­
FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience,: June 2014
Question Everything!Everything!!

Question Everything!

Question Everything!

This blog does not promote

This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

MEN OF PEACE

MEN OF PEACE
"I don't know how to save the world. I don't have the answers or The Answer. I hold no secret knowledge as to how to fix the mistakes of generations past and present. I only know that without compassion and respect for all Earth's inhabitants, none of us will survive - nor will we deserve to." Leonard Peltier

Sunday, June 29, 2014

President’s continued attack on the economy

President’s continued attack on the economy—which includes a massive increase in illegal immigration—the nation’s economy will remain tenuous

What Economic Recovery?




You have to know that the Obama administration has run out of excuses for destroying the U.S. economy when it starts to blame it on the weather.



According to the Commerce Department, the economy based on its Gross domestic product—the value of its goods and services—fell at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 2.9% in the first quarter of this year. That was the largest recorded drop since the end of World War II in 1945!

The June 20 edition of The Wall Street Journal’s article, “Economy Shrank Rapidly in First Quarter” led off by reporting that “Weather disruptions at home and weak demand abroad caused a contraction in the U.S. economy in the first quarter, renewing doubts about the strength of the nation’s five-year-old recovery.”
http://online.wsj.com/articles/u-s-gdp-contracted-at-2-9-pace-in-first-quarter-1403699600?mod=trending_now_4&articleIndex=3

What recovery? When the economy stays in the basement for five years you are looking at an on-going stagnation based on too much government interference with growth, the decline of the nation’s middle class, the lack of new start-up businesses, and the reluctance or inability of consumers to spend money, if they have any to spend.

In May, writing on his blog, Economic Collapse, Michael Synder pointed to “27 Hugh Red Flags for the U.S. Economy” noting, for example, that according to government numbers, “everyone is unemployed in 20 percent of all American families.” The other indicators include:http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/27-huge-red-flags-for-the-u-s-economy



Sales for construction equipment were down 13% in April and have been down for 17 months in a row.
During the first quarter of 2014, profits at the office supplies giant, Staples, fell by 43.5%
Foot traffic at Wal-Mart stores fell by 1.4% during the first quarter of 2014.
It is being projected that Sears will soon close hundreds more stores and may go out of business altogether.
Existing home sales have fallen for seven of the last eight months and seem to repeating a pattern witnessed back in 2007 prior to the last financial crash.
The home ownership rate in the U.S. has dropped to the lowest level in 19 years.
You do not have to be an economist to understand that President Obama’s economic policies are flat-out failures that include a “stimulus” that wasted billions of taxpayer dollars without stimulating the economy, nor that having a $17 trillion debt means anything other than a nation teetering on a massive economic collapse.

In May, CNSnews reported that “A record 92,594,000 Americans were not in the labor force in April as the labor force participation rate matched a 36-year low of 62.8 percent, according to data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.”http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/92594000-americans-not-labor-force-hits-all-time-record-participation

This is not my definition of a “recession” although we are told that it ended in 2009. This is a “depression” for millions of Americans. The labor force participation rate has gone from 63.5% to 63.3%, the lowest since 1979, but the Obama administration keeps telling us that it is “improving.”

Consumer spending is down. Exports are down. Employment is barely increasing. The only thing that is up is inflation.

Edward C. Prescott, a 2004 Nobel Laureate in Economics and Lee E. Ohanian, a professor of economics UCLA, writing in the June 26 edition of The Wall Street Journal, noted that the declining GDP rate was “the worst productivity statistic since 1990. And productivity since 2005 has declined by more than 8% relative to its long-run trend. This means that business output is nearly $1 trillion less today than what it would be had productivity continued to grow at its average rate of about 2.5% per year.”

“Lagging productivity growth is an enormous problem because virtually all of the increase in Americans’ standard of living is made possible by rising worker productivity.”

The Obama administration would have you believe that the economic decline in the first quarter was due to a harsh winter. They will be blaming it on a hot summer come autumn.

This is an administration whose main theme these days is the threat of “climate change”, but it has nothing to do with the climate and everything to do with vast government spending and borrowing, an explosion of regulations that have slowed or stopped the creation of new businesses, a “war on coal” that is forcing a decline in the production of electricity, and a widespread perception that the President is the worst to have held office since the nation began.

There is no recovery. There is a return to the factors that led to the 2008 financial crisis. Government entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that bought up all the sub-prime mortgage loans and packaged them as assets are still in business. Credit card companies are reaching out to sub-prime users, signing them up. Nobody seems to learn anything from the past, even if it is the recent past.

If the control of the U.S. Senate cannot be wrested away from a Democratic Party led by Harry Reid and a GOP increase in the U.S. House that was led by Nancy Pelosi until the 2010 elections cannot be achieved in the forthcoming November elections, the President’s continued attack on the economy—which includes a massive increase in illegal immigration—the nation’s economy will remain tenuous.

By Alan Caruba

Cody Wilson: "Authority Isn't To Be Blindly Trusted At All Costs Universally!"

Cody Wilson: "Authority Isn't To Be Blindly Trusted At All Costs Universally!"

The Solution to Everything: Slavery to the State

The Solution to Everything: Slavery to the State


Let me clarify that. Slavery to the corporate State. Government and mega-corporations work hand in hand.

The incurably naïve believe the State is beneficent. The government is kind. The government knows what to do. The government will solve society’s ills if we let it.

Of course, the government, in the form of NSA, is spying on everybody all the time—but you see, that’s not really the government. It’s a rogue element.

Sure it is. And rainbows will appear at any moment and the people of Earth will experience a galactic frequency that eradicates all impulses toward conflict.

To put it another way, people see what they want to see.

“Ahem, when I say ‘government,’ I don’t mean the CIA or the Pentagon or the FDA or the President’s national security team, or fraudulent federal scientists, or the whole lot of venal people in Congress, or corrupt prosecutors and judges or invasive bureaucrats or paper-pushing money-sucking desk jockeys.”

Of course not. Government is an idea in the mind of God.

And when you think about it, the NSA watches over us to make sure we stay on the path of righteousness. It’s absurd to be suspicious of the State. The authors of the Constitution, who tried to limit central authority, were a bunch of paranoids.

We need more government, not less.


Here are quotes from George Orwell. In case there is any doubt, he is describing aspects of the State:

“As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me. They do not feel any enmity against me as an individual, nor I against them. They are ‘only doing their duty’, as the saying goes. Most of them, I have no doubt, are kind-hearted law-abiding men who would never dream of committing murder in private life.” (The Lion and the Unicorn, 1941.)

“Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage — torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians — which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘our’ side.” (Notes on Nationalism, 1945.)

“A totalitarian state is in effect a theocracy, and its ruling caste, in order to keep its position, has to be thought of as infallible. But since, in practice, no one is infallible, it is frequently necessary to rearrange past events in order to show that this or that mistake was not made, or that this or that imaginary triumph actually happened. Then, again, every major change in policy demands a corresponding change of doctrine and a revaluation of prominent historical figures.” (The Prevention of Literature, 1946)

“But actually, he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty’s figures, it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connexion with anything in the real world, not even the kind of connexion that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version.” (1984, chapter 4.)

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.” (1984, chapter 5.)

But you see, these are all old Orwell remarks. Now we have a different kind of State. It’s…government. Yes. The State isn’t government. Aha. The State exists in places other than America. In America, we have government. Yes, that’s right. Two different animals. One is repressive, and the other is earnest. (More rainbows for the sentimentalists.)

Here are quotes about the State from Aldous Huxley’s 1932 novel, Brave New World:

“Till at last the child’s mind is these suggestions, and the sum of the suggestions is the child’s mind. And not the child’s mind only. The adult’s mind too—all his life long. The mind that judges and desires and decides—made up of these suggestions. But all these suggestions are our suggestions!” (Chapter 2.)

“Every one belongs to every one else.” (Chapter 3.)

“Mother, monogamy, romance. High spurts the fountain; fierce and foamy the wild jet. The urge has but a single outlet. My love, my baby. No wonder these poor pre-moderns were mad and wicked and miserable.” (Chapter 3.)

“Everyone works for every one else.” (Chapter 5.)

“Don’t you wish you were free, Lenina?”
“I don’t know what you mean. I am free. Free to have the most wonderful time. Everybody’s happy nowadays.”
He laughed, “Yes, ‘Everybody’s happy nowadays.’ We begin giving the children that at five. But wouldn’t you like to be free to be happy in some other way, Lenina? In your own way, for example; not in everybody else’s way.”
“I don’t know what you mean,” she repeated. (Chapter 6.)

But again, Huxley’s remarks are about the aspirations and victories of the State, which doesn’t exist in America. Never has.

