THE OLIVE BRANCH

THE OLIVE BRANCH

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Then there is the word “World”. While the word “world” is not a bad or unkind word in any way it is does ring a different kind of bell when contrasted with terms such as ‘Nation States’ and ‘National Sovereignty’. In terms of securing national sovereignty and individual freedom suddenly the notion of ‘world’ can present a major threat to that sovereignty. There is no valid argument for the destruction of our planet and any form of life on it.As human beings, our greatness lies not so much in being able to remake the world - that is the myth of the atomic age - as in being able to remake ourselves. Be the change that you want to see in the world. This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Gross violation of constitutional rights

Gross violation of constitutional rights




First, allow me to offer this warning: Do not, for one moment, believe the FCC has backed off its CIN (Critical Information Needs) initiative. It WILL be back, in another guise, most likely as a study to determine if minority ownership of broadcast stations is at a satisfactory level.  Of course, it is not—at least not in the eyes of the Democratic Party.

It has been a while in coming but, as an old retired broadcaster, I have been expecting this move by the government for a very long time.  Once The Dictator,” Obama, moved into the White House it was but a matter of time.

Ajit Pai, a commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission, was so upset about this move by the government to filter the news we get daily from the broadcast—AND—print media that he wrote an article about if for the Wall Street Journal Online.  Here are HIS words:

”... The government has no place pressuring media organizations into covering certain stories.”


Commissioner Pai continues: Last May the FCC proposed an initiative to thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country. With its “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs, or CIN, the agency plans to send researchers to grill reporters, editors and station owners about how they decide which stories to run. A field test in Columbia, S.C., is scheduled to begin this spring.

How does the FCC plan to dig up all that information? First, the agency selected eight categories of critical information such as theenvironment and economic opportunities,” that it believes local newscasters should cover. It plans to ask station managers, news directors, journalists, television anchors and on-air reporters to tell the government about their news philosophy and how the station ensures that the community gets critical information.

Before we go on, allow me to explain for those of you who have never been involved in the broadcast business— the FCC is basically the same to broadcasters as the IRS is to all taxpayers.  Only worse. The FCC holds the life of a broadcast station in it’s hands.  They can revoke the station’s license when they choose and that station, that business, is kaput!

So.  Understand this:  When the FCC makes asuggestion it is taken as a commandment from on high.  If they say: Jump.” The station licensee says: “How high?Then, without waiting for a reply, jumps as high as he can.

I was in broadcasting in one of the training areas of the FCC for nearly two decades.  I had far more dealings with FCC inspectors than I ever—- ever—- wanted.  Working in pairs they’d hit a station in the early morning and spend most of the day going over that station’s logs—transmitter logs, program logs, and such.  The entire building became a pressure cooker during those hours.

In a training area, as we were, we knew thenew guy was going to attempt to impress his trainer, so, we expected, and got, everything short of a body cavity search by the trainee.  It was brutal.

So when the FCC says they are going to ask the station personnel to “tell the government about their news philosophy and how the station ensures that the community gets critical information.” That’s not EXACTLY how it will work.  Allow me to translate that for you into the language every broadcaster knows:  It means the FCC is going to tell the broadcaster that these are eight categories of critical information the licensee WILL begin covering immediately, and, I am sure, make reports to the FCC as to what was aired, when it was aired , the name of the person broadcasting the coverage, etc..  As I said above—a suggestion from the FCC is understood to be a commandment.

Commissioner Pai goes on:  Participation in the Critical Information Needs study is voluntary—in theory. Unlike the opinion surveys that Americans see on a daily basis and either answer or not, as they wish, the FCC’s queries may be hard for the broadcasters to ignore. They would be out of business without an FCC license, which must be renewed every eight years.


The democrats have been trying to reestablish the old Fairness Doctrine which shackled broadcasters for decades—dating back to 1949.  The FCC stopped enforcing the policy in 1987 and finally took it off the books in 2011.  There had been scads of lawsuits filed by broadcasters and broadcasting associations pleading that the Fairness Doctrine did not serve the public interest and did, indeed,  infringe upon freedom of the press.  What it DID do was cause a lot of dial turning as people switched stations to get away from the dry public affairs topics and banal discussions of topics they hadn’t the slightest interest in.

You may remember that near the beginning of this piece, I noted that this policy would affect both the broadcast and the PRINT media.  Note please: the PRINT media.  The FCC has no control over the print media, only the broadcast media.  So, if this is just a fact finding incursion into the broadcast newsrooms, then what, pray tell, is a broadcast regulation agency doing in a newspaper newsroom?


