There’s a Vast Conspiracy of Prosecutors Refusing to Charge Cops

There’s a Vast Conspiracy of Prosecutors Refusing to Charge Cops





Ever since the Grand Jury refused to indict Darren Wilson, the left went full Truther and began claiming that the prosecutor deliberately threw the case. There was absolutely zero actual evidence for this claim and no one with any knowledge of the law even tried to argue it.

But that didn’t stop it from taking over the blogsphere.

Now a jury failed to indict the cop who took down Eric Garner in New York City. That’s two grand juries in two different states and two different prosecutors.

So it must be a conspiracy. A vast conspiracy of prosecutors.

In the Zimmerman/Martin case, rather than dealing with the facts, the left got its trial thanks to Angela Corey, a completely unscrupulous prosecutor. Her reward for getting an unwinnable case to trial wasn’t support, but once again accusations from the left that she had deliberately torpedoed the case even after doing everything possible and even dubiously legal to get George Zimmerman.

So that makes a conspiracy of three prosecutors.

The left simply can’t accept the fact that juries of mixed race shot down their favorite race baiting cases three times because they followed the law.

It’s that simple.

In every criminal case, the left advocates the idea that just because someone did something wrong doesn’t mean that they can be sent to jail without legal grounds for it. But when it decides that it wants to lynch someone, then it completely ignores the letter of the law and insists that any failure to indict is some sort of vast conspiracy.

A sensible liberal would understand that it’s possible to take issue with the actions of George Zimmerman, Darren Wilson, etc and point out that they could have acted differently, without at the same time tethering oneself to demanding that they be locked up no matter what the law is or isn’t.

But those are very nearly extinct

by Daniel Greenfield