This Is What a Hillary Clinton Presidency Would Look Like

This Is What a Hillary Clinton Presidency Would Look Like



Hillary Clinton will prove to be the Lizzy Borden
of this generation.

I am no fan of the Republicans, but the Democrats are dedicated to the overt destruction of the United States of America and the Constitution. Hillary Clinton is the evil personification of the Democratic party

The Democratic Party Is the Enemy of the People

This is the face of a domestic terrorist. She will jail all talk show hosts who speak out against Muslim extremism. One day following the San Bernardino massacre, she did not utter a word about the 14 Americans that were executed by a Muslim terrorist. But Lynch(mob) threatens to arrest anyone speaking out against Muslim extremism. I do not have words to describe how out of touch this administration is with the American people.  Please not the background as Lynch delivered her threat to Americans who will not submit to extremism and Sharia Law.



Loretta Lynch

Of all the unconstitutional acts committed by the Democrats, the best, or worst, is yet to come. When Hillary Clinton receives the Democratic nod to be their Presidential candidate, America will enter the darkest days in her history.

America is facing unprecedented challenges and when one surveys the field of presidential candidates and we are forced to say that Donald Trump is our best candidate, it is safe to say that things could not be much worse. American is truly about to learn the meaning of the term “choosing between the lesser of two evils” and Hillary Clinton is as evil as they come.

Ron Paul Fears Hillary



Ron Paul fears a Clinton presidency more than anything else. 

Ron Paul called Hillary Clinton pro-Fed and pro-War, and these two traits may represent her strong points.

With the country poised to go to war over Syria and/or the South China Sea issues, Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to enter into the decision making in this frightening series of events or any other crises for that matter. A Hillary Clinton presidency would spell the sudden and decisive doom for this country. Is she worse than Obama? Undoubtedly, she would prove worse for the country than even the current President.

Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to become president. Her treachery, propensity for criminal behavior and her depraved indifference for her fellow Americans, makes her at the moment, the most dangerous woman in America. SHE IS WORSE THAN OBAMA!

In every scandal that she has been a part of, the body count skyrockets, far beyond the normal actuaries of mortality. Nothing sticks to this woman. If Hillary ever becomes President, history has shown that she is capable of the greatest reign of terror ever perpetrated by a sitting President. Warmongers like John McCain are doing their best to lead the US into World War III on behalf of the globalist bankers. However, McCain looks tame compared to Clinton. After reading the following, even an Obama phone recipient would be hard pressed to throw their blind support behind Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton Is the Enemy of the People

Richard Nixon was run from office for the deletion of 18 minutes of audio tape to cover up a burglary at the Watergate Hotel. This event was considered to be the greatest scandal to ever be visited upon the office of the President. Yet, Nixon’s Watergate transgressions pale in comparison to Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. How this woman is not in prison, is mind-boggling.

From following the evidence trail for 3 years, I am convinced that the Clinton emails deal with Benghazi and the ongoing ISIS/drug cartel invasion of the United States


The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same

In a case of the more things change, the more they stay the same, the scope of Hillary Clinton’s criminality cannot be covered in one article. In fact, I doubt that it could be covered in one book. The body count stories alone, associated with both Hillary and Bill, could fill volumes. By some estimates, the body count now tops 85 victims. Therefore, in the interest of brevity, a brief comparison will be made between the Clinton Whitewater affair and the Benghazi murders of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans. The undeniable conclusion that the reader will draw from these two comparative cases is that Hillary Clinton, one the President’s former top cabinet members, is, has been and probably always will be a sociopathic criminal with no conscience.
http://www.handpen.com/Bio/clintonbodycount.htm

Whitewater and the Missing Billing Records

For those who were old enough to remember, you will recall that Whitewater was a real estate development in Arkansas which became a nightmarish scandal for Bill and Hillary when it became insolvent. Clintons’ partner, Jim McDougal, owned a savings and loan association (i.e. Madison Guaranty) that hired Hillary and her firm, the Rose Law Firm. When the Savings and Loan institution failed, costing taxpayers $65 million, the Whitewater vacation development project collapsed as well. Hillary stated 99 times under oath in 1996, that she did not recall what work she did for Madison Guarantee. This is a stellar case in point why I believe that Hillary will never tell what she REALLY knows about the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens. After six hearings and $40 million dollars of investigations, Special Prosecutor, Ken Starr did not determine that the Clintons’ were innocent of criminal wrongdoing when he concluded that “This office has determined that the evidence was insufficient to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that either President or Mrs. Clinton knowingly participated in any criminal conduct … or knew of such conduct.” Prosecutors had previously subpoenaed Hillary’s billing records from Madison. However, Hillary continued to lie as she reported that she couldn’t find them. Two years later, the records turned up in the White House family residence under circumstances that Hillary has never been able to fully explain. Why she did not go to jail is a mystery. The best case scenario was that the First Couple were lying under oath and obstructing justice, just like Hillary has done with regard to the Chris Stevens murder.
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/20/whitewater/

