Meet your next President

May God save us all and may God save America!
Meet your next President


Meet your next President, Hillary Clinton
You know, the closer we get to the 2016 presidential elections, the more I fret the uncertain future which may lay ahead for our great nation, courtesy, if you will, of some of my fellow-Americans lackadaisical deportment regarding our decadent State of the Union - a paradoxical departure from everything that America stood for just prior to our president Barack Obama’s untimely election, as he claimed on October 30th, 2008, to being just five days away [election day] from fundamentally transforming the nation - a feat, which, in hindsight, he was able to consummate fully and unobstructed.

As far as I am concerned, one of America’s worse political blunders, ever, in the history of this nation, was, of all things, the election of Barack Hussein Obama to be our president, not once but twice, first in 2008 and then again in 2012. And, whereas there was plenty of blame to go around for the iniquitous error of electing this man to lead America, I was impelled, at the end of the day, to lay blame solely on our trite laissez-faire conduct regarding Americans’ most basic commitment to democracy and our democratic system, to wit: our compromise with destiny to elect someone to the highest office of the land willing to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America gallantly willed to us by the Founding Fathers - a task arduously despoiled off by all those who voted this man into office.

Americans’ apathy and political inertia, have been, in fact, an illness now reaching epidemic levels of untenable proportions, albeit paving the way for yet more of the same in 2016. For those of us who think it cannot not get any worse than what it already is, brace yourselves, for the election of a Hillary Rodham Clinton to the presidency of the U.S., would probably make Obama’s tenure on this post, pale in comparison to what lies ahead, so help us God. Be mindful though, the chances for this uneventful political faux pascoming of age, are as great or greater than American’s irresponsiveness would care to own up to.

In lieu of the eminent threats posed by Clinton’s chances of becoming our next president, I deemed it a solemn and sober responsibility of mine, to share with you, some of the most troublesome and worrisome issues surfacing in Clinton’s library of public life history - issues which, at worst, can impoverish her chances of being elected as president, and, at best, would outright disqualify her from her audacious run for the presidency, provided of course, that Americans would find it, in their best interests, to becoming au faitwith their political future; with the implausibly high stakes, earlier forsaken in the presidential elections of 2008 and 2012. For Americans to replicate the electoral blunders which ensued the election of Barack Obama twice in the past by electing Hillary Clinton as their next president, could be, indeed, a fatal error of unprecedented consequences; a presumption largely founded on Clinton’s controversial chronicles; a prosaic life riddled with scandals and turmoil as she has, throughout time, left behind a trail of serious discredits amidst an eerie career in pursuit of political prowess - a career which would easily earn Clinton the rights to becoming the poster child of Prince Machiavelli’s school of evilness given her uncanny talents in making the ‘ends justify the means’.

Clinton’s wearisome past, from Whitewater to Benghazi to her sneering role in her husband Bill’s scandal with Monica Lewinsky,



Clinton’s wearisome past, from Whitewater to Benghazi to her sneering role in her husband Bill’s scandal with Monica Lewinsky, are but a testament to our raison d’etres dreading the election of this woman to becoming the next president of the United States of America. Both Hillary and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, have lived contemptuous lives climbing social and political ladders; all as a self-serving means to their madness in becoming rich, powerful, and famous, commendable, were it not for the way in which they went about their climb. In fact, the Clinton’s rise to power has all the elements of a well scripted Hollywood suspense novel including but not limited to some dead people along the way, such as was the highly mysterious death of Vince Foster on July 1993 - the deputy White House counsel during Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Although Foster’s death was ruled to be a suicide, to this day, some of the Clinton’s most assiduous detractors, continue to believe his death was more of a conspiracy, alleging there was more to it than first met the eye and that the president and first lady [Bill and Hillary Clinton] tried to cover it up. Foster’s untimely death during the first few months of Bill Clinton’s administration, was associated to his role and participation with them [the Clintons] in their legendary Whitewater scandal - a real estate deal gone bad; a deal where the Clintons, had, allegedly, used their political clout to coerce an employee at Madison Guaranty Savings and Loans in Little Rock, Arkansas, owned by Jim and Susan McDougal into making an illegal loan to the latter. Madison Guaranty eventually went bust costing taxpayers millions of dollars. The McDougal’s, coincidentally, just happened to be partners with the Clintons in the infamous Whitewater real estate investment. By the same token, throughout all the scandals, Madison Guaranty was legally represented by Arkansas’ Rose Law Firm, where Hillary and Vince Foster had become firm partners and friends - a quintessential Clinton soap-opera. While the Rose law firm had been subpoenaed for papers presumably incriminating the Clintons for their potential criminal involvement in all the scandals surrounding Whitewater and Madison Guaranty, the papers had suddenly vanished, while later appearing in the Clinton’s White House; the presumption at the time by the conspiracy theorists was that Foster had played a key role in the disappearance of the evidence, thus his eminent suicide as investigators appeared to be drawing closer to making a connection which would criminally incriminate both Foster and the Clintons in the Whitewater controversy. Ultimately the Clintons were never charged, but 15 other persons were convicted of more than 40 crimes, including Bill Clinton’s successor as Arkansas Governor, Jim Guy Tucker, who was removed from office. A vintage finale to yet one more of the Clinton’s unending melodramas.


