I Hope I am Wrong

We are dealing with a forceful political crusade set out to destroy capitalism, democracy and the values on which this Republic was first founded

I Hope I am Wrong

As you may or may not have noticed, during the past few months, I decided to take a brief political sabbatical, and managed to stay away from my passionate dissertations designed to kindle that American spirit which made this country the great nation it once was—a spirit which, I am sorry to say, has all but vanished amidst an incomprehensible wave of, again, unfathomable events.  All these events point to a swift permutation to becoming a full-fledged communist state, albeit while many Americans succumb to a subliminal “denial”—one where the blindfolds makes them look upon the obvious as nothing short of a surreal aberration embraced by a conservative bourgeoisie; not to mention that the scoundrel in the White House, specifically made a commitment to carrying out said transformation back on October 30th, 2008, just before he was elected as the 44th president of the U.S.

Today, however, I am out to talk to you about, what else, but “the” only topic worth talking about at this point in time considering the magnitude and repercussions of our forthcoming presidential elections—one which as far as I am concerned may very well turn out to be not just another change in the presidency of the U.S., but an apocalyptic landmark to mankind. Yes, I can sense history being made on November 8, 2016. And I see you and I a part of it all, thus my incessant obligation to humbly share with the world my very own personal views and vantage point, in the way I see it all developing—my self-effacing predictions on the outcome of this momentous election.

Just in case that you don’t know me or are not familiar with my political penchants, all of which I have amply shared with my reading audience throughout the years, I am a devout and passionate conservative from the old school; that dying breed of Americans who, like me, cherish democracy and capitalism as [the] greatest political system in the history of mankind, bar none. I shall also preface the rest of my essay today by letting you know that, come Tuesday, November 8th, I will be giving my vote to Donald Trump, no “ifs” or “buts” about it. With that out of the way, I am also going to go out on a limb and predict that Hillary Clinton will win these elections, hands down, and become the next and first woman president of the United States—you can also earmark this day as the beginning of doomsday and Armageddon for mankind, should my prediction come true.

Before you start your crusade to hang me, a la witches of Salem for my audacious prediction, just let me give you my side of the story. Before I do, though, let me just elucidate on the fact that my prediction is not one governed by pessimism nor gloominess, but it is, instead, evoked by a marked sense of realism as opposed to a romantic and passionate desire for the improbable - one that historically attempts against reality if only serving as a cause for major disappointments and let-downs in life, as, at times, we all tend to build hopes and expectations on improbable events—which as I see it, is exactly what is happening to candidate Donald Trump and the republican party in these elections.

Speaking of odds and notwithstanding all the national polls, anecdotally set out to give audiences like you and I all kinds of insights on how the rest of us think about the candidates and the elections, I say there are few and far between many other telltale signs which, as far as I am concerned, are far more relevant and insightful on predicting the outcome of the elections other than the polls, pollsters and political insiders. I am talking about plenty of innocuous, of seemingly irrelevant and extraneous happenings which day to day tell you a story far more discerning than national polls aimed at predicting electoral behaviors of universes such as evangelicals, millennials, Hispanics, or otherwise cross-reference us with predictable patterns of comportment, historically gathered from randomly sampling a group of our peers. Accurate? Maybe. Still, as far as I am concerned, I personally, feel much better served in the proposed objective by reaching-out for my own intuitiveness as opposed to letting myself be swayed one way or the other by what a few of my peers think how I or they are likely to do come election day.

Anyways, as I turn on my T.V. every day, to keep myself abreast in the continuing Clinton / Trump saga - you know Hillary’s emails, Trump’s supposed bigotry and so on, there is not a day that goes by where I do not sense what a dreadful future awaits us all. I can’t help but feel sorry for Donald Trump in his dwindling chances of becoming our next president. If you ask me, I think the man is fighting an uphill battle of sorts. I see a man, that notwithstanding all his frailties and evident gaffs made along the way on the campaign trail, appears, nevertheless, wanting to do good by his country, regardless, if only we could all understand and come to terms with the realization that his opponent is not one Hillary Clinton, but it is a whole army of radical Americans determined to continue the path of transforming the United States of America into a communist republic, and kid yourself not, this is exactly where we are headed.