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118858052960914805.html

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/20/whitewater/

The Whitewater Body Count

John Wilson was found dead from an apparent hanging suicide on May 18, 1993. He was a former Washington DC council member and claimed to have information on Whitewater at the time of his death. Jon Parnell Walker was an investigator for the RTC who was looking into the linkage between the Whitewater and Madison Savings & Loan bankruptcy. Walker “fell” from the top of the Lincoln Towers Building. Stanley Huggins was a principal in a Memphis law firm which headed a 1987 investigation into the loan practices of Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan. Stanley died in Delaware in July 1994 and the highly questionable reported cause of death was viral pneumonia.


Jim McDougal

Jim McDougal was a close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton. He was also their banker, and political ally prior to being sent to prison for eighteen felony convictions for his Whitewater related actions. A key Whitewater witness, McDougal died of a heart attack on March, 8, 1998, while, inexplicably, being held in solitary confinement. Solitary confinement? I thought high profile prisoners like McDougal went to Club Fed to serve out their terms, not solitary confinement. Of course, in solitary confinement, there are no witnesses to murder. McDougal was in position to have had intimate knowledge of Hillary’s Whitewater affairs, but dead men tell no tales. Johnny Lawhon died on March 29, 1998. The former Arkansas transmission specialist who discovered a pile of Whitewater documents in the trunk of an abandoned car on his property and turned them over to Ken Starr. Lawhon was killed in a car wreck two weeks after the McDougal death. Details of the “accident” have remained suspicious.

Clinton Is Backed By Criminals


Norman Hsu, major Campaign
Contributor to Hillary Clinton

Both of the Clintons’ have a long history of questionable criminal associations. Because this is an article and not a book, I will use the Hsu case as an example of the many criminal associations that Hillary Clinton has participated in. The infamous Norman Hsu became one of Hillary’s biggest fundraisers in which he donated over $850,000 to her campaign, and his donations continued to the day that Hsu surrendered to the California State Superior Court after being found guilty of a Grand Theft conviction.  Hsu had been a fugitive from justice for over 15 years. Hsu became a fugitive when he failed to appear for sentencing by the court after pleading no contest to the Grand Theft charges. You might want to loosen your collar and adjust your eyeglasses. This means that Hillary Clinton was accepting money from a convicted criminal who was evading justice during the same exact time frame. Hsu’s crime was connected to raising more than a million dollars from investors for a phony business scheme which didn’t exist.  And true to the criminal nature of the Obama Administration, Hsu also gave $18,000 to Barack Obama election campaign. Doesn’t that make Hillary an accessory after the fact?http://realchange.org/hillary.htm















One is judged by the company one keeps

The Benghazi Murders

There is now proof that Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned plea was denied by Clinton. As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack.
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/14/report-obama-administration-warned-about-attacks-did-nothing/

http://thecommonconstitutionalist.com/2012/10/26/benghazi-the-cover-up/


General Hamm

 

When General Hamm received his “stand down” orders from Panetta on behalf of Obama, he defiantly made plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening the order, by his second in command, General Rodriquez. Out to sea, Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm’s rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command “for allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.” Both men were held for months in undisclosed locations, until after the 2012 election and then became part of the Obama body count as they were two of the 260+ senior command military officers that have been fired by Obama. As an aside, if there is any kind of a silver lining in these very dark clouds, it appears that much of the senior military leadership has had enough of the traitorous Obama and his den of corrupt criminals and some of them are willing to risk their career in the name of actually serving the American people.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/navy-replaces-admiral-leading-mideast-strike-group-because-of-ongoing-investigation/

