FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today


To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

"Until the philosophy which holds one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned, everywhere is war and until there are no longer first-class and second-class citizens of any nation, until the color of a man's skin is of no more significance than the color of his eyes. And until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all without regard to race, there is war. And until that day, the dream of lasting peace, world citizenship, rule of international morality, will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained... now everywhere is war." - - Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia - Popularized by Bob Marley in the song War

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Friday, April 22, 2016

Nationalism versus Federalism

Nationalism versus Federalism




The presidential campaign so far seems filled with nationalistic appeals, which is dangerous for America.  In some places around the world, the difference between nationalism and patriotism may be blurred, but in our country, nationalism is the very antithesis of patriotism.

Nationalism is inherently centralizing, and it is the first step toward totalitarianism.  The most significant change in German government after the Nazis took power was the destruction of the power of the states of Germany.  Bad nations invariably begin with the consolidation of all practical power in nationalism rather than limited central power. 

The greatest single achievement of America was that the sovereign states were persuaded to allow in the Constitution very limited powers to a national government, while states retained the vast preponderance of government power.  The Tenth Amendment put an exclamation point on that fact and the Eleventh Amendment was intended to make clear that federal courts had no power to decide cases involving states. 

The greatest single calamity in America today is that these states have become little more than appendages of federal power in many areas.  The rationale for this long campaign by nationalists against American governmental structure is this "crisis" or that "emergency."  The First World War, then the Depression, then the Second World War, then the Cold War, then environmental issues...and so on.  The Tenth Amendment, like the Eleventh Amendment, has essentially been treated as if these part of the Constitution had been repealed.
National power have been grabbed from citizens and from states.  This power is always grabbed for "emergencies," of course, and the problems the national government pretends to solve are never solved.  The consequences of that for our nation are profound, and more than anything else, this is the source of our problems in America.

The contrast with national solutions to problems rather than federal (i.e., state government) solutions to problems is the difference between monopoly and markets.  When states exercise power over education or labor relations or abortion or civil liberties, then the wise exercise of that power will attract to well-governed states people, commerce, brains, and talent.

This marketplace of governments works in practice and it also allows the sort of diversity which leftists pretend to pine for so deeply.  The greater the nationalization of government, the fewer areas in which states can be truly independent, and the less those independent policies matter. 

Nationalism has another sinister toxin in politics and government.  When our nation was formed, there was no capitol per se, and when the District of Columbia was created, it was intended to be located in the middle of America, as it was in 1790.  Today, the District of Columbia is farther away from much of America than London was from the American colonies when the Revolutionary War began.

As long as federalism kept the national government relatively insignificant, the dramatic isolation of our center of national government power from the rest of America did not matter.  Today, a map of "red" and "blue" states shows quite clearly how proximity to national government is directly connected to lust for national government hegemony.

When schemes to solve the myriad problems we face through national means, rather that state-by-state ones, are proposed, Flyover Country knows what that means: their interests, their values, and their rights will be subordinated to people who live thousands of miles away by those who scarcely know (or care) about what life is like in these "colonies." 
  
There are two practical problems in a presidential election with making the case for federalism rather than nationalism in addressing those things that government ought to address. 

First, federal politicians since FDR have bought votes by promising goodies paid for through an unlimited national credit card (something states cannot do) and Federal Reserve fiat money.  Promising national solutions to problems always sounds better than saying states should try many different solutions to perceived national problems.
Second, those who tell America about national government live in the surreal fantasy world of Washington and New York.  These folks quite naturally think in terms of nationalism and not federalism.  This includes not just the pundits who are invested in nationalism, but also the politicians who live in Washington and not where their voters live.  So we hear from these politicians the constant call to "bring us together" though the compression of Americans into a single national glob – a recipe for misery and failure. 

Convincing voters that federalism and not nationalism is the answer to our problems is hard, but it must be done.
The presidential campaign so far seems filled with nationalistic appeals, which is dangerous for America.  In some places around the world, the difference between nationalism and patriotism may be blurred, but in our country, nationalism is the very antithesis of patriotism.

Nationalism is inherently centralizing, and it is the first step toward totalitarianism.  The most significant change in German government after the Nazis took power was the destruction of the power of the states of Germany.  Bad nations invariably begin with the consolidation of all practical power in nationalism rather than limited central power. 

The greatest single achievement of America was that the sovereign states were persuaded to allow in the Constitution very limited powers to a national government, while states retained the vast preponderance of government power.  The Tenth Amendment put an exclamation point on that fact and the Eleventh Amendment was intended to make clear that federal courts had no power to decide cases involving states. 

