FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

Come On Folks: Get Behind Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign

Remember, Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign is independent because it is wholly funded by YOU
Veterans Project & The Family Assistance Campaign is one of the webs only truly independent sources of news and opinion.
Without YOUR help it can not continue to exist.
Please help - Act now! Click the link below

Please provide whatever you can- $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100- To Use your debit/credit card or check pay here on facebook pay to Founder Joseph F Barber :
We provide Veteran, IN NEED WE PROVIDE FOOD ,CLOTHING,HOUSEING AND TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM SCHOOL OR WORK,AS WELL AS LEGAL AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE, IT IS OUR SINCERE HOPES THAT THE LOVE AND COMPASSION SHOWN THROUGH THE HEARTS AND COMPASSION OF THOSE WHO ASSIST IN THIS INDEVORE TO HELP YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN STAND FREE AND INDEPENDENT FROM THE THINGS THAT BROUGHT THEM TO OUR LIVES IS DONE SO THEY CAN LEAD PRODUCTIVE LIVES WITH FAITH AND FAMILY VALUES THEY SEE IN OUR OWN HOMES AS We SHARE OUR LIVES WITH THESE AND MANY YOUNG MEN & WOMEN.WE believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. Each of us must learn to work not just for one self, one's own family or one's nation, but for the benefit of all humankind. Universal responsibility is the key to human survival. It is the best foundation for world peace

or if you prefer to send a check or money order,to 47874 Dalea pl,oceanside Ca,92057 USA.
Low income readers: DON'T send money, just encourage others to subscribe.
https://www.facebook.com/lawfulrebelion/

Thanks for your support

https://the-family-assistants-campaign.blogspot.com/

for personell contact with me the founder please call 24/7 @ 442-264-9578

To all who have assisted in the past. Thank you. Your help is greatly appreciated. Peace and Joy.Founder Joseph F Barber

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today


To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

"Until the philosophy which holds one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned, everywhere is war and until there are no longer first-class and second-class citizens of any nation, until the color of a man's skin is of no more significance than the color of his eyes. And until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all without regard to race, there is war. And until that day, the dream of lasting peace, world citizenship, rule of international morality, will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained... now everywhere is war." - - Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia - Popularized by Bob Marley in the song War

