Blame should be laid where it belongs: on Activist Obama’s doorstep
If racial unrest follows Zimmerman jury decision, blame it on Activist Obama
It should go without saying that love and pride of country should be the first qualifications for anyone seeking the presidency of America.
President Barack Hussein Obama came into the power of the White House as an activist—pushed by activists.
Foreboding for the future of America, Obama will always be an activist. He doesn’t know what else to be because he’s always been an activist. Even as an Illinois senator, he merely wore the title without doing any of the heavy lifting.
In the day-to-day running America, Obama leans on the tools of activism and has been doing so ever since he first got elected.
Obama is really the long hoped for ‘King of the Isms’ who waited as long as 100 years for one of their own to come along and turn the tables on an unsuspecting and pliable civil society.
With an agenda activated to deliberately destroy the country that elected him, Obama is really the Activist who Made it as President.
In the White Noise thrown up by the mainstream media and cable television talking heads, the topic of Obama is often changed and re-routed to bad presidents of the past. As bad as some of them were, they were at least sincere. Not one of them ever came into office as an activist with a publicized intent for the ‘Fundamental Transformation of America’.
We live in an era where we let the riffraff star in our lives. Starring in many lives of quiet desperation during the last three weeks is Edward Snowden propagandized by WikiLeaks Julian Assange as the Double O Seven of the 21st century.
Has anyone other than America’s Survival Cliff Kincaid and New Zeal blog Trevor Loudon ever thought that President Barack Hussein Obama has much in common with self-styled leaker Edward Snowden? Hoopla aside, both are activists now running with the ball.
Holed up at Moscow Airport, Snowden is stirring the pot that promotes the propaganda that America is the world’s biggest ‘bad guy’ in what some news outlets are calling “the biggest bout of anti-Americanism since the Iraq war”. (Financial Times, July 12, 2013)
Obama dishes on America under the official emblem of a U.S. president, and worse does it when he’s on taxpayer-paid trips to foreign lands.
Even while the stock in trade of both Snowden and Obama is putting down America, they have seized the laurel wreaths of folk heroes. Time will soon prove that not everybody bought so easily into fake hero worship.
Though not everybody readily admits it, so far America and the Free West have survived every one of Obama’s destructive policies. Things are looking rough. Jobs are scarce, bills mount and hope is fading.
But will there be no coming back from the last two fronts to which Obama is leading the world?
How does America credibly extricate itself from the evil Muslim Brotherhood which Obama so flagrantly boosts? Will it be the Revolution in Egypt that finally capsizes the ship known as the Middle East?
Will it be the racial unrest that follows an innocent jury call for George Zimmerman that finally ‘forces’ Obama’s hand on declaration of Martial Law?
Fifteen months ago Obama the Activist planted the first seeds of racial unrest when he announced out of the blue: “You know if I had a son he’d look like Trayvon.” (Politico, March 23, 2012)
These are the words of an activist, not a president.
Should the racial unrest many worry about follow the impending Zimmerman jury decision, the blame should be laid where it belongs: on Activist Obama’s doorstep.
I'm here but not sure where I'm going. I learned this from you today Dissatisfaction with government and complaints about violations of the Constitution are rising, but the majority of such demands are for someone else to so something, leading to more frustration when no one seems able or willing to do so. There is growing awareness that the "justice system" isn't delivering justice, and more and more people who encounter that system become victims of it, who then obsess on their own cases and make themselves unavailable to understand how their cases fit into a larger process or seek systemic reforms. It sometimes seems like the Establishment is encouraging a controlled opposition that absorbs dissidents and neutralizes them.
ReplyDeleteOne of the signs it may be controlled is the dearth of specific action plans for correcting the problems. No one seems to be offering drafts of legislation that gets any traction, few offer any legal pleadings that actually get filed except perhaps as amicus briefs that get ignored. There are plenty of books and articles that examine parts of the problem, but offer only vague solutions, and the only specific proposals that seem to get any attention are really bad ideas that seem designed to discredit their causes and proponents.