Reality, dear friends is that Mr. Trump, I am sorry to say, is not fighting Hillary Clinton alone for the post of president in the 2016 elections, but instead he is fighting a powerful, well-oiled ideological machine. He is fighting a culture that includes, our own native well-trained radicals—our own breed of socialists / communists, like Mr. Bernie Sanders, now proliferating the populous of our nation’s top universities; the halls of Congress; the guilds of Hollywood; the nation’s inner city communities of black and Hispanic minorities; the Black Liberation extremists groups, and a far-left mainstream media, hesitantly in control of the public opinion of the nation, and, yes, the rank and file of his own republican party—a sorrowful clan of quintessential establishment politicians who have all but let Barack Obama and his lieutenants such as Hillary Clinton, get away with murder, and I don’t mean this just literally.

You can now begin to see why Mr. Trump, as bright a person as he is, has gone through three election campaign managers in the course of the last three months and, at this rate, will not surprise me if he goes through yet three more before this thing is all over. I have not a doubt in my mind that Mr. Trump foresees in these elections the very same dauntingly discouraging foresights that I do, thus his persistent reference to the fact that the elections are rigged. Having been a fighter and winner for the most part of his life, Mr. Trump finds himself for the first time ever as a potential loser. Mr. Trump, I dare say, has never before had to fight such a magnanimous opponent as is an entire nation of losers and underachievers—a nation where class-hatred, bigotry and resentment have now become the nurturing and breeding grounds for a changing pattern of culture, unthinkable to many of us, in years past. Unthinkable to all born and raised loving everything that our country stood for.


But, then again, what is clear to me is that whether it was Hillary Clinton or Bozo the Clown, running for president on the democratic ticket, whomever the candidate was, he or she was pretty much assured to win the presidency even before the start of the race. Mr. Trump’s bid for the post was doomed from the start as our nation is only short of becoming a totalitarian state. Arguably, Trump’s arduous efforts were not against an individual nor even a party but against a defiantly well-organized, conceptual movement, with deeper pockets than the billionaire contender himself—with figureheads such as George Soros, ready, willing and able in going all out to subsidize the upheaval, sparing nothing in making sure they all succeeded in completing Obama’s transformation commitment.

You know that all cliché: “the proof is in the pudding”. Never before has this old adage been so accurately descriptive as in these elections. Think of it this way, the name Hillary Clinton, or for that matter, the Clinton name, be that of herself or husband Bill, comes with an unprecedented aura of corruption, never before seen in the history of American politics, but abundantly found in third-world nations around the world. Hillary Clinton’s personal resume is consumed with, again, an unprecedented list of corruptions, wrongdoings, misconducts, delinquencies and law-breaking incidents. The Clintons’ climb to power and wealth, makes the notorious couple of criminals Bonnie Parker and Clyde Borrow, during the Great Depression days, pale in comparison. To the best of my knowledge, the infamous couple Bonnie and Clyde, while known for their lawlessness, were not, as far as I am concerned, ever a threat to our national security as is this Clinton rat.

As an educated political writer one of the first things one learns in the trade is to be as factual as you possibly can in your presentations. As such, for years now I was forced to carry-on with my due diligence as I went about researching this Clinton rascal. In doing so, I became incessantly disturbed with this woman’s clear postures jam-packed with Machiavelli’s overtones all throughout her political career. If there was ever a life of misguided falsehoods driven by the old precept where “the ends justify the means”, it has to be that of Hillary Clinton, as, never before, has the nation seen anyone in its political tapestry with such an unmeasured yearning to amass power and wealth as that seen in our own twenty-first century version of Bonnie Parker.

Notably, Hillary’s radicalism dates back to her Wellesley college years where a young anti-establishment Clinton befriends Saul Alinsky. Metaphorically speaking Alinsky may be thought of as the greatest promoter of communism in the United States. In 1969, Hillary Rodham wrote a 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College about the famed communist entitled There Is Only the Fight…: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model. In the years that followed, Clinton was, like she is always is, at center-stage in what came to be known as the Whitewater scandal—a shady real-estate business deal gone bad involving the Clintons back in the 1950s. The term Whitewater, is sometimes used to include the mysterious death of Vince Foster, a partner and friend of Hillary Rodham at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, during the Whitewater scandal. Foster, later became Deputy White House Counsel during the first half-year of President Bill Clinton’s administration, when he committed suicide under strenuous circumstances, which, to this day, have paved the way for continued debates disputing his death as a conspiracy theory involving the Clintons.