In America, we have a fluid and flexible government, which tries to respond to the people’s needs. Of course. Just ask Elizabeth Warren or Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, George W Bush, or the ghost of Richard Nixon. Ask the heads of Goldman Sachs, Monsanto, Dow, DuPont. Google, Facebook, Microsoft.

There are “repressive States” in Europe, Asia, and Africa, but that is a foreign phenomenon.

Rebelling against the State? Not here. Here we merge with the government and help it and encourage it. Besides, we’ve recently learned—and this is a revelation—that rebelling is very likely a terrorist act. Well, that settles that.

We’re all in this together. Even if the “we” and the “this” and the “together” seem to require some further clarification, rest assured it will be forthcoming. At the right time.

The government understands time (and also space). It arranges them. Someone has to.

The government is not the State, the government is not the State.

Hillary: Congenital Liar, or Innocent Victim of Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?

When it comes to the raw truth, Hillary Clinton appears to be uniquely unqualified to critique anyone's "reliability as a source of information!"

Hillary: Congenital Liar, or Innocent Victim of Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?




From the archives of days long since ended when free speech was still practiced openly, the late columnist William Safire started a political fire storm by accusing Hillary Clinton, at the time functioning as the self-anointed co-president of the United States, of being a “congenital liar.”



As expected, Safire’s column did not set particularly well with then-President Bill Clinton, whom threatened to punch Safire on the nose, were if not for the fact that he (Bill Clinton, AKA Slick Willie) was the elected half of the manacled duo.

Other Clintonistas rushed to Hillary’s defense by objecting to the word “congenital,” which means inherited or a medical condition existing at birth. Egged on by Hillary herself, defenders pointed out that Hillary’s estrangement from truth did not commence until after she was introduced to, and paired with, Slick Willie.

Slick Willie called that a “damnable lie” and threatened to punch Hillary on the nose, were it not for the fact that it was Easter Sunday and he had an urgent appointment in the Oral Office with a chubby intern named Monica Lewinsky.

This rancid page from American history springs up because Hillary Clinton is now seen as a formidable candidate for the US presidency in 2016.



With Hillary’s sights set so high, it is crucial that she be fully vetted, a function normally carried out by the mainstream media, except when the candidate is a radical leftist Democrat and personal favorite of biased reporters and editors.

As was the case of Barack Obama and just about everyone running with a D affixed to his or her name.

But more about Hillary.

When it comes to veracity, or lack thereof, we must not forget that, in the brutal street war waged for the Democrat presidential nomination in 2008, Hillary once boasted that she was made battle tough and ready for any 3 am call on the Red Phone—- as a result of ducking sniper fire while on a mission in Bosnia for hubby President Clinton.

Unfortunately for the “inevitability queen,” a CBS reporter, who had accompanied Hillary on her Bosnia trip in 1996, unearthed a clip of video that totally debunked her “dodging sniper fire” campaign rhetoric.

As reported:

“As has now been conclusively established by video film and news photographs, Hillary Clinton did NOT come under sniper fire in Bosnia in March 1996 when she made a morale-boosting visit to U.S. troops enforcing the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement. But she is taking plenty of bullets for her over-dramatic accounts of the trip, and acknowledged on Monday that she had made a “misstatement.” She said it should be treated as a “minor blip.”

From that same report, this, in part:

“U.S. Air Force journalist Don Jackson was standing on the back of a flatbed pick-up truck filming the event when Clinton’s plane touched down. Here is his account:

Mrs. Clinton arrived to a flight line full of well-wishers, both military and civilian, accompanied by her staff as well as comedian Sinbad and singer Sheryl Crow who were there to entertain troops.

To set the record straight, there was no enemy fire, and no imminent danger. If there had been any danger, “well-wishers” would not have been allowed on the tarmac, much less allowing me to stand above everyone else on the back of a truck.

And Sinbad and Sheryl Crow would’ve been running for their lives instead of taking the time to be interviewed by yours truly, on the tarmac. Mrs. Clinton’s [claim] is a lie, plain and simple.”

Bottom line: When it comes to the raw truth, Hillary Clinton appears to be uniquely unqualified to critique anyone’s “reliability as a source of information!”

In other words, as William Safire stated so succinctly and flawlessly, Hillary is a “Congenital Liar”.

By John Lillpop

Didn't Sign up For This!

Didn't Sign up For This!


It is no secret that I spent twenty years in the U.S. Army. However the World has changed, and unfortunately, not for the better. At the time I enlisted, the Soviet Union was the biggest World threat, and had been so since my birth in 1950. When I manned the radars in the fire control section of the Nike-Hercules missile system (designed to protect the U.S. and our overseas allies from a Soviet bomber attack), I felt proud to be a part of using these nuclear devices to protect my country. It was a different era and I had a different mindset.

Today I am looking at the World that my service, along with millions of other people helped to create. The least I can say is that I am aghast at what we have helped to create and I apologize for my part in what we have succeeded in achieving; a near fascist nation with the military power to subjugate every nation on the planet. This is what we have achieved, and the American people need to understand the implications of this. The fact is that the people in power in this country are trying to use this military power, along with our economic power to create World hegemony, another way to say that they want to conquer the World.

This is what we accused the Soviet Union of trying to do during the Cold War. This was the reason millions of Americans signed up to go to war and to work in the defense industries and allow our tax dollars to go toward bigger and better armaments to defend the "Free World" from Russian and Chinese Communism instead of rebuilding out infrastructure and trying to devise ways to develop green energy to get off the fossil fuels that are killing this planet. This was also the reason we neglected to properly fund medical research that could have culminated in destroying diseases that are still rampant around the World. The fear of Communism also took funds away from the American people that had contributed their tax dollars and now find themselves worse off than their parents and under trillions of dollars in national debt in order to fund a military that uses an amazing 54% of our discretionary national budget.

We have seen our political system being used to a degree never seen in our history by the wealthiest amongst us in order to receive favors from Congress and the Executive branch. We have allowed these bought politicians to allow for foreign manufacturing of "American" products to allow our industrialists to reap bigger profits for themselves and their shareholders through "Free Trade" agreements that sold off American manufacturing to other nations. We hear talk of a "World Economy" that is in essence a way to skim the profits from manufacturing the products in the World to the people that own the companies that produce these products and those that fund their International manufacturing adventures (Wall Street).

We are told that America is the richest nation on Earth. I have no doubt that this is true, but I can see that this nations riches are not being dispersed to the American people that fought the wars and paid their taxes to create the monster of a global economy. Instead, the money is being held by the richest families that run and control these huge American assets and to those shareholders wealthy enough to buy stock in these companies that manufacture globally instead of giving manufacturing jobs to the American people that allowed them to do this through a system of half-truths and lies foisted upon them by every party in power after the Kennedy era.

We have seen the creation of institutions such as The World Bank and The International Monetary Fund that are run by the same bankers that have run the Western System of banking for well over a hundred years. The same six families that have control over much of this banking system have used their interests to create World Wars and supported both sides of these wars at times to create huge fortunes that added to their coffers. Now they are humankinds greatest predators. They set the stage for nations to wage economic wars against each other and when some nations economies falter, they rush in to render huge loans to "save" these nations.

Meanwhile, as with most things that are too good to be true, they also dictate how these funds (which amount to billions of dollars) are to be used. They make sure that debtor nations only use the borrowed money to buy equipment and to use contractors from an approved list that they supply, adding to the profits of their subsidiaries. The proceeds of the money borrowed doesn't usually flow back into the economies that borrowed this money and there isn't enough economic expansion to pay back the banks that made these loans. Now the real fun begins. The desperate nations that are in debt to the World Bank and the IMF now must sell off its assets such infrastructure (transportation facilities, hospitals, airlines) to internal conglomerates. They also sell mining rights and fisheries and other national resources to international interests to pay their bills, in other words, these nations are raped by the bankers.

This brings us to this "special relationship" we have with the United Kingdom. It seems that most of these bankers come from the U.S. and the UK. After 150 years of trying to derail the United States in almost every endeavor we undertook, we now are the World's greatest allies. We forget that it was the threat of war with the UK and France from Russia that stopped those nations from recognizing the Confederate States of America that almost started a first World war. The Russians even sent two fleets to the United States and put one in San Francisco and one in New York Harbor. That part of history has been scrubbed out of history since the cold war by American revisionists.

While many allied soldiers died during World War II, it was the Russians that paid the price in blood. Over twenty million Russians died fighting and having their citizens killed by the Nazi's. It wasn't just German Nazi's that did the killing however, it was Hungarian, Romanian, Italian and yes Ukrainian Nazi's. It was no surprise to FDR when Russia demanded control of Eastern Europe. It was completely understandable to anyone that understood the horror that they had gone through. Still, the American propaganda machine after FDR's death hyped the take-over of Eastern Europe as nothing but a Communist plot, downplaying the carnage that most of these nations had brought against the Soviet Union. Still, in the Khrushchev Era (Khrushchev, by the way was Ukrainian), The Ukraine was given Russian provinces in order to temper the nation and remove the threat of unrest. One of those provinces was Crimea.