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

A Primer on Socialism Security

A Primer on Socialism Security

Note: This is an excerpt from Progressivism: A Primer on the Idea Destroying America(2014).
Like government schools, Social Security is a failed program that nevertheless remains popular with the American people.  Why?  Keep in mind that progressivism is not a rational system of thought but a means to make progressives feel better about themselves and provide a (false) sense of control over a big, complex and often hostile world.  As such, the mindset necessarily excludes any notion that progressive programs might fail or might cost too much which, in the case of Social Security, is a critical issue.  If progressivism was sensitive to its own failures, it would not be what it is and would not serve the purposes that make it so popular.  If a program needs more resources, then, since progressives have no theory of costs or awareness that all resources are scarce, the progressive will merely propose spending more money as has been done with Social Security, at least, twenty times.  At no time when higher Social Security taxes were proposed to save the program from insolvency, did progressives ask themselves, is this program worth the increased costs?  Should we liquidate the program instead of continually increasing costs?  Where are those additional resources coming from?  How were those resources being used before they were taxed away?  What harm will be done to persons and to their projects and to the overall economy by seizing those resources from where they are being used and applying them to save an insolvent program, the campaign promise of a dead and depraved politician, FDR?[1]
These would all be fair, rational, logical questions to ask, however, progressivism is not a rational or logical system of thought.  If progressivism asked these questions, it would defeat its prime goal of making the believer feel better and have a greater sense of control over the world.  It would then cease to exist in its present form!
Lest the reader think I am being too harsh on progressives, let me acknowledge that progressives do respond to allegations that their policies have failed, however, they do so by “doubling down” on progressivism.  They do so in a manner that preserves the nature of progressivism as a means of maintaining a sense of control and positive emotion.  They will therefore invariably propose fixing the broken, failed or insolvent program by using more government force, more taxation and more regulation.  The state will get ever greater power.  Social Security itself illustrates this as what was originally constructed as an inherently insolvent program with people paying very little in, became a program with many people getting out of it large sums that they never paid in.  Facing the choice of liquidating an insolvent program and admitting that progressivism had failed, or doubling down on progressivism by raising taxes, the progressive chose to continue being a progressive.
So, in evaluating from a rational point of view whether the program failed, the key problem is not logical, but psychological!  How do we figure out how to get our arguments and facts past the mental force field that protects the progressive from having his emotional therapy session painfully interrupted?  I have no easy answer to this but believe that defining the problem itself is the first step toward solving it. Now that I hope I have the progressive’s attention, what is the case for the failure of Social Security?
First, as with many progressive programs, Social Security was a classic instance of the government purporting to solve a problem caused by the failure of previous government programs.  By 1935, America was not even remotely a free market nation.  Big government, whose first manifestation was the Civil War (1861-1865) was now firmly ensconced in numerous areas of life and had had many decades to disrupt the workings of private society.  Some of the major examples of programs that had damaged the economy included: World War I, the Income Tax, the Federal Reserve, government schools, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, Hoover’s disastrous big government policies and the early portion of FDR’s New Deal.  All these programs destroyed private wealth, disrupted families, and reduced the wealth available to support what was a complex and successful web of private, voluntary relief agencies.[2]  Worst of all was the impact of the Federal Reserve and Hoover’s policies in causing, lengthening and worsening the Great Depression.
Social Security in turn immediately worsened the Great Depression:
“Payroll taxes to finance Social Security and Unemployment Insurance programs increased employers’ wage bills even further, which also reduced the level of employment. In their book Out of Work, Ohio University economists Richard Vedder and Lowell Galloway provide econometric estimates that government-mandated payroll cost increases added nearly 1.2 million people to the unemployment rolls by 1938.”[3]
Even after the Depression, Social Security increased unemployment by raising the cost of employing workers.
For those lucky enough to get a job, the payroll tax robs them of a tremendous amount of wealth for as much as 45 years in exchange for the possibility, if they remained alive and subject to the whim of Congress and assuming that the Federal Government still existed at that time, they would receive a modest pension paid for by extorting current workers.  For those inclined to plan for the future, Social Security robs them of the capital they could otherwise invest in a market-based pension that could pay a greater rate of return.  Whereas Social Security revenue is immediately spent by the state on wealth-destroying activities such as war, private pensions would be paid out of productive investment in productive assets such as stocks and real estate.
Worst of all, Social Security turns older Americans into dependents on the state, forcing them, in effect, to be cheerleaders for a corrupt, murderous, imperialistic kleptocracy just so they can be assured that the kleptocratic state will pick the pockets of younger workers to pay them a few hyper-inflated shekels in their declining years.  At a time when the elderly should be relying on their families, they are forced to spend their golden years voting like automatons for the same wretched state that is destroying the future of their own children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
“Social Security” is another Orwellian lie.  It is, in fact, antisocial and insecure.  It weakened the age-old bond between parent and child.  As Allan Carlson writes about Sweden: “The rise of the welfare state can be written as the steady transfer of the ‘dependency’ function from the family to the state. . .”[4] In olden days, older parents would live with their children and help raise the grandchildren.  Now, adult children think nothing of moving thousands of miles away from their parents and then easing them into government-funded nursing homes where they are drugged into oblivion with Medicaid-funded drugs providing huge profits to Big Pharma.  FDR and LBJ in three generations were able to undo the family structure built up over the eons.  The kids are in daycare, the grandparents are in nursing homes and the adults are tax slaves for the progressive state.  What a country!
The program is always teetering on the edge of disaster as it depends entirely on taxing current workers.  Social Security is not an entitlement but a mere statute that can be changed any time at the whim of Congress.  The level of benefits and the age of eligibility can also be changed at any time.  Benefits are also subject to the vagaries of inflation and the indexing of inflation is obviously subject to manipulation.  The Freudian slip on the security of Social Security is the constant refrain from Democrats that the Republicans (fat chance!) will cut your benefits if they win the next election.  This is a concession of the basic insecurity of the program.
Of course, the government can only give what the government possesses.  Thus, if the government becomes insolvent, which is the current projected trend, the checks will stop or will be paid with hyper-inflated virtually worthless dollars.  Finally, if the Progressive State of America (PSA) ceases to exist, as has every other overextended imperialist power in history, the checks will cease.  Only a fool would discount that possibility in a country founded by a violent revolution, which suffered a violent Civil War and has a history of racial, religious and ethnic conflict that seems to be intensifying at the moment.  If that happens, you can trade in your Treasury checks for Confederate war bonds.
I have argued elsewhere that the only politically practical way to abolish Social Security is to buy out current recipients with cash paid for by selling off government assets.[5]
Notes
[1] See Chapter 9.
[2]Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835); Richard C. Cornuelle, Reclaiming the American Dream: The Role of Private Individuals and Voluntary Associations (Philanthropy & society), Random House, New York, 1965.
[3] T. DiLorenzo, “A New, New Deal,” Mises Daily (Oct. 10, 1998).
[4] “What has Government Done to Our Families,” Mises Daily, Jan. 5, 2003.
[5] “A $21 Trillion Tax Cut,” Mises Daily, Mar. 20, 2001.

