FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

No donations yet. Help launch this campaign and become the first donor.

https://www.gofundme.com/toolreplacementfund

Come On Folks: Get Behind Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign

Remember, Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign is independent because it is wholly funded by YOU
Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign is one of the webs only truly independent sources of news and opinion.
Without YOUR help it can not continue to exist.
Please help - Act now! Click the link below

Please provide whatever you can- $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100- To Use your debit/credit card or check pay here on facebook pay to Founder Joseph F Barber :
We provide Veteran, IN NEED WE PROVIDE FOOD ,CLOTHING,HOUSEING AND TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM SCHOOL OR WORK,AS WELL AS LEGAL AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE, IT IS OUR SINCERE HOPES THAT THE LOVE AND COMPASSION SHOWN THROUGH THE HEARTS AND COMPASSION OF THOSE WHO ASSIST IN THIS INDEVORE TO HELP YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN STAND FREE AND INDEPENDENT FROM THE THINGS THAT BROUGHT THEM TO OUR LIVES IS DONE SO THEY CAN LEAD PRODUCTIVE LIVES WITH FAITH AND FAMILY VALUES THEY SEE IN OUR OWN HOMES AS We SHARE OUR LIVES WITH THESE AND MANY YOUNG MEN & WOMEN.WE believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. Each of us must learn to work not just for one self, one's own family or one's nation, but for the benefit of all humankind. Universal responsibility is the key to human survival. It is the best foundation for world peace

or if you prefer to send a check or money order,to 47874 Dalea pl,oceanside Ca,92057 USA.
Low income readers: DON'T send money, just encourage others to subscribe.
https://www.facebook.com/lawfulrebelion/

Thanks for your support

https://the-family-assistants-campaign.blogspot.com/

for personell contact with me the founder please call 24/7 @ 442-264-9578

To all who have assisted in the past. Thank you. Your help is greatly appreciated. Peace and Joy.Founder Joseph F Barber

TOOL REPLACEMENT FUND

Help launch this campaign and become the first donor. WE HAVE HAD ALL OUR TOOLS STOLEN FROM US AND THEY ARE UNRECOVERABLE AND IT IS VITAL TO OUR EFFORTS THATY THESES TOOLS BE REPLACED ,THEY ARE THE MAIN SOURCE OF OUR REVENUE THAT SUPPORTS OUR EFFORTS TO HELP FEED HOUSE VETERANS & CITIZENS ALIKE

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today


To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

"Until the philosophy which holds one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned, everywhere is war and until there are no longer first-class and second-class citizens of any nation, until the color of a man's skin is of no more significance than the color of his eyes. And until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all without regard to race, there is war. And until that day, the dream of lasting peace, world citizenship, rule of international morality, will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained... now everywhere is war." - - Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia - Popularized by Bob Marley in the song War

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

On the Brink of Nuclear Terror?

The recent attempts in Brussels by members of the Islamic State to sabotage and gain access to material and know-how in the nuclear realm highlight the urgency

On the Brink of Nuclear Terror? A Threat and Response Balance Sheet



When Shultz, Perry, Kissinger, and Nunn published their op-eds on a world free of nuclear weapons in 2007 and 2008, the primary motivating factor for their new and surprising joint agenda was the fear that the world’s most dangerous weapons, materials, and know-how would fall into the hands of the most dangerous entities, namely, terrorists. When Barack Obama became president in 2009 he adopted this agenda, advocating a plan to reduce nuclear weapons worldwide – to create “a world without nuclear weapons.”
One component of his disarmament agenda was to carve out a plan to secure nuclear materials in all states, a goal that the administration began to advance with its inaugural Nuclear Security Summit held in Washington, DC in 2010. Thereafter, follow-up summits were held in 2012 (Seoul) and 2014 (The Hague), with the final two-day summit held on March 31-April 1, 2016, once again in Washington DC.

The threat that sparked these international efforts has become somewhat more concrete with the latest reports indicating that the recent terror attacks in Brussels possibly included a nuclear dimension. In the wake of the Brussels attacks, and ahead of the recent Nuclear Security Summit, IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano issued a warning that “terrorism is spreading and the possibility of using nuclear material cannot be excluded.” At the summit itself, the risk of nuclear terror was highlighted and participants took part in an exercise that simulated a radiological attack over Western cities.
To be sure, the threat of nuclear terrorism is not new. Warnings were issued against the backdrop of concerns of nuclear leakage following the breakup of the Soviet Union, and al-Qaeda made no secret of its desire to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction. But events surrounding the Brussels attacks raise the possibility of intent being joined by capability, if Islamic State terrorists are able to exploit the security vulnerabilities of nuclear facilities  as manifested in Belgium, a Western state – either to attack these sites or steal materials from within. A radiological attack could occur through dispersion of radioactive materials from a drone, as was simulated in the exercise, or by an actual attack on a nuclear facility that released these materials. (The risk of a terror organization getting its hands on an actual nuclear weapon is still very low.)