Russian troops fought Ukrainian fascists well after the official end of World War II. It was a few years before the Ukraine was at peace. Many Ukrainians fled to the US and Canada to escape the USSR and were greeted with open arms. Unfortunately, many of these emigrants escaping communism were hard core Nazi's. Huge communities in Canada and the U.S. of Ukrainians popped up, sending money back to their homeland and keeping their traditions including National Socialism. When the "Orange Revolution" happened (with CIA help) they sent money and materials. When the Orange Revolution fell apart, they waited until another period of unrest.

They got it when the EU (UK, Germany and others) made overtures to Ukraine. The Western part of the nation (including Galicia with the largest concentration of Nazi's in their population) was ecstatic. Many Western Ukrainians despised Russia. They were also tempted by the richness of the West and the promise of economic help by the IMF and the World Bank, not understanding the ramifications of taking their "help". Huge demonstrations erupted in Kiev helped in part by 5 Billion U.S. taxpayer Dollars admitted by Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. Now the demonstrations got ugly. Snipers were killing not only the police, but protestors. It was recently reveled that the shots were coming from a building that the protestors occupied. It has been determined by some as an attempt by the protestors to create a revulsion towards the democratically elected government.

It apparently worked. With mounting pressure from the protestors and under EU pressure he signed a deal to transfer powers to parliament and hold early elections. But within hours the President had fled the capital and his administration had crumbled. He then went to Russia with his family and to safety. Putin admits that Viktor Yanukovych was a horrible leader and he is politically doomed, but he still contends that he was ousted in a coup. He doesn't mention that it was a Western backed coup but look at the facts. Putin has been acting as diplomatically as he can.

Most people in the World understand that Crimea is occupied by a 95% Russian population and was ceded by Khrushchev in the 1950's. The Crimean's, seeing a chance to return to Mother Russia, immediately organized a referendum to rejoin Russia. Russia never invaded the Crimea, contrary to what the State Department, President Obama and the mainstream media tell you. Russia is allowed to have 26,000 troops in Crimea and had a 50 year lease on the port of Sevastopol, the headquarters of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. These Russian military took no part in the events in the Crimea, it was the military self-defense force of Crimea that detained Ukrainian solders at their bases.

The referendum passed with 97% of the vote and the Russian Duma passed a bill to incorporate them back into the Russian State and President Putin signed the bill. End of story. The U.S. government and U.S. media story that the Crimea was "invaded" by Russia is a propaganda event designed to mislead the American people and it is working... unfortunately. Many Americans still trust in the mainstream media to tell them the truth, it doesn't. The corporate media regurgitates exactly what the government wants them to say. People like Scott Pelley on CBS is nothing but a lackey that spews out American State Department information designed to deceive the American public.

This time, American propaganda has overstepped its ability to deceive many Americans. There are U.S. citizens that are rethinking what the government is telling them. I credit Edward Snowden for telling us the truth about the mass surveillance on American citizens for raising the consciousness of the American public. I also credit President Obama for informing us on how the American government stoops to lies and deception by letting him tell us outright lies and distortions about the events in the Ukraine and the Crimea. Congressman Alan Grayson just stated about the events in the Crimea;

“Why are we pretending otherwise? Why are we speaking about naked aggression, why are we speaking about stealing Crimea, why are we speaking about bullying, or the new Soviet Union, or thuggery, or audacious power-grabbing, or bully bear Putin, or Cold War two?”
Our nation wants the Ukraine to loot the natural resources of that country and to put it into NATO and use it as launching pad for missiles in order to render Russia helpless to retaliate after a U.S. first nuclear strike. This would make Russia pliant and subservient to this coalition of the U.S. and the EU.

The sad part of this story for me personally, is that I now find myself living in a country (and pardon the hackneyed phrase) that is on the wrong side of history. I admire Steven Segal (who I don't like as an actor) for going to Russia and siding with President Putin. If I had the resources I might also move to Russia. I find myself living in a country that fails to live up to our Constitution and treats its people, not as citizens, but as subjects. There is no real democracy in this nation and our political system is broken with no chance of repairing it. It is controlled by influential people with money to act in their interests.

Everything you hear in the Mainstream media is suspect. Everything that comes out of Congress is suspect. The President lies to his people. The government spies on us. This is something I didn't sign up for.

ISIS (DAASH) now recruiting in Palestinian camps in Lebanon--who are those guys?

ISIS (DAASH) now recruiting in Palestinian camps in Lebanon--who are those guys?


As Washington and London were affirming the past few days their intentions to continue to arm “moderate rebel factions” in Syria, Tel Aviv just announced it would like to be helpful by joining with “moderate Arab nations” to battle their mutual Muslim enemies.

Israel offered on 6/26/14 to help “moderate” Arab nations who may feel threatened by the lightning land grabbing offensive by Islamic militants in Iraq. As its foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman, an arch Zionist Islamophobe and Arabphobe, met with Secretary of State John Kerry in Paris, he reportedly talked sweet about some Arabs and told Kerry that "the extremists currently operating in Iraq and Syria will try to challenge the stability in the entire Gulf region, first of all in Kuwait." A statement from his office added that “Israel could provide effective and reliable assistance to moderate Arab states who are dealing with extremists.”

Just a few days after visiting Iraq, and being briefed on the pathetic situation, Kerry seems intrigued by the Zionist idea and noted according to a senior U.S. official, that it is "important that countries in the region (including Israel) stand together against the (ISIS) threat."

Basically “Israel wants to do what Shite Iran has started doing” he continued, which according to the New York Times is flying surveillance drones over Iraq and sending military equipment to help Baghdad fight the Sunni insurgents. Except Israel wants to arm the Sunni tribes in league with the West and the Gulf monarchies and not arm the Shia.

Israeli officials and AIPAC are arguing to Washington that Israeli interests were converging with moderate Arab nations and “both sides should be dealing with the threat of Iran, world jihad and al-Qaida, as well as the spill-over of conflicts in Syria and in Iraq to neighboring countries." The Israeli embassy issued a statement, "Today, (6/26/14) there is a basis for the creation of a new diplomatic-political structure in the Middle East." Yet another ‘New Middle East’, one wonders?

This week, (6/22/14) on NBC’s Meet the Press, Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu restated the half-century old Zionist project and continuing to permanently divide and control the Middle East. On the subject of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (DAASH) Netanyahu expressed the intention of his regime to continue to promote internal strife in Israel’s neighboring states. “We must weaken both [Sunni and Shia Muslims],” Netanyahu said, restating his governments preferred policy to have Muslims continue fighting among themselves. “When your enemies are fighting each other, don’t strengthen either one of them, weaken both,” he told the American public.

While it would not be the first time the Zionist regime has worked with preferred members of the Arab League to advance its own interests, another strong incentive to ratchet up its “split the Arabs” policy is the popular spill-over political effects of the advancements of DAASH in Iraq and Syria. Briefly stated, Lebanon is awash with rumors about a “Sunni uprising” to regain what is viewed by some in Lebanon and the region as seeking justice for their substantial political and economic loses since the 2003 Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq.

If the Gulf Kingdoms and the West agree to share information and leverage with respect to Iraq and Syria with Netanyahu & Co., it will be with the knowledge that Israel has another motive in wanting to join the coalescing forces against ISIS (DAASH). Presumably it is also is what its Lebanon based agents are surely reporting from the Palestinian camps.

Briefly put Palestinian camps generally, and using Ein el Helwe, in Saida, Lebanon as an example, are beginning to experience what Nahr el Bared camp near Tripoli, Lebanon did in 2007. At Nahr al Bared, over a period of more than six months began to notice the arrival of ‘strangers.’ Some camp residents asked “Who are those guys”? At first the new arrivals appeared to be rather self-effacing, very polite, and seemingly deeply religious. They tended to keep to themselves and soon their families arrived. More than one Sheik in Nahr al Bared assured the camp residents that the strangers were “good Muslims” and some were even teaching lessons from the Koran at the Mosque.

Fast forward, and as one of the Nahr el Bared camp leader explained in great detail to this observer at the time, soon residents soon began to notice changes in what were in fact affiliates or members of a new group calling itself “Fatah el Islam (FEI).” For example, the Islamists began to accost women on the street demanding that they wear a full length Hijabs and to stop smoking and more generally change their ways to be “better Muslims”.

