To Force Another to Consent is Terrorism by Definition

To Force Another to Consent is Terrorism by Definition.

JOSEPH F BARBER·WEDNESDAY, MAY 8, 20192 Reads

I have not been afforded the rights to file a formal and ,Lawful complaint against the abuse my wife and myself have suffered AND IS ON GOING do to the unlawful actions of the Oceanside police depts officers at this point I make this complaint to we the people AND THE CITIZENS OF OCEANSIDE CA

My name is Joseph F Barber and my rights have been violated by the Oceanside police dept since the violation and illegal towing of my vehicle i have been set in harms way i have requested a meeting with the chief of police Chief Frank McCoy and todate I have been denied all rights as a citizen to meet with the public servant who took a code of ethics and oath to defend the citizens and community from criminal types and those that would do HARM to hard working honest citizens and visitors to Oceanside in such ways as to set them in harms way and despite are calls to the chief we have been set aside and our rights marginalized and told by Chief Frank McCoy's officers that they did not take and oath to defend my rights nor my wife's rights whom is very ill and as been placed on the streets of oceanside some 2468 miles from any one we know here in oceanside ca, the officers who initiated the traffic stop informed me of the same thing they cared nothing about my rights nor the welfare of my wife even after I informed them of our situation and that we were in rout to our home state and family my wife and myself are both veterans of the united states military and since this offense as been to the emergency room 3 times and have not so much as one traffic ticket in some 20 years on the point of our right to travel and our rights to freedom of movement

Karen Laser

Lieutenant

Support Operations Division

https://www.facebook.com/OceansidePD/

Ignacio Lopez

Lieutenant

Support Operations Division

https://www.facebook.com/OceansidePD/

These two officers gave us the run around and lead us to believe that if we did comply with their wishes and their extortion we would be on our way and that it would be in our interest to do so another implied to coarse or threaten us into conformity but much more that this it was theft not only of our vehicle but of the funds we needed to get home to our family,understand we have on multiple occasions requested a complaint form and been refused Chief Frank McCoy has ignored our plea for help in the open and blatant violation of our rights to travel as well as our rights to freedom of movement these rights belong to all citizens of the united states of america Chief Frank McCoy

again this is the response we continue to get from oceanside so called finest let me add it has escalated do to my response of these violations of our rights and my son has know been attacked and his vehicle towed and again his rights as ours were violated .I have made my first call to the city of oceanside Attorney whom I was directed to call her name is Anny Higle oceanside city attorney her number is 760-583-4360

As I post this to the oceanside police this evening this is my response

If you are posting an emergency message call 911 immediately. If you need non-emergency assistance, call (760)435-4900. Please Note: The Oceanside Police Department's Facebook page is not monitored 24/7; be patient as a response may not be immediate.

we want the people of Oceanside to understand their rights as well as ours for they are yours as well as every citizen of the United States of America

Your automobile is your private property, it's your right to travel in it. Private property cannot be regulated lawfully by a third party. Right are not privilege. Traveling is not a right if there is a license fee.. The corporation that made the car can be regulated.. it's a corporation. The road is paid for by gas usage for being on them, it's public property like a park I don't need a license to travel freely or be in a park. You do not control equal and free rights they are already inherent.. no human being has power over another. No corporation has power over a human being.. no government has power of a private individual beings or property. This is the meaning of liberty and freedom. You either support liberty or you don't.

The license is a FEE I do not consent to pay and you have to honor that RIGHT of consent.. it has nothing to do with my competence as a person or most of you wouldn't haven't been given that privilege. This human rights issue has to do with commercial code and the codification of human rights, not a license or the fee. This is not a petty argument and it's not going away anytime soon. Are you going to honor my rights as I honor yours? You have a right to travel in your private automobile on public roads to public park. Anyone countering this fact is standing against RIGHTS deserves none. WE have many rights that are not listed on a piece of paper. The basic outline called the Bill of Rights are not the only rights we get. These rights are inherent and inalienable.. they precede the government and will be there long after it's gone. Rights are FREEDOM... the freedom to choose voluntarily to consent with community or decline without penalty.