In November 2015, footage tracking the comings and goings of a top official who worked at the Nuclear Research Center at Mol in northern Belgium (which produces radioisotopes) was found in an apartment of the terrorists who perpetrated the Brussels attacks. The surveillance might have been part of preparations to kidnap him. Two days after the Brussels attacks, a security guard at a nuclear plant was murdered and his pass stolen. These findings have raised concern that the Islamic State “is seeking to attack, infiltrate or sabotage nuclear installations or obtain nuclear or radioactive material” (New York Times, March 25, 2016).
Before the advent of the Islamic State, the prospect of nuclear terrorism, though on the agenda, but was not considered likely, notwithstanding the al-Qaeda threats. Attaining weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is not a simple matter, and terrorists have been able to achieve their goals with conventional means. In addition, handling WMD can be dangerous for the terrorists themselves, and crossing the WMD threshold could even alienate their constituencies.

But the atrocities committed by the Islamic State raise the concern that there are no normative boundaries that will not be crossed in its quest to kill infidels, and in the most sensational manner. In fact, and perhaps following the example set by Assad, the Islamic State has already crossed the WMD threshold in the chemical realm. Chemical weapons were reportedly used on the battlefield; it seems that the organization is producing its own chemical agents, and some may have been found in Syria. Moreover, the relatively loose organizational structure for the terrorists operating in Europe – with cells given some degree of autonomy – suggests that there could be somewhat weaker organizational constraints on these attacks. If this is the case – and evidence regarding the degree of centralization in the organizational structure of ISIS is not conclusive – the perpetrators could be less prone to considering factors beyond the very strength of the damage that they can cause. Therefore, the concrete indications of attempts to gain access to nuclear plants or figures must today be taken seriously.
In 2007 Shultz, Perry, Kissinger, and Nunn stated that “the steps that we are taking now to address these threats are not adequate to the danger.” Since 2007, steps have been taken to address the threat, culminating in Obama’s nuclear security initiative. The summits have carved out concrete proposals to address the threat at the highest level, and some nuclear materials have been secured. But the process that Obama launched is a long term one, and success will likely be measured more in terms of reducing the threat than eliminating it. It is also not clear whether Obama’s successor will even place the issue high on his or her agenda.

The recent attempts in Brussels by members of the Islamic State to sabotage and gain access to material and know-how in the nuclear realm highlight the urgency, and underscore that the international community must do its utmost at the national, regional, and global levels to deny the terrorists that possibility. Against the backdrop of the highly unstable situation in the Middle East, and the fact that the Islamic State has supporters in most Arab countries, there is reason to be concerned about the safety and security of nuclear material in this region, first and foremost regarding new nuclear power reactors. Initiatives that are currently being considered, such as phasing out the use of highly enriched uranium in civil commerce, gaining control of uranium enrichment production, and improving nuclear security are but a few initiatives that should be given the highest priority when discussing ways to deal with the looming threat of nuclear terrorism.
What might be Israel’s contribution to these international efforts? Israel has been a part of Obama’s nuclear security initiative from the start, and has actively participated in all of the summits with high level delegations. Israel attributes great importance to the issue, especially in light of the increase in nuclear programs throughout the Middle East. Regarding the recent summit, Israel noted that it is prepared for the scenario of a radiological attack; moreover, it is prepared to help other states in the region prevent the smuggling of radioactive materials into their territory. Indeed, this is an issue that could be discussed in a regional framework, if a regional security dialogue were to be initiated in the Middle East. However, due to the seriousness of the matter, and until this can be discussed in a regional framework, the IAEA should take the lead and try to help regional member states who have a clear interest in confronting this threat.

The recent attempts in Brussels by members of the Islamic State to sabotage and gain access to material and know-how in the nuclear realm highlight the urgency

On the Brink of Nuclear Terror? A Threat and Response Balance Sheet



When Shultz, Perry, Kissinger, and Nunn published their op-eds on a world free of nuclear weapons in 2007 and 2008, the primary motivating factor for their new and surprising joint agenda was the fear that the world’s most dangerous weapons, materials, and know-how would fall into the hands of the most dangerous entities, namely, terrorists. When Barack Obama became president in 2009 he adopted this agenda, advocating a plan to reduce nuclear weapons worldwide – to create “a world without nuclear weapons.”
One component of his disarmament agenda was to carve out a plan to secure nuclear materials in all states, a goal that the administration began to advance with its inaugural Nuclear Security Summit held in Washington, DC in 2010. Thereafter, follow-up summits were held in 2012 (Seoul) and 2014 (The Hague), with the final two-day summit held on March 31-April 1, 2016, once again in Washington DC.

