U.S. Communist Manifesto vs. Declaration of Independence

U.S. Communist Manifesto vs. Declaration of Independence

There’s very little proof that Obama or anyone in his administration – particularly Hillary Clinton – truly understands or believes the tenets in the U.S. Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. If they did, they would know that they are running a federal government in direct contradiction to both of those sacred documents.

To be honest, they run a government much more congruent to the Communist Manifesto, the 1848 pamphlet written by Karl Marx with the assistance of Friedrich Engels. By 1950, following various Communist revolutions, roughly half the world’s population lived under Marxist governments and by the principles in the Manifesto.

In short, as History.com explained, “The political pamphlet – arguably the most influential in history – proclaimed that ‘the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles’ and that the inevitable victory of the proletariat, or working class, would put an end to class society forever.”

However, as ConservativeUSA.net explained, the pamphlet produced much more than a differing political philosophy: “The Manifesto was intended to incite violent revolution, was a recipe for tyranny itself [‘dictatorship of the proletariat’], and was later used as propaganda (a ‘glorious goal’ to believe in) to blind followers to the realities of the brutal dictatorships that oppressed all workers and slaughtered millions under Communist rule. Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ and Mao’s ‘Little Red Book’ served similar evil and deadly purposes.”

In September 2009, just months after becoming president, Obama spoke to the nation’s students in a much-anticipated address.

With the transcript of his speech in hand, even CBS News confessed, “Now there’s no more mystery. With the text finally in hand, we can uncover the socialist subtext hidden within.” Then, CBN proceeded in exposing at least a dozen socialist goals Obama utilized in attempting to indoctrinate students in that single speech. CBS titled its article, “In His Own Words: Obama’s Communist Manifesto.”

From that time forward, we have weekly witnessed the Obama administration enacting Communist Manifesto principles and tenets in his policies and politics. Instead of upholding and leading with the U.S Constitution and Bill of Rights in hand, they have utilized Karl Marx’s “10 Planks” to destroy freedoms and seize power by growing the federal government’s overreach and control.

Consider any of Obama’s actions in light of the Communist Manifesto, particularly through his executive orders. Far more than the high number of them is the subject matter that each one addressed.

Ponder Obama’s (and Hillary’s) modus operandi and political tenure through Karl Marx’s “10 Planks”:

Abolition of Property in Land and Application of all Rents of Land to Public Purpose.
A Heavy Progressive or Graduated Income Tax.
Abolition of All Rights of Inheritance.
Confiscation of the Property of All Emigrants and Rebels.
Centralization of Credit in the Hands of the State, by Means of a National Bank with State Capital and an Exclusive Monopoly.
Centralization of the Means of Communication and Transport in the Hands of the State.
Extension of Factories and Instruments of Production Owned by the State, the Bringing Into Cultivation of Waste Lands, and the Improvement of the Soil Generally in Accordance with a Common Plan.
Equal Liability of All to Labor. Establishment of Industrial Armies, Especially for Agriculture.
Combination of Agriculture with Manufacturing Industries; Gradual Abolition of the Distinction Between Town and Country by a More Equable Distribution of the Population over the Country
Free Education for All Children in Public Schools. Abolition of Children’s Factory Labor in its Present Form. Combination of Education with Industrial Production.
Of course, Obama and Hillary aren’t going to quote the Communist Manifesto as they continue their political escapades to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.” I’ve already thoroughly documented both of their communist political playbooks found in the works of neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and the Cloward-Piven strategies.

If Obama’s communist collaborator and compromise is Cuba, as he told a group of young people in Argentina, Hillary’s – indeed, the Clinton dynasty’s – is definitely China. Just as China has compromised building its market economies in defiance of what Marx advocated to create a quasi-capitalistic state, Hillary will continue to compromise the tenets of capitalism and our republic to morph America into a quasi-communist state.

Donald Trump was right when he said two weeks ago that Hillary has been in bed with Communist China since Willie’s presidency.

Trump explained:

“Hillary Clinton supported Bill Clinton’s disastrous NAFTA, just like she supported China’s entrance into the World Trade Organization.

“We’ve lost nearly one-third of our manufacturing jobs since these two Hillary-backed agreements were signed.

“Our trade deficit with China soared 40 percent during Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state – a disgraceful performance for which she should not be congratulated, but rather scorned.

“Then she let China steal hundreds of billions of dollars in our intellectual property – a crime which is continuing to this day.

“Hillary Clinton gave China millions of our best jobs, and effectively let China completely rebuild itself.

“In return, Hillary Clinton got rich!

“The book ‘Clinton Cash,’ by Peter Schweitzer, documents how Bill and Hillary used the State Department to enrich their family at America’s expense. She gets rich making you poor.

“Here is a quote from the book: ‘At the center of U.S. policy toward China was Hillary Clinton … at this critical time for U.S.-China relations, Bill Clinton gave a number of speeches that were underwritten by the Chinese government and its supporters.’

“These funds were paid to the Clinton bank account while Hillary was negotiating with China on behalf of the United States.

“She sold out our workers, and our country, for Beijing.”

The travesty of U.S. business with China is that China stole $360 billion of U.S. intellectual property just last year, according to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and William Evanina, director of the Counterintelligence and Security Center under Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

PolitiFact confirmed that, “Evanina told reporters in November 2015 that, based on reports by nearly 140 companies, espionage via computer hacking costs the U.S. economy $400 billion a year, and that the Chinese government is believed to be behind 90 percent of those attacks. That works out to $360 billion.”

“That’s twice the total U.S. exports to China, last year alone,” Newt added.

One thing is perfectly clear: We don’t need another China crony in the White House!

America isn’t ready for President Hillary Clinton. It should never be. (Make sure you see the July-released movie, coming to a theater near you: Dinesh D’Souza’s “Hillary’s America.”)

If the citizens of the United States are to turn away from the Communist Manifesto and preserve the purpose of the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and our Bill of Rights, we must first thoroughly reexamine and learn about each of them, and uphold America’s founding documents by testing every political action in light of them.  Then, we must encourage and instruct our households and posterity to do the same. (That is exactly what my New York Times bestseller, “Black Belt Patriotism,” does: It examines modern-day problems and issues in light of our Founders’ work and those founding documents.)


As Benjamin Franklin said at the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence in July 1776, “We must all hang together or most assuredly we will all hang separately.”