Meanwhile, the U.S. will have chosen a new president, while the United Nations has already crowned itself with King of the World status

UN signing away national sovereignty today

It’s not the Donald J. Trump proposed temporary wall to keep America safe from undocumented refugees that’ should be the biggest worry, but the wall getting the green light today at the United Nations.

No one will be able to scale the UN wall, which makes—starting today—all of civilian society walled-in-by-bureaucracy global citizens.

The sound of the UN prison gate slamming shut, as noiseless as the tree falling in a forest with no one there to hear, won’t initially alarm populations preoccupied with the failing economies of their own nations.

But, after today, no country will be allowed the distinction of sovereignty as civil society becomes the UN’s long-touted One World Order, instituted under the cover of Agenda 21/2030’s global warming/climate change.

“Four months after nearly 200 nations finally reached an historic deal in Paris to address climate change, more than 160 of them will send representatives April 22 to sign it in New York, in hopes of getting the deal entered into force well before 2020. (Bloomberg, April 20, 2016)

“United Nations and world leaders are touting the likely historic nature of the April 22 ceremony—they expect to set a record for the number of leaders signing an international agreement on a single day—with a total of 162 nations planning to send representatives to UN headquarters, the UN said April 19.

 “They include the U.S., Japan, Australia, Canada, and European nations but also developing countries, including India, Mexico, Brazil and Indonesia.

“According to the UN, only heads of state, heads of government and foreign affairs ministers are generally “empowered” to sign such international agreements.”

“The United States withdrew from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) in 1996 after concluding that the organization lacked a clear purpose and was generally ineffective. With support from the Clinton Administration, Congress refused to pay arrears that the organization claims are owed by the United States. Since this decision, UNIDO has periodically requested that the U.S. rejoin the organization, and news reports indicate that the Obama Administration has considered that possibility.[1] (Heritage.org, Oct. 29, 2014)

This would be a mistake. In recent years, other governments have chosen to withdraw from UNIDO after concluding that the organization is of marginal importance and provides poor value for money. The evidence indicates that the U.S. was correct to withdraw from UNIDO, and there is no compelling reason to reverse that decision.”

“Nations are to resume talks on implementing verification requirements and other issues at negotiations in Bonn, Germany, May 16-26, and high-level UN talks (COP-22) scheduled for Nov. 7-18 in Marrakesh, Morocco.” (Bloomberg)

The high level talks in Marrakesh, Morocco, will take place after the outcome of the 2016 presidential race is known.

Meanwhile, the U.S. will have chosen a new president, while the United Nations has already crowned itself with King of the World status.

Related:

• U.N. Agenda 21 hiding behind Agenda 2030
• UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism
• UN Set to Launch ‘New Universal Agenda’ for Global Governance
• The Climate Industry and the ‘Green Religion’