How You Became A Commodity-The Creation of Constructive Trusts

How You Became A Commodity-The Creation of Constructive Trusts

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution created a secondary class of citizens so the slaves could become federal citizens and be "freed." The only problem today, is that most people have been duped into giving up their Sovereignty to become second class Federal citizens. In America we are born American Nationals, and do not become federal citizens unless we legally are duped into swearing allegiance to the federal state. Trouble is, nobody tells us this, because New World Order society planners want to enslave us to the federal debt we did not create, and make us pay and pay because they maneuvered the United States into bankruptcy in the 1930's. We have been sold into economic slavery.
Not just "we," but specifically your own personal body has been sold without anyone telling you. There are many definitions of The United States. The law says the US "includes,"- "includes" means "is only." Title 28 Section 1332(d)"United States"(d) The word ''States'', as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. It does not mention the sovereign state republics, because they are not included.  According to Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County - Supreme court of Alabama Feb 2, 1909: "There are two classes of citizens under our form of government, citizens of the United States and of the state; and one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter." Merrian v. New York. New York is foreign to the United States, and 28 USC 1603(a) "foreign state" is a political subdivision of a foreign state, which is a separate legal person that is neither a citizen of a State of the United states. Elk v. Wilkins 112 US 94 Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes (an alien, though dependent power), although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more "born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government or the children born within the United States, of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreign nations.

Most don't know it, but most Americans probably have no income or commerce connected with the corporate United States body politic and its zones and territories, i.e. District of Columbia, Guam,  American Samoa, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands or any of the States of the Union or political subdivisions, thereof, all their earnings from their labour are received from outside these areas, not from within said areas which are foreign to them and they have never been engaged in any revenue taxable activity involving alcohol, tobacco, or firearms, so without a Birth Registration certificate or Social Security Number, they are not legally subject to the jurisdiction of the United States corporate body politic. But no one will tell you this, or lets you know you were born free, because you won't pay taxes or die in contrived wars. It will upset the International Bankers who are siphoning off our economic base. They want you to believe you "have to" be their slave. This is accomplished through societal conditioning, and legally, through the constructive fraud of un-rebutted presumptions and withholding all the facts from you. The Feds have got everyone with a birth certificate and a social security number to become subservient to them. During our signing up for an adhesion-to-the-federal-body-politic birth certificate and social security number, we didn't know it, but the Feds used these applications to create two implied (unwritten, called "constructive") trusts in which we were duped into giving the Feds a "security interest"

of ownership in our bodies. They trade these security interests (a monetized copy of your birth certificate, and a monetized copy of your social security application) in international commerce as if they were money. Presto! Your body is now the collateral on the national debt.

 And you didn't know about it or knowingly agree to it. 76 American Jurisprudence 2d "TRUSTS" section 210: "Promise, agreement or contract - Generally speaking a constructive (implied, unwritten) trust does not require any agreement between the parties - either actual, or express (in writing), or implied, to create the trust, Rather, a constructive trust generally stems from the equitable powers of the court."

Once we legally give them this power, they skim off the cream, and keep the value of the trust (as a piece of paper commercially tradable security interest) and then give us back possession of our bodies and make us responsible for the upkeep of the trust property, again, trust property means our bodies. It's a perfect master/slave relationship for the Feds, they get the value we freely give away, but they have no worries since we, as mere possessors, are the ones now legally bound to have to do all the maintenance on ourselves and our property and to follow the trust rules and be "law abiding."
Since we obviously proved ourselves insane by the act of giving away control of our lives to someone else, the courts have ruled that by the performance of this insane act we are obviously incompetent, and therefore, they need to appoint a Guardian over us, and who better to be the Guardian than the trustee we gave the power to, the Feds. The courts use the federal and state statutes as the daily enforcement/maintenance rules for the upkeep of the trust property, our contracted into slavery bodies.

This scam is all Constitutional under our exercising our Right to Contract. Here is the statute, or trust rule, where we let them legally turn us all into "Federal Personnel," subject to federal jurisdiction by the act of getting a Social Security number. UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES i. PART I - THE AGENCIES GENERALLY (1) CHAPTER 5 - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE (a) SUBCHAPTER II - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 552a. Records maintained on individuals (a) Definitions. - For purposes of this section - (12) The term ''Federal benefit program'' means any program administered or funded by the Federal Government, or by any agent or State on behalf of the Federal Government, providing cash or in-kind assistance in the form of payments, grants, loans, or loan guarantees to individuals; and (13) the term ''Federal personnel'' means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits). Social Security is a Federal benefit program. You, as federal personnel, don't have any freedom in healthcare or in any other area because you appoint them your master to take care of you. But their version of "taking care" of us is to burn babies, raid clinics, imprison doctors, therapists and educators, tax us un mercilessly, and outlaw real cures for disease.

This fictitious statutory federal citizenship status, and your body's secret existence as mere collateral for a security interest traded as an article of international commerce is legally signified whenever your name is spelled in ALL CAPITALS on financial and legal documents. Check your mail. This appointment of being our masters that we were tricked into giving them has now, through their un rebutted tort feaster fraud, grown to become their almost complete dictatorial control power over our bodies, our finances, our minds, or our children, and how we use them. This power over us is, or is about to become, SLAVERY. We are squarely to blame. Through our Right to contract power of appointment. Yes, we did appoint them trustees over our bodies, but only because they withheld all the facts from us. This is contract fraud. They did not tell us when we signed up, that these secret trusts were created, and that the creation of these unwritten constructive trusts would give them this complete statutory control over us. They couldn't. They know perfectly well that we aren't really insane, and that we would never agree to such a contract if we openly knew about it.