Today, FEI is relatively strong and growing, but secretively in Ein el Helwe. But they are not alone. New arrivals, plus young, unemployed, discouraged and increasingly disenchanted and angry youth are reportedly secretly holding meetings with DAASH, Al Nusra and other recruiters and they are promised immediate material benefits and soon to be granted the full right to work plus a deepening Resistance to the occupation of their country, Palestine. There are takers naturally, but numbers so far are difficult to learn. Militias are growing in the camps but it’s difficult to calculate just how fast because camp residents know of many outside intelligence agents living among them, ranging from Lebanese Internal Security to Zionist agents and many others, so keeping their work secret is most essential.

According to analysts in Lebanon, and a recent report in Now Lebanon, the small cells based in rural northern Lebanon, the eastern Bekaa, and the Palestinian camps, where law enforcement remains very difficult are expanding due to the ISIS’ surge in Iraq and its apparent success in securing popular support from Sunni tribes and former Baathist groups. Fears continue to spread that the Sunni-Shiite sectarian struggle will explode in Lebanon as well.

But the threat does not come only from outside Lebanon’s borders, according to a security source in Ain al-Helweh Palestinian refugee camp. The source reported that he has been receiving information recently about Jihadist factions mobilizing in several areas of Lebanon, including Palestinian refugee camps with both DAASH (ISIS) and al Nusra Front setting up training camps. According to one source, Jihadists reportedly are not only mobilizing inside the Palestinian camps: it is happening across Lebanon, especially after the Qalamoun second battle. Fanatic Muslims and takfiris are spreading very fast. “What is happening in Iraq and Qalamoun shows that the situation will soon be very dangerous in the region, including Lebanon. It will all become a jihad battlefield,” the source said.

Two active and knowledgeable Palestinians from Ein el Helwe camp explained to this observer this week as they introduced me to the leader of Fatah el Islam, “Of course all the camps are affected just like everyone else around here by what has been happening in Iraq and Syria. Palestinians always want to avoid local fights but we always seem to be pulled in. Look what happened in the Lebanese civil war. Our leadership tried everything it could do stay out of the sectarian fight but we were pulled in and paid a huge price.

As for the attitude of the general camp population in Lebanon, a recent unscientific poll found that more than 96% of camp residents in Lebanon do not want to stop the Resistance but rather to reclaim all their stolen land. This survey results compares remarkably closely to a June 15-17 poll commissioned by the Zionist Washington Institute. That poll comprised face-to-face interviews with a standard random geographic probability sample of 1,200 adult Palestinians, yielding results with a 3% statistical margin of error. Only 22% of Gazans would opt to give up the ‘by whatever means necessary’ Resistance “to end the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza to achieve a two-state solution." Even fewer, pick a "one-state solution," in which "Arabs and Jews having equal rights in one country, but want their country returned from the river to the sea." The “two-state solution” is the preferred option of a mere 9% in the West Bank and 10% in Gaza. Nearly two-thirds of the Palestinians in the same Zionist poll said "resistance should continue until all of historic Palestine is liberated."

Both the Zionist poll and the informal one done in Palestinian camps in Lebanon find board support for popular resistance against the Zionist occupation seen as having a positive impact by most respondents in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon. These activities include stepped up demonstrations, building more support for the BDS campaign, strikes, marches, and mass refusals to cooperate, though various acts of Resistance to confront the Zionist occupiers.

Increased Resistance is seen as having a positive impact by most respondents in both territories: 62% in the West Bank, 73% in Gaza and close to 90% in Ein el Helwe.

Meanwhile, a twitter account with 21,000 followers, one of many, and this one dubbed the "League of Supporters", called this week for DAASH sympathizers to post messages warning America not to carry out airstrikes against DAASH. Rather they urged their supporters to prepare to follow them and to confront the Zionists across Palestine.

In summation, the Zionist regime is very aware that the camps are likely to explode for a number of reasons not least of which the lack of civil rights including Palestinians is being banned from most jobs and the rising anger in and among the camps. It is also the case that the Zionists realize that the future looks bleak for its continuing occupation of Palestine internationally and helping stamp our extremist Jihadists, even by working with Arab regimes, and to weaken Iran in the process, it what it must do.

As Canadian freelance writer and journalist Brandon Martinez reminds us: “Fragmenting, weakening and Balkanizing the Middle East has been part and parcel of the Zionist impulse from the very beginnings of the Jewish state. Israeli strategist Oded Yinon candidly outlined this imperialist line of thought in his 1982 paper “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s.” A strong, unified Iraq is Israel’s primary military concern, Yinon stressed” Yinon went on to push for the territorial dissection of Iraq into three state-lets along ethnic and confessional lines. And we may well witness these developments in Iraq. He promoted much the same scenario for Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Iran and other Arab/Muslim states bordering the Zionist colony.

Martinez further observes, “The Zionists have used deception, subterfuge and cunning to con the world into entering conflicts and conflagrations that have expedited their ominous aims. But Israel’s insatiable avarice for more land and resources will eventually be its downfall, just as every empire in history has sooner or later collapsed under its own weight.”

Reminding this observer of a quote a valued friend from New Mexico recently sent to me:

“Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future, too” (Marcus Aurelius).

-###-

THE PALESTINE CIVIL RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
Beirut and Washington, DC
"Legislate in 2014! Demand that Lebanon's Confessions grant Palestinian Refugees internationally mandated civil rights: the right to work, to own a home, and to repair camp shelters!

THE SABRA-SHATILA SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM (SSSP-lb.com)
Beirut and International
“Education: Is the essential pillar of Palestinian Resistance"
Nelson Mandala 7/2011
Franklin P. Lamb, JD, LLM,PhD
Legal Adviser, The Sabra-Shatila Scholarship Program, Shatila Camp (SSSP-lb.com)
Board Member, The Palestine Civil Rights Campaign, Beirut-Washington DC

Who are the 'moderate' rebels President Obama wants to train and arm?

Who are the 'moderate' rebels President Obama wants to train and arm?


Well, God bless Barack Obama – he’s found some “moderate” rebels in Syria. Enough to supply them with weapons and training worth $500m. Congress wants to arm these brave freedom fighters, you see. And Obama, having sent his 300 elite Spartan lads to Iraq to help Nouri al-Maliki fight the rebels there, needs to send help to the rebels in Syria – even though most of them are on the side of the rebels in Iraq whom Obama wants Maliki to defeat.

Confusing? You bet. So first steps first. Who are the “moderate” rebels whom Obama wants to train and arm? He doesn’t name them – and he can’t, because the original “moderates” whom America swore to arm (with the help of the CIA, the Brits, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey) were the so-called “Free Syrian Army”, mostly composed of deserters from Assad’s government forces. But the FSA – briefly beloved of John McCain until he discovered a pro-al-Qa’ida fighter sharing a photo-op with him in northern Syria – has decomposed.
Its men have gone home, switched to the bearded Islamists of the Nusrah or Isis – or Isil if we heed the latest acronym – or re-deserted to the government army and taken up arms for Assad again. Some freedom fighters! They weren’t given enough weapons, we are told. Now they’ll get more. And no doubt sell them – as they did the last lot. For it is a sad fact of war that whenever a gun crosses a border, it represents not loyalty but cash.

Give an FSA man – if you can find one – an anti-aircraft missile and it will be sold to the highest bidder. In all the civil wars I’ve covered, I’ve never seen a weapon in the hands of a militia which hasn’t bought it from someone else. In a humiliating interview on Channel 4, our own Defence Secretary admitted that weapons given to Syrian rebels had fallen into the hands of the bad guys. How do you monitor all the guys whom you give a gun to? Send them off with a personal drone to make sure they don’t sell it?

Besides, how do you actually find a “moderate” these days in Syria’s war? The Islamist rebels fight to the death. No “moderates” they. And – accursed facts now intervene – these are the very same Islamist rebels now threatening the Iraqi state. And just to make things even more confusing, Maliki has just been thanking Assad’s boys for air-raiding his own rebel enemies on the Iraqi-Syrian border on the grounds that Syria and Iraq are “friends”.

So now to our own real friend, the Department of Home Truths. What’s left of the FSA has been fighting the Islamist Isis-Isil forces. So have the Kurdish militias in northern Syria. So have a few village militias. And the Syrians have a suspicion that this is Obama’s half-baked plan: to arm the anti-Islamist Syrian rebels to fight the pro-al-Qa’ida rebels and thus – indirectly – keep both the Assad and Maliki regimes in power.

The problem is that Obama must do this without revealing that the Syrian-Iraqi battle against Sunni Wahabis is one and the same war, that Assad’s Syrian army – using Russian jets – is struggling against exactly the same enemy as Maliki’s Iraqi army, also soon to be augmented (if we are to believe Maliki’s blather to the BBC Arabic Service) with Russian jets. In other words, Assad not only has the public support of Moscow; he has the private support of Washington (and therefore, of course, of Israel).