No.  There is more here, dear reader, than meets the eye.  It is, I believe, the first step in the government take over of the news organizations in America.  The government bureaucrat dreams of control of the press. THAT’S where this is all headed.

This is, in my opinion, a violation of the First Amendment.  But it doesn’t matter.  The Obama Regime has already completely trashed the constitution.

If the FCC is allowed to carry through with this plan, it will not be long before government monitors will take up residence in newsrooms all across America and every piece of script, every article of news for print, will be approved or disapproved by them!  America’s free press will be dead.

I would hope this would be a wake-up call for the liberal media in America.  We have warned for many, many, decades that the progressive Marxists they (the liberal media) run interference for, for which they shuck and jive on a daily basis, once in control of the government would come after them—FIRST!  They didn’t believe us.  I suspect they will not believe it when those government “minders” take up positions in their newsrooms and dictate to them the news they will—and will not—broadcast or print.

This is another glaring reason we need to clean out the US Senate in November and put a conservative in the Oval Office in 2016.  As long as a Democrat occupies the Oval Office, the Democratic Party will have control of the FCC.  That’s the way it works.  Control changes with the party in the Oval office.

In the meantime, I intend to speak with my Congressman and insist that he do what he can to stop this government takeover of America’s newsrooms.

I think Byron York of the Washington Examiner summed it up best.  He said: If the FCC goes forward, it’s not clear what will happen to news organizations that fall short of the new government standards. Perhaps they will be disciplined. Or perhaps the very threat of investigating their methods will nudge them into compliance with the administration’s journalistic agenda. What is sure is that it will be a gross violation of constitutional rights.

DONATE TO SUPPORT FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience









Let April bloom with a donation to .FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience Be a partner in the effort to provide the best analysis possible and Citizen Journalism. THANK YOU!






12 trips through the ghetto


12 trips through the ghetto


Robert Woodson challenges both parties' thinking about poverty.


Meet the man who took Paul Ryan on 12 trips through the ghetto

Author
By Dan Calabrese

To the extent that poverty could be addressed by public policy, there is this big honking problem: For the most part, neither party sees political advantage in really trying to make that happen. Democrats benefit when poverty persists and their political allies in the poverty industry enjoy the steady flow of public funds, especially as low-income voters continue to embrace the illusion that voting for Democrats is in their best interests. Republicans figure there is not much point because venturing into the inner city would eat up lots of time and resources and bring you little reward.

That kind of thinking drives Robert Woodson crazy. He is a black conservative who has run the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise since 1981, and while politicians give lip service to the question of poverty, he’s spent decades in the trenches discovering the real causes of the problem, and real solutions. But that doesn’t mean no one in the political world is paying attention. The Wall Street Journal’s Jason L. Riley told us over the weekend that Paul Ryan approached Woodson wanting to know what he could teach him about better approaches to poverty. Woodson’s answer was that he would help, but only if Ryan and his people were serious enough to devote serious time to the issue. They were, and to date Woodson has taken Ryan on 12 trips into high-crime, drug-infested neighborhoods as part of a larger effort to show Ryan the real dynamics that drive poverty:http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304441304579481593325577488?mg=reno64-wsj

Mr. Woodson sees an opportunity here for the GOP to do right by the poor without abandoning its conservative principles or pandering. He points to the successful outreach efforts of former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan and former Indianapolis Mayor Stephen Goldsmith, two Republicans who worked with local minority communities to push market-driven urban redevelopment and were rewarded politically by blacks for doing so.

To illustrate the difference between his approach to community activism and a liberal’s, Mr. Woodson tells me about a pastor in Detroit who wanted to build 50 new homes in a ghetto neighborhood but couldn’t find financial backing or insurance. “If he had gone to someone on the left for help, they would have gotten their lawyers to sue the insurance company and the bank for redlining or something. What I did by contrast is arrange a meeting between the insurance executives and the pastor. They saw what he was trying to do, the people in the neighborhood he was employing. They saw someone developing human capital.” The insurance company got on board and a bank followed. With financing in place, the homes were built, as was a new restaurant currently run by a man who did 13 years in prison.