To force another to consent is terrorism by definition.

"Justice is not blind, idealism is blind, and ideas are crafted and called legal code".

we have sent all information to Sebastian Ohanian, Esq.

Fla. Bar 98046

Cal. Bar 271403

267 Minorca Ave, Suite 100

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Tel. 786-369-5447

Fax. 786-369-0915

Evidence of our rights being violated and this legal document was submitted into the investigation on 3 different meetings with the oceanside police dept

The united 50 States of America

Secured Party Declaration And Notice

Under Uniform Commercial Code and Constitutional Law

Name of Sovereign: __Joseph F Barber

City: Oceanside ,Sovereign Nation/State ,Ca Zip: 92054

Date of Birth: 04/28 1963 ,Male: __x___ Female: ______ Eyes: blue ,Hair: Grey

I Declare Myself a legal Sovereign, Operating Under Common Law, Title 4, U.S.C, 1, Flag of Peace and secure all my rights under U.C.C 1-207. I am NOT a corporate being dealing in commerce requiring a license of any kind. I travel by RIGHT, not by Privilege. Anything you say or do in violation of my Rights, can and will be used against you in a court of law.

Signature of Sovereign:

*************************************************************************************

Sovereign Right to Operate a Private Vehicle

"NOTICE" TO PUBLIC SERVANTS intending to violate my free rights under law:

The Bearer, being an un-enfranchised Sovereign, is authorized under statute at large, First Congress 1789, Session 1, Chapters, page 52; Articles of Confederation, Article 4-3-1-1781; MC 38: Title 18, Section 241, USC Title 42, Section 1983, 1985, 1986, of the unhampered use of all navigable waters and all common law highways, roadways, and byways which are used for transport either private, public, or commerce anywhere in these United 50 States of America. Said driver/operator is affirmed in obedience for the protection of the Constitution for the United States of America and may be detained only upon sworn complaint of an injured party as per the Bill of Rights, Article IV, and common law. The undersigned claims his rights at law as a Sovereign citizen (NOT a resident) of Colorado state, and rejects, and is not subject to, the contract obligations in equity known as the Motor Vehicle Codes of the respective states, via U.C.C. 1.

Notice: The "driver’s license" demanded, and provided under duress, which is issued by the state of California, is NOT legally issued to me as a secured party with respect to the named party on the license, JOSEPH F BARBER, in all caps.

Case Law: (Emphasis mine throughout)

Americans' "freedom to travel throughout the United States has long been recognized as a basic right under the Constitution," according to multiple cases including Williams v Fears, 179 US 270, 274; 21 S Ct 128; 45 L Ed 186 (1900); Twining v New Jersey, 211 US 78, 97; 29 S Ct 14; 53 L Ed 97 (1908), as listed in the case of United States v Guest, 383 US 745; 86 S Ct 1170; 16 L Ed 2d 239 (1968), a case involving criminally prosecuting people for obstructing the right (obstruction is a federal crime pursuant to federal criminal law 18 USC 241).

Case law shows that the "liberty" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment extends beyond freedom from bodily restraint and includes a much wider range of human activity, including but not limited to the opportunity to make a wide range of personal decisions concerning one's life, family, and private pursuits. See Meyer v, 262 US 390, 399; 43 SCt 625, 626; 67 L Ed 1043 (1923), and Roe v Wade, 410 US 113, 152-153; 93 S Ct 705, 726-727; 35 L Ed 2d 147 (1973). One of these life, family, private pursuits is obviously driving.

In effect, as per the Supreme Court decision in the case of Crandall v Nevada, 73 US 35; 18 L Ed (1867), speed limits and other traffic control devices, being non-fact-based, are simply an unlawful tax or impost on travel, and thus unconstitutional for the reason cited in Crandall. (Crandall involved a tax on travelers! which is what in essence speed limits, unscientific stop signs, etc., simply are, stripped of all the phony fraudulent politician folderol pretending them to relate somehow to safety, not to mention that are extortion violating the federal anti-racketeering act (RICO), 18 USC 1961 and the law against obstructing federal rights, 18 USC 241).