As we fast-forward in Clinton’s legacy of scandals , we find the rat now, embodying the role of an abused yet forgiving spouse of her womanizing playboy husband Bill in the Monica Lewinsky scandal that brought shame to the White House, again, like never before in the history of the nation. While Clinton’s apparent “stand-by-your-man” gained her, at the time, the unselfish support of many women in America, praising her for her ability to forgive her husband’s misdeeds, as many thought, her stance would go to prove her much sought-after family values, shared by most mainstream American women. Little did her supporting cast realize then that Clinton’s magnanimity had nothing to do with family values or the likes of it at all, but had all to do with furthering her own political agenda, one which we now, in retrospect, understand included her bid for the presidency, which otherwise would have been badly severed had she not played the forgiving wife role, as she did during the much publicized scandal.

Our next stop in Clinton’s unending trail of controversies deals with her role in the massacre at the embassy in Benghazi, Lybia on September 11th, 2012, which ended with the death of four of America’s best, including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, all the while as then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton refused to offer military assistance to those in peril under the attack of extreme Islamic militants. Clinton’s role in the administration’s conspiracy was to underplay the attack, including repeated lies to the immediate family of the fallen heroes, as she heartlessly blamed the attack on a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islam video made in the U.S.

As far as Clinton’s most recent scandals, there is, of course, the unending saga that deals with Clinton’s infamous emails and the use of her family’s private email server while conducting highly sensitive government business in her role as Secretary of State. As she was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, I chuckled any time I heard the possibility of a Clinton indictment while law-experts contended her use of a private server violated the State Department’s protocols—a potential federal offense which violated federal laws and regulations of recordkeeping and breaches of laws governing our homeland security. FBI Director James Comey, was presumably an honorable man who would not hesitate in having Clinton indicted were he to find probable cause in the Clinton controversy. Not to anyone’s surprise, however, and notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Comey, did in fact made public his discovery of all kinds of irregularities and anomalies pointing to Clinton’s guilt in her alleged violations regarding breaches of secrecy, in a press briefing conducted by hypocritical Comey on July 5th, 2016, the FBI Director, concluded that: “...no charges were appropriate in this case”. Well, I could have told you that, even before the investigation started, Clinton—a bona fide member of the Totalitarian elite now governing our country would be rendered innocent of all charges given the fact that our honorable president would make sure to guarantee the rat her safeguard from any law-enforcing agencies of this administration.

As for Mr. Comey, I say shame on him! Of the whole scandal what I personally find most appalling is the nations’ degree of naiveté, or shall we say stupidity in hoping that Clinton would be indicted and taken out of the presidential race. Give me a break.

Our last stop in Clinton’s most recent controversy now brewing in the election arena is the one dealing with he Clinton Foundation, originally founded in 1997 as a nonprofit corporation deceivingly self-defined in its mission statement as one meant to “strengthen the capacity of the people in the United States and throughout the world to meet the challenges of global interdependence”. What the mission statement expediently leaves out is the Foundations’ principal objective of making the Clinton’s filthy rich albeit by entering into all kinds of “quid pro quo” deals, including some with the nation’s worse enemy-states. Repulsively, I may add. Once again, we find crooked Hillary in one of her most controversial political soap-operas yet -one where, again, the Clinton rats, willingly accept quid pro quo donations in the millions of dollars from countries such Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Algeria and Brunei—all countries which the same State Department she once headed faulted the contributing countries for their records on sex discrimination against women. Clinton was fine with taking money from all these countries,while on the other hand, espousing women’s human rights—as a key issue championed by her in a hypocritical platform filled with double-standards.

On April 23rd, 2015, Fox News’ Bret Baier hosted a documentary named ‘The Tangled Clinton Web’, based on Peter Schweizer’s book ‘The Clinton Cash’. In the book as well as in the documentary, Schweizer and Baier cite a revealing list of controversial quid-pro-quos deals, wherein both Bill and Hillary play leading roles in multiple, murky fund-raising interactions with major foreign donors and supporters of the Clinton Foundation throughout the world, while patrons allegedly were otherwise rewarded with all kinds of ‘political favors’, even when such errands could end up jeopardizing our national security.

Ranking among the top controversies cited by Schweizer in his book, I thought was one dealing with the matchlessly dangerous mineral known as uranium—one whose enriched version just happens to be a critical component in the production of nuclear weapons. In the Clinton’s tangled web of un-American activities circa 2005, ex-president Bill Clinton travels to Kazakhstan, where multi-millionaire Frank Giustra, a Canadian investor, was trying to “get control to buy a couple of uranium mines” in that country. Giustra and Clinton strike a partnering relationship and emanate as cohorts working on philanthropic endeavors. At the same time, “Giustra was, conveniently and coincidentally, involved in helping to facilitate speaking engagements for Clinton in Kazakhstan.”