You will recall, of course, that some statements Ryan made recently sparked a brouhaha in which liberal poverty pimps knee-jerked into racism accusations against Ryan. But you may also recall that the previous week, Ryan was talking about finding better solutions to poverty than the traditional dichotomy the two parties usually give us. Now you know, at least in part, where all this is coming from.http://www.caintv.com/cue-the-liberal-freakout-as-pa

http://www.caintv.com/paul-ryans-astonishing-notion

Woodson assails Republicans who genuflect at the altar of race pimps like Jesse Jackson, saying it’s time to stop validating such people. At the same time, he showed up at the recent White House unveiling of President Obama’s “My Brother’s Keeper” initiative, saying he doesn’t care about partisanship if something works. (He expects, however, it will make little difference because most of the money will go to Jackson and Sharpton types.)

Some of you are upset with Ryan about his recent strategic decisions concerning the budget. Fine. But Ryan is doing something here that Republicans need in a partisan sense, and more importantly that the nation needs in a substantive sense. We can all recognize that left-wing approaches to poverty have been a disaster, but when Republicans refuse to engage on the issue because they figure there’s nothing to gain politically, all that happens is that we leave inner-city people in the hands of liberal politicians who will always do what they’ve always done.

Finding solutions that actually work would not only change the nation’s political dynamics - imagine what would happen if the GOP could merely become competitive for inner-city black votes - but it could changes a lot of people’s lives for the better. Paul Ryan may not be perfect, but a nation with a lot of political poseurs and very few real leaders needs people like him on the scene precisely because he is willing to do things like
 this.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

From serving us to intimidating us.

From serving us to intimidating us.

It’s Tax Freedom Day (finally), but I don’t feel very free

Author
By Herman Cain

According to the Tax Foundation, today, April 21, 2014, is Tax Freedom Day. It’s the day we have worked as a nation collectively to pay our total tax bill for the year. This includes federal and state income taxes for a combined total of $4.5 trillion.

Tax Freedom Day is three days later than last year at 111 days into the year.

We will spend more on taxes in 2014 than we will on food, clothing and housing combined. President Obama’s latest 10-year budget proposal would have had taxes and federal spending to continue increasing with no end in sight. If the president had his way, our taxes would continue to go up with no end in sight.

The administration’s response to all of this is to ignore the facts, ignore the people and businesses who have been hurt by increased tax burdens, ignore the fact that median household income continues to decline, and try to intimidate those of us who are not afraid to speak out concerning the abuses of this administration.

So, on Tax Freedom Day, the pain of working for a federal government wrought with waste, fraud, abuse and corruption may have ended for this year, but an audit could be lurking just around the corner. Another sneak-a-tax may be buried in a regulatory rule we have not seen yet.

A request for a tax-exempt status for an organization considered “conservative” might be held up indefinitely. Or, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the IRS may be ignored or delayed indefinitely, such as the one made by the Republican National Committee. They have been waiting for over 200 days for a FOIA request that can usually be answered within 30 days.

Tax Freedom Day, unfortunately, does not ease the stress of an unexpected and intrusive action or demand into our lives by this administration. They have replaced service to the people with intimidation of the people.

Just ask Dr. Ben Carson, who is being audited following his public criticism of ObamaCare in the presence of President Obama. Ask Catherine Englebrecht, who was harassed by multiple federal agencies for starting an organization to help insure integrity at the ballot box. Ask cattle rancher Cliven Bundy, whose prized bulls were killed by federal Bureau of Land Management agents because they say he owes back grazing fees. I don’t know if he does or not, but is that a sensible way to resolve the dispute with a government that is supposed to work for us?

Tax Freedom Day is an important benchmark for the year, but when do we get IRS freedom day? Answer! It’s when we replace the tax code.

When do we get EPA freedom day, NLRB freedom day, NSA freedom day, Senator Harry Reid freedom day, Representative Nancy Pelosi freedom day, and President Barrack Hussein Obama freedom day?

Answer! It’s when we change control of the Senate in November 2014, and elect a Republican president in 2016. Until then, I don’t feel free.

Quite the contrary, I feel threatened that my life could become a living hell at the whim of the same federal government that we fund with our hard-earned tax dollars.

Brushfires of Freedom

We desperately need men of the caliber of Samuel Adams to lead a freedom movement in America today. Without those men, we will lose our beloved country


Author
By J.D. Longstreet

During this country’s first “... times that try men’s souls…,”  a member of a small minority of the American colonists, thought of as a radical, a rabble rouser, even a traitor, kept the fires of freedom burning in the hearts and minds of his fellow colonists.  His name was Samuel Adams.  He was known by his friends as just plain “Sam.”

Just plain Sam became a Founding Father of the United States of America.

Sam was born on September 27, 1722 in Boston, Mass..  At the height of his formal education he held a Master of Arts degree from Harvard.

Sam became a politician.  He was a tax collector.  So when he wrote those rants concerning the king’s taxes, ole Sam knew what he was talking/writing about.

