FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today

To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Monday, November 28, 2016

Fidel Castro’s Legacy will Live

Fidel Castro’s Legacy will Live

Fidel Castro has had an enormous impact on the geopolitics of the era in which I have lived, an era of increasing U.S. imperial economic/military dominance of the globe.  As with all highly influential leaders he has his avid followers and his keen distractors.  His legacy is somewhat more mixed, but in general, and from an international globalist perspective, he accomplished more positive than negative, in particular in light of the lifetime U.S. embargo/sanctions against Cuba.
The latter is very interesting when considering the U.S.’ relationship with dictatorships/autocracies around the world.  Having killed off several millions of Southeast Asians and over 50 000 of its own people during the Vietnam war, the U.S. is now actively trading with the minimally communist Vietnamese government as if nothing ever happened.  China, which is labelled a communist dictatorship, is in effect an integral part of the U.S.economy, without which the ordinary consumer citizen of the west would not be able to buy so much cheap/inexpensive stuff for their entertainment.  Millions died in China, both as a result of western nations trying to slice the country up into spheres of influence, and following because of Mao’s reactionary policies.  [1]
Canada has taken a slightly different approach, never having cut diplomatic relationships with Cuba and recognizing mainland China’s government in 1970, nine years before Nixon did for the U.S.    U.S. president elect Trump has called him a “brutal dictator” who has “killed tens of thousands” (more like two thousand), imprisoned political activists, and not allowed free speech.  There are many detractors of Castro in Canada.  In consideration of what I have said above he has been considerably less brutal than the U.S. in its actions (generally supported by Canada) around the world in its invented fights against communism and now terrorism.
All empires need enemies of the state in order to redirect the anger of their own citizens outwards towards an evil other.  Cuba effectively serves that purpose for the western hemisphere – a supposedly evil example standing up to the good empire.   The U.S. agreed with Soviet Russia not to invade Cuba after the 1963 nuclear standoff, but there certainly have been many other inept attempts to do away with Castro, perhaps half-heartedly as that would remove the evil other from the U.S.’ back yard – Latin America.
Neither the U.S. nor Canada, of course, are concerned about relationships with a country simply because they are a dictatorship.  Saudi Arabia is a prime example as it supports Sunni salafist fanatics in a global ‘outreach’ program to defeat the infidels of the world.  The CIA created Chilean dictatorship of Pinochet (1973) destroyed a relatively egalitarian society and imposed the Washington consensus austerity on the country, at the cost of thousands killed and tens of thousands tortured.  Neighbouring Argentina in 1976 suffered a similar CIA coup, with an estimated 30 000 “disappeared” thanks to CIA meddling.  [2]
In the same era, Cuba assisted Angola and Namibia in gaining their independence while fighting the apartheid autocracy of South Africa, the latter supported by the U.S.  Farther north, Cuba helped Ethiopia defeat the invading Somali army which again was supported by the U.S.