Hillary Clinton Thesis: There is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model
Then again, if anyone is seriously considering to vote for this woman to becoming our next president, they should equally and just as seriously begin to probe into her background and qualifications for the most powerful job on the planet; one with ad nauseam power in changing the future course of mankind - that simple. Are we as Americans going to trust Hillary Clinton to guide our destinies? As if we are, we better know what we are getting into. Our first stop in reviewing the plenteous questionable issues surrounding Clinton is while she attended Wellesley College circa 1969, and published her 92-page undergraduate thesis “There is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model”. In her thesis, Rodham allegedly advocates Alinsky’s most important contribution to the radical cause as his embracing of political nihilism. In other words, our ex-First Lady, ex-Senator to the United States Congress, ex-presidential candidate, and ex-Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton advocated Saul Alinsky’s commitment to:

“blame political systems such as capitalism and democracy for mankind’s shortcomings andhardships, therefore essentially a need to doaway with them [the systems] in their entirety.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Are you kidding me? Is this really the person we want to elect as our next president? Do we really want our next president to be one that advocated getting rid of capitalism and democracy?

Do we really want our next president to be one that advocated getting rid of capitalism and democracy?

I personally believe the Clinton-Alinsky connection to be the most troublesome issue of all as to any foregoing considerations for Clinton’s presidency, if nothing else, because this connection reflects the woman’s true political identity; her backbone and hidden political agendas. That being the case, I must then refer you to more recent discoveries regarding previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary and the late left-wing activist Saul Alinsky, with a revealing insight regarding Clinton’s relationship with [the] most controversial anti-U.S. activist in recent history, shedding more light yet into Clinton’s hypocritical stands on fundamental ideological beliefs regarding everything our nation stands for, just as did her soul-mate, Barack Obama.

Clinton’s newly-published letters were obtained from the Washington Free Beacon and are a part of the archives for the Industrial Areas Foundation - a training center for community organizers founded by Alinsky. Whereas Clinton and Alinsky had several meetings in 1968 as the former was writing her thesis on Alinsky’s community organizing, the letters suggest that Alinsky had indeed amuch deeper influence on Clinton than previously thought. In 1971, while Clinton attended Yale Law School, she reached out to Alinksy, suggesting to him her dire need for more of his [Alinsky’s] radical material such as to aid and abet her with her political activism on issues such as what she refers to as: “the Yale-Cambodia [Vietnam] madness”. The letters also suggest that Alinsky had assisted Clinton with all her political activism throughout the years while attending Yale. Picture, if you will, an untamed and wild young political activist amidst a turbulent collegiate environment provoked by the 1960s Vietnam war, and just as soon you would be picturing the image of a rebellious left-wing radical militant by the name of Hillary Rodham - a quintessential anti-establishment disciple of the Alinsky model.

Alinsky advocated guerilla warfare tactics and civil disobedience
For all those readers who may not be familiar with Saul Alinsky, you would probably be shorn of the ability of making an honest judgment in attempting to assess the gravity of the Clinton connection with this man. Suffice it to say that Saul Alinsky was, as far as I am concerned, the 20th century version of Karl Marx. A self-proclaimed radical, Alinsky advocated guerilla warfare tactics and civil disobedience in order to correct what he perceived to be an institutionalized power gap between government and the underprivileged classes in deprived communities throughout the land. Like Marx before him, Alinsky’s philosophy divided the world into the “haves” [the middle and wealthy classes] and the “have-nots” - [the poor]. He, like Hillary after him, both embraced an “ends-justify-the-means” approach to a political model which ultimately promoted the redistribution of power and wealth, hence, Barack Obama’s beloved platform reform, as the latter also had, at one time, become a stout supporter and promoter of the Alinsky model. As if this were not enough,one year prior to his death, in 1971, Alinsky published his book Rules for Radicals, which he symbolicallydedicated to the anti-Christ “Lucifer” - coincidentally, the same book, mind you, which presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, incessantly asks Alinsky, in her newly-published letters, if his book had yet been published, as if it had, she would be: “missing the fulfillment of Revelation”.