He was elected to Massachusetts Assembly in 1765, became a delegate to the First Continental Congress in 1774,  signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776, became a member of Massachusetts State constitutional convention in 1781, was appointed Lieutenant Governor of Mass. in 1789. and was elected Governor of Massachusetts, 1794 until 1797.

No grass grew beneath the feet of just plain “Sam.”


“Samuel was the son of a merchant and brewer. He was an excellent politician, an unsuccessful brewer, and a poor businessman. His early public office as a tax collector might have made him suspect as an agent of British authority, however he made good use of his understanding of the tax codes and wide acquaintance with the merchants of Boston. Samuel was a very visible popular leader who, along with his second cousin John (John became President), spent a great deal of time in the public eye agitating for resistance.” —USHistory.org

It was as a Massachusetts assemblyman that Samuel first proposed a Continental Congress.

Of all Sam Adams’ accomplishments, the single most important, for me, was his ability to fire up the masses with his writing. Ole’ Sam could write—and he had a flare for embedding his passion for freedom and republicanism in every treatise he produced as a pamphlet.

Sam also managed to fire-up the British (and American) King and the British government, too.  When Sam published his circular letter in 1768 calling for colonial non-cooperation with the Brits it prompted the occupation of Boston by British soldiers.  Many historians claim that led to the Boston Massacre in 1770.

To help coordinate resistance to what he saw as the British government’s attempts to violate the British Constitution at the expense of the colonies, in 1772 Adams and his colleagues devised a committee of correspondence system, which linked like-minded Patriots throughout the Thirteen Colonies. Continued resistance to British policy resulted in the 1773 Boston Tea Party and the coming of the American Revolution. (Wikipedia)


241 years later, Sam Adams’ actions and writings are STILL motivating Americans to political action in defense of freedom.

Ole Sam wrote such sagacious nuggets as:  It does not take a majority to prevail… but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.

He also wrote: The Constitution shall never be construed… to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.


Sam also wrote this one and I am very afraid we modern Americans have completely forgotten the wisdom it encapsulates:  The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.


It is difficult to believe, but Sam Adams is considered a controversial figure in early America. So far as I am concerned, that is pure bunk.  Sam Adams was a passionate patriot who fought for freedom from Great Britain with the skill and talent with which God had blessed him.  This country was extraordinarily lucky to have had a Samuel Adams in the right place at the right time.

Some claim that Sam had been steering his fellow colonists towards independence long before the outbreak of the Revolutionary War.  There is written evidence of that.

Then there are others who say Sam was a propagandist who incited his fellow colonists to mob violence to accomplish HIS goals.


In January 1748, Adams and some friends, inflamed by British impressment, launched the Independent Advertiser, a weekly newspaper that printed many political essays written by Adams. Drawing heavily upon English political theorist John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, Adams’s essays emphasized many of the themes that would characterize his subsequent career. He argued that the people must resist any encroachment on their constitutional rights. He cited the decline of the Roman Empire as an example of what could happen to New England if it were to abandon its Puritan values. (Wikipedia)


The more one reads of Sam Adams’ writings the more he begins to sound very much like a modern day conservative blogger.  Indeed, I suspect that were he alive today that is exactly what he would be doing.

I did not set out to deliver a history lesson in this piece.  My intention was to draw a comparison between the literal host of conservative bloggers who write daily much the same message as did Samuel Adams.  Unfortunately, the conditions in America have deteriorated until they once again resemble the same conditions between the government and the governed as they did in Sam Adams’ day.  The only difference—we are now suffering oppression at the hands of our own government and not that of a British king.  To this scribe that makes it doubly difficult to abide.

I submit that Americans are going to find they must become bold again.  Sam Adams showed the way.  His love of freedom, his passion for liberty was the fuel that drove him to become a Founding Father of this nation.

Each time we sit or stand passively by and allow our President and our Congress to ignore the constitution with impunity, we are spitting on the constitution. We are effectively “selling-out” our Founding Fathers who risked everything to give us a free nation.  We are also demonstrating disrespect for our fellow Americans who have given their lives, their limbs, and their future on some foreign battlefield to preserve the freedom and rights enumerated within our constitution.

What’s happening in America today is unconscionable.  Americans standing by and allowing the US to be bludgeoned and bled dry by the domestic communist movement—with renewed vigor —as a result of the election of a Marxist (Communist) President is a deeply troubling mystery.  I cannot fathom it.

