Question Everything!Everything!! |
Welcome to Truth, FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience. , is an alternative media and news site that is dedicated to the truth, true journalism and the truth movement. The articles, ideas, quotes, books and movies are here to let everyone know the truth about our universe. The truth will set us free, it will enlighten, inspire, awaken and unite us. Armed with the truth united we stand, for peace, freedom, health and happiness for all
Question Everything!
This blog does not promote
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
Obama, Clinton and Rice
Fifteen months after our humiliation at Benghazi the Old Gray Lady brings back the video meme to bail out Obama, Clinton and Rice
Times Benghazi exposes strange embed-fellows
When The New York Times first published its Dec. 28 story “A Deadly Mix in Benghazi” by top national security and foreign affairs reporter David D. Kirkpatrick, it seemed just another Christmas present for President Barack Obama and his Times-anointed successor Hillary R. Clinton.
Another twist is that Kirkpatrick and the Times are channeling St. Paul.
Not only is the story a wonderful Christmas gift for Obama and Clinton, it also was published two days after Dec. 26, the Feast of St. Stephen. Stephen, the first Christian martyr, was stoned to death by a mob led by Paul, then a Pharisee counterinsurgency agent fighting Christians.
If fact, we know what we know about Stephen from Paul, himself, who later wrote: Yeah, I know it was terrible, I was there.
The Sept. 11, 2012 attack, six weeks before the presidential election between Obama and his Republican challenger former Massachusetts governor W. Mitt Romney, was stage-managed by the White House with its willing minions in the mainstream media, so as not to affect the election.
In fact, Romney only once raised the courage to ask what really happened during a raid that burned our buildings at the compound to the ground and cost the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.
After Obama’s hound dogs chased him back into his rhetorical bunker, Romney never mentioned it again—giving the president a hall pass for our huge international humiliation.
The NYT story relied on the crucial assistance of the State Department’s David McFarland, our Libyan mission’s political officer during the raid. In exchange, for McFarland’s insights and details about his and his boss’ attempts to win over the Libyan militia, the paper-of-record dutifully noted that the young diplomat cabled Washington with warnings before the attack
Helluva job, Dave!
McFarland, of course, is one of the Benghazi survivors the administration kept from speaking to reporters or congressional hearings. What was the price for this prize? Simple, the Times made the case that after its extensive investigation of the raid that the attack was sparked by local anger over the infamous video “‘The Innocence of Muslims” by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.
Clinton, Obama and National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice, then the ambassador to the United Nations all blamed the video for the attack—even after it was revealed that an original White House draft of the talking points it gave Rice for her Sept. 16, 2012 five-for-five Sunday talk show appearances blamed Al Qaeda.
This piece of data contradicted the president’s oft-repeated campaign speech claim: “Al Qaeda is on the run.” Um, that had to go.
The backlash against the Kirkpatrick story has been overwhelming.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R.-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, went on the NBC News program “Meet the Press” to criticize the story.
Issa said the Kirkpatrick deserves credit for his research in the raid, but he that it was ridiculous that video was the cause of the complex, two-staged attack.
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Michael J. Rogers (R.-Mich.) tweeted from @RepMikeRogers to CBS News in response to the story: .@CBSEveningNews To say there is no Al-Qaeda affiliate organizing, helping & participating would be completely inaccurate #Benghazi.
This back-and-forth might have died out, but Kirkpatrick, @ddknyt, threw down an unexpected trump card in a Twitter at Richard Grenell. Grenell, named in September by the media website DCFishbowl: “Journo you don’t want to fight on Twitter.”
Grenell, a former Romney campaign foreign policy spokesman, wondered how the Times story was sourced, to which @ddknyt replied: “@RichardGrenell we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack- still invaluable.”
[Hat tip to Twitchy.com for cataloging]http://twitchy.com/2013/12/31/nyt-we-had-a-reporter-on-the-scene-talking-to-the-attackers-during-the-benghazi-attack/
Whoa. Whoa? What? Grenell and others were quick to jump up and ask: Really? The New York Times had a reporter embedded in the pack of insurgents that attacked our diplomatic compound and killed our ambassador and three other Americans?
NYT: liberal elite’s roving damage control team
In reality, the only way that this is really true is that NYT paid off one of the militants and logged it in the ledger as “pay for reporter” instead of “bribe for terrorist murderer of Americans.”
There was a time when Times men were patriotic Americans, but those days are gone. Now, they are part of the liberal elite’s roving damage control team.
One of the dirty secrets of journalism is that reporters keep more secrets than they expose. Many times that is because there is no way to formally verify a story well enough to print.
Other times, it is because telling the secret would contaminate a relationship or betray a confidence.
Then, there are the times when it is the Times, and its sisters in the ya-ya-green-fried-tomatoes liberal media sisterhood.
We have not heard all The New York Times knows, or for that matter what our leaders know about Benghazi.
Maybe, if we are good, we will find out next Christmas—after the 2014 midterms.