Why else would the White House say that the money for Syrian “moderates” would help “counter terrorist threats” – “terrorist” being Assad’s description of his enemies. But of course, Obama must keep calling Assad a “brutal dictator”. Difficult to explain all this on Fox News, of course. So just keep repeating the word “moderate”. Over and over again.

The War on Humans

The War on Humans




As hard as it is to believe, there is a segment of society, especially in developed Western countries, that considers the human race to essentially be a parasite.

This 31-minute documentary covers what can fairly be characterized as the anti-human movement and the various ways it is rearing its ugly head around the world.

Some of the examples shown in this documentary are downright absurd. Plant rights? Really? I was hoping they accidentally used an article from The Onion, but no, the Swiss government actually does recognize “plant dignity.”

From the YouTube description:

Are humans the enemy? Should pigs and peas have constitutional rights? The War on Humans is a 31-minute documentary that critiques growing efforts to disparage the value of humans in the name of saving the planet. The documentary investigates the views of anti-human activists who want to grant legal rights to animals, plants, and “Mother Earth,” and who want to reduce the human population by up to 90%. The video features Discovery Institute Senior Fellow Wesley J. Smith, author of a companion e-book with the same title.

What do you think? Are humans really the enemies of the planet? Should the human population really be reduced by up to 90% in the name of environmentalism? Let us know in the comments.


Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered In US War And Occupation Of Iraq "1,455,590"

 
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In U.S. War And Occupation Of Iraq 4,801

Number Of International Occupation Force Troops Slaughtered In Afghanistan : 3,454

Cost of War in Iraq &; Afghanistan
$1,545,277,754,020


So, Your Spiritual Awakening Cost You Some Friends

So, Your Spiritual Awakening Cost You Some Friends



Have you noticed a change in your relationships with other people lately? Is it sometimes difficult or awkward to talk to others about spiritual topics? Do you, at times, feel alone in your beliefs? Have you lost contact with any long time friends recently? You are not alone!

I’m fortunate to have a lot of Facebook friends who post similar types of links. Too many times, I see a lot of people who talk the talk but are afraid to walk the walk, due to being ridiculed for their thoughts and posts (GROUP-THINK). I've lost some longtime friends because of this but have made many, many new ones. Once the ego is released, you no longer worry about conformity and peer pressure.

Group-think is a psychological phenomenon that structures various belief systems within a group of people while discouraging individual creativity and independent thinking. Even within a group of individuals who are spiritually awakened, you will find groupthink.

If you look at the recorded history of mankind, you’ll find that this history is merely someone’s interpretation of a landmark event or evolutionary process, backed by eyewitness testimonial, scientific data, video or faith. The actual truth may be hidden or distorted for many reasons, but mostly for control and power. Look no further than the origins of mankind and you’ll find a plethora of creation myths from all cultures with varying dates of our existence. Who’s right?http://www.in5d.com/20-history-questions-they-refuse-to-answer-in-school.html

http://www.in5d.com/everything-weve-been-taught-about-earth-origins-is-a-lie.html

Can you talk to your friends about the universe? Do they know what a stargate or chakra is? Are they willing to talk about ascension or spiritual enlightenment?http://www.in5d.com/nassim-haramein-stargate.html

http://www.in5d.com/earth-chakras-and-vortices.html

http://www.in5d.com/how-to-ascend-ascension-101-part-1.html

http://www.in5d.com/3-stages-of-enlightenment.html

When you talk to people about the creation myth, they tend to remain inside the box with a belief system that supports religion’s story of creation, which dates mankind back to 4,000 B.C. If you raise questions about our true origins, it tends to separate people and relationships between those who think outside the box versus those who think inside the box. When these topics arise within relationships, they often create dissention. It’s hard for anyone to admit they've been deceived for so long and even more difficult to admit they were possibly wrong in their assumptions.
http://www.in5d.com/when-spiritual-awakening-begins.html

http://www.in5d.com/who-created-god-if-god-created-everything.html

This is a prime example of how our educational systems keep us locked inside the box without questioning anything about what we've been taught.

Those who remain inside the box are afraid of what others might think if they venture outside the box, so they remain complacent and subservient while conforming to what society dictates rather than relying on their own discernment and judgment. People could live their entire lives pretending to be what society expects them to be and not even know it!

From an ego perspective, our thoughts are basically cultivated by what we've learned from our family, friends, educational systems and religious beliefs, but what have we truly been taught? What can we say about anything that wasn't regurgitated to us by someone else?

As evidenced by past life regressions, our previous lives and soul history remain dormant in our cellular DNA and can be recalled through our subconscious minds through hypnotherapy. Within your cellular DNA, you actually remember being back with the Source along with all of the things you wanted to accomplish during this incarnation, as well as all of the challenges you wanted to overcome and all of the people who would lead you to where you are. This includes the people that have come and gone from our lives.
http://www.in5d.com/free-past-life-regression-self-hypnosis-mp3.html

http://www.in5d.com/dna-can-be-influenced-and-reprogrammed-by-words-and-frequencies.html

Sometimes, we project to be someone that we expect others to see in us. In psychology, this is referred to as the shadow self, where we project an identity that conforms to how other people may perceive us versus being true to who we really are. Some people may find out that they never knew who they were because they lived their lives through the expectations of how others will perceive them.

Those who have begun their spiritual journeys may also be confronting these issues, which initially creates cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance occurs when you get an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding conflicting ideas simultaneously. This is the transition period that many of us have gone through, where our beliefs have changed, yet we’re unsure about relating these new ideas to our friends and family, due to fear or rejection.http://www.in5d.com/we-are-spiritual-beings-on-a-human-journey.html

As our spiritual journeys continue, we become more comfortable within our own beliefs and less concerned about how our friends and family view this awakening. This is when the ego becomes separated from the self and fear is dissolved by love. At this juncture, we begin to talk to acquaintances, as well as friends and family, about spiritual and metaphysical topics, with less regard about what they might think of us or how we may be perceived by others.http://www.in5d.com/spiritual-awakening-quiz.html

http://www.in5d.com/twin-flames-origin-purpose-and-relationships.html

In time, spirituality will be the predominant frame of mind and it’s likely that those who have strayed from us will be the first in line to ask for help in adjusting to the new paradigm.

And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. — Friedrich Nietzsche

Remember this: You are not alone! Those who truly love you will stand by you, no matter what. Those people who are no longer part of our lives have already played their role in helping us find out who we truly are. Sometimes, it takes polarity to be able to differentiate who we are and where we’re going. This is where the unawakened help immensely, by providing that contrast which allows us to see the differences.
http://www.in5d.com/polarity.html

Envision each awakened person across the planet holding a candle. While your individual candle may not seem like a lot of light, it greatly contributes to making the world FULL of light and keeps us connected, no matter how far apart we may be. While it may be painful to lose some dear friends, think about what they have brought to your life and why.
http://www.in5d.com/benefits-of-candle-gazing-trataka.html

Chances are, you’ll end a few old relationships with people who were, at one time, very close to you, only to create new relationships with like-minded people. Forgive yourself, as well as your friends, if you feel badly about this. They came into your life for a reason a season or a lifetime:

Reason, Season, or Lifetime

People come into your life for a reason, a season or a lifetime. When you figure out which one it is, you will know what to do for each person.

When someone is in your life for a REASON, it is usually to meet a need you have expressed. They have come to assist you through a difficulty; to provide you with guidance and support; to aid you physically, emotionally or spiritually. They may seem like a godsend, and they are. They are there for the reason you need them to be.

Then, without any wrongdoing on your part or at an inconvenient time, this person will say or do something to bring the relationship to an end. Sometimes they die. Sometimes they walk away. Sometimes they act up and force you to take a stand. What we must realize is that our need has been met, our desire fulfilled; their work is done. The prayer you sent up has been answered and now it is time to move on.

Some people come into your life for a SEASON, because your turn has come to share, grow or learn. They bring you an experience of peace or make you laugh. They may teach you something you have never done. They usually give you an unbelievable amount of joy. Believe it. It is real. But only for a season.

LIFETIME relationships teach you lifetime lessons; things you must build upon in order to have a solid emotional foundation. Your job is to accept the lesson, love the person, and put what you have learned to use in all other relationships and areas of your life. It is said that love is blind but friendship is clairvoyant.