We desperately need men of the caliber of Samuel Adams to lead a freedom movement in America today.  Without those men, we will lose our beloved country


The Muslim Brotherhood in America

The Muslim Brotherhood in America

Unsafe Spaces: Islamist Mosques


Author
By Frank Gaffney Jr.

The contempt that America’s enemies have for the United States these days is palpable. The most obvious current example is Vladimir Putin’s disdain for President Obama, whom he regards as little more than a speed-bump on the road to his conquest of Ukraine and perhaps other nations in what the Kremlin calls Russia’s “near-abroad.”

Not content with snatching Crimea and preparing reprises elsewhere, Putin has a jet buzz one of our ships in the Black Sea for ninety minutes then launches a new multiple-warhead intercontinental ballistic missile. By contrast, Team Obama is busily dismantling what’s left of our navy and strategic forces.

Then there’s the back of the hand treatment China showed Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel when, during his recent visit to the People’s Republic, the Pentagon chief had the temerity to lecture his hosts about how to behave internationally. They took him to see their just-refurbished aircraft carrier and unveiled a new fighter aircraft to operate from it. The best Hagel could do was announce that the U.S. was going to respond to Beijing’s increasing belligerence in the region by sending there a grand total of two more anti-missile destroyers–by 2017.

A more subtle, but no less in-your-face kind of contempt has just been served up by Muslim Brotherhood operatives and other Islamists in this country.


To mark the occasion of the first anniversary of two of their fellow jihadists’ murderous attack at the Boston Marathon, the leaders of several Brotherhood fronts have launched something called the “Safe Spaces Initiative.” They evidently think we are so stupid, or at least now so submissive, that they can try to put mosques off-limits to law enforcement. This is all the more astounding since we know that the perpetrators of the terrorism of a year ago used the Islamic Society of Boston mosque in Cambridge to become versed in the ways of the supremacist Islamist doctrine known as shariah and the jihad it commands.

A chief proponent of this Safe Spaces gambit is Salam al-Marayati, the president of an Islamist influence operation out of California with extensive access to the Obama administration, the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). In an opinion piece posted by altmuslim blog on March 28, al-Marayati actually makes plain the true purpose of his Safe Spaces Initiative.http://www.patheos.com/blogs/altmuslim/2014/03/empowering-the-community-to-deal-with-extremism-in-our-mosques/

Notwithstanding the portrayal of this proposal as a means of preventing radicalization in mosques, in the words of al-Marayati: “Safe spaces are needed so that government informants and extremist recruiters are prevented from violating the sanctity of the mosque. In essence, we want to enhance both a spiritual safety and public safety.” (Emphasis added.)


Unfortunately, the latest announcement by William Bratton–the former police commissioner recently re-appointed by New York’s new, Islamist-friendly mayor, Bill de Blasio–would sure seem to justify the Brothers’ low regard for us. As the New York Times reported today “The New York Police Department has abandoned a secretive program that dispatched plainclothes detectives into Muslim neighborhoods….Plainclothes detectives looked for ‘hot spots’ of radicalization that might give the police an early warning about terrorist plots.”http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/16/nyregion/police-unit-that-spied-on-muslims-is-disbanded.html?_r=0

The Times quoted the NYPD’s chief spokesman, Stephen Davis, who made clear the completeness of the department’s submission to the Islamists who style themselves as the “leaders” and “representatives” of all Muslim Americans: “‘Understanding certain local demographics can be a useful factor when assessing the threat information that comes into New York City virtually on a daily basis,” Mr. Davis said. “In the future, we will gather that information, if necessary, through direct contact between the police precincts and the representatives of the communities they serve.”


I discussed the folly of making mosques surveillance-free zones in an interview on Secure Freedom Radio this evening with former federal prosecutor and best-selling author Andrew C. McCarthy. Here’s part of our conversation (for the entire podcast, click here):

FRANK GAFFNEY: The Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, who’s a Muslim Brother fellow-traveller jihadist type, has a rather poetic turn of phrase for it. He says, “The minarets are our bayonets, the domes our helmets, the mosques our barracks, and the faithful our army.” And, Andy, this gives rise to a concern that I’m sure you share about an initiative that some of these Muslim Brotherhood types, notably Mohamed Magid, the president of the largest Muslim Brotherhood front in the United States, the Islamic Society of North America–and, oh, by the way, a frequent visitor at the Obama White House and prominent source of counsel to him and others in his Administration–

ANDY MCCARTHY: And another unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation.

FG: Indeed. These guys have cooked up something called the “Safe Spaces Initiative.” I wonder what you make of that idea, particularly as it seems their purpose is to, as one of them put it, “keep government informants…from violating the sanctity of the mosque.”

