/terror.pdf
Traditionally, the topic has been reserved for “tin foil hat wearing” conspiracy theorists or their websites, but people are FINALLY beginning to realize the amount of evidence accumulating that suggests we the people, are at risk of being placed under martial law, and losing all of our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.
For those of you who are finally starting to realize there is major trouble on the horizon, largely as a result of the failure of the U.S. Dollar and Western banks, deteriorating conditions here at home both socially and economically, and nuclear tensions reaching all new heights, then I suggest you get your FREE GUIDE for how to survive Martial Law here, otherwise when things go south, the facility like the one below is where you might likely wind up.
For anyone with no idea where to begin making preparations, a very good, and very inexpensive tool to teach you how and what you should be preparing, is a book called “Conquering the Collapse.” Since I’ve practically worn out my own iPad reading my copy, in the following link I provide you with a review of the book: Be Ready For Any Emergency – The Crucial Guide For Any Family’s Safety (Videos).
If you do nothing else, you can learn more about the coming crisis in the links at the bottom under the heading titled, “If nothing else, these links are essential.” The writing is on the wall everywhere… I strongly suggest checking out the post titled, Start “Doubling Up On Your Prepping;” Countdown to Economic Collapse.
Once all hell breaks lose, it will be too late by then to do anything about it. The writing is on the wall everywhere right now… do what you can while you still can!

FOR MORE LINKS ON THE LIKELY COMING MARTIAL LAW:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