Obviously many of these wars had to do with the geopolitical anti-communist days, but it reflects the U.S.’ ongoing ambition to destroy anything even remotely independent of its desires, and more, to prevent a showcase for how anything slightly socialistic could be successful.  Back to Cuba under embargo/sanctions: it is considered to be a ‘bad’ example of socialism because of its lack of ‘modernity’ – in other words lack of acceptance of the western corporate power agenda for global hegemony.
Castro’s foreign policy was obviously aligned against U.S. foreign policy.  His domestic policies were the main point of antagonism.  First off, he got rid of the corrupt mafia related government of Batista.  Only later – when U.S. companies refused to be bought out at the artificially low prices they themselves had set (for tax purposes) – did he nationalize the companies.  Even more egregious by U.S.standards was Castro’s distribution of land to hundreds of thousands of Cuban workers -  not exactly a communist collectivist action, but one that defied the big landowners such as United Fruit (Chiquita – United Brands) whose employees were essentially indentured serfs.
For all its problems following the revolution, Castro had several large successes that seldom are viewed in western media.  Cuba has one of the highest literacy rates in the world, more doctors per capita, and a lower infant mortality rate than the U.S.  Life expectancy is slightly under that of the U.S., but can be accounted for as the embargo limits/prohibits medical supplies entering Cuba.  It frequently is one of the first countries to offer medical aid to disaster stricken areas, recently notable being Haiti.
One of its larger successes has been with agriculture.  Long supported with Soviet purchases of sugar and other agricultural products, this collapsed along with the Soviet collapse.  Rather than succumb to western depredations, Castro allowed a limited free enterprise system for agricultural practices, creating what should be a model sustainable, healthy, environmentally friendly farm base.
Thus overall, Castro has had a positive impact on the world.  He proved to be flexible yet resolute leader, he stood up to the power and greed of corporate America, he created a society – that while limited in its political expression – that is healthy and well educated.  His steadfastness after the Soviet collapse created a sustainable agricultural base – and his long term survival allowed the U.S. to continue its illogical misinformed hubristic rhetoric against a country that in no way threatened the U.S.  As demonstrated by U.S. policy/actions with China and Vietnam, none of its actions against Cuba make any sense at all, and are demonstrably regressive.
Castro’s legacy will live on generally as a positive force for the majority of the world.  Thank you to Pierre Trudeau for keeping Canada open to Cuba (and China), and for Justin Trudeau for not copying the hate inspired rhetoric of our southern neighbours, or our own neocon U.S. sycophants.
Notes
[1] Perhaps a similar reaction as per Pol Pot in Laos – after western destruction of civil society, the influence of rabid anti-capitalist/western fanatics created their own domestic bloodbath.   Now that I think of it, the same scenario is what created IS in Iraq and Syria. 
[2] The list of U.S.-CIA interventions is a global phenomenon up to and including the neonazi supported coup in Ukraine and the recent destruction of Libya and Yemen as functioning societies.  Previously Serbia was bombed into submission on the pretext of “human rights” shown to be a falsehood later, but allowing the U.S. to separate Kosovo from Serbia primarily to establish Camp Bondsteel, one of the largest military bases.  Canada participated in all these destructive activities in support of the U.S. corporate/military interests.