42-2-101. Licenses for drivers required.

(1) Except as otherwise provided in part 4 of this article for commercial drivers...

Colorado Article 42-2-101 clearly states, licensing is for commercial drivers, not private citizens..

"...For while a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that right does not extend to the use of the highways...as a place for private gain. For the latter purpose, no person has a vested right to use the highways of this state, but it is a privilege...which the (state) may grant or withhold at its discretion..." State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073.

"The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which a citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment."

"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution." - Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293.

"The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, 125. Reaffirmed in Zemel v. Rusk 33 US 1.

"Where activities or enjoyment, natural and often necessary to the well being of an American citizen, such as travel, are involved, we will construe narrowly all delegated powers that curtail or dilute them... to repeat, we deal here with a constitutional right of the citizen..." Edwards v. California 314 US 160 (1941).

"Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. - Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago, 169 NE 22 ("Regulated" here means stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission or unconstitutional taxation; i.e. - licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc., requiring financial consideration, which are more illegal taxes.)

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."- Thompson v Smith, 154 SE 579.

"The right to travel is protected by the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment."

"Right to travel is constitutionally protected against private as well as public encroachment."

Volunteer Medical Clinic, Inc. V. Operation Rescue, 948 F2d 218; International Org. Of Masters, Etc. V. Andrews, 831, F2d 843; Zobel v. Williams, 457 US 55, 102 Sct. 2309.

"The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel along the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some vehicle." House v. Cramer, 1 12 N. W. 3; 134 Iowa 374 (1907).

"License: In the law of contracts, is a permission, accorded by a competent authority, conferring the right to do some act which without such authorization would be illegal, or would be a trespass or tort." Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1910).

"The license means to confer on a person the right to do something which otherwise he would not have the right to do." City of Louisville v. Sebree, 214 S.W. 2D 248; 308 Ky. 420.

"The object of a license is to confer a right or power which does not exist without it." Pavne v. Massev, 196 S.W. 2D 493; 145 Tex. 273; Shuman v. City of Ft. Wayne, 127 Indiana 109; 26 NE 560, 561 (1891); 194 So 569 (1940).

"A license is a mere permit to do something that without it would be unlawful." Littleton v. Buress, 82 P. 864, 866; 14 Wyo.173.

"A license, pure and simple, is a mere personal privilege...River Development Corp. V. Liberty Corp., 133 A. 2d 373, 385; 45 N.J. Super. 445.

"A license is merely a permit or privilege to do what otherwise would be unlawful, and is not a contract between the authority, federal, state or municipal granting it and the person to whom it is granted..."American States Water Services Co. Of Calif. V. Johnson, 88 P.2d 770, 774; 31 Cal. App.2d 606.

"A license when granting a privilege, may not, as the terms to its possession, impose conditions which require the abandonment of constitutional rights." Frost Trucking Co. V. Railroad Commission, 271 US 583, 589 (1924); Terral v. Burke Construction Company, 257 US 529, 532 (1922).

Public roads belong to the people, since we pay for them, therefore exercising one’s liberty upon them is a natural right. The right to travel, or to locomotion, is upheld in the constitution, and actually predate the constitution;

"These are rights which existed long before our constitution, and we have taken pride in their maintenance, making them a part of the fundamental law of the land."

"Personal liberty, which is guaranteed to every citizen under our constitution and laws, consists of the right to locomotion,—to go where one pleases, and when, and to do that which may lead to one's business or pleasure, only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. . . .

"Any law which would place the keeping and safe conduct of another in the hands of even a conservator of the peace, unless for some breach of the peace committed in his presence, or upon suspicion of felony, would be most oppressive and unjust, and destroy all the rights which our Constitution guarantees." Pinkerton v Verberg, 78 Mich 573, 584; 44 NW 579, 582-583 (1889).

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment... In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed... Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it... A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution JTM) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)

"The word privilege is defined as a particular benefit, favor, or advantage, a right or immunity not enjoyed by all, or it may be enjoyed only under special conditions." Knoll Gold Club v. U.S., 179 Fed Supp. 377, 380.