Gregg Prescott,

Saturday, June 28, 2014

US Military Personnel forced to Submit to the Sharia during Ramadan


US Military Personnel forced to Submit to the Sharia during Ramadan




Editors Note:    I read the original notice I got about this and thought it was wrong.  Upon researching it I found it was correct!  I am amazed.  This is what the Obama administration and the US military are obsessed with as armies of jihad tear through the Middle East, murdering, plundering, raping and mutilating??  Our military even have to wear clothing considered decent by these medeival, barbaric muslims and greet them in a certain way?? What is even worse it the propaganda even quotes a US soldier, a Petty Officer 1st Class James Ramirez as saying, and I quote from the article here:     “It actually made me want to do a lot more research into the religion.”  Religion???  No folks, Islam is not a religion.  It is a cesspool of filthy, degrading, inhumans and is a cult where the so called God they worship is a sick paedophile (Muhommad). They are intollerant of all who are not Muslim and their aim is world domination and the implementation of Sharia Law.  God help you if you are gay!!  They have no plans to integrate into any other society than their own.  Cultural Diversity, a phraze so beloved by the left, is not eben in their vocabulary.  They even have the President of the United States, a usurper of unknown lineage,  background and history, with a Muslim name (HUSSEIN)  and an upbringing in a strong Muslim country (Indonesia), supporting any Muslim aim he can, arming them with American weapons, even those groups alligned to al Qaeda who are sworn to destroy the Big Satan (America) as well as Israel.   Obama and this sick cult even were united in the plot to murder, rape and violate the ambassador in Libya and the other three American heroes murdered with him in Benghazi. America, our military are being slowly destroyed by the left wing and the Obama Administration and this is just a further nail in their coffin….Just my opinion America, Fred Brownbill.



US personnel in Bahrain prepare for Ramadan
By Hendrick Simoes
Stars and Stripes
Published: June 26, 2014 (thanks to witness)

http://madworldnews.com/us-military-forced-submit-sharia-law-ramadan/


Ali Hassan, a base cultural adviser at Naval Support Activity Bahrain, briefs about 150 U.S. personnel about Islam, the Islamic lunar calender, and about customs and traditions during Ramadan, Tuesday.

MANAMA, Bahrain — U.S. personnel accustomed to drinking their coffee on the drive to work will have to put that habit on hold for about a month. It’s one of a few lifestyle changes Americans will have to make during the holy month of Ramadan.

Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. Officials expect Ramadan to begin at sunrise on Saturday, depending on when the new moon is sighted. The holy month lasts for approximately 30 days — until about July 28. For Muslims around the world, Ramadan is a month of fasting and devotion to God. Most Muslims fast from dawn to sunset, when families gather for Iftar — the meal that breaks the fast.

For the 8,200 U.S. personnel living here, and those serving throughout the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility — including service members, civilian personnel, contractors and family members — the month may require changing some daily routines.

Businesses and government offices will reduce hours and most restaurants will be closed during daylight hours.

While not required to fast during Ramadan, in Bahrain, Americans can be fined or detained by local authorities for eating, drinking or smoking in public when off-base during daylight hours.

Navy officials are requiring U.S. personnel to dress more conservatively off-base during Ramadan. Although not a requirement by Bahraini authorities, the Navy is demanding that men wear long-sleeved shirts and women wear sleeved blouses that cover their elbows. Also, men must wear long trousers, and women should wear pants or skirts that cover the knees.

Base cultural advisers have spent the last few weeks conducting Ramadan briefs to educate Americans about the holy month. Ali Hassan briefed about 150 personnel Tuesday about Islam, the lunar calendar and customs and traditions during Ramadan.

It actually made me want to do a lot more research into the religion, said Petty Officer 1st Class James Ramirez. He said the additional requirements during the month aren't a big deal to him. For such a small period of time, it’s a small sacrifice, he said.

Other service members echoed that sentiment.

Hassan encouraged personnel to experience Iftar in a Ramadan tent, many of which are set up at various locations around Bahrain during the holy month and welcome non-Muslims.

“Make it a point to visit these tents while you’re here. You don’t know if you’ll ever come back to Bahrain in the future,” Hassan said during the brief.

While the tents offer a more traditional atmosphere, many restaurants put aside their regular menus during the month and serve special Iftar dinners.

Things to Know During Ramadan:


Eating, drinking, chewing and smoking in public are civil offenses in some Islamic countries.

Men should wear long sleeves and pants. Women’s sleeves should extend below the elbow and pants or skirts should cover the knees.

Avoid critical remarks about fasting or any religious practice.

Most restaurants will be closed except those in 4- and 5-star hotels.

Businesses alter and reduce hours during the day; some open at night until early morning hours.

Arabs are good hosts and may offer you food or refreshments during daylight hours. Such offers should be declined.

All consumption of alcohol by U.S. military personnel is prohibited at any off base public venue in the U.S. Navy 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility during Ramadan.

It’s customary to say ‘Ramadan Kareem’ during Ramadan.

Source





Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books.
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/us-military-personnel-forced-submit-sharia-ramadan/#M0zuQzTTCsOouSbQ.99

Origin of the Domestic Surveillance Grid and its True Purpose

Origin of the Domestic Surveillance Grid and its True Purpose .. 


by Save America Foundation


This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it . . . I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I’m afraid that’s something I cannot allow to happen.HAL 9000



We see them everywhere, oculus infinitum, lidless and ceaselessly aware, silently watching and listening to everything and everyone. They are installed throughout our towns and cities, at traffic signals, in public transportation, on light fixtures, atop buildings and towers, at toll booths, along all major highways and byways. And let us not forget about all the personal computing, gaming, smart devices, and even smart home appliances that have built-in cameras and microphones, which from the expository investigations of the NSA’s PRISM program, proved to be two-way with software built-in to enable remote operation from third parties.

 camera

camera


High tech street lights withhomeland security applicationsare now being installed in major U.S. cities for the rollout of the IntelliStreets network control system. According to a press release put out by Amerlux, the Intellistreets smart site spying hubs that double as street lights are expected to become commonplace not only on regular streets but also for “retail malls, sports venues, on college campuses, and in new construction.”http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/amerlux-partners-with-illuminating-concepts-and-intellistreets-to-develop-smartsite-state-of-the-art-led-street-lighting-and-network-control-system-149998175.html

There is also the ECHELON program, “…a global system for the interception of private and commercial communications,” and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Minority Report-style Trapwire surveillance system, which employs facial recognition and body analysis to determine whether a person might be about to commit a terrorist or criminal act.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

The cameras are literally everywhere, and they are being used under the guise of security and law enforcement. They are the domestic audio/video capture surveillance apparatus. They are The Grid.
Information Awareness Office (IAO)

Total Information Awareness is the term used by intelligencia. The Information Awareness Office (IAO) was established by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in January 2002 to bring together several DARPA projects focused on applying surveillance and information technology to track and monitor terrorists and other asymmetric threats to U.S. national security, by achieving Total Information Awareness (TIA).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Advanced_Research_Projects_Agency



Lest we be deceived by the language, since September 11, 2001, the term terrorist” has been re-branded to refer to any organized military force that resists a despotic usurpation of power. In the United States, terrorist now refers to any domestic rightwing extremist group that has the potential to repel federal encroachment, including gun owners, returning veterans, and conservative political activists. Whoever owns the language, owns the debate.http://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf


Total Information Awareness was achieved by creating enormous computer databases to gather and store the personal information of everyone in the United States, including personal e-mails, social networks, credit card records, phone calls, medical records, and numerous other sources, without any requirement for a search warrant.

The Dark Knight hinted at the potential use for this technology with a high frequency generator.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6cv0KsTTfY



But how did all of this come to be? How did it all get started, and who was behind it?


The answer may shock some of you. Its not what you think, and its not why you thought it. I can assure you.

State Department Publication 7277, authored under United States Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, and personally delivered to the United Nations by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, mandated the implantation of the surveillance system.

JFK, you say? Yes. The same man who instituted the Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. § 2551, created to establish a world governing body for the control of armaments, and Public Law 87-297, which calls for the United States to build-down and eventually eliminate its armed forces. That’s right, the great John Kennedy, known for his pioneering efforts in civil rights and peace, was a powerful voice for the International Socialists who are attempting the dissolution and disarmament of nation states and the creation of a new international order which claims authority over the sovereign. Don’t believe it? Here is the documentation, a comprehensive list of the Kennedy Administration’s arms control and disarmament legislation, Senate filings, Executive Orders, and other papers, by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_Control_and_Disarmament_Act_of_1961

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-75/pdf/STATUTE-75-Pg631.pdf

http://www.jfklibrary.org/~/media/assets/Reference/Research%20Guides%20in%20PDF%20format/Arms%20and%20Disarmament%20RESEARCH%20GUIDE%20Updated.pdf

U.S. State Department Memorandum 7277, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World

For those who don’t know, U.S. State Department Memorandum 7277, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, spells out a plan to create a United Nations Peace Force that would enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds. It further outlines the combining of the military forces of the United States with Russia in three stages, into what will be the peace-keeping forces of the new world government under the authority of the United Nations. We are currently in stage 2 of the plan, and moving inexorably into the final stage.http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

I wrote about some of the revelations in this document back on July 17th of 2012, in my blog, The True Agenda of U.N. and State Department Gun Control, but in my research I missed the key aspect of the document regarding establishing domestic surveillance on a nationwide scale.
http://americathebattlefield.blogspot.com/2012/07/true-agenda-of-un-and-state-department.html

The mandate for the implementation of a domestic video surveillance apparatus is embedded in stage 1, located in Section F of the memorandum. Here is the text from the document:

F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:

(b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.