AM: Yeah, well, you know, it’s unfortunate that with this particular Justice Department and this Administration they’re probably pushing on an open door.

FG: It’s probably a wired game, let’s be honest. These guys have almost certainly got this rigged with the Justice Department.

AM: But the amazing thing is for all of Obama and Eric Holder’s caterwauling about, you know, how we’ve proved again and again that the civilian justice system is the best way to prosecute terrorism cases–well, why don’t they ever check into what was proved in those prosecutions that they like to tout around? Because if they open the transcripts…what they would find is that mosques were used as recruitment centers, they were used for conspiratorial conversations and agreements, they were used to house weapons, they were used to transfer weapons, and they really were used to light a fire under people who might have been fence-sitters but who were powerfully influenced by some of the imams, particularly the guy who I prosecuted in the 1990s, the Blind Sheikh.

It was in the mosques that [Omar Abdel-Rahman] did most of the damage that he did to the United States. So this is not something we speculate about, Frank. This is something that’s actually been proved in court, and proved again and again and again. So, if you’re going to say that a mosque needs to be a safe space, then what you’re really saying is we’ve taken willful blindness, which was a problem, and we’ve now codified it, so it’s not just willful blindness; it’s just mulish, absolute refusal to come to terms with what we’re up against.

FG: Yeah. And to speak to the other subject of your trilogy there, it is a formula for more of the grand jihad, not less. It is a certainty that you will find more Tsarnaev boys being recruited, or being trained, or being armed, or in other ways being enabled. It simply is mindboggling, Andy, and I think the American people couldn’t comprehend what’s going on here, or believe it if told it.

We can’t afford more of the sort of willful blindness that will give rise to more unsafe mosques and other places, and more jihad

True Christians don't participate in Earth Day

True Christians don't participate in Earth Day

Earth Day—High Holy Day of Paganism


Author
By J.D. Longstreet

Today, masses of human beings around the globe will celebrate the worship of the earth ... not God ... not the creator—but the creation.


Rocks will be worshiped, rivers will be worshiped, trees will be worshiped, the sun will be worshiped, fish, snails, spiders, and all sorts of creeping things will be worshiped today.

Grown-up, adult, men and women will bow down to “THINGS,” to idols, in fealty to a god of their own creation.  They will offer their lives in service to, well, NOTHING.  And these are grown-up people, adults, human beings you would think would have the intelligence to know better.  But you would be mistaken.

Even worse, there will millions among the Pagans who worship the earth, or Gaia (goddess of the earth and mother of Cronus and the Titans in ancient mythology), who claim to be Christians.  Please notice:  I said “CLAIM” to be Christians.

Let me be as clear as I possible can be here:  You cannot be a Christian and worship Gaia (by celebrating Earth Day) at the same time ... period.  It is impossible.

Man cannot serve two masters. “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other.”SOURCE:  Matthew 6:24—The New Testament

Then for those of you who are the cafeteria type Christians who pick and choose the parts of the Christian faith you like and just ignore the parts you dislike, please note that you are in violation of the Ten Commandments.  In fact, you are violating the very first commandment:


“And God spake all these words, saying,

I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.”  Exodus 20: 2 - 4 The Old Testament


You may find some way to justify your Pagan faith in some way that will settle your conscience, but, as a Christian (at least you claim to be) you are spitting in the face of God with your worship of that which He created.

It is not unusual to see mainline Christian churches taking part in Earth Day celebrations across America.  They have become a stench in the nostrils of the Almighty and are become apostate—no longer faithful to Providence.

One must wonder if that explains the great falling away of celebrants from the mainline denominations today.  Their numbers are dwindling as the evangelicals numbers are climbing.  As I said, one must wonder.

Look.  I’m not a preacher, a pastor, an evangelist, a prophet, or anything remotely approaching that—BUT—I have eyes to see and ears to hear and I use them and I reason.

Reason!  Ah!  There lies the rub!


See.  I observe that which takes place around me.  I listen to that which goes on around me and then I allow my brain to do its God-given task of reasoning—and discerning.

Discerning is another of those special gifts that, unfortunately, seems to be reserved for only a few human beings on earth at any given time.

A person with discernment is blessed with having or revealing keen insight and good judgment.  Usually they are unobtrusively perceptive and sympathetic, and usually they are able to make, or detect, effects of great subtlety, meaning they are quite sensitive.

You can quickly see the truth in my statement that there are few of these people around today.