"...those things which are considered as inalienable rights which all citizens possess cannot be licensed since those acts are not held to be a privilege." City of Chicago v. Collins, 51 N.E. 907, 910

"Illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed." Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1884); Exparte Rhodes, 202Ala. 68 71.

"The State cannot diminish rights of the people." Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516

"Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void." Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60.

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;...shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..." Article VI of the U.S. Constitution:

"Under our system of government upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him/her, except as his/her conduct to others, leaving him/her the sole judge as to all that affects himself/herself." Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-60.

"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice."- Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24.

"Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." - Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

"For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights."- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

There is no question that there is NO injured party involved here, and a citation/ticket issued by a police officer, or jail/incarceration for any cause including no valid driver’s license, registration or insurance, and save for criminal activities involving an injured party, is a penalty or sanction, and is indeed "converting a Right into a crime."

"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right which the public and individuals cannot be rightfully deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 337 IIL200,169 NE 22, 66 ALR 834. Ligare v. Chicago 139 III. 46, 28 NE 934. Booney v. dark, 214 SW 607; 25 A M JUR (I'1) Highways, Sec. 163.

Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law. Yick Wo vs. Hopkins, U.S. 356 (1886)

"Our system of government, based upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him, except as his conduct to others, leaving him the sole judge as to all that only affects himself." Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-6O.

"A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution." Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, at 113.

Compelling me, a sovereign individual, into a contract with Colorado by securing, for money, a "driver's" license or vehicle registration, or face fines or imprisonment for non-crimes, is a direct violation of my rights under law. My rights have been secured via my Uniform Commercial Code 1 filing with the Secretary of State of Colorado, and accepted.

The Claims will produce forensic evidence showing how the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION issues LETTERS OF MARQUE via Colorable de facto Laws, Statutes, Public Policies, Codes, Rules Administrative Procedures etc., to Agencies and the Agents in turn function as the Insurgents committing hostile and warlike acts of blatantly, directly, forcible, employing intimidation, fear, threats, actions such as coercion, terrorism, racketeering, privateering under the Color of Law and Color of Right, conspiring against, abridging and depriving the Defendants, and access to the Rights and Constitutional Exemptions of the Defendants and that are Secured and Protected by Law from such actions.

1. Belligerency - the status of de facto statehood attributed to a body of insurgents, by which their hostilities are legalized. The international status assumed by a state (i.e. nation) which wages war against another.

2. Belligerent - One who is hostile or combative which as a state is hostile, combative and wages war hostilities and aggression against its own citizens by a body of insurgents by which their war hostilities are presumed legalized.

3. Privateer - A vessel owned, equipped, and armed by one or more individuals, and duly commissioned by a belligerent power to make war upon the enemy, usually by preying on his commerce. A vessel is commissioned by a state or a nation by the issue of a letter of marque to its owner to carry on all hostilities, presumably according to the laws of war. Formerly a state issued letters of marque to its own subjects, and to those of neutral states as well, but a privateersman who accepted letters of marque from both belligerents was regarded as a pirate. Piracy and Privateering are Federal offences 18 USCA 1692 et seq. See Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition page 1195

4. Letter of Marque - An authorization formerly granted in time of war by a government to the owner of a vessel to capture enemy vessels and goods. See Article I 8 US Constitution.

5. War - For there to be a war a sovereign or a quasi-sovereign must engage in hostilities. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., C.A.N.Y., 505 F.2d 989,1005.

6. Piracy - Those acts of robbery and depredation upon the high seas, which if committed on land, would have amounted to a felony. Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life. 18 USCA 1651. Piracy and Privateering are Federal offences 18 USCA 1692 et seq. Blacks Law Dictionary

Further potential crimes:

-Title 28- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil Rights, 241 Conspiracy against private property rights.

-Title 28- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil Rights, 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.

-The 4th Constitutional Amendment; Deprivation of security of the Private Property Right from government invasion.