What military forces do you think they’re talking about? Federal military forces don’t need to be reported on. Their concentrations and movements are not only already under closely monitored command and control, but illegal within the continental United States under Posse Comitatus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

They’re specifically talking about militias. They’re talking about American citizens who will execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions.They’re talking about people who will fight Soviet, Chinese, and/or other troops both foreign and domestic, who attempt to occupy the United States as international peace keeping forces.

But what exactly do they mean by peace keeping forces? Karl Marx, regarded as the father of socialism, a screaming racist and the founder of the Ku Klux Klan, defined peace according to his ideology, saying, “The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.” Now you know exactly what the U.N. peace keepers are for. They are occupation forces for the world totalitarian socialist government.

To reduce the risks of war, indeed.


But that’s not all. State Department Memorandum 7277 was issued in conjunction with key disarmament legislation by the United States and the Soviet Union. The following is an excerpt from Gary Allen’s 1976 book, Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State:

In the early ’60s, Congress approved legislation creating something called the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. A program of “general and complete disarmament” became the official policy of the United States.

The entire sequence is a fascinating illustration of how the Shadow Government achieves its aims. The first serious disarmament proposal was produced by the Council on Foreign Relations in 1959. The idea was then discussed at a Pugwash Conference, and, in September 1960, the soviets presented their own disarmament program.

One year later, in September 1961, the Kennedy Administration issued its disarmament proposal, in State Department Publication 7277, Freedom From War.

Now, here is the clincher: all four proposals ― from the CFR, the Pugwash Conference, the Soviets, and the State Department ― are virtually identical.

If you have been reading my blog for any length of time, or researching geopolitical alliances outside the mainstream spectrum of acceptable debate; if you have read any books by A. Ralph Epperson, Cleon Skousen, Anatoliy Golitsyn, G. Edward Griffin, J.R. Nyquist, William Cooper, or Gary Allen, then you already know that the perceived aggressions between the United States and the Soviet Union ― not to mention the Cold War ― was a massive deception perpetrated on the people to generate fear and gain control over population groups. In truth, both the U.S. and Soviet Union were and still are allies behind the scenes. If you follow the money, the political and industrial relationships between U.S. and Russian interests confirm all of it.

The perceived aggressions continue to this day with the poorly-acted charade between Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama. Remember that all it took was one open mic to expose this fact. Obama carelessly exposed the pageant when a reporter’s microphone was left open. Obama assured the departing Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev, that he will have the flexibility required to deal with missile defense issues after the 2012 presidential election. This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility,Obama implored. Medvedev responded, “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

http://rt.com/usa/obama-caught-medvedev-president-502/

Further proof is in the Open Skies Treaty, which:


…establishes a regime of unarmed aerial observation flights over the territories of its signatories. The Treaty is designed to enhance mutual understanding and confidence by giving all participants, regardless of size, a direct role in gathering information through aerial imaging on military forces and activities of concern to them. Open Skies is one of the most wide-ranging international arms control efforts to date to promote openness and transparency in military forces and activities.

Even though officially the earliest mention of the Open Skies Treaty was in 1992, the flyovers have been going on all through the Cold War, ever since the Truman Administration. Not only that, the provisions of the treat ― and the international disarmament procedure as a whole ― mandate that it must always be overseen under the command of a Soviet flag officer.

So, how did that co-called Cold War work for everyone? It worked great for its engineers. Through its agents of fear, fanning the flames of rumors of wars and the ever-present threat of destruction, it successfully shoveled billions of dollars worth of taxpayer money into the coffers of defense contractors and government agencies.

Recall also the plot exposed by KGB defector, Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, when he warned the CIA in the early 1960′s what would be carried out by the global Communist Party to bring America to its knees. In Golitsyn’s 1998 book, The Perestroika Deception, he detailed the long-term top secret plan engineered by the Communist Party to morally, financially, and militarily weaken the United States of America in order to bring the nation into a global communist New World Order.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/1347260/posts

Senator Barry Goldwater was right. Congressman Larry McDonald was right. William Cooper was right.

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev also told the world what the plan was. Observe his transparent words to the Americans who opposed the plan:

We will take America without firing a shot . . . we will bury you! . . . We can’t expect the American people to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have communism . . . We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within.

And so they are.

H. Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, which is part of the globalist syndicate working toward financial, educational, and political control, said in 1953:

“We at the executive level here were active in either the OSS [Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the CIA], the State Department, or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we operated under directions issued by the White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives [National Security Decision Directives], the substance of which were to the effect that we should make every effort to alter a life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.”

"We have met the enemy, and he is us."



These people have been compromising this country for many, many years to destroy it from within, and we couldn't for the life of us identify the enemy, because we would never believe that it was Americans doing it.

But you see, they’re not Americans. They’re socialist/communist traitors. And they want to destroy this country so that they can realize the dream of the international one world socialist government. One class of people. One religion. Total control and ownership of everything and everyone by the State.

And when the people resist and rise up to form opposition forces, the eye in the sky is there to “report on concentrations and movements of military forces.”


"Nothing Is Beyond Our Reach." - NROL-39 / USA-247


And if the cameras on the ground aren’t enough, USA-247, also known as NRO Launch 39 or NROL-39, an American reconnaissance satellite operated by the National Reconnaissance Office, was launched on December 6, 2013. The USA-247 launch received a relatively high level of press coverage due to the mission’s choice of logo, which depicts an octopus sitting astride the globe with tentacles unfurled, and the motto “Nothing Is Beyond Our Reach.” The logo choice was extensively criticized in light of the 2013 surveillance disclosures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA-247



These people who have their tentacles around the globe, those who Rolling Stone writer Matt Taibbi referred to in 2009 as the “great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity,” who are establishing observation posts to report on concentrations and movements of military forces, know that the only legal and lawful force of arms within CONUS ― according to the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution for the united States of America ― is the unorganized militia of the several states. And the militia, according to the law, is not a paramilitary organization. It is a military organization. They know the truth of this.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405

The following is the legal precedent of the militia, and it has never been amended nor repealed:

Constitution for the united States of America, Article I, Section 8:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei

The Congress shall have power

To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Bill of Rights, Amendment II:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

10 U.S. Code § 311 ― Militia: composition and classes
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied malesat least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are—

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the-militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

The Federalist Papers No. 29, Concerning the Militia : http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fed_29.html
From the Daily Advertiser
Thursday, January 10, 1788
Author: Alexander Hamilton

To the People of the State of New York:


THE power of regulating the militia, and of commanding its services in times of insurrection and invasion are natural incidents to the duties of superintending the common defense, and of watching over the internal peace of the Confederacy.

See also The Federalist No. 46.
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa46.htm

Two landmark U.S. Supreme Court rulings also upheld the legal sovereign force of arms among the People:

In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), the decision involved the Second Article and Amendment to the United States Constitution, and established the legal precedent of the unorganized militia of the several states. U.S. v. Miller declared that ownership of a firearm could be restricted only if the firearm had no connection to military or militia activity. This case also strongly suggested that bans on military pattern firearms, ammunition, and magazines are unconstitutional, as these devices plainly are central to the effectiveness of the militia and its mission.http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174

Likewise, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms for personal defense unconnected with service in a militia has been reaffirmed. The Court Justice Scalia wrote in the majority opinion: “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” Justice Scalia went on to define a militia “…comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense . . . The Anti-Federalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved.”http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

In this case, the Supreme Court effectively struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determining that handguns are “arms” for the purposes of the Second Amendment. And the true purpose of the Second Amendment is to guarantee a well regulated militia.
http://www.archive.org/stream/firearmscontrol00colugoog/firearmscontrol00colugoog_djvu.txt

You see, the law is on our side; the side of We the People, the rightful masters of both the Congress and the Courts, composed of a body educated and trained to uphold and secure our Constitutional Republic.



The recent resurgence in the identification, demonization, vilification, and attempted nullification of Constitutionally-protected militia groups by the subversive elements operating from within the federal government, and supported by their lying news media propagandists, is reaching a fever pitch. It has also been said that the one thing that scares the money masters in London the very most is the growing minutemen movement in the States. In fact, they are doing everything they can to fund its opposition and nullification.