When I see the utter madness that reigns on Earth Day around the globe,  it is extraordinarily easy to understand how evil can so easily warp the minds, the hearts, and, yes—the soul of man.  For understand, gentle reader, participants in this Pagan worship, this Pagan ritual, endanger their very soul. Those who bow down to this false god—Gaia, are committing blasphemy against God.

If you, dear reader, are among those committed to the celebration of the Pagan rite of worshiping the earth and the so-called earth mother, Gaia,  then you are standing at a precarious point in your life.  By your life, I mean not just your life span on this planet, but your life from the moment that eternal spark we call the soul was ignited by God until, well, forever.

See, I am convinced there is much more to life than our brief time here on earth.  A soul, like energy, can be created, and even changed, but it cannot be destroyed.  So after seventy or eighty years here, I believe it moves on to so much more.

It seems to me it would behoove us all to pay more attention to the way we use our limited time on planet earth and avoid such stupid, idiotic, blasphemous, apostate activities as the Pagan worship of a non-entity represented by a tree, a rock, a lizard, a snail, or whatever.

One of the laws of nature is this:  For every action, there is an equal, and opposite, reaction.  The point is:  There will be retribution—divine retribution.

As I observe the mindless celebrations on Earth Day I am reminded of the Israelites making—and then worshiping—a golden calf while Moses was up on the mountain receiving the Ten Commandments from God.

To be sure, the Israelites thought their Pagan festival was, well, logical, just as we excuse our own foray into Paganism today.  It cost them ... dearly.  Three thousand men were killed in a single day and that entire generation of Israelites were barred from ever entering the Promised Land.  They were forced to wander in the desert until all had died.  Their children then claimed the prize.


Earth Day is an abomination. It is disgusting and abhorrent.  America and, indeed, the world will pay for this affront to the Divine.



The choice for Christians, dear reader, is clear.  No one, NO ONE, can serve two masters.

Consider the clear and concise words of Joshua echoing down the ages:  “Choose ye this day whom ye will serve. As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”

Earth Day is the catalyst for decisive action on all our parts, especially those who claim to be Christians.

Today we must make a choice between eternal separation from God or disavowing all association with the evil entity sponsoring Earth Day.

So, there it is:  My opinion, my view, on Earth Day and Christians participating in it’s festivities.  Simply put:  True Christians don’t participate in Earth Day


A Globalist Is a Satanist

A Globalist Is a Satanist


April 21, 2014



Galatians 5:1

For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery

  The more things change, the more things stay the same. Heed my warning: Anyone who tried to rob you of your freedom serves Satan because the loss of the freedom to choose is antithetical to the word of God.

On this Easter day of 2014, some people are wondering just why did the Roman authorities kill Jesus? The answer to this question is multi-dimensional. Of course, Satanic forces tried to extinguish the message of God’s salvation emanating  from Jesus and then later from the 12 disciples, through the process of crucifixion. This was based upon the mistaken notion that if the messenger is killed, the message would die. And try to kill the word of God they did. The Romans failed miserably.

The words of Jesus are embedded with the message of self-determination and freedom. Every person is free to choose their path by either choosing salvation or choosing eternal damnation. Even in this life, we can achieve fulfillment by adhering to the word of God. Therefore, controlling the message has always been the goal of tyrants because they seek to be your God. All tyrants attempt to control and own the message of salvation and freedom in order to obscure the fact that all human beings have the freedom to choose and that freedom is granted by God.


Freedom is Gods gift to mankind, government does not grant that right. No man, no government and certainly no despot controls my mind, my heart and my soul. Through the grace of God, the spirit of freedom is inherent in our soul, it is in our DNA and freedom and man cannot be separated, even in physical death.



The People Are Not Buying Salvation Through Government


Freedom is not granted by government

Most opinion polls place Obama’s approval rating in the percentile of the low 30′s. Congress has an estimated approval rating of less than 10%.  The word is out, our government does not serve the people and most of the people are waking up to that fact.  Even the sheep who do not know the difference between a Bilderberg and the restaurant known as Build Your Own Burger, know that something is terribly wrong.

History will soon repeat itself. When the word of Jesus would not die, Christians became the source of entertainment as they were fed to the lions. Yet, the one true religion, the message of Jesus, spread throughout the world. In today’s world, we are about to experience a repeat of the same cycle.

The word of God and subsequent freedom will go forth and the forces of evil will attempt to exterminate the same message. Persecution and genocide will be their strategy. I have consistently said that we are on a path to Armageddon (i.e. World War III). The path to man’s ultimate fate will consist of a major false flag, brutal martial law and then World War III. The precursor to man’s inevitable fate will be the extermination of freedom. And in today’s world, this means the control of the internet.