The threat that sparked these international efforts has become somewhat more concrete with the latest reports indicating that the recent terror attacks in Brussels possibly included a nuclear dimension. In the wake of the Brussels attacks, and ahead of the recent Nuclear Security Summit, IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano issued a warning that “terrorism is spreading and the possibility of using nuclear material cannot be excluded.” At the summit itself, the risk of nuclear terror was highlighted and participants took part in an exercise that simulated a radiological attack over Western cities.
To be sure, the threat of nuclear terrorism is not new. Warnings were issued against the backdrop of concerns of nuclear leakage following the breakup of the Soviet Union, and al-Qaeda made no secret of its desire to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction. But events surrounding the Brussels attacks raise the possibility of intent being joined by capability, if Islamic State terrorists are able to exploit the security vulnerabilities of nuclear facilities  as manifested in Belgium, a Western state – either to attack these sites or steal materials from within. A radiological attack could occur through dispersion of radioactive materials from a drone, as was simulated in the exercise, or by an actual attack on a nuclear facility that released these materials. (The risk of a terror organization getting its hands on an actual nuclear weapon is still very low.)

In November 2015, footage tracking the comings and goings of a top official who worked at the Nuclear Research Center at Mol in northern Belgium (which produces radioisotopes) was found in an apartment of the terrorists who perpetrated the Brussels attacks. The surveillance might have been part of preparations to kidnap him. Two days after the Brussels attacks, a security guard at a nuclear plant was murdered and his pass stolen. These findings have raised concern that the Islamic State “is seeking to attack, infiltrate or sabotage nuclear installations or obtain nuclear or radioactive material” (New York Times, March 25, 2016).
Before the advent of the Islamic State, the prospect of nuclear terrorism, though on the agenda, but was not considered likely, notwithstanding the al-Qaeda threats. Attaining weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is not a simple matter, and terrorists have been able to achieve their goals with conventional means. In addition, handling WMD can be dangerous for the terrorists themselves, and crossing the WMD threshold could even alienate their constituencies.

But the atrocities committed by the Islamic State raise the concern that there are no normative boundaries that will not be crossed in its quest to kill infidels, and in the most sensational manner. In fact, and perhaps following the example set by Assad, the Islamic State has already crossed the WMD threshold in the chemical realm. Chemical weapons were reportedly used on the battlefield; it seems that the organization is producing its own chemical agents, and some may have been found in Syria. Moreover, the relatively loose organizational structure for the terrorists operating in Europe – with cells given some degree of autonomy – suggests that there could be somewhat weaker organizational constraints on these attacks. If this is the case – and evidence regarding the degree of centralization in the organizational structure of ISIS is not conclusive – the perpetrators could be less prone to considering factors beyond the very strength of the damage that they can cause. Therefore, the concrete indications of attempts to gain access to nuclear plants or figures must today be taken seriously.
In 2007 Shultz, Perry, Kissinger, and Nunn stated that “the steps that we are taking now to address these threats are not adequate to the danger.” Since 2007, steps have been taken to address the threat, culminating in Obama’s nuclear security initiative. The summits have carved out concrete proposals to address the threat at the highest level, and some nuclear materials have been secured. But the process that Obama launched is a long term one, and success will likely be measured more in terms of reducing the threat than eliminating it. It is also not clear whether Obama’s successor will even place the issue high on his or her agenda.

The recent attempts in Brussels by members of the Islamic State to sabotage and gain access to material and know-how in the nuclear realm highlight the urgency, and underscore that the international community must do its utmost at the national, regional, and global levels to deny the terrorists that possibility. Against the backdrop of the highly unstable situation in the Middle East, and the fact that the Islamic State has supporters in most Arab countries, there is reason to be concerned about the safety and security of nuclear material in this region, first and foremost regarding new nuclear power reactors. Initiatives that are currently being considered, such as phasing out the use of highly enriched uranium in civil commerce, gaining control of uranium enrichment production, and improving nuclear security are but a few initiatives that should be given the highest priority when discussing ways to deal with the looming threat of nuclear terrorism.
What might be Israel’s contribution to these international efforts? Israel has been a part of Obama’s nuclear security initiative from the start, and has actively participated in all of the summits with high level delegations. Israel attributes great importance to the issue, especially in light of the increase in nuclear programs throughout the Middle East. Regarding the recent summit, Israel noted that it is prepared for the scenario of a radiological attack; moreover, it is prepared to help other states in the region prevent the smuggling of radioactive materials into their territory. Indeed, this is an issue that could be discussed in a regional framework, if a regional security dialogue were to be initiated in the Middle East. However, due to the seriousness of the matter, and until this can be discussed in a regional framework, the IAEA should take the lead and try to help regional member states who have a clear interest in confronting this threat.



No comments :