-The 5th Constitutional Amendment Deprivation of Liberty and Private Property without Just Compensation.

-The Theft of the Personal Private Property by Taking without Just Compensation.

-The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter I 1985-Conspiracy interfering with Private Property Rights.

-The United States Code Annotated Title 18 1651 et seq Piracy and Privateering activities conducted on vessels at dry dock under commercial law by a body of insurgent Privateers.

-The United States Code Title 18 152 and 3571 provides fine up to $500,000.00 or imprisonment for up to 5 years for the presenting of fraudulent claims, fraudulent indictment, fraudulent evidence.

-The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter II obstructing the evidence in the witnesses through the modification of language creating Federal Racketeering; Influenced and Corrupt Organizations activities extorting financial means creating economical damage point beyond recovery.

-The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter III deprivation of the evidence in the witnesses through modification of language creating acts of Federal Racketeering; Influenced and Corrupt Organizations; Terrorism; Privateering.

-The United States Code Title 42 1986 For knowledge and the right to stop and correct a wrong,

-The United States Code Title 28 USC 1746 and Title 18 1621 Perjury and conspiring to commit perjury.

-The United States Code Title 18 1001 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b). Extorting private property through the modification of language.

-The United States Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 95 1651 Interference with commerce by threats or violence.

-Acting without establishing as a matter of record, Proper Jurisdiction over me.

-Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Upholding the "Oath of Office" and Upholding the Office of Public Trust.

-Acts of War against the United States Government Treaties and Organic Constitution Constituting Treason.

-Violation of Substantive Rights and Private Property Rights Secured and Protection by Constitutional Law.

-Employing Intimidation to affect Identity, Nationality, Birthright. Thief Using a Fiction, Artificial Person Name to Impersonate and Steal the Sovereign De Jure Identity.

Federal law 18 USC 1961 bans engaging in a pattern of crime. When state and local officials in essence extort money, they are committing federal felonies and are in essence "racketeers" as per the law.

Under penalty of perjury, I affirm that the information contained in this document is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. All Specific Rights are explicitly reserved, without prejudice, U.C.C. 1-207, Common Law, Law of Nations.

Signed:__joseph F barber_____________________________________________ Date: ________________

I declare under penalty of perjury that the identified Sovereign named above appeared before me with picture identification, and acknowledged this document before me as his personal testimony on;

Date: __________________ /s/ ____________________________________________

(NOTARY PUBLIC'S JURAT)

Apostille Certificate: what is it for and why is it needed?

For the average immigrant, the word apostille is probably something they’ve never heard before. All they want is a better life for themselves and their loved ones in a country that is sure to have more rules, regulations and red tape than what they’re used to. Enter the Apostille.

Thanks to the Hague Convention, any document that is meant to be used in an overseas legal matter must be apostilled, or legalized. Before a document can be processed with the legalization office, the document must be signed by a notary or solicitor and it must be officially certified. These pertain to official government documents or otherwise drafted documents that bear the seal or stamp of a relevant authority. These can include: general registry documents, court papers and academic results.

As of now, countries that have agreed to the specific convention of apostille certificates include the UK, most of Europe and the USA. Apostille Certificate is a document authentication, now recognized by over 60 countries worldwide, and the demands are only growing with increasing demand. Furthermore, document verification especially goes smoother in one of the member states that recognize apostilles.

The job of an apostille is to ease the legal burden on your transition into your new domicile, so that the assimilation process can be as easy as 1-2-3. However, if you never did a document legalization before, it is wise to hire the professional services who can legalize your document in accordance with international regulations. Their main job on documents includes but is not limited to: procuring, translating and authenticating the proper naturalization documents needed to obtain proper legal status in the new country of whoever is applying for legal citizenship. Their services are also useful when it comes time to get married, securing power of attorney, proving name change, obtaining and legalizing background checks for employment overseas, health records verification, and property ownership. Whatever your particular case may be, they can draw up the proper legal documents needed to suit your needs. Especially in this day and age where people move between the countries, and getting your documents done properly and correctly can ensure that all of your matters will be managed smoothly and in time.

