Europe is rapidly coming to the conclusion that their conversion into Eurabia is not no longer a conspiracy theory, but is now indeed an inevitability

Islamic Nations Within Nations

The first two international wars fought by the United States after our founding were the Barbary Wars.  Through the Washington and Adams administrations the United States paid tributes to the Muslim Barbary States in the hope of keeping our passage across the Atlantic, and more specifically in the Mediterranean, safe from from attacks by Islamic ships.  Thomas Jefferson refused to continue paying the protection money, and launched a war against Islam.  The next President of the United States, James Madison, also engaged in war against Islam to stop the Muslim pirates from attacking American vessels, and taking into slavery American sailors.

Though John Adams was not willing to wage war against Islam, he recognized the danger presented by the followers of Muhammad. Correspondence from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson on July 16, 1814, reveals John Adams’ true feelings about Islam: Adams states that Mohammed is “a military fanatic” who “denies that laws were made for him; he arrogates everything to himself by force of arms.”

During Adams’ presidency, Jefferson was Vice President.  The two men visited with the Barbary ambassador to ask under what authority the Muslims believed they had to attack and enslave non-Muslim vessels and sailors.  The ambassador’s response was that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

The Muslim ambassador did not say that the attacks were being perpetrated by a small, radical sect, or that theirs was a religion of peace and he would try to fix the problem with the extremists that had hijacked his religion.  The ambassador was honest, and openly proclaimed that the Qu’ran teaches that Muslims have a duty to wage war against those who have not accepted the authority of Islam (by paying the tribute), enslave the infidels, and if they were killed in the process they would go to heaven.

Thomas Jefferson owned a Qur’an so that he could better understand the enemy, and he came to the conclusion that the Muslims could not be negotiated with.  The only answer was brute force.

After serving under Washington and Adams, and witnessing those two presidents appeasing the Muslims, Jefferson had had enough. “Too long, for the honor of nations, have those Barbarians been [permitted] to trample on the sacred faith of treaties, on the rights and laws of human nature!”

The gates of the West have been thrown wide open, and hijrah (jihad by immigration) is easily spreading across the world completely unimpeded

John Quincy Adams, the son of our second president, who himself served as the sixth president, provided the following words regarding Islam: “In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.” [emphasis in the original]

The Ottoman Empire brutally expanded prior to the discovery of the New World, but was in decline during the years Americans first launched invasions against the Barbary Coast.  The Ottoman Empire experienced its final defeat in World War I, and was broken up into smaller states following the war.  These Islamic states banded together in an attempt to destroy the newly created Jewish State of Israel in 1948, and the excuse for unrest in the Middle East has persisted ever since.  Massive global expansion, however, was on hold - until now.

Islam has been patient, and now their patience is paying off for them.  The gates of the West have been thrown wide open, and hijrah (jihad by immigration) is easily spreading across the world completely unimpeded at a never before seen rate.  Even more amazing is that despite the violent history of Islam, and the fiery words of conquest by Islamic religious and political leaders, Europeans have gladly opened their arms and welcomed the terrorists in the name of helping the poor, down-trodden refugees.  The United States and Canada have also been taking in massive numbers of Muslims, claiming they are people in need of our tender care, not a people that we need to be defending ourselves against.

The liberal left statists have convinced themselves of their own bullcrap.  Desperate to fill their emotional coffers with good deeds, they have actively sought ideologies to give their loving support to.  Islam is aware of the dependence liberal leftists have on emotion, and their misguided desire to spread good intentions regardless of whether or not those good intentions are founded in sound doctrine.  The Islamists coddle the liberal left’s needy self-esteem, promising them that they are doing a good thing allying with the Muslims. . . as they slowly insert a scimitar in the backs of the unsuspecting multiculturalists.

Across Europe, as the numbers of Muslims increases, “No-Go Zones” have been forming.  Muslims have been creating Islamic regions within the host countries.  In France there are over 750 no-go zones.  In America, Dearborn, Michigan has become, for all intents and purposes, a massive no-go zone.

The United Kingdom is finally beginning to see their mistakes regarding Islam, but the attempt to slow the downward spiral may be a little too late.

The former head of Britain’s top multiculturalism agency, Trevor Phillips, confesses he “got almost everything wrong” regarding Muslim assimilation and warns the West that Muslims create “nations within nations.”

As in France, Muslims have carved out a large number of no-go zones across Britain.  Through those regions, the Muslim invaders have established 85 Islamic courts dispensing shariah “justice” across the U.K.

The former head of Britain’s Equalities and Human Rights Commission says perhaps he and other multiculturalists erred in assuming they would blend into western society and adopt our values.

I suppose hindsight is twenty-twenty for the Brits.  Phillips says it “may” have been a mistake to loosen immigration restrictions and roll out the prayer mat for large numbers of Islamists.  He says he was naive to think the real risk of the arrival of these foreign communities was discrimination against Muslims.

“For a long time, I too thought that Europe’s Muslims would become like previous waves of migrants, gradually abandoning their ancestral ways, wearing their religious and cultural baggage lightly, and gradually blend into Britain’s diverse identity landscape,” he said. “I should have known better.”

Phillips now says followers of Islam, in fact, hold very different values from the rest of society and many want to lead separate lives.

“We’re heading in entirely the wrong direction,” he recently wrote. “So much so that some of them would rather live under a wholly different system.”

The problem is that Islam is not just a culturally different way of life.  Islam is a political ideology much like Nazism that seeks world domination, and of which the adherents believe they are so superior over any non-Muslims that “anything” is acceptable when it comes to how Muslims treat non-Muslims.  The nature of Islam is violence and a sickening perversion of human sexuality. . . while claiming they are the opposite.

Islam is a political ideology much like Nazism that seeks world domination

To show the severity of the attitudes by Muslims toward the West, in London alone surveys have shown:

• One in five U.K. Muslims refuse to enter a non-Muslim house.
• Almost 40% say a woman should always obey her husband.
• Nearly one-third say a man has the right to have more than one wife.
• A majority want to outlaw homosexuality (the irony being that homosexuality, especially towards little boys, runs rampant in Islamic society).
• Nearly one-fourth want to obey only Islamic laws, not the laws laid down by parliament.
• More than a third (35%) say Jews have too much power.

Some administrators in Belgium are also beginning to rethink their multicultural policies.  In Belgium, the no-go zones in that country have become breeding grounds for terrorists.

Not only did Muslims in Belgium dance in the streets during the terrorist attacks in Brussels, but “They threw stones and bottles at police and press during the arrest of (terrorist co-conspirator) Salah Abdeslam.”

Yours truly has seen the dangers of allowing Muslims into our communities from the very start.  Muslims have no intention to assimilate into western society.  Theirs is a journey of conquest.  They hold contempt for western values, and it is their goal to increase their numbers until they can collapse The West from within..

Meanwhile, as Europe is rapidly coming to the conclusion that their conversion into Eurabia is not no longer a conspiracy theory, but is now indeed an inevitability, the Obama administration is continuing its policy of importing thousands of Muslim migrants per month.

And all of these troubles are upon us because of only a small minority of Muslims entering our countries.  What will it be like when their percentage grows to a significant enough of a number that Muslims become more emboldened, and don’t fear any reprisal at all for their activities?