The greatest single calamity in America today is that these states have become little more than appendages of federal power in many areas.  The rationale for this long campaign by nationalists against American governmental structure is this "crisis" or that "emergency."  The First World War, then the Depression, then the Second World War, then the Cold War, then environmental issues...and so on.  The Tenth Amendment, like the Eleventh Amendment, has essentially been treated as if these part of the Constitution had been repealed.
National power have been grabbed from citizens and from states.  This power is always grabbed for "emergencies," of course, and the problems the national government pretends to solve are never solved.  The consequences of that for our nation are profound, and more than anything else, this is the source of our problems in America.

The contrast with national solutions to problems rather than federal (i.e., state government) solutions to problems is the difference between monopoly and markets.  When states exercise power over education or labor relations or abortion or civil liberties, then the wise exercise of that power will attract to well-governed states people, commerce, brains, and talent.

This marketplace of governments works in practice and it also allows the sort of diversity which leftists pretend to pine for so deeply.  The greater the nationalization of government, the fewer areas in which states can be truly independent, and the less those independent policies matter. 

Nationalism has another sinister toxin in politics and government.  When our nation was formed, there was no capitol per se, and when the District of Columbia was created, it was intended to be located in the middle of America, as it was in 1790.  Today, the District of Columbia is farther away from much of America than London was from the American colonies when the Revolutionary War began.

As long as federalism kept the national government relatively insignificant, the dramatic isolation of our center of national government power from the rest of America did not matter.  Today, a map of "red" and "blue" states shows quite clearly how proximity to national government is directly connected to lust for national government hegemony. 

When schemes to solve the myriad problems we face through national means, rather that state-by-state ones, are proposed, Flyover Country knows what that means: their interests, their values, and their rights will be subordinated to people who live thousands of miles away by those who scarcely know (or care) about what life is like in these "colonies."   

There are two practical problems in a presidential election with making the case for federalism rather than nationalism in addressing those things that government ought to address. 

First, federal politicians since FDR have bought votes by promising goodies paid for through an unlimited national credit card (something states cannot do) and Federal Reserve fiat money.  Promising national solutions to problems always sounds better than saying states should try many different solutions to perceived national problems.
Second, those who tell America about national government live in the surreal fantasy world of Washington and New York.  These folks quite naturally think in terms of nationalism and not federalism.  This includes not just the pundits who are invested in nationalism, but also the politicians who live in Washington and not where their voters live.  So we hear from these politicians the constant call to "bring us together" though the compression of Americans into a single national glob – a recipe for misery and failure. 

Convincing voters that federalism and not nationalism is the answer to our problems is hard, but it must be done.

Nationalism versus Federalism




The presidential campaign so far seems filled with nationalistic appeals, which is dangerous for America.  In some places around the world, the difference between nationalism and patriotism may be blurred, but in our country, nationalism is the very antithesis of patriotism.

Nationalism is inherently centralizing, and it is the first step toward totalitarianism.  The most significant change in German government after the Nazis took power was the destruction of the power of the states of Germany.  Bad nations invariably begin with the consolidation of all practical power in nationalism rather than limited central power. 

The greatest single achievement of America was that the sovereign states were persuaded to allow in the Constitution very limited powers to a national government, while states retained the vast preponderance of government power.  The Tenth Amendment put an exclamation point on that fact and the Eleventh Amendment was intended to make clear that federal courts had no power to decide cases involving states. 

The greatest single calamity in America today is that these states have become little more than appendages of federal power in many areas.  The rationale for this long campaign by nationalists against American governmental structure is this "crisis" or that "emergency."  The First World War, then the Depression, then the Second World War, then the Cold War, then environmental issues...and so on.  The Tenth Amendment, like the Eleventh Amendment, has essentially been treated as if these part of the Constitution had been repealed.
National power have been grabbed from citizens and from states.  This power is always grabbed for "emergencies," of course, and the problems the national government pretends to solve are never solved.  The consequences of that for our nation are profound, and more than anything else, this is the source of our problems in America.

The contrast with national solutions to problems rather than federal (i.e., state government) solutions to problems is the difference between monopoly and markets.  When states exercise power over education or labor relations or abortion or civil liberties, then the wise exercise of that power will attract to well-governed states people, commerce, brains, and talent.

This marketplace of governments works in practice and it also allows the sort of diversity which leftists pretend to pine for so deeply.  The greater the nationalization of government, the fewer areas in which states can be truly independent, and the less those independent policies matter. 

Nationalism has another sinister toxin in politics and government.  When our nation was formed, there was no capitol per se, and when the District of Columbia was created, it was intended to be located in the middle of America, as it was in 1790.  Today, the District of Columbia is farther away from much of America than London was from the American colonies when the Revolutionary War began.