By Jim Miles

Fidel Castro’s Legacy will Live

Fidel Castro has had an enormous impact on the geopolitics of the era in which I have lived, an era of increasing U.S. imperial economic/military dominance of the globe.  As with all highly influential leaders he has his avid followers and his keen distractors.  His legacy is somewhat more mixed, but in general, and from an international globalist perspective, he accomplished more positive than negative, in particular in light of the lifetime U.S. embargo/sanctions against Cuba.
The latter is very interesting when considering the U.S.’ relationship with dictatorships/autocracies around the world.  Having killed off several millions of Southeast Asians and over 50 000 of its own people during the Vietnam war, the U.S. is now actively trading with the minimally communist Vietnamese government as if nothing ever happened.  China, which is labelled a communist dictatorship, is in effect an integral part of the U.S.economy, without which the ordinary consumer citizen of the west would not be able to buy so much cheap/inexpensive stuff for their entertainment.  Millions died in China, both as a result of western nations trying to slice the country up into spheres of influence, and following because of Mao’s reactionary policies.  [1]
Canada has taken a slightly different approach, never having cut diplomatic relationships with Cuba and recognizing mainland China’s government in 1970, nine years before Nixon did for the U.S.    U.S. president elect Trump has called him a “brutal dictator” who has “killed tens of thousands” (more like two thousand), imprisoned political activists, and not allowed free speech.  There are many detractors of Castro in Canada.  In consideration of what I have said above he has been considerably less brutal than the U.S. in its actions (generally supported by Canada) around the world in its invented fights against communism and now terrorism.
All empires need enemies of the state in order to redirect the anger of their own citizens outwards towards an evil other.  Cuba effectively serves that purpose for the western hemisphere – a supposedly evil example standing up to the good empire.   The U.S. agreed with Soviet Russia not to invade Cuba after the 1963 nuclear standoff, but there certainly have been many other inept attempts to do away with Castro, perhaps half-heartedly as that would remove the evil other from the U.S.’ back yard – Latin America.
Neither the U.S. nor Canada, of course, are concerned about relationships with a country simply because they are a dictatorship.  Saudi Arabia is a prime example as it supports Sunni salafist fanatics in a global ‘outreach’ program to defeat the infidels of the world.  The CIA created Chilean dictatorship of Pinochet (1973) destroyed a relatively egalitarian society and imposed the Washington consensus austerity on the country, at the cost of thousands killed and tens of thousands tortured.  Neighbouring Argentina in 1976 suffered a similar CIA coup, with an estimated 30 000 “disappeared” thanks to CIA meddling.  [2]
In the same era, Cuba assisted Angola and Namibia in gaining their independence while fighting the apartheid autocracy of South Africa, the latter supported by the U.S.  Farther north, Cuba helped Ethiopia defeat the invading Somali army which again was supported by the U.S.
Obviously many of these wars had to do with the geopolitical anti-communist days, but it reflects the U.S.’ ongoing ambition to destroy anything even remotely independent of its desires, and more, to prevent a showcase for how anything slightly socialistic could be successful.  Back to Cuba under embargo/sanctions: it is considered to be a ‘bad’ example of socialism because of its lack of ‘modernity’ – in other words lack of acceptance of the western corporate power agenda for global hegemony.
Castro’s foreign policy was obviously aligned against U.S. foreign policy.  His domestic policies were the main point of antagonism.  First off, he got rid of the corrupt mafia related government of Batista.  Only later – when U.S. companies refused to be bought out at the artificially low prices they themselves had set (for tax purposes) – did he nationalize the companies.  Even more egregious by U.S.standards was Castro’s distribution of land to hundreds of thousands of Cuban workers -  not exactly a communist collectivist action, but one that defied the big landowners such as United Fruit (Chiquita – United Brands) whose employees were essentially indentured serfs.
For all its problems following the revolution, Castro had several large successes that seldom are viewed in western media.  Cuba has one of the highest literacy rates in the world, more doctors per capita, and a lower infant mortality rate than the U.S.  Life expectancy is slightly under that of the U.S., but can be accounted for as the embargo limits/prohibits medical supplies entering Cuba.  It frequently is one of the first countries to offer medical aid to disaster stricken areas, recently notable being Haiti.
One of its larger successes has been with agriculture.  Long supported with Soviet purchases of sugar and other agricultural products, this collapsed along with the Soviet collapse.  Rather than succumb to western depredations, Castro allowed a limited free enterprise system for agricultural practices, creating what should be a model sustainable, healthy, environmentally friendly farm base.
Thus overall, Castro has had a positive impact on the world.  He proved to be flexible yet resolute leader, he stood up to the power and greed of corporate America, he created a society – that while limited in its political expression – that is healthy and well educated.  His steadfastness after the Soviet collapse created a sustainable agricultural base – and his long term survival allowed the U.S. to continue its illogical misinformed hubristic rhetoric against a country that in no way threatened the U.S.  As demonstrated by U.S. policy/actions with China and Vietnam, none of its actions against Cuba make any sense at all, and are demonstrably regressive.
Castro’s legacy will live on generally as a positive force for the majority of the world.  Thank you to Pierre Trudeau for keeping Canada open to Cuba (and China), and for Justin Trudeau for not copying the hate inspired rhetoric of our southern neighbours, or our own neocon U.S. sycophants.
Notes
[1] Perhaps a similar reaction as per Pol Pot in Laos – after western destruction of civil society, the influence of rabid anti-capitalist/western fanatics created their own domestic bloodbath.   Now that I think of it, the same scenario is what created IS in Iraq and Syria. 
[2] The list of U.S.-CIA interventions is a global phenomenon up to and including the neonazi supported coup in Ukraine and the recent destruction of Libya and Yemen as functioning societies.  Previously Serbia was bombed into submission on the pretext of “human rights” shown to be a falsehood later, but allowing the U.S. to separate Kosovo from Serbia primarily to establish Camp Bondsteel, one of the largest military bases.  Canada participated in all these destructive activities in support of the U.S. corporate/military interests.


By Jim Miles


No comments :