It Wasn’t His Enemies But Trump Who Unleashed The “Torrent of Hatred”, Claims Judge

Fox News, where Judge Andrew P. Napolitano is singing the latest ‘Justice for The Squad Ballad’, off-key

It Wasn’t His Enemies But Trump Who Unleashed The “Torrent of Hatred”, Claims Judge

Special Counsel Robert Mueller III has finally moved off the public stage leaving the four members of the so-called “Squad’ team on it.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Ayanna Pressley entered Stage Left as self-declared ‘victims’, and victims they will remain as long as their newly-found political careers last.

Count on hearing all about squad members, non-stop victimhood all the way up to Election 2020 over television networks—including Fox News, where Judge Andrew P. Napolitano is singing the latest ‘Justice for The Squad Ballad’, off-key.

Everything in life, including in the sleazy world of politics, comes full circle.

You may be one of the multi-millions who thought a torrent of hatred was unleashed by the spoil-sport progressives when Donald J. Trump got himself elected president.

Now that things have come full circle that notion has been 100 percent reversed.

While Mueller was supposedly slipping into dementia and being elderly abused by the Special Counsel’s 17 lawyers and prosecutors working to reclaim Election 2016 for Hillary Clinton, four squad members, pushed into public conscience by roughly 90 percent of the mainstream and social media, were waiting eagerly to replace him.

Why the Special Counsel Chief’s slip into dementia saw no light until he came before Congress on Wednesday will remain as elusive as Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

The roosters and roosterettes have come home to roost at the television network

Did anyone out there ever think that President Trump would be blamed for unleashing the “torrent of hatred” in which we now all live by Fox News rather than CNN or MSNBC?

It’s now Fox News Channel senior judicial analyst Judge Napolitano accusing the badly beleaguered Trump for releasing the “torrent of hatred” that stopped the clock for any further progress for the USA on November 8, 2016.

It’s uncouth, undignified and even unwarranted for a president to respond in any way to his tormentors, who are well-founded victims.

The roosters and roosterettes have come home to roost at the television network who, catapulted into No. 1 status by being “fair and balanced”.

Napolitano claims in a top-of-the-page (later moved down) Fox column yesterday that it was Trump—and only Trump—who released the “torrent of hatred.

To be fair His Honor isn’t the only one.  Fox News is also home to former DNC chair Donna Brazile, Neil Cavuto, Bret Baier and others.

Does anyone wonder where Napolitano was on Jan. 21, 2017, the day Donald Trump was officially inaugurated as America’s shocking-to-the progressives duly elected 45th?

January 21, 2017 was the day when the 1-million-strong Big Women’s March released a torrent of hatred that brought angry activists to the streets of their towns and cities, world-wide.

Organized in part by the likes of America-hating Linda Sarsour, acolyte of the hate-spewing Louis Farrakhan, the Big Women’s March called screaming protesters to the streets in the U.S., Canada and Britain.

The day that went down in a blaze of pink pussy caps, knitted well in advance as the chosen symbol of hatred.

That was the day when the far left came to get even with “misogynist” President Donald Trump before he had served his first day in office.

The smears and name calling of celebrity speakers hit a new level of low, with Trump even openly accused on televised coverage of being involved in an incestuous relationship with his own daughter.

The loathing of the four women the judge defends goes much further than the hatred of a president

It was the epic unleashing of a torrent of hatred and spleen venting on full display, viewed by millions some of whom carry its venom to the present day.

But Judge Napolitano has a column on Fox News, headlined, ‘Trump has released a torrent of hatred’, leaving some to wonder was he not tuned in to television or radio on that day?

“…I have known President Trump personally since 1986,” Napolitano wrote in his column. “The private Trump I have known is funny, charming and embracing. That is not the public Trump of today. When he loudly called for four members of Congress – women of color who oppose nearly all his initiatives and who have questioned his fitness for office – to go back to the places from which they came, he unleashed a torrent of hatred.”

The issue at hand is so much bigger than the Judge having known President Trump “personally since 1986”.

Napolitano describes the four women who oppose “nearly all of his (Trump’s) initiatives “who have questioned his fitness for office” as “women of color”—something President Trump never did.

The loathing of the four women the judge defends goes much further than the hatred of a president because it goes all the way to dissatisfaction with the country they were elected to serve, and with Americans.

Does this mean that it is kosher for some of the aggrieved to be able to partake in the corrosion of hatred, but not others?

Does a duly elected president have no right to defend himself against active, visceral hatred?

Does a duly elected president have no right to defend himself against active, visceral hatred?

Some are already asking where is the gratitude of the women for the privilege of living in the most blessedly free country in the world?

Where is the gratitude for the one welcomed with open arms into the country where she and her family chose to live, as millions of others are?

Where is the gratitude of all four who were given the privilege of serving their home states as elected officials?

In his description about hatred being back, Napolitano explains that “hatred is so volatile and destructive that, once unleashed, it takes on a life of its own. It is cover for our deepest and darkest instincts.”

Fair enough.

“It also captivates our attention, Napolitano wrote.  “Could that be the president’s wish – that we think about hatred of his targets rather than the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who spent two years investigating the president and testified before two House committees Wednesday?”

Could it be that senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel Judge Andrew P. Napolitano hates that former Special Counsel Robert Mueller was not able to finish Trump off on unproven accusations of Russian collision, so accuses the president of unleashing a “torrent of hatred” against the four Congress women trying to undermine him instead?

Even though we’re not supposed to question the leading No. 1 cable news channel about anything, was Just asking all the same.

Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com.