Admiral Gayoutte




The evidence is clear. Clinton knew that Stevens was in grave danger and ordered extra security. Obama refused to support Clinton, purposely leaving Stevens exposed. At this point, Clinton had a choice…… Does she go along to get along and become an accomplice to murder? Or, does she resign and refuse to go along with the murderous intentions of Panetta and Obama? Even if Clinton had resigned that should not have been enough to avoid criminal charges of depraved indifference by failing to report a crime that she knew was going to happen and then did take place.She later did quit, but she never told what really happened. Clinton had both a moral and legal imperative to resign and then tell what she knew. General Hamm and Admiral Gayouette are clearly men who understand their moral and legal imperatives. They refused to obey an unlawful and unconstitutional order. Clinton, true to her criminal background and history of inappropriate choices, chose to go along, to get along. There can be no doubt that Clinton would have had limited options if she would have displayed the courage of Hamm and Gayouette and refused to obey an illegal order from Obama through Panetta. I also understand that it would have been gut wrenching to decide where she could have gone with this information? The logical choice is Eric Holder, the Attorney General. However, with Holder’s complicity in Fast and Furious, Clinton would have known that Holder was not an option and that he is just as corrupt as Obama. She could not have gone to the FBI, because it is controlled by the President. Local law enforcement has no jurisdiction. Now, before you start to feel sorry for Clinton, please realize that Congress threw her a lifeline. Clinton’s supporters have told me that her life would have been in danger, if she had told all to Congress, and my response was “You mean in the same way that Chris Stevens life was in danger?”

The Clot Heard Around the World

Leaders are supposed to possess both moral and physical courage. Do not feel sorry for Clinton, she was not totally without options. Congress gave her a chance to save her reputation and possibly her legal rear end. She could have told what she knew about Obama and Panetta being the butchers of Benghazi. Hillary’s testimony could have brought down this criminal administration. Instead, we found a former Secretary of State who developed the Benghazi flu and “could not” testify. And when this strategy, designed to avoid congressional testimony, wore thin, Clinton demonstrated that she has a better head fake than hall of fame basketball star, Michael Jordan, when she suddenly developed an alleged blood clot near the brain Clinton is still putting her political career and her loyalty to the democratic party ahead of her oath of office. Anyone, who has an IQ higher than room temperature, knows that Obama and Panetta let Stevens be murdered and their intent was deliberate. So, rather than doing the right thing, Clinton wants to appear to be protecting the President and ultimately the Democratic party. In my opinion, Clinton chose to take the proverbial political bullet so she could retain support from her party in order that she can run in 2016 with full party support. Meanwhile, Obama and Panetta made a decision to let Stevens get murdered to make the trail of evidence go cold with regard to their illegal gun running operations to Al-Qaeda, into Syria via Turkey, in this Middle East version of Fast and Furious. And Hillary simply goes along to get along. In the aftermath of Stevens murder, here sits Hillary Clinton placing her personal political ambition over the life of an ambassador who did not have to die. She is still breaking the law by obstructing justice and not telling what she knows. Ironically, if Clinton had done the right thing with regard to the murders of these four Americans, some people might have softened their views on her past criminality. However, at the end of the day, America needs to face the fact that Hillary Clinton is a criminal to the core. People like her are so used to using graft, corruption and murder, so often, to get what they want, they do not honestly know how to pursue personal goals without incorporating these variables into their decision making.

The Benghazi Victim Trail

Ambassador Chris Stevens along with Sean Smith,  Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed in a planned terrorist attack in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. Some of the four victims families render a harsh verdict of the Obama Administration.  Sean Smith’s mother.Patricia Smith, has said that the president ‘murdered her son’ and Tyrone Woods’ father has echoed her sentiment. And Hillary went along to get along. And now, she wants to be your President.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227589/Benghazi-consulate-attack-Obama-murdered-son.html


What Will  a Hillary Clinton Presidency Look Like?

 

The Banks under Hillary Clinton.




Under Hillary Clinton, this will soon this will be a more familiar sight in our communities only their helmets will be blue.







Do you see yourself in this photo?



Pro Deo et Constitutione – Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Dave Hodges - Joseph F Barber

Everywhere we look there are signs of moral decay, political corruption and fascistic tendencies. However, activists have not been passive. For decades, since the end of democracy in America first became undeniable, we have tried every tactic to avert catastrophe. We have voted, written letters, donated money, held signs, protested in marches, clicked links, signed petitions, tweeted websites, written books, taught classes, knitted sweaters, learned how to farm, turned off the television, programmed apps, engaged in direct action, committed petty vandalism … All this has been for naught. Popular revolution remains the only reasonably viable tactic remaining.

In the 18th century, America’s founding fathers were in the same situation as we are today. They also sought justification to start a rebellion against a despotic empire that claimed to be their rightful government. They knew that what they intended to do was illegal from the king’s perspective, but they found solace in a higher law, a universal law that takes priority over temporal authority. The thirteen colonies made the case for insurrection in the Declaration of Independence of the United States and thereby permanently enshrined as inalienable “the Right of the People to alter or abolish” the government. The precedent of our own history grants us the right to revolt. Further, the seriousness of corporate America’s threat to the world puts us under obligation to act. Now we will sweep the parasites out of power and reinstate the rule of the people.