FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today

To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Friday, November 4, 2016

Lock her up? Ain’t never going to happen!

As much as it is justified, Hillary Rodham Clinton will never see the inside of a jail cell

Lock her up?  Ain’t never going to happen!



It sounds good. Thousands of adoring Trump supporters chanting “lock her up” whenever the name of Hillary Clinton is mentioned. But it is unlikely to ever happen. Especially for crimes she might have committed prior to the election.
There can be little doubt should Clinton become the next president of the United States, she will be pardoned by Barack Obama prior to his leaving office on Jan. 20. The stage is actually being set for the justification for the issuance of a pardon should Clinton be successful on Nov. 8. Not that Obama ever needs a good reason to do anything.

Obama does not need a reason to pardon Clinton

Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, the president has the power to grant reprieves and pardons and there are very few exceptions. A pardon can only apply to a breach of the law of the United States, not state or local laws. And the president cannot pardon someone for crimes they may commit in the future. The president also has no power to shield an office holder from impeachment by the House, followed by a trial in the Senate.
Contrary to the views some people hold, a person can receive a pardon for any federal offences they may have committed during a specified period. It is not necessary for them to have been convicted of a crime or even indicted. President Gerald Ford granted a pardon to Richard Nixon although Nixon had never been charged with an offence. The fact that Clinton will probably not be indicted before Obama leaves office does not preclude her being granted a pardon.
Obama does not need a reason to pardon Clinton although he is being given a good reason to. In an attempt to dissuade Americans from electing a blatant criminal to the highest office in the land, there has been a lot of talk of a “constitutional crisis” if Hillary is elected. She will be so busy defending herself she will not have time to govern (although the way she will govern, this could be a good thing). The U.S. will effectively be without a president and commander-in-chief. This gives Obama the perfect excuse to pardon Clinton so she can give people free stuff, bring in millions of refugees, disband America’s borders and of course raise taxes on those horrible rich people.

Obama cannot protect Clinton from possible impeachment

Although Obama cannot protect Clinton from possible impeachment, this raises another issue. Can a president be impeached for treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors committed prior to that president holding office?  At least one expert says she cannot.
Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina, is a leading expert in impeachment who advised the House of Representatives during Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Gerhardt told Law Newz impeachment cannot be used to “re-litigate an election.” The professor went on to say the purpose of impeachment is to be able to remove someone in office for misconduct committed “while that official is in office.” A common sense view of impeachment suggests the wrongdoing must have occurred while in office.
If Donald Trump wins the White House on Nov. 8, Obama of course can still pardon Clinton. While the justification for the pardon would be less than if Clinton was president, Obama really doesn’t need a good reason to issue a pardon. Not having a reason Americans will buy for Obama doing something has never stopped him before. As long as he has his phone and his pen, Clinton will likely be the proud recipient of a presidential pardon.
While there seems to be less talk of others being pardoned, if Obama pardons Clinton, he will probably grant the same remedy to Bill and possibly Chelsea.
Obama will never admit he did anything wrong. He’ll just blame Whitey and the Republicans
Another question has been raised; one that has never been tested. Can a president of the United States pardon themselves? Should Hillary win, the authorities begin to close in and Obama’s busy playing golf, can Clinton grant herself a pardon? Well, the Constitution does not specifically give a president that power but then again, it is not specifically prohibited.
Obama himself is involved in allegations of wrongdoing by Clinton and could possibly face conspiracy charges. Will he try and pardon himself? This is not very likely because Obama will never admit he did anything wrong. He’ll just blame Whitey and the Republicans.
No matter who the next president will be, Americans will have to be satisfied with some of Clinton’s underlings getting jugged while she walks. Most notably of these is Huma Abedin who in one day went from being Hillary’s “second daughter” to merely “a staffer.” As much as it is justified, Hillary Rodham Clinton will never see the inside of a jail cell.

By Arthur Weinreb 

As much as it is justified, Hillary Rodham Clinton will never see the inside of a jail cell

Lock her up?  Ain’t never going to happen!



It sounds good. Thousands of adoring Trump supporters chanting “lock her up” whenever the name of Hillary Clinton is mentioned. But it is unlikely to ever happen. Especially for crimes she might have committed prior to the election.
There can be little doubt should Clinton become the next president of the United States, she will be pardoned by Barack Obama prior to his leaving office on Jan. 20. The stage is actually being set for the justification for the issuance of a pardon should Clinton be successful on Nov. 8. Not that Obama ever needs a good reason to do anything.

Obama does not need a reason to pardon Clinton

Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, the president has the power to grant reprieves and pardons and there are very few exceptions. A pardon can only apply to a breach of the law of the United States, not state or local laws. And the president cannot pardon someone for crimes they may commit in the future. The president also has no power to shield an office holder from impeachment by the House, followed by a trial in the Senate.
Contrary to the views some people hold, a person can receive a pardon for any federal offences they may have committed during a specified period. It is not necessary for them to have been convicted of a crime or even indicted. President Gerald Ford granted a pardon to Richard Nixon although Nixon had never been charged with an offence. The fact that Clinton will probably not be indicted before Obama leaves office does not preclude her being granted a pardon.
Obama does not need a reason to pardon Clinton although he is being given a good reason to. In an attempt to dissuade Americans from electing a blatant criminal to the highest office in the land, there has been a lot of talk of a “constitutional crisis” if Hillary is elected. She will be so busy defending herself she will not have time to govern (although the way she will govern, this could be a good thing). The U.S. will effectively be without a president and commander-in-chief. This gives Obama the perfect excuse to pardon Clinton so she can give people free stuff, bring in millions of refugees, disband America’s borders and of course raise taxes on those horrible rich people.

Obama cannot protect Clinton from possible impeachment

Although Obama cannot protect Clinton from possible impeachment, this raises another issue. Can a president be impeached for treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors committed prior to that president holding office?  At least one expert says she cannot.
Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina, is a leading expert in impeachment who advised the House of Representatives during Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Gerhardt told Law Newz impeachment cannot be used to “re-litigate an election.” The professor went on to say the purpose of impeachment is to be able to remove someone in office for misconduct committed “while that official is in office.” A common sense view of impeachment suggests the wrongdoing must have occurred while in office.
If Donald Trump wins the White House on Nov. 8, Obama of course can still pardon Clinton. While the justification for the pardon would be less than if Clinton was president, Obama really doesn’t need a good reason to issue a pardon. Not having a reason Americans will buy for Obama doing something has never stopped him before. As long as he has his phone and his pen, Clinton will likely be the proud recipient of a presidential pardon.
While there seems to be less talk of others being pardoned, if Obama pardons Clinton, he will probably grant the same remedy to Bill and possibly Chelsea.
Obama will never admit he did anything wrong. He’ll just blame Whitey and the Republicans
Another question has been raised; one that has never been tested. Can a president of the United States pardon themselves? Should Hillary win, the authorities begin to close in and Obama’s busy playing golf, can Clinton grant herself a pardon? Well, the Constitution does not specifically give a president that power but then again, it is not specifically prohibited.
Obama himself is involved in allegations of wrongdoing by Clinton and could possibly face conspiracy charges. Will he try and pardon himself? This is not very likely because Obama will never admit he did anything wrong. He’ll just blame Whitey and the Republicans.
No matter who the next president will be, Americans will have to be satisfied with some of Clinton’s underlings getting jugged while she walks. Most notably of these is Huma Abedin who in one day went from being Hillary’s “second daughter” to merely “a staffer.” As much as it is justified, Hillary Rodham Clinton will never see the inside of a jail cell.

By Arthur Weinreb 


No comments :