Question Everything!Everything!! |
Welcome to Truth, FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience. , is an alternative media and news site that is dedicated to the truth, true journalism and the truth movement. The articles, ideas, quotes, books and movies are here to let everyone know the truth about our universe. The truth will set us free, it will enlighten, inspire, awaken and unite us. Armed with the truth united we stand, for peace, freedom, health and happiness for all
Question Everything!
This blog does not promote
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Questions for Presidential Candidates
Questions for Presidential Candidates
A little over a month from now, voters in Iowa will be heading into their local caucuses to cast the first substantive votes in the process that will determine whom the major parties nominate for president. In Jan. 2017 — just over a year from now — the United States will inaugurate only its third president of the 21st Century.
If re-elected, that person could serve until Jan. 2025.
By then, America could be a profoundly different country than the one in which many of today’s voting-age citizens were born.
It could be far less secure, less wealthy and less free than the United States of the second half of the 20th Century. It could be further uprooted — perhaps irreparably — from the principles of limited government, self-reliance and traditional values that made this nation great in the first place.
Or Americans could turn back to common sense and the Constitution.
Here are some questions presidential candidates could answer to clarify where they stand on some basic issues:
—Do you agree with the principle stated in the Declaration of Independence that God endows all human beings with unalienable rights, including the rights to life and liberty, and that it is the purpose of government to secure these God-given rights?
—Do all innocent human beings have a God-given right to life from conception to natural death that it is the duty of government to protect, including from abortionists and those who would commit euthanasia?
—Is marriage the union of one man and one woman, and should it be legally defined that way throughout the United States of America?
—The First Amendment protects the “free exercise” of religion. Can any level of government ever rightfully force individuals, businesses, or non-profit institutions to act against their faith or their moral principles?
—Would you nominate to the Supreme Court anyone who believes that abortion or same-sex marriage are constitutionally protected rights or that the Constitution permits the government to tell Christians they must buy or provide insurance that covers sterilizations, contraceptives or abortion-inducing drugs or devices?
—Should federal tax laws be used for any purpose other than to raise the revenue needed to pay for the legitimate constitutional functions of the federal government?
—Will you seek to create any new federal entitlement programs or expand any existing ones?
—Will you seek to abolish any federal entitlement programs?
—Will you seek to abolish any federal cabinet departments?
—Will you balance the federal budget during your first four years in office and reform the federal government in a manner that keeps the budget in balance over the long term?
—Do you believe the federal government has the capacity to build sufficient barriers and place sufficient manpower at the southern border to seal it against illegal immigrants, drug smugglers and terrorists, and if elected, will you build the barriers and deploy the manpower needed to do so?
—Will you enforce the immigration laws of the United States within the United States and veto any legislation that permits people who entered this country illegally or who overstayed a visa to remain here as legal residents or potential citizens?
—As initially drafted, the Constitution would have given Congress the power to “make” war. In his notes on the Constitutional Convention, James Madison said that when the convention considered this provision he and Elbridge Gerry “moved to insert ‘declare,’ striking out ‘make’ war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.” Do you believe the president can use military force without prior congressional authorization — such as President Obama did when he intervened in the Libyan civil war — other than when it is necessary to repel an attack on the United States or U.S. citizens?
—Do you agree that the purpose of U.S. foreign policy is to advance the liberty, security and prosperity of the American people not to change the nature of foreign governments?
Terence Jeffrey
Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
LAWFUL REBELLION STAND FOR WHAT IS RIGHT
if you support our troops this is a must http://josephfreedomoranarchy.blogspot.com/2015/12/iraq-afghanistan-war-veterans.html
If re-elected, that person could serve until Jan. 2025.
By then, America could be a profoundly different country than the one in which many of today’s voting-age citizens were born.
It could be far less secure, less wealthy and less free than the United States of the second half of the 20th Century. It could be further uprooted — perhaps irreparably — from the principles of limited government, self-reliance and traditional values that made this nation great in the first place.
Or Americans could turn back to common sense and the Constitution.
Here are some questions presidential candidates could answer to clarify where they stand on some basic issues:
—Do you agree with the principle stated in the Declaration of Independence that God endows all human beings with unalienable rights, including the rights to life and liberty, and that it is the purpose of government to secure these God-given rights?
—Do all innocent human beings have a God-given right to life from conception to natural death that it is the duty of government to protect, including from abortionists and those who would commit euthanasia?
—Is marriage the union of one man and one woman, and should it be legally defined that way throughout the United States of America?
—The First Amendment protects the “free exercise” of religion. Can any level of government ever rightfully force individuals, businesses, or non-profit institutions to act against their faith or their moral principles?
—Would you nominate to the Supreme Court anyone who believes that abortion or same-sex marriage are constitutionally protected rights or that the Constitution permits the government to tell Christians they must buy or provide insurance that covers sterilizations, contraceptives or abortion-inducing drugs or devices?
—Should federal tax laws be used for any purpose other than to raise the revenue needed to pay for the legitimate constitutional functions of the federal government?
—Will you seek to create any new federal entitlement programs or expand any existing ones?
—Will you seek to abolish any federal entitlement programs?
—Will you seek to abolish any federal cabinet departments?
—Will you balance the federal budget during your first four years in office and reform the federal government in a manner that keeps the budget in balance over the long term?
—Do you believe the federal government has the capacity to build sufficient barriers and place sufficient manpower at the southern border to seal it against illegal immigrants, drug smugglers and terrorists, and if elected, will you build the barriers and deploy the manpower needed to do so?
—Will you enforce the immigration laws of the United States within the United States and veto any legislation that permits people who entered this country illegally or who overstayed a visa to remain here as legal residents or potential citizens?
—As initially drafted, the Constitution would have given Congress the power to “make” war. In his notes on the Constitutional Convention, James Madison said that when the convention considered this provision he and Elbridge Gerry “moved to insert ‘declare,’ striking out ‘make’ war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.” Do you believe the president can use military force without prior congressional authorization — such as President Obama did when he intervened in the Libyan civil war — other than when it is necessary to repel an attack on the United States or U.S. citizens?
—Do you agree that the purpose of U.S. foreign policy is to advance the liberty, security and prosperity of the American people not to change the nature of foreign governments?
Terence Jeffrey
Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Joseph F Barber
LAWFUL REBELLION STAND FOR WHAT IS RIGHT
if you support our troops this is a must http://josephfreedomoranarchy.blogspot.com/2015/12/iraq-afghanistan-war-veterans.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anyone is welcome to use their voice here at FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN AMERICA FOR THOSE WITH OUT MONEY if you seek real change and the truth the first best way is to use the power of the human voice and unite the world in a common cause our own survival I believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. Each of us must learn to work not just for oneself, ones own family or ones nation, but for the benefit of all humankind. Universal responsibility is the key to human survival. It is the best foundation for world peace,“Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world...would do this, it would change the earth.” Love and Peace to you all stand free and your ground feed another if you can let us the free call it LAWFUL REBELLION standing for what is right