In the days that followed, Giustra’s company went from “a worthless shell company overnight—and became this ...huge uranium mining deal.” In exchange for the favor, the Clinton Foundation received a contribution of $31 million dollars from Giustra, and a pledge for another 100 million dollars.

Giustra’s mining consortium, christened with the name ‘Uranium One’ would soon become a mega-conglomerate. According to Schweizer, “Uranium One became very active in acquiring uranium assets in the United States itself and by 2008, 2009, it had become a particularly attractive target for the Russian government.” On a public address made in January 2013 to the Russian Parliament, Sergey Kiryenko, head of Russia’s nuclear corporation Rosatom, announced Russia’s consolidated 100% acquisition of Uranium One and said: “I am pleased to inform you that today we [Russia] control 20 percent of uranium in the United States. If we need that uranium, we shall be able to use it any time. ” The Russian acquisition of U1, was projected to have control over what could amount to approximately 50% of the world’s uranium output by 2015 - symbolically speaking, a major share of the precious mineral and a real and present danger to the future of nuclear warfare given the fact that Russia would not falter in sending uranium to its client-state, Iran. You figure that one out.

Shortly after the Russians had announced their intentions to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. As if the web was not sufficiently entangled when Hillary became Secretary of State, the Clinton Foundation had to sign a Memorandum of Understanding clarifying possible controversies and conflicts of interest with the State Department, such as the U-1 deal. Notwithstanding such contingency and in spite of the fact that then Senator from N.Y., Hillary, had seriously pretended to be opposed to the “sale” of uranium to potential enemies of the U.S., pointing to the serious implications of the Russians getting uranium, she still ratified the Russian purchase, thus violating the provisions of the Memorandum—and, one more time providing a clear showing of her abounding hypocrisy.

All right, so I rest my case. Simply said, the point I am trying to make, is that the aging politician has no boundaries when climbing the ladder of power and wealth. By now, most of the nation, including her most staunch supporters, do, in fact, admit to Clinton’s dishonesty and corruption, as well they should, given her outrageous trail of lawlessness. Anyone else except her, anyone of us, the little people, would have been long ago disbarred from our law degrees and locked behind bars for good, let alone be given the opportunity to run for the presidency of the most powerful country in the world. Clinton’s resume would immediately disqualify any one of us from a security clearance, even at pet shelters throughout the nation. I personally have met and known people who were disqualified from running for offices in the state and federal governments, merely for holding associations with questionable characters. I met an aspiring Ambassador to one of the Caribbean islands, who was swiftly barred from holding the office, given a short-lived romantic association with a known representative of the Cuban government in Washington.

So, what say you? Clinton’s trail of controversies, her legacy of dead-people left behind, are, in fact but a shameful reminder to all of us, of how low our country has fallen. Were Hillary Clinton to be found today guilty of murder in the first degree in a court-of-law in the land, I dare say, she would probably get away with it unharmed, and, in all likelihood would still be running for president, albeit with the same number of supporters she now has—merely a sign of the times. A sign of the rampant corruption of this administration and of a great majority of Americans. But then again, what can you expect from a government that sends millions of dollars to the world’s primary sponsor and exporter of terrorism? What can you expect from the most corrupt administration in the history of the nation?

The moment we all realize that we are not dealing with just an individual, a president or even a party; the moment we all realize we are dealing with a forceful political crusade set out to destroy capitalism, democracy and the values on which this Republic was first founded; the moment we all take off the blindfolds and begin to see the realities now abundantly pointing to the beginning of the end, as we draw ever so close to becoming a communist state; the moment we realize we live in a country readily willing to aid and abet our most viscious enemies around the world, that will be the moment, when we will all realize and begin to understand about Mr. Trump’s slim chances of ever becoming the next president of the United States.

In closing today, I do so with an open invitation to all of you to go out and vote on November 8, 2016, regardless—this being the only hope for my being mistaken in my prediction. My last message today, is I have never ever been so hopeful to be wrong as I am today. But…I just can’t help it. I truly hope, that come November 8th, I will be proven wrong, as such a blunder could in fact translate into making the difference between being flanked, on the one hand by a prosperous future for our children and their children and, on other hand, by the potential for Armageddon for the doomsday of mankind, certainly the end-of-time for our great United States of America. May God save us all.


By Obie Usategui

Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
https://josephfreedomoranarchy.blogspot.com.