For all the evidence tying Hillary to this despicable man, and upon the realization that her close association with Alinsky could ensue substantial collateral damage to her public image, she does, find a way, as she always does, to manipulate the issues to where she appears to be promoting a detachment from Alinsky and his model, in the name, of course, of political correctness, whereas in herWellesley College thesis, she appears to be largely sympathetic to Alinsky, while at the same time, critical on some of his tactics. Clintons’ fabricated departure from the Alinsky model argues that the latter is “unrealistic” to implement and/or difficult for others to replicate, albeit the fact, she does not, mind you, at any time, reject or disavow the model itself, but merely the way of implementing it. As the model portends for the destruction of capitalism to be Alinsky’s ultimate objective, I can only conclude the same objective to hold true for our esteemed presidential candidate - to Clinton, I conclude, it was not a matter of whether or not the nation should adopt Alinsky’s model; it was just a matter of how to do it.

So yes, I will spare giving you the multiple other reasons why you should never vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 as I deem her Alinsky connection to be more than enough to discourage anyone from voting for her and/or de-facto disqualify her to run for the office of the president. I personally believe her entire political trajectory or otherwise her flight as a political figure, beginning as a First Lady during her husband’s presidency; later as a U.S. senator; and finally as Secretary of State, are saturated with controversies of one kind or the other, however, none as contentious as her ties with a renown communist and U.S., hater, such as Saul Alinsky. Hillary’s presumed stoicism during husband Bill’s Monica Lewinsky crisis, was really meant for Americans to believe she was standing by her man, however it was all but a rehearsed rendition of an act, part of ploy, warily crafted to allow her unwavering race of her own presidential aspirations to continue without any bruises from the latent scandal, as otherwise, a faintly human showing of emotions, anger even, by her during the controversy, could have seriously hampered her chances of reaching her ambitious objective of yet becoming president of the United States of America.

Ditto for the Benghazi controversy, where once again, just like in the Whitewater scandal, there are four deaths instead of just one. The death of four innocent human beings, who would probably be alive today, were it not for this woman’s disconnect with the pleas to increment security in our Libyan embassy. Clinton’s testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the 2012, 9/11 Benghazi terror attack where she infamously declared “What difference does it make?” when pressed for answers on how and why four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed, is a telltale indication, once again, of what this woman is all about. On and on. There are not many things that truly ‘make a difference’ in Clinton’s life other than, her boundless “ambitions”.

Finally, I have, for the past few years, been dedicating a good part of my life to warning you, my fellow-Americans of the dangers posed by a Barack Obama as president of this great land as I am, once again, given to the task of warning you, all over, of the dangers posed by Hillary Clinton. If upon reading the foregoing dissertation, you, my fellow-Americans, decide, still, to go on and vote for this lady as our next president in 2016, then, I shall peacefully lay blame on no one else but you for all the perils now looming over our nation; for our decadent state of the Union; for the clear and present dangers now a part of our lives; for ISIS or ISIL; for the beheadings of innocent people around the world; for the ever-growing threats posed by Islamic extremists. If after reading the foregoing dissertation, you make up your mind and decide that you still want to vote for this ruthless communist, Hillary Clinton, so be it.

I remind you all that, however, we do get in life what we bargain for. Remember the old adage, “be careful what you wish for”. As our world continues to deteriorate, first with president Barack Obama at the helm and now possibly in the future with Hillary Clinton, do not, I repeat, do not try to find or lay blame on anyone else but yourselves; for the unending apathy and lethargy now akin to most Americans are all to blame for. We are, after all, our own worst enemies. The time has come to fetch-up to the dreadful conditions now prevalent in our great nation - the time has come, mind you, to cleanse our government of all the Saul Alinsky’s disciples; of his model; and of all those seeking power strictly for their own self-advancement. God save us from the evils reservedly promoted by all left-wing radicals, socialists and cloaked communists, and last but not least, by all the world terrorists, including our own home-bred version. The time has come, my fellow-Americans to pick-up where we left off in 2008. Just remember, for all the flaws you may have come across in our capitalist and democratic society, it is still, to this day the greatest political system there ever was, bar none. Our renovation and plight to recover America starts with but one vote and one vote only - your vote. Do not throw it away. Do not elect Hillary Clinton in 2016, as if you do, you could, for all intents and purposes, just be posing for the end to come sooner than later.

May God save us all and may God save America!