Would anyone in their right mind give someone the power to burn their children alive? That's what just happened in Waco, Texas. They don't tell us this is why they can, for example, take your children away from you or deny you life restoring oxygen/ozone and other therapies, or deny you really meaningful health care, and enslave you into being responsible for an artificially created and fraudulent national debt, or make you give up a third of the fruits of your labour to the federal trustee as payment for managing your trust- in the form of "taxes" - which all only go overseas to fatten the coffers of the foreign multinational IMF bankers. See Title 22 U.S. Codes Section 286 for proof of the International Monetary Fund having their hand in our Cookie jar.

They CONCEAL from us that WE OURSELVES, by using our own God given right to contract, in this case for a birth certificate and social security number, gave away our rights by using our "POWER OF  APPOINTMENT, " to unknowingly make them trustees over our lives. However, we the individual people also, AS THE ORIGINAL TRUST CREATORS, HAVE THE POWER AND RIGHT TO LEGALLY AND PEACEFULLY UN APPOINT, or "RELEASE," and "TERMINATE" THIS ADHESION TRUST RELATIONSHIP with them.

No longer can they fine and jail us, and break up our families, and send our children off to die in their wars. The truth of this is right in front of us in the statutes, but the evil tort feasters in government have hidden the statutory PROCEDURAL PATH to the RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF ALL TRUSTEE POWER OVER US deep in some corner of every state and federal lawbook.
The statutory release path is unbelievably, and fraudulently, found under different titles such as, "Act for the Simplification of Fiduciary Security Transfers," or under plumbing codes (The power of appointment flows through the trust as in a "pipe"), or elsewhere, to deliberately make the release-termination path almost impossible to find. Who actually reads ALL the laws? They know very few do, and count on you not doing it so you never know you can rebut their presentments.

BECAUSE THE FACT OF THE CREATION OF THE INITIAL ADHESION, ALONG WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF HOW TO TERMINATE THE CONSTRUCTIVE ADHESION TRUSTS IS WITHHELD FROM US, THAT PROVES INTENTIONAL FRAUD ON THEIR PART. A BREECH OF THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTY AS TRUSTEES TO BE HONEST! A BREECH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY IS GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF THE TRUST. DUE TO THEIR MISREPRESENTATION AND FRAUD WE, AS THE CREATORS, HAVE A RIGHT TO UNCREATE OR "RELEASE" AND "TERMINATE" THE  ADHESION TRUST SLAVE CONTRACTS UNDER EQUITY. IT IS ONLY UNDER AN EQUITY JURISDICTION WHERE THE TRUE OWNER/CREATOR HAS THE POWER TO DO THIS. IF ONLY WE KNOW ABOUT IT! 

Many have tried to "revoke" or "rescind" (wrong words) this adhesion contract, using the wrong procedure or words, only to have the courts shoot them down. They are indeed entitled to the relief they seek, but since they used the wrong but since they used the wrong procedures and wording the court could not "hear" what they were saying. The proper procedural application of this heretofore secret knowledge in the courts returns us and the doctors and ministers and teachers and mothers and fathers and everyone else to a state of freedom of choice in our lives, with no big brother forcing poisons into our food and healthcare, no reaching into our pockets, and no stuffing toxins into our minds at School. But the fraud perpetrators don't make it easy to get out of their trap because they need it to exist." Until our next issue, stay cool and remain low profile! Privacy World

Here's the text of the 1st Section of the 14th Amendment:

 All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its  jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 The idea behind defining national citizenship in the 14th Amendment was for the purpose of protecting the newly freed blacks from the law of the states in which they resided. Previously, blacks were "persons" for the sake of apportioning representation, but were not "citizens" of the United States, or of their state, and were therefore not entitled to protection of the Bill of rights.

This was made very apparent in the "Dred Scott v Sandford", which held that Dredd Scott, a slave, did not have standing to sue in the Federal Court because the Court did not recognize him as a citizen of the United States. The USSC held that blacks were "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." (From Wikipedia)  Although what the court said was evil and wrong, it was legally correct because the US Constitution was intentionally set up to incorporate the evils of slavery without mentioning slaves. This was done by the aforementioned use of terms "person" and "citizen". It was surprising to many that they had the "Bill of Rights" protections only as against the federal government, but prior to the 14th Amendment, the states were not held bound to these. The 14th  Amendment incorporated the bill of rights protections to all citizens of the United States against ALL government.

Thus, the 14th Amendment incorporated the Privilveges and Immunities Clause:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;

The Due Process Clause:

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
And the equal protection clause:

nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The "Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County" appears to be pointing out the difference between State citizenship and United States citizenship: "There are two classes of citizens under our form of government, citizens of the United States and of the state; and one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter." Thus one may be a citizen of the United States without being a citizen of, say, Texas. In Elk v Wilkins, it appears that the court is pointing out that the Native American Tribes has a different status as "nations" within the United States, and thus not a citizen by birth. I couldn't find the "Merrian" case mentioned. I am interested in learning more if there is really something to this. I think the real evil here is that the Supreme Court has held that Corporations are "persons" under the Constitution and therefore entitled to protection. It is really insane when you consider that the Supreme court has recently held that foreign born nationals in a foreign state are not "persons" entitled to Constitutional protection. Madness.

"Stop judging by appearances, but judge justly."