Speaking of the English, the British Security Industry Authority (BSIA) estimated there are up to 5.9 million closed-circuit surveillance cameras in their country, including 750,000 in sensitive locations such as schools, hospitals and care homes. BSIA’s security industry report estimated that there exists one camera for every 11 people in the UK. And that report is a year old.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10172298/One-surveillance-camera-for-every-11-people-in-Britain-says-CCTV-survey.html

The United Kingdom has already fallen. Their traitorous leaders have already overthrown their Magna Carta, the 1215 charter ― a precursor to our Constitution ― that limited the powers of the King of England and protected the rights of the people. And isn’t it very telling that the Magna Carta now resides within the walls of the U.S. National Archives building in Washington, D.C.? That would be like our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights being locked away in the Tower of London. What it means is that the Magna Carta is no longer in effect in its parent nation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/


Americans are not like the English, however. We are not like the Soviets. We are not like the Chinese, the North Koreans, the Mexicans, or the Cambodians. We are, for the most part, fiercely nationalistic, patriotic, religious, and moral. We have come to embrace the Great Experiment of Freedom, and will not go silently into the night as it is stripped from us. As Barak Obama claimed at a Midwestern fundraiser in April of 2008, we “cling to guns or religion or antipathy.” Yes, we do, especially when traitors try to take it all away from us.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZWaxjiQyFk



We have got to call them for what they are. If they are traitors, we must call them traitors. If they are liars, we must call them liars. If they have committed treason, we must say it aloud, and they must know that we are aware.

As we enter into the third and final stage of the plan, the United Nations recently posted job openings looking for U.S.-based Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Specialists.
United Nations Careers: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer, P4

Here is an excerpt of the text from the posting:http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/united-nations-seeks-us-based-disarmament-demobilization-reintegration-specialists/
United Nations Careers: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer, P4
Posting Title: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer, P4

Job Code Title: DISARMAMENT, DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OFFICER

Department/ Office: Department of Peacekeeping Operations
Duty Station: NEW YORK

Work Experience: A minimum of seven years of progressively responsible experience in disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration or related area. Experience working within peacekeeping, peace-building or development programmes operations is desirable. Experience with small arms control, conflict/post-conflict crisis management, economic recovery is desirable. Experience coordinating multiple partner agencies, funds or programmes is desirable.

Languages: English and French are the working languages of the United Nations Secretariat. For the post advertised, fluency in English isrequired.

Notice that the spelling is clearly European.


If you live in New York, pay close attention to this. Especially as New York seems to be the major beta testing ground of domestic terrorism. Not only that, ISIS terror leader and mass-murderer, Al-Baghdadi, told U.S. troops in 2009 as he was being released, Ill see you guys in New York.” If that isn’t a call-to-arms for the constitutional New York state militias to start recruiting and training, I don’t know what is. And yet, the Mayor of New York City and the Governor of New York State are doing everything within their power to assistance/disarm their constituents. And the U.N. is forming “disarmament and demobilization” detachments within that very sector. So, the state and local governments of New York are effectively working in concert with U.N. disarmament policies.http://www.dadychery.org/2011/01/03/haiti-is-the-proof-of-the-failure-of-the-international-assistance/


One of the greatest advocates of the United Nations was President George Herbert Walker Bush. In a speech given to a joint session of the United States Congress on September 11, 1990, eleven years to the day before the attacks of 9/11, he said:

Out of these troubled times, our fifth objectivea new world order can emerge.”


Then, on January 16, 1991, he said:

We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.

As we know, the U.N.’s founders, especially Alger Hiss who authored the Charter of the United Nations, were exposed and convicted as communist Soviet spies. Addressing the General Assembly of the U.N. on February 1, 1992, Bush confirmed the end goal:

It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.

No one in the world can say it better than the people who are planning it themselves. Bush was only one in a thousand world leaders who have been calling for a system of global governance and international cooperation, and I would be all for that if it were to be implemented to actually end wars and establish global peace without infringing on the Creator-endowed rights of the people. But it isn’t.


Read the U.N. Charter. Read their Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Neither one of these documents recognize that our rights are inherent and endowed by a Creator God. The U.N. affirms that our rights are privileges granted by the State. Privileges can be revoked at will.

No, the New World Order is not being implemented to bring about peace. It is in fact being implemented to establish a global monopoly of power and violence. During the United Nations Gun Debate at King’s College in July of 2001, a U.N. spokesperson made this revealing statement:
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr

Civilian ownership of firearms in the U.S. threatens the legitimate powers monopoly of the State.

Their own words give them away, discredit them, and expose them for the traitors that they are. They discredit themselves better than anyone else ever could. They are their own worst enemy.

Its not the Russians and the Chinese who are destroying our freedoms. It is enemies of the Constitution who are posing as Americans right here at home, those who the United States Military Oath of Enlistment refers to when it affirms that the Oath-taking soldier will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.That is why the enemies of our Constitution are telling us that the slaves cannot ― and must not ― be armed.http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html



The observation posts are going up throughout our country toreport on concentrations and movements of military forces, so that when the people have had enough of this lawless agenda, those who are behind the subversion of our Republican form of government may reduce the risks of war by accident, miscalculation, and surprise attack.

The enemy never wants to be caught off-guard; never wants to be surprised. It is a calculated military strategy. As former U.S. Navy SEAL, Ben Smith, warned, “The American citizen and the American service member are now the battlefield,” and it all happened while we were sleeping, when we shirked our duties as Americans.

We have all at one time or another been greatly deceived, though. We were told to look over there across the sea, to revere the foreign enemy with terror. We were told that an outside threat was the cause of the infringement of our rights here at home, and that we needed to sacrifice our Liberty on the alter of security. We were told that the outside threat was so great, that only a national government with a monopoly of power could suppress it. We were told that the authority we granted to the State would be used responsibly, and would never be abused to oppress the people. We were told by the gate-keepers that, “it would never happen in America.”

James Madison said:

If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy . . . The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad.


Does that sound familiar?


Cicero said it best when he warned:
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.

The rotting soul of a nation saw new lows in East Germany and the Soviet Union, when the Stasi, the East German Secret Police (or Ministry for State Security), and the NKVD, the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs, established widespread surveillance of the people for purposes of control and purging of dissidents. No opposition can ever be allowed in socialist states, because the truth is the greatest weapon of all, and spreads like a wildfire in the hearts of men and women. Establishing an iron grip of control is the name of the game.

Our founders recognized this and dealt with it permanently in our Bill of Rights. The Fourth Article and Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

It is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law. In order for an intrusion on a person’s privacy to be legal and lawful, it has to be reasonable, supported under due process of law, provide that there is probable cause that you have committed a crime, contain a warrant signed by a judge who is under Oath, and must describe in detail the specific person, place, and thing to be searched and seized.

Without all of that combined, and until the Fourth Article and Amendment has been legally amended or repealed by the necessary two-thirds vote in Congress, no search or seizure of our person, place, or things; or infringement on our privacy is legal whatsoever, and is therefore null and void under the law.

What does that tell you about the emerging, all-encompassing surveillance police state, where you are considered guilty until proven innocent?



Stop Watching Me

In closing, even if the subversives operating from within our government woke up one day and decided to all-of-a-sudden start obeying the law, there will still always have to be a militia in this country. Our forefathers understood what governments do. Historically, they have a tendency to gain power and become oppressive, and enslave the population.

That’s why they gave us the Second Article and Amendment. That is exactly why we had militias back then, and exactly why we have them today. It is exactly the reason we must always have them, to be used as a last resort to defend against tyranny in government. Lawful and just governments have nothing to fear from an armed citizenry. Whereas, a government that distrusts its people owning weapons, has earned the distrust of its people.

James Madison said it all in I Annals of Congress 434 on June 8, 1789:
A well regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.


In the words of Aristotle:
Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms.


And that is why the domestic audio/video surveillance apparatus is being erected around us. The people who are actively destroying our country greatly fear the legal and lawful resistance of the People they intend to oppress. They want to monitor the resistance, reduce the risk of surprise attack, and formulate offensive demobilization and disarmament from the safety of a television screen.

They are so afraid of the People rising up and taking the law into their own hands to stop what is happening. And history has shown over and over and over again that it generally only takes 3% of any given population to suppress a foreign or domestic enemy takeover. Both the law and the odds are in our favor. The enemy is so far outnumbered and outgunned, it is absolutely unbelievable.


So, if we allow defeat with so much in our favor, then we deserve everything we get.

Keep in mind all of this is being done while the border is still wide open, and millions of illegal aliens are flooding into the country.

Join your local militia. Arm. Train. Prepare. Spiritually, mentally, and physically. Learn the law so that you can recite it verbatim. Learn the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and abide by it in your units. Establish close, personal relationships within your community, and surround yourselves with like-minded patriotic American men and women who will stand for Freedom no matter what.

Do it now. The numbers may be in our favor, but time is not.

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY CAMPAIGN OF CONSCIENCE