Times Benghazi exposes strange embed-fellows
When The New York Times first published its Dec. 28 story “A Deadly Mix in Benghazi” by top national security and foreign affairs reporter David D. Kirkpatrick, it seemed just another Christmas present for President Barack Obama and his Times-anointed successor Hillary R. Clinton.
Another twist is that Kirkpatrick and the Times are channeling St. Paul.
Not only is the story a wonderful Christmas gift for Obama and Clinton, it also was published two days after Dec. 26, the Feast of St. Stephen. Stephen, the first Christian martyr, was stoned to death by a mob led by Paul, then a Pharisee counterinsurgency agent fighting Christians.
If fact, we know what we know about Stephen from Paul, himself, who later wrote: Yeah, I know it was terrible, I was there.
The Sept. 11, 2012 attack, six weeks before the presidential election between Obama and his Republican challenger former Massachusetts governor W. Mitt Romney, was stage-managed by the White House with its willing minions in the mainstream media, so as not to affect the election.
In fact, Romney only once raised the courage to ask what really happened during a raid that burned our buildings at the compound to the ground and cost the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.
After Obama’s hound dogs chased him back into his rhetorical bunker, Romney never mentioned it again—giving the president a hall pass for our huge international humiliation.
The NYT story relied on the crucial assistance of the State Department’s David McFarland, our Libyan mission’s political officer during the raid. In exchange, for McFarland’s insights and details about his and his boss’ attempts to win over the Libyan militia, the paper-of-record dutifully noted that the young diplomat cabled Washington with warnings before the attack
Helluva job, Dave!
McFarland, of course, is one of the Benghazi survivors the administration kept from speaking to reporters or congressional hearings. What was the price for this prize? Simple, the Times made the case that after its extensive investigation of the raid that the attack was sparked by local anger over the infamous video “‘The Innocence of Muslims” by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.
Clinton, Obama and National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice, then the ambassador to the United Nations all blamed the video for the attack—even after it was revealed that an original White House draft of the talking points it gave Rice for her Sept. 16, 2012 five-for-five Sunday talk show appearances blamed Al Qaeda.
This piece of data contradicted the president’s oft-repeated campaign speech claim: “Al Qaeda is on the run.” Um, that had to go.
The backlash against the Kirkpatrick story has been overwhelming.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R.-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, went on the NBC News program “Meet the Press” to criticize the story.
Issa said the Kirkpatrick deserves credit for his research in the raid, but he that it was ridiculous that video was the cause of the complex, two-staged attack.
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Michael J. Rogers (R.-Mich.) tweeted from @RepMikeRogers to CBS News in response to the story: .@CBSEveningNews To say there is no Al-Qaeda affiliate organizing, helping & participating would be completely inaccurate #Benghazi.
This back-and-forth might have died out, but Kirkpatrick, @ddknyt, threw down an unexpected trump card in a Twitter at Richard Grenell. Grenell, named in September by the media website DCFishbowl: “Journo you don’t want to fight on Twitter.”
Grenell, a former Romney campaign foreign policy spokesman, wondered how the Times story was sourced, to which @ddknyt replied: “@RichardGrenell we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack- still invaluable.”
[Hat tip to Twitchy.com for cataloging]http://twitchy.com/2013/12/31/nyt-we-had-a-reporter-on-the-scene-talking-to-the-attackers-during-the-benghazi-attack/
Whoa. Whoa? What? Grenell and others were quick to jump up and ask: Really? The New York Times had a reporter embedded in the pack of insurgents that attacked our diplomatic compound and killed our ambassador and three other Americans?
NYT: liberal elite’s roving damage control team
In reality, the only way that this is really true is that NYT paid off one of the militants and logged it in the ledger as “pay for reporter” instead of “bribe for terrorist murderer of Americans.”
There was a time when Times men were patriotic Americans, but those days are gone. Now, they are part of the liberal elite’s roving damage control team.
One of the dirty secrets of journalism is that reporters keep more secrets than they expose. Many times that is because there is no way to formally verify a story well enough to print.
Other times, it is because telling the secret would contaminate a relationship or betray a confidence.
Then, there are the times when it is the Times, and its sisters in the ya-ya-green-fried-tomatoes liberal media sisterhood.
We have not heard all The New York Times knows, or for that matter what our leaders know about Benghazi.
Maybe, if we are good, we will find out next Christmas—after the 2014 midterms.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anyone is welcome to use their voice here at FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN AMERICA FOR THOSE WITH OUT MONEY if you seek real change and the truth the first best way is to use the power of the human voice and unite the world in a common cause our own survival I believe that to meet the challenges of our times, human beings will have to develop a greater sense of universal responsibility. Each of us must learn to work not just for oneself, ones own family or ones nation, but for the benefit of all humankind. Universal responsibility is the key to human survival. It is the best foundation for world peace,“Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world...would do this, it would change the earth.” Love and Peace to you all stand free and your ground feed another if you can let us the free call it LAWFUL REBELLION standing for what is right