In short, an apostille certificate is absolutely necessary for all matters regarding the legal documents of immigrants to ensure a smooth transition. When you are new to a country and need someone to trust, look no further. It’s a bureaucracy out there, but it doesn’t have to be for you. Rather than go through the never-ending back and forth process of hoping that everything has been done completely and in proper legal form, don’t take the chance of not hiring an apostille services agency, you’ll be thankful you did.

https://youtu.be/3egDmWYx5Tw?t=508

It would seem my friends you and I are indeed Indentured Servants for our government has been borrowing off your LIFE and Labor and has kept from you and I years of interest payments and now the Federal Reserves owns us.

Maybe We The People should file a Class Action lawsuit for Fraud and Deceit against the Federal Reserve and then The Crown and Congress. No matter how you look at this they owe us big time!!!

I bought the vehicle one day prior to the officer pulling me over I was exercising my right of freedom of movement traveling as a lawful traveler.

My wife had bought a one way slip which was posted on my back window as we were moving to Florida on the day I was pulled over. It cost her 45 dollars. The officer said he didn't care about my rights,as I was also recording the incident. Once the officer knew I was recording he grabbed my phone and kept it until his business was over. He did give me back my phone but all was deleted. He gave me a ticket for non reg., No license., And no insurance. I did and do have insurance. (The reg. Was the temp one way slip. ) The oceanside police dept will not except this lawfull temp registration another violation of my rights to freedom of movement and free travel,

Can we not drive the car to different state without paying CA taxes lease/finance Yes you can buy a car in California without paying CA sales tax and drive it ONE WAY to any state on what is call a CA DMV One Way Trip Permit.

I have bought (leased) cars in SoCal from Honda, Mercedes, BMW to name a few that gave me that tag to drive back east with.

It looks like this:

I have also provided and addition travel permit

Vehicle Registration Permits (FFVR 36)

• Vehicle Moving Permit
• Temporary Operating Permit (TOP)
• One Trip Permit
• Nonresident Commercial Trip Permit

One Trip Permit(CVC §4003)

A one trip permit may be issued for a fee, in lieu of California registration, to move a vehicle required to be registered:

• When unladen, for one continuous trip from a place within California to a place in or outside California or from outside California to a place in California (by the most direct route).
• For participation as a vehicular float or display in a lawful parade or exhibition for one round trip from one place to another. The total round trip cannot exceed 100 miles and must be completed within 60 days.

A one trip permit is valid for a nonresident:

• To move a newly purchased trailer coach into California.
• Member of the armed forces to move an unregistered trailer coach they own into, out of, or within California.

Important: A one trip permit cannot be used to move a crane or trailer coach owned by a California resident.

Blank one trip permits may be purchased in volume from any DMV office.

Issuing a one trip permit does not affect California tax requirements. For sales and use tax information, contact the Board of Equalization (BOE) at www.boe.ca.gov or 1–800–400–7115.

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/pubs/brochures/fast_facts/ffvr36#otp

The officer was informed I was a savergn,his first action was to step back and put his hand on his weapon. He said, " we're going to go with this crap now right?"

He escalated the situation by telling me to give him the keys and get out of the vehicle I was being detained.

I asked why I was being detained, he said, " I don't need a reason to detain you."

My window was only partially down he told me he was going to break my window and pull me out if I didn't comply.

So I exited my vehicle because he was giving me the lawful order, under der-rest.

I still as of yet , don't know why I was being detained. I was hand cuffed , my vehicle was illegally searched, and he continued thru the process of having my vehicle impounded.

This officer made my ill wife and I homeless and on the streets both of us veterans, since all our cloths and other belongings we're in the vehicle as I stated before, we were on our way out of Oceanside moving back to Florida. leaving my ill wife and I without our belongings and away from anyone we know for 1000s of miles away.

All my tools to work with we're placed on the street along with a small tool trailer I had just purchased, they were just paving the streets when I asked the officer if he would assist me in moving my trailer off the street and around the corner where they were not paving so the paving company would not have it towed.