Clinton’s Administration Predicted Today’s Battleground


In a 1995 report, entitled The Communication Stream of Conspiracy Commerce, foretold the Internet as a new method of communication employed by the right wing… and the internet is used to convey their fringe stories into legitimate subjects of coverage by the mainstream media. In other words, a Clinton era report predicted what Brzezinski has openly lamented, the internet has made “we the people increasingly difficult to control.http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/assets/storage/Research%20-%20Digital%20Library/formerlywithheld/batch4/2007-0080-F.pdf


In a 2009 speech, Zbigniew Brzezinski proclaimed, “…in early times, it was easier to control a million people, literally it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today, it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people. It is easier to kill than to control….”





Brzezinski is an insider’s insider. He and David Rockefeller co-founded the Trilateral Commission. He served as Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser. He may as well have been called Mr. President during the Carter years because he ran the American economy into the ground while undermining American sovereignty during the Carter administration. Many suspect that he also controls Obama. He was, after all, Obama’s Russian Studies professor at Columbia back in the 1980′s. We know that he handpicked Jimmy Carter to become the President and many suspect he had a large hand in grooming Obama for the same job. Brzezinski’s close affiliation with Rockefeller makes him a person of interest when it comes to the subjugation, of not only this country, but of the entire planet.


Brzezinski is obviously the globalist’s man on the ground and serves the role as puppet masterTherefore, we would be wise to listen and to take seriously what this New World Order and Satanist demagogue has to say because he and his globalist colleagues are beyond hiding their intentions, they are making their move because they know if they don’t move soon, that too many people on the planet will awaken and stop their tyranny in its tracks.

During a speech in Poland, Brzezinski publicly lamented that it has becomeincreasingly difficult to suppress and control the “persistent and highly motivated populist resistance of politically awakened and historically resentful peoples.” Brzezinski is clearly referring to “we the people”, the people in the alternative media.http://www.infowars.com/brzezinski-populist-resistance-is-derailing-the-new-world-order



                                          Onward Christian Soldiers

                                                                       
Whether you have a large following by hosting your own talk show, or you have a large website where you expose the truth, or you simply write on message boards and also alert your family to the tyranny that has overrun our country, all of us are part of the alternative media. None of us are more important than any other freedom fighter. Look in the mirror, you are the last line of resistance to the planned eugenics take over on this planet and we are being increasingly effective!

Conversely, a globalist is a Satanist because they seek to erase free will and the freedom to choose one’s destiny. If one follows the doctrine of globalism, they are following the mandates of Satan. There is no middle ground. On this Easter Sunday, it is time for each of us to decide. Are we going to reject the tenets of globalism and its Satanic, collectivist dictates, or, are we going to stand tall like Christ’s disciples and choose God’s word, the message of salvation and ultimate freedom by opposing the enemies of humanity?

Possess the Soul by Controlling the Message is the Goal
The Satanic tools of enslavement begins with the control of the internet.

This is why John McCain once introduced legislation to fine bloggers $300,000 for offensive comments.

This is why McCain sponsored another piece of legislation to give away control of the internet to Verizon and Bell South five years ago. This is why we have seen SOPA and Feinstein’s recent attempt to silence citizen journalists.

This is why we are hearing that the Trans Pacific Partnership is going to give control of the internet, for its member nations, to a small tribunal and this cannot be challenged in Congress.

Although it does not often feel like it, we are winning the propaganda war or the globalists would not be interested in shutting us down.


Brzezinski and the globalists are panicked because they know what I know; Social psychology teaches us that a society only must have 10% of its population be dedicated to an ideal before it catches hold and spreads to 75% of the masses that we call the sheep. We are on the precipice of reaching this threshold. The globalists desperately need a game changing event. They are out of time, humanity is finally rolling out of bed and the globalists are poised to strike.

Conclusion
As it was in the time of Jesus, controlling the message is the precursor to controlling the hearts, minds and souls of the people.  As the alternative media speculates as to what event will set off the darkest days of humanity, we should remember that all satanically inspired tyrants will attempt to extinguish freedom. Again, in the modern day world, that means the control of the internet.


Satanists have tried to possess the soul since the dawn of time. Even if the globalists seize the internet, that does not mean the end of freedom.  So long as your tongue moves and you have breath to speak, it is your duty to point our collective fingers at evil and refuse to bow down.



                    John 8:32 And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.



http://revolutionradio.org/?p=72096