Marijuana Kills Brain Tumors, But Is Still Illegal

Marijuana Kills Brain Tumors, But Is Still Illegal


The U.S. government admits in newly funded research that compounds found in marijuana have an unprecedented ability to go in and kill brain tumors without any negative side effects. But you’re still going to jail if you try and use it as a medication.

And let’s be clear here: we’re not talking about prosecution for those who just ‘want to get high.’ In fact, as I’ve explained before, the true health effects of marijuana really don’t have to come with its infamous psychoactive effect Instead, we look to the non-THC (which is what gets you high) compounds within marijuana that are specifically known for their anti-cancer and antioxidant effects.
http://naturalsociety.com/why-is-marijuana-illegal-examining-the-health-aspects-of-cannabis/

The worst part is that even marijuana without THC is still illegal, despite having zero ‘high’ effects. But then again, this new study on anti-tumor activity even focuses on extracts of marijuana that often do not cause any high either. As reported by Raw Story on the latest study:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/04/feds-admit-medical-pot-works-on-brain-tumors-but-theyre-going-after-users-anyway/

“In a report issued by a U.S. government-funded research group tasked with studying drug abuse and addiction, researchers are admitting that marijuana is useful in killing off specific types of brain tumors. The report — coming from a government-backed group with annual budget of over $1 billion — arrives at an awkward time for the administration following an announcement by the Department of Justice this week that it will continue to prosecute medical marijuana cases against individuals in defiance of Congress.”

A quick search within the PubMed National Library of Medicine database for ‘marijuana’ turns up a host of studies, highlighting every aspect imaginable regarding the plant in its many forms. Some advocacy websites have even compiled a list of studies in an easy-to-read format surrounding marijuana, which has led numerous journalists to ask the obvious question: Why are we spending so much time researching an illegal drug for its numerous benefits while stamping side-effect-riddled drugs with the FDA stamp of approval with far less research?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=marijuana
http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000884
http://www.hightimes.com/read/cannabis-has-been-studied-more-many-fda-approved-pharmaceuticals

The truth? Marijuana is backed by more clinical research than most pharmaceutical drugs.
http://naturalsociety.com/marijuana-backed-studies-fda-approved-pharma-drugs/

When considering that the average drug label contains 70 side effects, and have not been thoroughly studied for long-term effects in many cases, it’s easy to see the scientific oddity that exists around the use of non-THC containing hemp (at the very least). Many popular pharmaceuticals have even been found to contain 100 to 125 side effects. Some pharma drugs come with over 525 negative reactions.

As the realization within the United States comes into focus surrounding the practical and health-related uses of marijuana, especially in its ‘no high’ non-THC form that only serves to enhance one’s health and state, it’s becoming more clear than ever that a serious role exists for hemp within the US and beyond.

Additional Sources: DrugAbuse :http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana-medicine

Anthony Gucciardi