Politically, Obama would no doubt prefer that we not find out how badly he screwed up this time

Politically, Obama would no doubt prefer that we not find out how badly he screwed up this time Obama just had to meddle in Egyptian affairs. He decided Hosni Mubarak had to go. A flawed leader, to be sure, but a dependable ally to the United States and Israel who did a good job of reigning in extremist elements in his country. In the middle east, there are never truly “good” options. Sometimes there are less terrible ones. For all of the celebrating among the American punditry and the president who foolishly believed the Egyptian people would glide gracefully from life under a dictator to Jeffersonian democracy overnight, what really happened was as predictable as night following day. Pushing Mubarak out created a power vacuum. In the mid east, those are always filled immediately by Islamic extremists and this time was no different. The Egyptian people, nowhere near prepared to govern themselves, elected the Muslim Brotherhood by way of Mohamed Morsi. One year later, the people are so pleased with their choice, there is massive violence in the streets. That ought to be enough to declare Obama’s Arab Spring to be a flop. But, wait, it gets worse. Was Morsi involved in the plotting of the 9/11/12 attack on our embassy at Benghazi? Kevin McCullough at Townhall.com has found that reports began popping up in June of 2013 citing an internal Libyan government memo that has not yet been noticed by the American press. According to McCullough, multiple sources have confirmed that the document details confessions of six Egyptians in Libyan custody for the attack. The memo was written as merely a perfunctory after action report. The report reveals that an Egyptian terror cell had been involved in the planning and execution of the attack, all connected to the terror group Ansar al-Sharia, well known to the U.S. Concerning the most important claim of the Libyan memo, Raymond Ibrahim, (an American research librarian, translator, and author, whose focus is Arabic history, language, and current events) indicates that ‘during interrogations, these Egyptian jihadi cell members ‘confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi…’‘’ The investigation also has led to a video taken the night of the attack in which the jihadis claim to have been sent personally by “Dr. Morsi”. Next thing we know, Obama is delivering fighter jets and tanks to the Egyptian regime. McCullough also wants to know why Morsi’s invitations to the White House kept getting canceled between September 2012 and March 2013. Did the White House know something about Morsi that made them a tad uncomfortable? The Commander in Chief was unreachable during the attack. To this day, we don’t know where he was or what he was doing. We do know that Hillary supported the Brotherhood’s project at the UN—to declare blasphemy of Islam a global crime. We know the White House and NSA hosted a Muslim Brotherhood radical on June 13, 2013, who is a personal assistant to a terrorist so extreme he’s not even allowed in the U.S. The current administration is rife with mid to upper level appointees with ties to the Brotherhood. Is Morsi’s involvement the reason for the staggering amount of lying that went on immediately after the attack? McCullough also points out this might be a good time to revisit our aid to Egypt program, at the least. The issue is whether anyone will pay attention to the memo. It was drafted for no other purpose than the normal course of business and should be given serious consideration as a credible document. Politically, Obama would no doubt prefer that we not find out how badly he screwed up this time.