Basic Principles Foundation for Defense Against The Terrorists

Basic Principles Foundation for Defense Against The Terrorists


Basic principles foundation for those who wish to be truly free.

Imagine that you are being pulled over… the bright red and blue strobes (that actually are meant to cause you to not think straight), then you stop and the cop comes up to the window and asks:
“Do you know why i pulled you over???”

I would tell him that I can’t read minds… but I could give him a million reasons. Were you in a bad mood? Were the lines painted crooked on the road? Is it going to rain and you stopped to let me know?

Then he asks for info, and perhaps even places “YOU” under arrest. He says that “YOU” have the right to an attorney, and that anything “YOU” say can and will be held against you, along with some other things about “YOU”.

This is called the Miranda WARNING… it is a warning… what IS a warning? A warning is an indication that something bad could happen. He WARNS you that there is danger.

So, where is the danger???

The danger comes with what he says next. What does he say next? “Do you understand the rights I have read to you?”
WHY is this so dangerous?

Because when you affirm the “understanding”, you just entered into a verbal contract, and also just confirmed that the “YOU” that he keeps referring to, is actually “YOU”. Who IS this “YOU” they keep referring to? Did you know that the term “you” means more than one, or plural?
By identifying yourself as “you”, you just waived all of your natural rights by agreeing to his terms. If you ID’d as the “YOU” by “understanding”, you can also kiss other rights goodbye… like the right to due process, motions, strawman, the all caps name, or any other argument in the world… just doesn’t matter now because you have entered a verbal contract.

The issue at hand is that YOU VOLUNTEER by entering into a verbal contract which is binding on you because it says: “ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN BE USED AGAINST YOU”.

So how should you answer the “Do you understand?” question? Answer: “How could I understand? I believe that I am not YOU, so how am I to answer whether or not “you” has this right, or that right, or that “you” understand anything? Didn’t I tell you my name? I don’t know who “you” is, who IS “you”?”

Then ask: “Are you a peace officer? If you are a peace officer then you must have a registration certificate which proves that you are a peace officer, and you must produce it upon request, correct?”

There is a big difference between if I am dealing with a peace officer, than dealing with a private agent corporate official.

You also need to tell the judge, “I did not agree to this. I told him what my name was, and he kept talking to “YOU”, and about “YOU” and I told him that I didn’t know who this “you person” was, he talked about me entering into some contract with him and I told him I do not wish to consent or engage in a contract, I have no business with this man.”

Then send the court a private communication, tell them that you are a PRIVATE 14th amendment citizen and…
Lots of people will be like “did he just say to claim 14th amendment citizenship?!??!!” 14th amendment citizen… WHAT???

Let’s look at the 14th amendment. Section one says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Did you see where it said: “are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside”

In other words, it provides for “dual-citizenship”. The citizen has not only “privileges” but also “immunities”.
I want those immunities. You might be thinking; immunity from what?

14th amendment, Section 4: (read carefully) “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.”

Did you see the part that said: “including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned”

Who receives pensions?

Cops? Judges? Prosecuters? Court officials? Teachers?

Who receives “BOUNTIES FOR SERVICES”? Doesn’t this mean that they are bounty hunters. For “services”… what services?
“Suppressing insurrection or rebellion”, that is what services.

Why would you ever go into their courtroom and “question” them about the way they do things?

Just tell them that there has been a mistake… I am not an insurrectionist or rebel, I am a “private citizen of the united states”, I am actively engaged in trying to reduce the public debt, and “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties”.

I would tell them that I am trying to pay my pension, and pay into my pension through bounty services because I am here to suppress insurrection and rebellion, and you are not to question my conduct.

The government of the united states is claiming to be a private debt collector, and because they are trying to collect a debt of the united states (a public debt) cannot be questioned.

And if they ever want you to do a competency evaluation by a medical or mental health professional.
Ask the evaluator “Where did you get your law degree?”

How could they possibly determine if you are compentent to to defend yourself in court if they don’t have a law degree?
So when they bring you into court and they have an “indictment” and a “charging instrument” which we all know about, they are giving you a private debt instrument, letting you know that you have committed an act of “insurrection or rebellion” against the united states which now makes you a criminal. You have no rights, because they cannot be questioned as to their method of obtaining that debt payment.

But then section 4 states: “But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.”

I would then let them know that you have it on very good authority that the united states court system is housed in a corporation known as the “Administrative Office of the United States Court” located in Washington D.C. which governs all courts and all judges, along with the “Designation and sentence computation center, federal bureau of prisons”, because they are all listed under that corporation.
When we look at the tax records of those organizations we find that they are private corporations.
Private corporations cannot represent the public.

The 2013 edition of the Corpus Jurus Secundrum, CORPORATIONS section, subsection 38 – 41 – where the supreme court stated that whenever the United States (a body public corporate) engages in commercial business it abandons it’s sovereign capacity and is to be treated as any other corporation.
Don’t they issue bonds? Payment bonds, bid bonds, and performance bonds?

They cannot engage in commercial business and still claim to be sovereign.

Their entire tax history will document that they are a private, for-profit, corporation. Which means that they engage in commercial business, and also means that they have absolutely no sovereign capacity… from the beginning. Which means that they are not government. And if they are not government then that means that they are insurrectionists and rebels claiming to be sovereign government when they have no sovereignty to claim.
So naturally, we go after the corporation for their insurrection and rebellion against the united states and we cannot be questioned about it when we go after those private corporations, which are also considered private persons by the law, and traded like any other corporation.

The KEY to remember is that you have the right to remain silent… this is where the verbal contract is initiated. Those who claim to be police officers are also said to be officers of the court. You engage the court as soon as you engage that officer, by saying “yes, I understand” instead of saying “no way I don’t understand anything being said to “YOU”. If you want to address me, then I might be able to respond to you, but at no time do I wish to enter into a contract with you. I don’t know who you are. I don’t even know if you are a peace officer or if you are working for a private corporation.”

Let them know that you do not wish to contract with them and that you do not wish to come out of your private citizen capacity. We do everything in our private capacity, even if you are in public… we still always operate in the private. Private record… not the public record.

When you are in your car, you are in the private because you are inside. When you open the door, you are not stepping out into the public, you are stepping out in your private capacity. You are ALWAYS in your private capacity. Do you give your debit card and pin number out to other people to use? Didn’t think so. Keep it in the private!

To learn more about how the government is really a corporation, have a look at the “Act of June 30th, 1864″, the “Act of Feburary 21, 1871″, and the “Act of June 11th, 1878″.