How many died thanks to Clinton security breach?

How many died thanks to Clinton security breach?

I’ve known women who have been drunks, drug addicts, liars and worse. I’ve known a woman who was herself a complete train wreck and intentionally turned her child into the same so she could have company. I’ve known women who have thought themselves to be clever when in fact their cleverness was consistent with an empty soup can. I’ve ministered to women who were in prison for murder.

But I’ve never known a woman as treacherous, calculating and outright evil as Hillary Clinton.


Why hasn’t the Internal Revenue Service investigated the Clinton Foundation for almost certain surreptitious financial misdeeds? Why hasn’t a federal grand jury been impaneled to investigate her direct involvement in the murders of Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doughty and Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Benghazi? These are but only two areas any other person would have been long ago indicted for.There’s no ambiguity pursuant to Hillary. There’s no explaining her record away. There is no rationalizing it. And yet she walks around lauded as being a formidable presidential candidate. What hold does she have over the lawmakers, courts and the federal investigative agencies? How can the likes of Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and former presidential nominee Mitt Romney attack Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, as being worse than the “black plague” at the same time reassuring America of Hillary’s cachet?

Which brings me to Hillary’s use of her private email server, which at one time, according to an Ars Technica investigation (See: “Where In The World Is Hillary Clinton’s Server,” Noah Rothman, HotAir.com, March 15, 2015), was located in Huntsville, Alabama. This is after it was reportedly located at her Chappaqua, New York, address – which was after what has been called: “A very strong indication that the clintonemail.com server [was]/is in Manhattan.” This before it was reported by New York Post writer David K. Li that “Hillary’s Email Server Was Run Out Of An old Bathroom Closet” (Aug. 18. 2015).

Li wrote: “Hillary Clinton’s email servers were maintained by a mom-and-pop outfit – run out of an old bathroom closet in a downtown Denver loft, according to a published report. … The company’s work with Clinton was a secret to many of its employees, who were amazed when they learned of it.”

In the same investigative article, Tera Dadiotis, a former employee at the company, said: “At the time I worked for them they wouldn’t have been equipped to work for Hillary Clinton because I don’t think they had the resources. They were based out of a loft, so [it was] not very high security; we didn’t even have an alarm.” Dadiotis was “a former customer relations consultant between 2007 and 2010.” Dadiotis continued, ” I don’t know how they run their operation now, but we literally had our server racks in the bathroom.”

Before the “Hillary walks on water” small-hat crowd pooh-poohs this as no big deal, let me point out it is a very big deal. Hillary Clinton was employed in a position unlike any you and I occupy. She was secretary of state. Her disregard for governmental protocol placed our national security at risk at the highest, most secret, if not the outright most clandestine levels of government. I would say that warrants more attention than the fatuous talking points blathered pursuant to Mr. Trump having the “nuclear football.”

Damage and fallout from Hillary’s intentional abrogation of policy is yet to be fully assessed, but that notwithstanding, there are alleged reports that members of our foreign service have been killed quite possibly because of her shameful disregard for agency protocol.

Even more reprehensible is Clinton’s cavalier attitude. Asked on “Face the Nation” (May 7, 2016) about being investigated by the FBI representing a “big deal,” she responded: “I say what I’ve said now for many, many months; it’s a security inquiry. I always took classified material seriously. There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me, and I look forward to this being wrapped up.”

Notice the “lawyer-speak” Clinton employed. It’s my understanding that the only reason the emails weren’t marked “classified” or “top secret” was because they weren’t sent through government servers – which forces the question: “Why weren’t they?”

However, FBI Director James Comey said he had no idea what “security inquiry” means. Comey said: “We’re conducting an investigation. That’s what we do. [I’m] not familiar with the term ‘security inquiry.'”

It appears that Clinton’s plan is to shrug her shoulders and play it off as no big deal when asked publicly about the investigation. At the same time, change the facts of what is truly taking place by inventing the fallacious assignation of “security inquiry.” After all, whom are we supposed to believe, the FBI director or her? Especially since her record for truth telling is so sterling.

Clinton’s actions are a serious breach of security protocol with as yet not fully realized dire consequences. But the so-called Republican leadership does nothing. And in light of what can only be called her criminality, how can they attack Mr. Trump for calling Clinton “crooked”?