FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience.

Joseph F Barber | Create Your Badge
This blog does not promote, support, condone, encourage, advocate, nor in any way endorse any racist (or "racialist") ideologies, nor any armed and/or violent revolutionary, seditionist and/or terrorist activities. Any racial separatist or militant groups listed here are solely for reference and Opinions of multiple authors including Freedom or Anarchy Campaign of conscience.

To be GOVERNED

Not For Profit - For Global Justice and The Fight to End Violence & Hunger world wide - Since 1999
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801

This is the callout,This is the call to the Patriots,To stand up for all the ones who’ve been thrown away,This is the call to the all citizens ,Stand up!
Stand up and protect those who can not protect themselves our veterans ,the homeless & the forgotten take back our world today

To protect our independence, We take no government funds
Become A Supporting member of humanity to help end hunger and violence in our country,You have a right to live. You have a right to be. You have these rights regardless of money, health, social status, or class. You have these rights, man, woman, or child. These rights can never be taken away from you, they can only be infringed. When someone violates your rights, remember, it is not your fault.,


DISCOVER THE WORLD

Facebook Badge

FREEDOM OR ANARCHY,Campaign of Conscience

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

The Free Thought Project,The Daily Sheeple & FREEDOM OR ANARCHY Campaign of Conscience are dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable. “Each of us has a unique part to play in the healing of the world.”
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” - George Orwell, 1984

STEALING FROM THE CITIZENRY

The right to tell the Government to kiss my Ass Important Message for All Law Enforcers Freedom; what it is, and what it is not. Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

When Evil Comes for Us


When law abiding citizens have no more tools with which to defend ourselves, what will we do when evil comes for us?

When Evil Comes for Us


Here is one of many problems—and in my view the MOST DANGEROUS problem—with the liberal position of banning “assault weapons” after the Orlando shooting:
Guns are tools, and nothing more. They can be tools used for good or tools used for evil. The same can be said of any tool. A hammer is a tool designed to hit things. It can hit a nail (a good use) or a person’s head (an evil use). A box cutter is a tool. It can cut boxes apart (a good use), or cut a person (an evil use). A gun is a tool.  It can shoot targets or game animals or violent criminals (a good use) or an innocent person (an evil use).

AND HERE’S THE PROBLEM:

The Left keeps talking about assault weapons as the “tool of choice” for mass shooters, and so we should ban assault weapons.
For now we’ll leave aside the pathetic and uneducated misuse of the term “assault weapon” and just consider how this works.
Once we ban “assault weapons,” will mass shootings go away? Of course not. To assume so would be to assume that assault weapons somehow inspire mass shooters to perform their evil acts, which is ridiculous (which means, unfortunately, that it is likely believed my many on the Left). People decide to perform evil acts and then look for a tool. Lately many have chosen “assault weapons.”
But these are not the ONLY tools they choose. Just to use some of the more recent examples:
Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, carried an “assault rifle” and a Glock 17 handgun.

Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter, carried an “assault rifle” and two handguns, a Glock 10mm and a Sig Sauer 9mm.

James Holmes, the Aurora theater shooter, carried an “assault rifle,” a 12-gauge shotgun, and two .40 caliber handguns.

Do you see the similarities, and the dangers?
So let’s say that we ban those evil “assault rifles.” In fact, let’s pretend we could go back in time and ban “assault weapons” before any of these mass shootings, and let’s remove the “assault rifle” from each of them. We are left with the following:
Omar Mateen carried a Glock 17 handgun.
Adam Lanza carried two handguns, a Glock 10mm and a Sig Sauer 9mm.
James Holmes carried a 12-gauge shotgun and two .40 caliber handguns.
Do you see the problem? Once the “tool of choice” is banned, those wanting to commit mass murder will simply default to their next tool of choice: handguns and non-“assault rifles.”
What will the left say then? You and I both know what they’ll say: the handgun has become the “tool of choice” for mass shooters. It must be banned. Then shotguns are the tool of choice, and must be banned.
 Once they have finally gotten their way and all firearms are banned, we will become like China, Japan, and UK, where knives are the tool of choice for mass killers.
And then what? We keep going down the list? Then we ban axes and then bows and arrows, and then box cutters and then hammers and then fists and then feet? After that do we ban Christmas lights, model cars, and pressure cookers (all used in the bombs built by the Boston bombers)? And then finally do we ban airplanes?
We waste time when focusing on the tools. Our focus should be on the evil motives behind the killer’s actions. In some cases this is pure insanity, and in others—and this obviously explains Obama’s current attempt to change the focus to the tool—it is radical Islam, something the Left is loathe to discuss.
So the problem isn’t just that the Left is so focused on the tool that they (purposely) ignore the evil; the problem is that the end game of this focus is the complete stripping of our Second Amendment rights.
And then, when law abiding citizens have no more tools with which to defend ourselves, what will we do when evil comes for us?


When law abiding citizens have no more tools with which to defend ourselves, what will we do when evil comes for us?

When Evil Comes for Us


Here is one of many problems—and in my view the MOST DANGEROUS problem—with the liberal position of banning “assault weapons” after the Orlando shooting:
Guns are tools, and nothing more. They can be tools used for good or tools used for evil. The same can be said of any tool. A hammer is a tool designed to hit things. It can hit a nail (a good use) or a person’s head (an evil use). A box cutter is a tool. It can cut boxes apart (a good use), or cut a person (an evil use). A gun is a tool.  It can shoot targets or game animals or violent criminals (a good use) or an innocent person (an evil use).

AND HERE’S THE PROBLEM:

The Left keeps talking about assault weapons as the “tool of choice” for mass shooters, and so we should ban assault weapons.
For now we’ll leave aside the pathetic and uneducated misuse of the term “assault weapon” and just consider how this works.
Once we ban “assault weapons,” will mass shootings go away? Of course not. To assume so would be to assume that assault weapons somehow inspire mass shooters to perform their evil acts, which is ridiculous (which means, unfortunately, that it is likely believed my many on the Left). People decide to perform evil acts and then look for a tool. Lately many have chosen “assault weapons.”
But these are not the ONLY tools they choose. Just to use some of the more recent examples:
Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, carried an “assault rifle” and a Glock 17 handgun.

Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter, carried an “assault rifle” and two handguns, a Glock 10mm and a Sig Sauer 9mm.

James Holmes, the Aurora theater shooter, carried an “assault rifle,” a 12-gauge shotgun, and two .40 caliber handguns.

Do you see the similarities, and the dangers?
So let’s say that we ban those evil “assault rifles.” In fact, let’s pretend we could go back in time and ban “assault weapons” before any of these mass shootings, and let’s remove the “assault rifle” from each of them. We are left with the following:
Omar Mateen carried a Glock 17 handgun.
Adam Lanza carried two handguns, a Glock 10mm and a Sig Sauer 9mm.
James Holmes carried a 12-gauge shotgun and two .40 caliber handguns.
Do you see the problem? Once the “tool of choice” is banned, those wanting to commit mass murder will simply default to their next tool of choice: handguns and non-“assault rifles.”
What will the left say then? You and I both know what they’ll say: the handgun has become the “tool of choice” for mass shooters. It must be banned. Then shotguns are the tool of choice, and must be banned.
 Once they have finally gotten their way and all firearms are banned, we will become like China, Japan, and UK, where knives are the tool of choice for mass killers.
And then what? We keep going down the list? Then we ban axes and then bows and arrows, and then box cutters and then hammers and then fists and then feet? After that do we ban Christmas lights, model cars, and pressure cookers (all used in the bombs built by the Boston bombers)? And then finally do we ban airplanes?
We waste time when focusing on the tools. Our focus should be on the evil motives behind the killer’s actions. In some cases this is pure insanity, and in others—and this obviously explains Obama’s current attempt to change the focus to the tool—it is radical Islam, something the Left is loathe to discuss.
So the problem isn’t just that the Left is so focused on the tool that they (purposely) ignore the evil; the problem is that the end game of this focus is the complete stripping of our Second Amendment rights.
And then, when law abiding citizens have no more tools with which to defend ourselves, what will we do when evil comes for us?


No comments :