The officer just laughed at me and said it was my problem. Since the 10th of April my 2001 chev. Yukon, at 45 dollars a day plus 200 hundred tow fee a 145 dollar release fee from the police Dept. Has been sitting in the tow yard . They want me to reg. My vehicle here in ca. Before I get my vehicle out of impound. ( Roadone towing) 8584925252.)

I spent money on a one-way for our move to Florida and thus will be registering it there. I have 10 days or so to do this after I bought the vehicle. According to the DMV of CA.

I informed him I had all my paperwork, bill of sale, the title around the corner with my wife at a motel, but he would not afford me the time to get the paperwork, I tried to call my wife but unfortunately she did not hear the phone as she is almost deaf without her hearing aids.

This has created an undue burden on my wife and i , since this has happened. The officer said, that my rights as a savergn don't apply here in California. Once my vehicle was towed, he handed me a ticket and my phone and left laughing at me.

I need my vehicle out of impound without fees due to anyone, as like I said my vehicle was toweillegallyly, and given a ticket under the color of authority ,

I am out of money now as I've had to spend my travel and gas money mostly on motels ..we are literally on the street now.

Im requesting assistance from legal aid in this matter altho I could be my own counsel . I do believe it would apeas the court if I had a license. Lawyer to represent me.

To let you know a little about me I am a syndicated author, freelance writer and blogger with a world wide following of 5 million people. This can be verified by googling my name. Joseph F Barber.

Update: yesterday I went and seen a lieutenant Lopez and Oceanside Police department it took most of my afternoon to try to speak with him and requested that I go to the DMV and get paperwork stating that I can use the one-day pass in a right to travel that might vehicle I'd gotten the Yukon GMC Yukon 2001 it work as my temporary registration to transport to my home state just before he has to get off around 5 p.m. I guess 4:30 we had spoken and he refused to release the vehicle to me again telling me that the DMV said that that vehicle in this travel from it is only within the state of California which is that true and I've got proof of that and will be pushing it along with the rest of the information that I have online now this is at becoming outreach they openly violate the constitutional rights. Only the constitutional rights of the United States constitution rights in the state of California of its citizens and people coming here

I found, very little help that can be provided to any citizen against law enforcement in the state of California it seems that they are immune in this police state, martial law has already been taken in being shown openly there are a few select officers that I have met here and they seem to be very good men but if it's any recourse to the leadership I experienced, this far by lieutenant Lopez and the seemingly corrupt institution of so called law enforcement in oceanside Ca the complaints from multiple individuals speaks foitselflf As for lieutenant Lopez he speaks of following the leader of the law yet directly violates the law and the constitution not only of his state but that of the united states and those rights guaranteed to the people the man has no dignity and tries to tell me he's going by the letter of the law instead of the spirit of the law oh by the letter as long the affidavits that I presented to him in the supreme Court rulings show that he is wrong but he fails to acknowledge that and since he doesn't go by that or the rules in supreme Court but by his own judgment hence my rights are being violated and my property stolen from me I'm being extorted and threatened by the local police am I on the safety and welfare how long will my wife we're both veterans the taxpaying citizens hard workers non-drinkers non drug use who now been placed on the street by the ones we expect to protect us or local police

I Have submitted along with this blog on a separate page or at the bottom of this the proof that I presented to the lieutenant lopez what' my rights our under the united states supremcourt'sts rulings as to be presented to their attorneys, I'm not sure that they'll even acknowledge it from what I understand he basically probably threw it in the trash as it was being no good when is actual case law and is it true about David that will be submitted to the court unfortunately for them and for me it's escalated into for more financial expense on myself which hints is the key to asset forfeiture they use that simple fact that something most people cannot afford to pay the extreme cost after 3 days I've already got a lien against my property in this equals out to $1,126 within 10 days that every actions and ways to try and take your property in any way they want they can say anything they want do anything you want within this is outrageous that such officers walk the streets today