A Primer on Socialism Security

Note: This is an excerpt from Progressivism: A Primer on the Idea Destroying America(2014).
Like government schools, Social Security is a failed program that nevertheless remains popular with the American people.  Why?  Keep in mind that progressivism is not a rational system of thought but a means to make progressives feel better about themselves and provide a (false) sense of control over a big, complex and often hostile world.  As such, the mindset necessarily excludes any notion that progressive programs might fail or might cost too much which, in the case of Social Security, is a critical issue.  If progressivism was sensitive to its own failures, it would not be what it is and would not serve the purposes that make it so popular.  If a program needs more resources, then, since progressives have no theory of costs or awareness that all resources are scarce, the progressive will merely propose spending more money as has been done with Social Security, at least, twenty times.  At no time when higher Social Security taxes were proposed to save the program from insolvency, did progressives ask themselves, is this program worth the increased costs?  Should we liquidate the program instead of continually increasing costs?  Where are those additional resources coming from?  How were those resources being used before they were taxed away?  What harm will be done to persons and to their projects and to the overall economy by seizing those resources from where they are being used and applying them to save an insolvent program, the campaign promise of a dead and depraved politician, FDR?[1]
These would all be fair, rational, logical questions to ask, however, progressivism is not a rational or logical system of thought.  If progressivism asked these questions, it would defeat its prime goal of making the believer feel better and have a greater sense of control over the world.  It would then cease to exist in its present form!
Lest the reader think I am being too harsh on progressives, let me acknowledge that progressives do respond to allegations that their policies have failed, however, they do so by “doubling down” on progressivism.  They do so in a manner that preserves the nature of progressivism as a means of maintaining a sense of control and positive emotion.  They will therefore invariably propose fixing the broken, failed or insolvent program by using more government force, more taxation and more regulation.  The state will get ever greater power.  Social Security itself illustrates this as what was originally constructed as an inherently insolvent program with people paying very little in, became a program with many people getting out of it large sums that they never paid in.  Facing the choice of liquidating an insolvent program and admitting that progressivism had failed, or doubling down on progressivism by raising taxes, the progressive chose to continue being a progressive.
So, in evaluating from a rational point of view whether the program failed, the key problem is not logical, but psychological!  How do we figure out how to get our arguments and facts past the mental force field that protects the progressive from having his emotional therapy session painfully interrupted?  I have no easy answer to this but believe that defining the problem itself is the first step toward solving it. Now that I hope I have the progressive’s attention, what is the case for the failure of Social Security?
First, as with many progressive programs, Social Security was a classic instance of the government purporting to solve a problem caused by the failure of previous government programs.  By 1935, America was not even remotely a free market nation.  Big government, whose first manifestation was the Civil War (1861-1865) was now firmly ensconced in numerous areas of life and had had many decades to disrupt the workings of private society.  Some of the major examples of programs that had damaged the economy included: World War I, the Income Tax, the Federal Reserve, government schools, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, Hoover’s disastrous big government policies and the early portion of FDR’s New Deal.  All these programs destroyed private wealth, disrupted families, and reduced the wealth available to support what was a complex and successful web of private, voluntary relief agencies.[2]  Worst of all was the impact of the Federal Reserve and Hoover’s policies in causing, lengthening and worsening the Great Depression.
Social Security in turn immediately worsened the Great Depression:
“Payroll taxes to finance Social Security and Unemployment Insurance programs increased employers’ wage bills even further, which also reduced the level of employment. In their book Out of Work, Ohio University economists Richard Vedder and Lowell Galloway provide econometric estimates that government-mandated payroll cost increases added nearly 1.2 million people to the unemployment rolls by 1938.”[3]
Even after the Depression, Social Security increased unemployment by raising the cost of employing workers.
For those lucky enough to get a job, the payroll tax robs them of a tremendous amount of wealth for as much as 45 years in exchange for the possibility, if they remained alive and subject to the whim of Congress and assuming that the Federal Government still existed at that time, they would receive a modest pension paid for by extorting current workers.  For those inclined to plan for the future, Social Security robs them of the capital they could otherwise invest in a market-based pension that could pay a greater rate of return.  Whereas Social Security revenue is immediately spent by the state on wealth-destroying activities such as war, private pensions would be paid out of productive investment in productive assets such as stocks and real estate.
Worst of all, Social Security turns older Americans into dependents on the state, forcing them, in effect, to be cheerleaders for a corrupt, murderous, imperialistic kleptocracy just so they can be assured that the kleptocratic state will pick the pockets of younger workers to pay them a few hyper-inflated shekels in their declining years.  At a time when the elderly should be relying on their families, they are forced to spend their golden years voting like automatons for the same wretched state that is destroying the future of their own children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
“Social Security” is another Orwellian lie.  It is, in fact, antisocial and insecure.  It weakened the age-old bond between parent and child.  As Allan Carlson writes about Sweden: “The rise of the welfare state can be written as the steady transfer of the ‘dependency’ function from the family to the state. . .”[4] In olden days, older parents would live with their children and help raise the grandchildren.  Now, adult children think nothing of moving thousands of miles away from their parents and then easing them into government-funded nursing homes where they are drugged into oblivion with Medicaid-funded drugs providing huge profits to Big Pharma.  FDR and LBJ in three generations were able to undo the family structure built up over the eons.  The kids are in daycare, the grandparents are in nursing homes and the adults are tax slaves for the progressive state.  What a country!
The program is always teetering on the edge of disaster as it depends entirely on taxing current workers.  Social Security is not an entitlement but a mere statute that can be changed any time at the whim of Congress.  The level of benefits and the age of eligibility can also be changed at any time.  Benefits are also subject to the vagaries of inflation and the indexing of inflation is obviously subject to manipulation.  The Freudian slip on the security of Social Security is the constant refrain from Democrats that the Republicans (fat chance!) will cut your benefits if they win the next election.  This is a concession of the basic insecurity of the program.
Of course, the government can only give what the government possesses.  Thus, if the government becomes insolvent, which is the current projected trend, the checks will stop or will be paid with hyper-inflated virtually worthless dollars.  Finally, if the Progressive State of America (PSA) ceases to exist, as has every other overextended imperialist power in history, the checks will cease.  Only a fool would discount that possibility in a country founded by a violent revolution, which suffered a violent Civil War and has a history of racial, religious and ethnic conflict that seems to be intensifying at the moment.  If that happens, you can trade in your Treasury checks for Confederate war bonds.
I have argued elsewhere that the only politically practical way to abolish Social Security is to buy out current recipients with cash paid for by selling off government assets.[5]
Notes
[1] See Chapter 9.
[2]Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835); Richard C. Cornuelle, Reclaiming the American Dream: The Role of Private Individuals and Voluntary Associations (Philanthropy & society), Random House, New York, 1965.
[3] T. DiLorenzo, “A New, New Deal,” Mises Daily (Oct. 10, 1998).
[4] “What has Government Done to Our Families,” Mises Daily, Jan. 5, 2003.
[5] “A $21 Trillion Tax Cut,” Mises Daily, Mar. 20, 2001.


No comments :