As long as federalism kept the national government relatively insignificant, the dramatic isolation of our center of national government power from the rest of America did not matter.  Today, a map of "red" and "blue" states shows quite clearly how proximity to national government is directly connected to lust for national government hegemony.

When schemes to solve the myriad problems we face through national means, rather that state-by-state ones, are proposed, Flyover Country knows what that means: their interests, their values, and their rights will be subordinated to people who live thousands of miles away by those who scarcely know (or care) about what life is like in these "colonies." 
  
There are two practical problems in a presidential election with making the case for federalism rather than nationalism in addressing those things that government ought to address. 

First, federal politicians since FDR have bought votes by promising goodies paid for through an unlimited national credit card (something states cannot do) and Federal Reserve fiat money.  Promising national solutions to problems always sounds better than saying states should try many different solutions to perceived national problems.
Second, those who tell America about national government live in the surreal fantasy world of Washington and New York.  These folks quite naturally think in terms of nationalism and not federalism.  This includes not just the pundits who are invested in nationalism, but also the politicians who live in Washington and not where their voters live.  So we hear from these politicians the constant call to "bring us together" though the compression of Americans into a single national glob – a recipe for misery and failure. 

Convincing voters that federalism and not nationalism is the answer to our problems is hard, but it must be done.
The presidential campaign so far seems filled with nationalistic appeals, which is dangerous for America.  In some places around the world, the difference between nationalism and patriotism may be blurred, but in our country, nationalism is the very antithesis of patriotism.

Nationalism is inherently centralizing, and it is the first step toward totalitarianism.  The most significant change in German government after the Nazis took power was the destruction of the power of the states of Germany.  Bad nations invariably begin with the consolidation of all practical power in nationalism rather than limited central power. 

The greatest single achievement of America was that the sovereign states were persuaded to allow in the Constitution very limited powers to a national government, while states retained the vast preponderance of government power.  The Tenth Amendment put an exclamation point on that fact and the Eleventh Amendment was intended to make clear that federal courts had no power to decide cases involving states. 

The greatest single calamity in America today is that these states have become little more than appendages of federal power in many areas.  The rationale for this long campaign by nationalists against American governmental structure is this "crisis" or that "emergency."  The First World War, then the Depression, then the Second World War, then the Cold War, then environmental issues...and so on.  The Tenth Amendment, like the Eleventh Amendment, has essentially been treated as if these part of the Constitution had been repealed.
National power have been grabbed from citizens and from states.  This power is always grabbed for "emergencies," of course, and the problems the national government pretends to solve are never solved.  The consequences of that for our nation are profound, and more than anything else, this is the source of our problems in America.

The contrast with national solutions to problems rather than federal (i.e., state government) solutions to problems is the difference between monopoly and markets.  When states exercise power over education or labor relations or abortion or civil liberties, then the wise exercise of that power will attract to well-governed states people, commerce, brains, and talent.

This marketplace of governments works in practice and it also allows the sort of diversity which leftists pretend to pine for so deeply.  The greater the nationalization of government, the fewer areas in which states can be truly independent, and the less those independent policies matter. 

Nationalism has another sinister toxin in politics and government.  When our nation was formed, there was no capitol per se, and when the District of Columbia was created, it was intended to be located in the middle of America, as it was in 1790.  Today, the District of Columbia is farther away from much of America than London was from the American colonies when the Revolutionary War began.

As long as federalism kept the national government relatively insignificant, the dramatic isolation of our center of national government power from the rest of America did not matter.  Today, a map of "red" and "blue" states shows quite clearly how proximity to national government is directly connected to lust for national government hegemony. 

When schemes to solve the myriad problems we face through national means, rather that state-by-state ones, are proposed, Flyover Country knows what that means: their interests, their values, and their rights will be subordinated to people who live thousands of miles away by those who scarcely know (or care) about what life is like in these "colonies."   

There are two practical problems in a presidential election with making the case for federalism rather than nationalism in addressing those things that government ought to address. 

First, federal politicians since FDR have bought votes by promising goodies paid for through an unlimited national credit card (something states cannot do) and Federal Reserve fiat money.  Promising national solutions to problems always sounds better than saying states should try many different solutions to perceived national problems.
Second, those who tell America about national government live in the surreal fantasy world of Washington and New York.  These folks quite naturally think in terms of nationalism and not federalism.  This includes not just the pundits who are invested in nationalism, but also the politicians who live in Washington and not where their voters live.  So we hear from these politicians the constant call to "bring us together" though the compression of Americans into a single national glob – a recipe for misery and failure. 

Convincing voters that federalism and not nationalism is the answer to our problems is hard, but it must be done.



No comments :