https://youtu.be/I-twWcl2XJg

https://youtu.be/ZRcpvDp592Q

Law Advocate

Your automobile is your private property, it's your right to travel in it. Private property cannot be regulated lawfully by a third party. Right are not privilege. Traveling is not right if there is a license fee.. The corporation that made the car can be regulated.. it's a corporation. The road is paid for by gas usage for being on them, it's public property like a park I don't need a license to travel freely or be in a park. You do not control equal and free rights they are already inherent.. no human being has power over another. No corporation has power over a human being.. no government has power of a private individual beings. This is the meaning of liberty and freedom. You either support liberty or you don't. The license is a FEE I do not consent to pay and you have to honor that RIGHT of consent.. it has nothing to do with my competence as a person or most of you wouldn't haven't been given that privilege. This human rights issue has to do with commercial code and the codification of human rights, not a license or the fee. This is not a petty argument and it's not going away anytime soon. Are you going to honor my rights as I honor yours? You have a right to travel in your private automobile on public roads to public park. Anyone countering this fact is standing against RIGHTS deserves none. WE have many rights that are not listed on a piece of paper. The basic outline called Bill of Rights are not the only rights we get. These rights are inherent and inalienable.. they precede the government and will be there long after it's gone. Rights are FREEDOM... the freedom to choose voluntarily to consent with community or decline without penalty. To force another to consent is terrorism by definition. "Justice is not blind, idealism is blind, and ideas are crafted and called legal code".

“Serving my country was a life-changing experience for me. It was during those years that I realized the importance of commitment, dedication, honor, and discipline. I have never laughed so much; nor have I ever prayed so much. I made life-long friends. The leaders and heroes I served with helped shape me into the man I am today. I feel honored to have been a part of such a great tradition and grateful to others who have walked the same path. Thank you!”

Civil-Asset-Forfeiture

file:///C:/Users/dbarb/OneDrive/Documents/Rutherford_QA_Civil-Asset-Forfeiture.pdf

Joseph F Barber,is a Builder /Contractor/ Freelance Writer and Editor of the blog FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience,Founder of the Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign.it is my message to We the people and the citizens of our world That the time has come were we must stand and be counted and to have are voices be heard to stand free and our ground feed another if we can ,I tell you this as it come from with in my soul There comes a point when a man must refuse to answer to his leader if he is also to answer to his own conscience.

"I don't know how to save the world. I don't have the answers or The Answer. I hold no secret knowledge as to how to fix the mistakes of generations past and present. I only know that without compassion and respect for all Earth's inhabitants, none of us will survive - nor will we deserve to." Leonard Peltier

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience

Pro Deo et Constitutione –

Libertas aut Mors Semper Vigilans Fortis

Paratus et Fidelis

Joseph F Barber

When Police Violate the Miranda Rule

Defend your rights. We've helped 95 clients find attorneys today.

When was the alleged crime committed?

Select an answer Less than 1 month ago 1-3 months 4-6 months 7-12 months More than 12 months ago

What happens to your case when the police have not followed the rules surrounding Miranda? There seems to be a bit of "common knowledge" in our society that if you are not read your rights and then arrested, your case will be dismissed. There is some fact in this statement, and also a lot of fiction. Learn more about Miranda violations and how they affect a criminal case here.

Nature and Consequences of Miranda Violations

• Police Questioning After the Suspect Claims MirandaSometimes police can continue to ask questions after a suspect has invoked the Miranda rights.
• Miranda Rights: What Happens If the Police Don't Read You Your RightsMany people believe that if they are arrested and not "read their rights," they can escape punishment. Not true. But if the police fail to read a suspect his or her rights, the prosecutor can't use anything the suspect says as evidence against the suspect at trial.
• Statements Obtained When Police Violate Miranda: Can They Be Used Against You?Most of the time, when the police fail to follow the Miranda rule, the defendant's statements cannot be used against him or her at trial -- but there are several exceptions.

Questions About Miranda Violations

• If the Police Find Evidence Because of a Miranda Violation, Is the Evidence Inadmissible?Conversations with the police can yield more than confessions. Sometimes they lead to physical evidence.

To be GOVERNED is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so. To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be place under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality