FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today


To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

"Until the philosophy which holds one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned, everywhere is war and until there are no longer first-class and second-class citizens of any nation, until the color of a man's skin is of no more significance than the color of his eyes. And until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all without regard to race, there is war. And until that day, the dream of lasting peace, world citizenship, rule of international morality, will remain but a fleeting illusion to be pursued, but never attained... now everywhere is war." - - Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia - Popularized by Bob Marley in the song War

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Thursday, May 12, 2016

PROOF! IMMIGRATION POLICIES DEFY LOGIC

PROOF! IMMIGRATION POLICIES DEFY LOGIC


When an American suggests sealing our border to block illegal immigration, he or she can expect to be called a racist, a bigot, a xenophobe.
So, many Americans keep their mouths shut.
But, when given a chance to vote for a candidate who supports their position, they take the chance.
That’s why the only people left standing in the Republican primaries were those who pledged to shut the border and build a big wall. If you didn’t take that position, you were eliminated early from contention for the presidential nomination.
What about the other side – the Democrats? The Democrats don’t believe in building walls – unless it’s the newly planned 14-foot-high wall being built around the White House. Democrats like open borders because it means more voters for their party – more dumb constituents who believe the Democrats are really going to take care of everyone, providing them with food, shelter, child care, medical care, welfare, jobs if they want them, cellphones, whatever.
I raise this issue today because of an interesting communication I received from a gentleman from India.
He is perplexed about why America and Europe feel compelled to accept massive numbers of Middle Eastern “refugees.”
Here are his key questions and points:
  • “There are oppressed people in many nations,” he said accurately.
  • “When there are many poor people in Eastern Europe, why invite Syrians, instead of helping them fight ISIS?” he asked.
  • As to the issue of the “low fertility rate” in Germany, “why couldn’t poor Eastern Europeans be invited? Or even our Indians?”
  • Why were the so-called “Syrians allowed just to barge in?”
  • “Are people from all nations, where there is strife, eligible to travel and get integrated with Europeans? How about Balochis, Kashmiris and many others? Why the special treatment for Syrians?”
This gentleman from India is obviously well-educated. He’s a doctor. But his entire letter was deferential, repeatedly suggesting he may not entirely understand the situation.
Guess what? He understands it as well as any frustrated American or European.
What is happening in America and Europe is inexplicable except in the terms I outlined at the beginning of this column. It’s really about three things:
  • For the establishment Republicans who run Congress, it’s about providing cheap labor to businesses that contribute to their political campaigns.
  • For the Democrats, it’s about building their constituency of miserable people who believe their unsustainable promises to provide everyone with everything they need if they just keep voting Democrat.
  • The last thing it’s all about is “globalization.” John Kerry came out and said it last weekend at a college commencement where he told graduates they should prepare to live in a “borderless world.”
Why do some people want a “borderless world”?
Because the elite don’t like being accountable to the people and the rule of law. In the kind of global village they envision creating, there won’t be any votes, and they will be the law.
It’s so clear what’s happening that a clear-thinking person across the world in India can see it.
Hey, there are unhappy, oppressed, exploited people all over the world! Why not just let them all in? Why not throw open the gates to everyone who wants to immigrate to Europe or the U.S.? Should we empty out China, India?
What if half of China marched out and headed for Europe? Would they be accepted?
What if the people on every 747 from China landing in the U.S. decided to stay? Would that be acceptable?
Why is it that Middle East “refugees” have the right to just walk into Europe and take over? Isn’t that an act of war, or at least aggression?
Why does the U.S. have an obligation to accept more than 10 percent of the population of Mexico, which already lives in the U.S.?
And what about the national security threat unknown, undocumented immigrants pose to the countries they overrun?
There are answers.
And they are increasingly self-evident. It’s just astonishingly hard to believe how bad those answers are.
See video illustrating immigration to U.S. since 1820:
 




PROOF! IMMIGRATION POLICIES DEFY LOGIC


When an American suggests sealing our border to block illegal immigration, he or she can expect to be called a racist, a bigot, a xenophobe.
So, many Americans keep their mouths shut.
But, when given a chance to vote for a candidate who supports their position, they take the chance.
That’s why the only people left standing in the Republican primaries were those who pledged to shut the border and build a big wall. If you didn’t take that position, you were eliminated early from contention for the presidential nomination.
What about the other side – the Democrats? The Democrats don’t believe in building walls – unless it’s the newly planned 14-foot-high wall being built around the White House. Democrats like open borders because it means more voters for their party – more dumb constituents who believe the Democrats are really going to take care of everyone, providing them with food, shelter, child care, medical care, welfare, jobs if they want them, cellphones, whatever.
I raise this issue today because of an interesting communication I received from a gentleman from India.
He is perplexed about why America and Europe feel compelled to accept massive numbers of Middle Eastern “refugees.”
Here are his key questions and points:
  • “There are oppressed people in many nations,” he said accurately.
  • “When there are many poor people in Eastern Europe, why invite Syrians, instead of helping them fight ISIS?” he asked.
  • As to the issue of the “low fertility rate” in Germany, “why couldn’t poor Eastern Europeans be invited? Or even our Indians?”
  • Why were the so-called “Syrians allowed just to barge in?”
  • “Are people from all nations, where there is strife, eligible to travel and get integrated with Europeans? How about Balochis, Kashmiris and many others? Why the special treatment for Syrians?”
This gentleman from India is obviously well-educated. He’s a doctor. But his entire letter was deferential, repeatedly suggesting he may not entirely understand the situation.
Guess what? He understands it as well as any frustrated American or European.
What is happening in America and Europe is inexplicable except in the terms I outlined at the beginning of this column. It’s really about three things:
  • For the establishment Republicans who run Congress, it’s about providing cheap labor to businesses that contribute to their political campaigns.
  • For the Democrats, it’s about building their constituency of miserable people who believe their unsustainable promises to provide everyone with everything they need if they just keep voting Democrat.
  • The last thing it’s all about is “globalization.” John Kerry came out and said it last weekend at a college commencement where he told graduates they should prepare to live in a “borderless world.”
Why do some people want a “borderless world”?
Because the elite don’t like being accountable to the people and the rule of law. In the kind of global village they envision creating, there won’t be any votes, and they will be the law.
It’s so clear what’s happening that a clear-thinking person across the world in India can see it.
Hey, there are unhappy, oppressed, exploited people all over the world! Why not just let them all in? Why not throw open the gates to everyone who wants to immigrate to Europe or the U.S.? Should we empty out China, India?
What if half of China marched out and headed for Europe? Would they be accepted?
What if the people on every 747 from China landing in the U.S. decided to stay? Would that be acceptable?
Why is it that Middle East “refugees” have the right to just walk into Europe and take over? Isn’t that an act of war, or at least aggression?
Why does the U.S. have an obligation to accept more than 10 percent of the population of Mexico, which already lives in the U.S.?
And what about the national security threat unknown, undocumented immigrants pose to the countries they overrun?
There are answers.
And they are increasingly self-evident. It’s just astonishingly hard to believe how bad those answers are.
See video illustrating immigration to U.S. since 1820:
 






No comments :